Explore the vast range of titles available.

This randomized trial compared a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) plus a glucocorticoid with a LABA plus a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for preventing exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The exacerbation rate was lower with the latter treatment. Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with an accelerated decline in lung function, 1 – 3 impaired quality of life, 4 hospitalization, 5 and increased mortality. 6 COPD exacerbations are costly to health care systems. 7 Thus, prevention of exacerbations is a key goal in the management of COPD. 8 Inhaled long-acting bronchodilators not only control symptoms but also prevent COPD exacerbations. 9 – 12 Inhaled glucocorticoids are also known to reduce the frequency of exacerbations and have been studied in combination with inhaled long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). 11 , 13 , 14 In one trial, the combination of a LABA plus an inhaled glucocorticoid (salmeterol–fluticasone) in fixed doses and . . .

PurposeFor locally-acting dry powder inhalers (DPIs), developing novel analytical tools that are able to evaluate the state of aggregation may provide a better understanding of the impact of material properties and processing parameters on the invivo performance. This study explored the utility of the Morphologically-Directed Raman Spectroscopy (MDRS) and dissolution as orthogonal techniques to assess microstructural equivalence of the aerosolized dose of DPIs collected with an aerosol collection device.MethodsCommercial DPIs containing different strengths of Fluticasone Propionate (FP) and Salmeterol Xinafoate (SX) as monotherapy and combination products were sourced from different regions. These inhalers were compared with aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), dissolution, and MDRS studies.ResultsAPSD testing alone might not be able to explain differences reported elsewhere in invivo studies of commercial FP/SX drug products with different Advair® strengths and/or batches. Dissolution studies demonstrated different dissolution rates between Seretide™ 100/50 and Advair® 100/50, whereas Flixotide™ 100 and Flovent® 100 had similar dissolution rates between each other. These differences in dissolution profiles were supported by MDRS results: the dissolution rate is increased if the fraction of FP associated with high soluble components is increased. Principle component analysis was used to identify the agglomerate classes that better discriminate different products.ConclusionsMDRS and dissolution studies of the aerosolized dose of DPIs were successfully used as orthogonal techniques. This study highlights the importance of further assessing invitro tools that are able to provide a bridge between material attributes or process parameters and invivo performance.

This large trial involving children with asthma examined whether the addition of a long-acting beta-agonist to current therapy with inhaled glucocorticoids affected asthma control in children. The primary safety end point was within the prespecified noninferiority margin. The safety of inhaled beta-agonists in patients with asthma has been debated since the 1960s. 1 – 5 After the introduction of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) in the 1990s and the findings of two studies involving adults, attention focused on a potential association of LABAs with an increased risk of asthma-related death. 6 , 7 A 2008 meta-analysis conducted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) showed a higher risk of asthma-related events (death, intubation, or hospitalization) among patients receiving LABAs than among patients not receiving these medications. 8 In a subsequent meta-analysis, a higher risk of serious asthma-related events was observed with salmeterol than with . . .

The current Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) treatment strategy recommends the use of one or more bronchodilators according to the patient's airflow limitation, their history of exacerbations, and symptoms. The LANTERN study evaluated the effect of the long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) dual bronchodilator, QVA149 (indacaterol/glycopyrronium), as compared with the LABA/inhaled corticosteroid, salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC), in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with a history of ≤1 exacerbation in the previous year. In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 744 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD with a history of ≤1 exacerbations in the previous year were randomized (1:1) to QVA149 110/50 μg once daily or SFC 50/500 μg twice daily for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was noninferiority of QVA149 versus SFC for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 26. Overall, 676 patients completed the study. The primary objective of noninferiority between QVA149 and SFC in trough FEV1 at week 26 was met. QVA149 demonstrated statistically significant superiority to SFC for trough FEV1 (treatment difference [Δ]=75 mL; P<0.001). QVA149 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in standardized area under the curve (AUC) from 0 hours to 4 hours for FEV1 (FEV1 AUC0-4h) at week 26 versus SFC (Δ=122 mL; P<0.001). QVA149 and SFC had similar improvements in transition dyspnea index focal score, St George Respiratory Questionnaire total score, and rescue medication use. However, QVA149 significantly reduced the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations by 31% (P=0.048) over SFC. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was comparable between QVA149 (40.1%) and SFC (47.4%). The incidence of pneumonia was threefold lower with QVA149 (0.8%) versus SFC (2.7%). These findings support the use of the LABA/LAMA, QVA149 as an alternative treatment, over LABA/inhaled corticosteroid, in the management of moderate-to-severe COPD patients (GOLD B and GOLD D) with a history of ≤1 exacerbation in the previous year.

Background: Wixela® Inhub® is a dry powder inhaler approved as a generic equivalent to Advair® Diskus® (fluticasone propionate [FP]/salmeterol fixed-dose combination) for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed at confirming the local (lung) therapeutic equivalence of both the FP and salmeterol components of Wixela Inhub (test [T]) to Advair Diskus (reference [R]) after inhalation. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in patients ≥18 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma compared the local therapeutic equivalence (using forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) of FP/salmeterol (100/50 μg) after inhaled delivery via T and R. Results: Randomized patients (N = 1127) received T (n = 512), R (n = 512), or placebo (n = 103). T and R significantly increased day 1 FEV1 area under the effect curve over 12 hours of the change from baseline (AUC[0–12]) and day 29 trough FEV1 over placebo, indicating that these endpoints were sufficiently sensitive for evaluation of bioequivalence. On day 1, T and R each increased FEV1 AUC(0–12) over placebo (3.134 L•h [T], 2.677 L•h [R]; each p < 0.0001). Following twice-daily dosing for 28 days, T and R also each increased trough FEV1 (measured on day 29) over placebo (235 mL [T], 215 mL [R]; each p < 0.0001). Least-squares mean T/R ratios (90% confidence intervals) for day 1 FEV1 AUC(0–12) and day 29 trough FEV1 were 1.120 (1.016–1.237) and 1.069 (0.938–1.220), respectively, indicating that T and R were bioequivalent for both co-primary endpoints. FP/salmeterol was well tolerated when administered via either T or R. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the therapeutic effects of Wixela Inhub are bioequivalent to Advair Diskus in the lung. Wixela Inhub represents a therapeutically equivalent new FP/salmeterol treatment option for use in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Abstract Background: Easyhaler® dry powder inhaler (DPI) containing salmeterol and fluticasone propionate was developed for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three different Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler test products (Orion Pharma, Finland) were compared against the reference product Seretide® Diskus® DPI (GlaxoSmithKline, United Kingdom) to study whether any of the test products are bioequivalent with the reference. Methods: Open and randomized pharmacokinetic four-period crossover study on 65 healthy volunteers was performed in a single center to compare the lung deposition and total systemic exposure of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate after administration of single doses (two inhalations of 50/500 μg/inhalation strength) in fasting conditions. Blood samples were drawn before dosing and at frequent time points between 2 minutes and 34 hours after dosing for determination of drug concentrations. The primary variables for total systemic exposure and lung deposition of fluticasone propionate were maximum concentration of the concentration–time curve (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last sample with quantifiable concentration (AUCt). For salmeterol, the primary variables for total systemic exposure were Cmax and AUCt and for lung deposition Cmax and AUC up to 30 minutes after study treatment administration (AUC30min). Results: One of the Easyhaler test products met all the criteria for bioequivalence with the reference. The 96.7% confidence intervals (CIs) for the test/reference ratios of fluticasone propionate Cmax and AUCt were 0.9901–1.1336 and 0.9448–1.0542, respectively. Ninety percent CIs for salmeterol Cmax, AUC30min, and AUCt ratios were 1.0567–1.2012, 1.0989–1.2255, and 1.0769–1.1829, respectively. Median salmeterol time to maximum concentration (tmax) was 4.0 minutes. Median fluticasone propionate tmax was from 1.5 to 2.0 hours. Terminal elimination half-life was 11 hours for salmeterol and 9–10 hours for fluticasone propionate. Conclusions: Salmeterol/fluticasone Easyhaler was shown to be bioequivalent with the reference product.

Among more than 11,000 patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, fluticasone–salmeterol was noninferior to fluticasone alone with respect to severe asthma events. The safe and appropriate use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) for the treatment of asthma has been widely debated. 1 In early reports, SABAs were associated with an increased risk of asthma-related death. 2 , 3 In the 1990s, analyses suggested that high use of SABAs (>1.5 to 2 canisters per month) might increase the risk of death or near-fatal asthma. 4 – 6 In one of these studies, the authors postulated that high use of SABAs was either a marker of poorly controlled asthma or a “toxic effect of the medications or their vehicles.” 6 Two large clinical trials, the Serevent Nationwide . . .

Dupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody, inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signalling, key drivers of type-2-mediated inflammation. Adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma who are receiving medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist require additional treatment options as add-on therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma on medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist, irrespective of baseline eosinophil count. We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, pivotal phase 2b clinical trial at 174 study sites across 16 countries or regions. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an asthma diagnosis for 12 months or more based on the Global Initiative for Asthma 2009 Guidelines receiving treatment with medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist were eligible for participation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous dupilumab 200 mg or 300 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks, or placebo, over a 24-week period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at week 12 in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 in L) in patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 300 eosinophils per μL assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients that received at least one dose or part of a dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01854047, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT number 2013-000856-16. 769 patients (158 in the placebo group and 611 in the dupilumab groups) received at least one dose of study drug. In the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL, the greatest increases (200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0008; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0063) in FEV1 compared with placebo were observed at week 12 with doses every 2 weeks in the 300 mg group (mean change 0·39 L [SE 0·05]; mean difference 0·21 [95% CI 0·06–0·36; p=0·0063]) and in the 200 mg group (mean change 0·43 L [SE 0·05]; mean difference 0·26 [0·11–0·40; p=0·0008]) compared with placebo (0·18 L [SE 0·05]). Similar significant increases were observed in the overall population and in the fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL subgroup (overall population: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p<0·0001; <300 eosinophils per μL: 200 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0034; 300 mg every 2 weeks, p=0·0086), and were maintained to week 24. Likewise, dupilumab every 2 weeks produced the greatest reductions in annualised rates of exacerbation in the overall population (70–70·5%), the subgroup with at least 300 eosinophils per μL (71·2–80·7%), and the subgroup with fewer than 300 eosinophils per μL (59·9–67·6%). The most common adverse events with dupilumab compared with placebo were upper respiratory tract infections (33–41% vs 35%) and injection-site reactions (13–26% vs 13%). Dupilumab increased lung function and reduced severe exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma irrespective of baseline eosinophil count and had a favourable safety profile, and hence in addition to inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy could improve the lives of patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma compared with standard therapy alone. Sanofi-Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Salmeterol is a commonly used β2‐agonist included on the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods published by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA). We developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the PK of salmeterol including its major metabolite, α‐hydroxysalmeterol, in plasma and urine after inhalation. The model was used to evaluate the ability of the current minimum reporting level (MRL) of 10 ng/mL for salmeterol to discriminate between permitted and prohibited use of salmeterol. Six studies on healthy participants, chronic asthmatics, or athletes were pooled and provided a total of 1175 concentrations (275 and 398 for salmeterol and 185 and 317 for α‐hydroxysalmeterol in plasma and urine, respectively) from 92 individuals. A two‐compartment model assuming intravenous‐like bolus absorption best depicted plasma salmeterol PK, with a complete parent conversion into α‐hydroxysalmeterol. Because urine volumes were only recorded in two studies, a separate urine compartment was defined to approximate physiologic micturition. Athletes had a 63% higher salmeterol plasma clearance and a 191% greater salmeterol urinary rate constant compared to other subjects, resulting in significantly higher salmeterol urine concentrations. Our popPK model suggests that salmeterol concentrations in urine at therapeutic doses (100 μg twice daily) are unlikely to be reported using the current MRL. However, to improve its sensitivity to detect cases of doping, an adjustment in the MRL and/or a different analytical target would be recommended. Study Highlights What is the current knowledge on the topic? ○Salmeterol is a commonly used β2‐agonist included on the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods of the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) with a specified dosing limit of 200 μg in any 24 h period via inhaled administration. A minimum reporting level of 10 ng/mL is currently used to flag urine doping samples as an indication of doping. What question did this study address? ○Our model‐based meta‐analysis was performed to provide the basis for evaluating the ability of the current WADA approach to discriminate between the permitted and prohibited use of salmeterol. What does this study add to our knowledge? ○This study provides a comprehensive description of the pharmacokinetics of salmeterol and its major metabolite in plasma and urine and discusses the impact of different dosing regimens on the urine concentrations of salmeterol in athletes/endurance‐trained individuals. How might this change drug discovery, development, and/or therapeutics? ○The model‐based simulations suggest that the current approach for evaluating suspected salmeterol misuses could be improved by revising the dosing regulations, refining the analytical methodology, and/or adjusting the MRL.

Background Prospective evidence is lacking regarding incremental benefits of long-acting dual- versus mono-bronchodilation in improving symptoms and preventing short-term disease worsening/treatment failure in low exacerbation risk patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Methods The 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group Early MAXimisation of bronchodilation for improving COPD stability (EMAX) trial randomised patients at low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids, to umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg once-daily, umeclidinium 62.5 μg once-daily or salmeterol 50 μg twice-daily. The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) at Week 24. The study was also powered for the secondary endpoint of Transition Dyspnoea Index at Week 24. Other efficacy assessments included spirometry, symptoms, heath status and short-term disease worsening measured by the composite endpoint of clinically important deterioration using three definitions. Results Change from baseline in trough FEV 1 at Week 24 was 66 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43, 89) and 141 mL (95% CI: 118, 164) greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol, respectively (both p  < 0.001). Umeclidinium/vilanterol demonstrated consistent improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index versus both monotherapies at Week 24 (vs umeclidinium: 0.37 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.68], p  = 0.018; vs salmeterol: 0.45 [95% CI: 0.15, 0.76], p  = 0.004) and all other symptom measures at all time points. Regardless of the clinically important deterioration definition considered, umeclidinium/vilanterol significantly reduced the risk of a first clinically important deterioration compared with umeclidinium (by 16–25% [ p  < 0.01]) and salmeterol (by 26–41% [ p  < 0.001]). Safety profiles were similar between treatments. Conclusions Umeclidinium/vilanterol consistently provides early and sustained improvements in lung function and symptoms and reduces the risk of deterioration/treatment failure versus umeclidinium or salmeterol in symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. These findings suggest a potential for early use of dual bronchodilators to help optimise therapy in this patient group.