Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Scarus spinus"
Sort by:
Scarus spinus, crustose coralline algae and cyanobacteria: an example of dietary specialization in the parrotfishes
Niche differentiation is a key stabilizing mechanism in the maintenance of biodiversity and species coexistence. Recent work shows that trophic niche partitioning between parrotfishes (Labridae: Scarini) is more extensive than previously described. One Indo-Pacific species, Scarus spinus, appears highly specialized, scraping crustose coralline algae (CCA) with powerful oral jaws. CCA are of low nutritional value, suggesting that the dietary targets of this parrotfish are protein-rich microphotoautotrophs associated with CCA, particularly filamentous cyanobacteria. We collected feeding substrata samples at mid-shelf and outer-shelf sites near Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia, in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Scarus spinus were followed on snorkel. When biting was observed, bite substrata were photographed and then a 22-mm-diameter core extracted around the bite site. Density of biota including filamentous cyanobacteria and diatoms was quantified microscopically on photographs of the bite cores (up to 630 × magnification). The taxonomy of cyanobacteria and CCA was refined using next-generation sequencing of 16S and 18S rRNA genes, respectively. CCA and filamentous cyanobacteria were present on all bite cores and the density of filamentous cyanobacteria where S. spinus fed did not vary between mid-shelf and outer-reef samples. Epiphytic and shallow endophytic cyanobacteria were consistently associated with the CCA where S. spinus fed, including Calothrix spp., Mastigocoleus testarum, Leptolyngbya spp., Hyella patelloides and Oscillatoriales. Our results emphasize the importance of high-resolution species-specific dietary data for parrotfishes. We conclude that polyphasic methods are essential both for diet tracing and to develop our understanding of the cyanobacteria that are integral to coral reef functioning.
Effects of repeated exposures to marine cyanobacterial secondary metabolites on feeding by juvenile rabbitfish and parrotfish
Secondary metabolites isolated from marine algae and cyanobacteria can act as feeding deterrents to a variety of herbivores, but past studies have rarely considered the responses of herbivores to these compounds over time. We examined the influence of repeated preference tests on the responses of juvenile rabbitfish Siganus spinus and juvenile parrotfish Scarus schlegeli to malyngamide A, malyngamide B, and malyngolide, 3 secondary metabolites from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. We offered fish choices between control food and food treated singly with these compounds in series of 3 to 5 preference tests, during which fish were either fed only during tests (periodic feeding) or continuously fed. Each of the 3 compounds deterred feeding by juvenile rabbitfish and parrotfish, but the magnitude of deterrence varied over time and between the 2 feeding protocols. In the continuous feeding protocol, rabbitfish were more discriminating in later trials with malyngamides A and B, while parrotfish were more discriminating in later trials with malyngamide A. Levels of deterrence of malyngamides A and B did not change over time in the periodic feeding protocols, and were lower than in the continuous feeding protocols for both species. Malyngolide generated the same amount of feeding deterrence in each feeding protocol and the fishes showed no changes in their consumption of malyngolide over time. Changes in hunger level and the amount of experience with foods may influence whether fish learn to reject foods that contain feeding deterrents, though the extent of this learning varies among compounds and fish species. These behavioral mechanisms may lead to the consumption of broader diets when preferred foods are less abundant.