Explore the vast range of titles available.

Officials said on Jan. 1 they continued to search for missing people and were investigating the cause of a wind-fueled grass fire that destroyed 991 structures.

Attorney General Merrick Garland defended FBI and Justice Department employees on Aug. 11 following an FBI search at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort.

Producing or sharing Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) is a severe crime that Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) fight daily. When the LEA seizes a computer from a potential producer or consumer of the CSEM, it analyzes the storage devices of the suspect looking for evidence. Manual inspection of CSEM is time-consuming given the limited time available for Spanish police to use a search warrant. Our approach to speeding up the identification of CSEM-related files is to analyze only the file names and their absolute paths rather than their content. The main challenge lies in handling short and sparse texts that are deliberately distorted by file owners using obfuscated words and user-defined naming patterns. We present two approaches to CSEM identification. The first employs two independent classifiers, one for the file name and the other for the file path, and their outputs are then combined. Conversely, the second approach uses only the file name classifier to iterate over an absolute path. Both operate at the character n-gram level, whereas novel binary and orthographic features are presented to enrich the text representation. We benchmarked six classification models based on machine learning and convolutional neural networks. The proposed classifier has an F1 score of 0.988, which can be a promising tool for LEAs.

Can the government buy its way around the Fourth Amendment 's warrant requirement? As the panic over data-sharing after Dobbs illustrates, the answer is an urgent yes. Transactions between the government and data brokers- businesses that acquire, aggregate, and sell massive amounts of data on individuals' digital activities-fall outside the Stored Communications Act's hopelessly out-of-date guardrails and through a Fourth Amendment \"loophole. \" Though the Supreme Court's 2018 Carpenter decision provides a useful framework for evaluating data 's Fourth Amendment protection, it will not save us from data brokers. The \"tick-tick-tock\" cycle of Fourth Amendment precedent and privacy legislation is off. As Orwell would say, the clocks are \"striking thirteen. \" It is past time for Congress to pass new privacy legislation. But what should that legislation look like? History, as usual, offers clues. In this Note, I argue that to rebalance competing interests in light of paradigm technological change, Congress must learn from past mistakes in drafting the Stored Communications Act. I analyze three potential legislative solutions-the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act; the My Body, My Data Act; and California's \"Delete Act\"-and propose my own, which combines the strengths of each and provides flexibility for future technological developments. That way, when the Fourth Amendment clock strikes again, we will be ready.

Six Mississippi police officers were sentenced in federal court after pleading guilty to the beating and torture of two Black men.

Argumentation is a mathematical discourse that is currently widely studied by researchers as a stepping stone in constructing mathematical evidence. A variety of argumentation studies display different formats and constructs ranging from Toulmin's argumentation with a formal logic system to a general discourse that presents justifications and explanations for informal arguments with an inductive approach. It is based on the student's difficulties in preparing a search warrant until later gave rise to the idea of reconstruction of the warrant and the importance of guide-redirecting warrant construction (GWC). The results showed that GWC could guide students in constructing statements and reasons or explanations towards the expected evidence. Students also realize that statements are related to reason and explanation in building whole arguments. Even so, the presentation of the statement is still aligned with the evidence submitted, so for reasons that display the axiomatic system, it still faces problems.

On Sept. 15, Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer (D) said the city has reached a settlement with Breonna Taylor’s family. The settlement includes reforms to Louisville Metro Police Department policies as well as a $12 million dollars to Taylor’s estate.

The meaning of the rights enshrined in the Constitution provides a critical baseline for understanding the limits of government action—perhaps nowhere more so than in regard to the Fourth Amendment. At the time it was adopted, the Fourth Amendment prohibited the government from entering into any home, warehouse, or place of business against the owner's wishes to search for or to seize persons, papers, or effects, absent a specific warrant. Consistent with English common law, the notable exception was when law enforcement or citizens were pursuing a known felon. Outside of such circumstances, search and seizure required government officials to approach a magistrate and, under oath, to provide evidence of the suspected offense and to particularly describe the place to be searched and persons or things to be seized. Scholars' insistence that the Fourth Amendment does not entail a general protection against government entry into the home without a warrant does more than just fail to appreciate the context. It contradicts the meaning of the text itself, which carefully lays out the conditions that must be met before the government may intrude. Reclaiming this meaning is essential for understanding the scope of the original Fourth Amendment and for ensuring a doctrine that reflects fidelity to the founding principles.

The Internet has become a minefield of crime, fakes, and terror perpetuated by anonymous users on a global scale. The security burden of protecting organizations is becoming increasingly difficult and costly, and this burden cannot be lessened under the current Internet protocol. In order to fundamentally solve these side effects, the Council of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) has adopted a grand vision of an ICT-Enabled Bright Society (in short, the Bright ICT Initiative). With the goal of preventing undesirable activities on the Internet, diverse issues can be investigated using a bottom-up perspective. Scholars are beginning to examine the concept and various approaches with the support of the AIS conferences and the information system journals. However, a unique approach and fundamental solution must be identified in order to drastically eliminate the negative side effects of these adverse online activities. In order to achieve this, four principles are proposed that will provide the foundation of the framework for a new and safer Internet platform, the Bright Internet, while protecting users' privacy at an appropriate level. The proposed principles are origin responsibility, deliverer responsibility, rule-based digital search warrants, and traceable anonymity. This endeavor requires the investigation of technologies, policies, and international agreements on which new business models can be created.

The western media, especially the television channels, brought fresh content imbued with individual aspirations that immediately caught the attention of audience both in rural and urban India who had almost become jaded by the likes of 'Hum Log' -an iconic series on family values telecast on state-run Doordarshan. [...]the worldview of the people regarding the role of families and societies in controlling their choices changed drastically. [...]evolution of the privacy laws in India amidst collectivist social milieu looks quite interesting. [...]Mirriam-Webster Dictionary defines privacy as \"freedom from unauthorized intrusion: state of being let alone and able to keep certain especially personal matters to oneself\"1 American scholar Tom Gerety views privacy as \"the control over or the autonomy of the intimacies of personal identity\"2 The University of California Privacy and Information Security Steering Committee Report of January 2013 described privacy as two intertwined concepts of autonomy and information privacy wherein \"autonomy is an individual's ability to conduct activities without concern of or actual observation, and Information privacy is the appropriate protection, use, and dissemination of information about individuals\".3 True, the notion of privacy has evolved from mere secrecy to a human need. [...]it is the judicial decisions in courts that enforce these regulations which determine the precise scope of privacy and identify which aspects of life can be classified as private.6 The European Convention on Human Rights was one of the first international documents which underlined the importance of Privacy in an Individual's life.7 PRIVACY IN INDIAN SOCIO-LEGAL CONTEXT The notion of privacy is not unfamiliar to Indian society.