Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
12 result(s) for "Selective conscientious objection United States."
Sort by:
Rules of Disengagement
Lessons from veterans and active duty service members in opposition to US interventionist military policy Rules of Disengagement examines the reasons men and women in the military have disobeyed orders and resisted the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It takes readers into the courtroom where sailors, soldiers, and Marines have argued that these wars are illegal under international law and unconstitutional under US law. Through the voices of active duty service members and veterans, it explores the growing conviction among our troops that the wars are wrong. While the Obama Administration's pledge to remove all American troops from Iraq by the end of 2011 is encouraging - and in no small way likely attributable to resistance by our armed forces - it continues to fight in Afghanistan, and the military may soon have a heightened presence elsewhere in the Middle East and in Africa. As such, Rules of Disengagement provides inspiration and lessons for anyone who opposes an interventionist US military policy.
Rules of disengagement: the politics and honor of military dissent
Rules of Disengagement examines the reasons men and women in the military have disobeyed orders and resisted the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It takes readers into the courtroom where sailors, soldiers, and Marines have argued that these wars are illegal under international law and unconstitutional under U.S. law. Through the voices of active duty service members and veterans, it explores the growing conviction among our troops that the wars are wrong. While the Obama Administration's pledge to remove all American troops from Iraq by the end of 2011 is encouraging - and in no small way likely attributable to resistance by our armed forces - it continues to fight in Afghanistan, and the military may soon have a heightened presence elsewhere in the Middle East and in Africa. As such, Rules of Disengagement provides inspiration and lessons for anyone who opposes an interventionist U.S. military policy.
Selective Conscientious Objection and the Right Not to Kill
Although the character of recent US military aggressions have obviated the need for a popular draft, the issue of conscientious objection is still important and still unresolved. There is a strong moral and legal basis for the right not to kill, the protection of which should be purchased at some cost to social utility.
Selective Service and Conscientious Objectors
Local Board Memorandum No. 107, issued by the Selective Service System shortly after the 1970 Welsh decision, sets forth for members of local boards the criteria for classification of conscientious objectors. The memorandum has attracted unreasonable criticism from two groups: those who believe that the Welsh decision does not apply to the Selective Service as amended in 1967 and those who argue that the memorandum does not enlighten local board members in a way that is consistent with the Welsh ruling.
EVOLUTION OF THE C. O. PROVISIONS IN THE 1940 CONSCRIPTION BILL
THE AUTHOR DISCUSSES THE HANDLING OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS FROM THE MENNONITES, THE CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN, AND THE SOCIETY OF FRIENDS DURING U. S. MOBILIZATION FOR WORLD WAR II. THE SIX MAIN GOALS OF THE SOCIETY OF FRIENDS IN THIS SITUATION ARE GIVEN. THE AUTHOR DISCUSSES HIS ROLE IN THE SITUATION AND QUOTES FROM LETTERS, TESTIMONIES, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS.