Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
42,332 result(s) for "Set theory."
Sort by:
What comes in sets?
Teaches set theory by looking at sets of objects, including eggs, markers, and sneakers.
Sorting
\"Explains to the reader about mathematical sorting\"-- Provided by publisher.
Gromov’s Theory of Multicomplexes with Applications to Bounded Cohomology and Simplicial Volume
The simplicial volume is a homotopy invariant of manifolds introduced by Gromov in his pioneering paper The first aim of this paper is to lay the foundation of the theory of multicomplexes. After setting the main definitions, we construct the singular multicomplex In the second part of this work we apply the theory of multicomplexes to the study of the bounded cohomology of topological spaces. Our constructions and arguments culminate in the complete proofs of Gromov’s Mapping Theorem (which implies in particular that the bounded cohomology of a space only depends on its fundamental group) and of Gromov’s Vanishing Theorem, which ensures the vanishing of the simplicial volume of closed manifolds admitting an amenable cover of small multiplicity. The third and last part of the paper is devoted to the study of locally finite chains on non-compact spaces, hence to the simplicial volume of open manifolds. We expand some ideas of Gromov to provide detailed proofs of a criterion for the vanishing and a criterion for the finiteness of the simplicial volume of open manifolds. As a by-product of these results, we prove a criterion for the
How Firm Are the Foundations of Mind-Set Theory? The Claims Appear Stronger Than the Evidence
Mind-set refers to people’s beliefs about whether attributes are malleable (growth mind-set) or unchangeable (fixed mind-set). Proponents of mind-set theory have made bold claims about mind-set’s importance. For example, one’s mind-set is described as having profound effects on one’s motivation and achievements, creating different psychological worlds for people, and forming the core of people’s meaning systems. We examined the evidentiary strength of six key premises of mind-set theory in 438 participants; we reasoned that strongly worded claims should be supported by equally strong evidence. However, no support was found for most premises. All associations (rs) were significantly weaker than .20. Other achievement-motivation constructs, such as self-efficacy and need for achievement, have been found to correlate much more strongly with presumed associates of mind-set. The strongest association with mind-set (r = –.12) was opposite from the predicted direction. The results suggest that the foundations of mind-set theory are not firm and that bold claims about mind-set appear to be overstated.
A survey of decision making methods based on certain hybrid soft set models
Fuzzy set theory, rough set theory and soft set theory are all generic mathematical tools for dealing with uncertainties. There has been some progress concerning practical applications of these theories, especially, the use of these theories in decision making problems. In the present article, we review some decision making methods based on (fuzzy) soft sets, rough soft sets and soft rough sets. In particular, we provide several novel algorithms in decision making problems by combining these kinds of hybrid models. It may be served as a foundation for developing more complicated soft set models in decision making.
A survey of parameter reduction of soft sets and corresponding algorithms
As is well known, soft set theory can have a bearing on making decisions in many fields. Particularly important is parameter reduction of soft sets, an essential topic both for information sciences and artificial intelligence. Parameter reduction studies the largest pruning of the amount of parameters that define a given soft set without changing its original choice objects. Therefore it can spare computationally costly tests in the decision making process. In the present article, we review some different algorithms of parameter reduction based on some types of (fuzzy) soft sets. Finally, we compare these algorithms to emphasize their respective advantages and disadvantages, and give some examples to illustrate their differences.