Explore the vast range of titles available.

There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Randomized controlled trial. Tertiary teaching hospital. Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG. Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (n = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1–2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40–60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1–1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP <65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors. The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4–91.2] mmHg·min; P = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP <65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; P = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, P = 0.001). Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability. [Display omitted] •Remimazolam reduced MAP decrease during anesthesia induction by 23% than propofol.•Remimazolam use needed less vasopressors and kept higher MAP levels than propofol.•Remimazolam offers better hemodynamic stability for anesthesia induction for CABG.

Emergence delirium (ED) is a common neurologic complication that can not only distress children and their families in the early postanesthetic period, but can also have adverse effects on children in the long-term. This study aimed to investigate the effects of single-dose dexmedetomidine on ED in children with sevoflurane anesthesia and to observe postoperative behavioral changes through long-term follow-up. Patients aged 2-7 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists class (ASA) I or II, scheduled for tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (Group D) or volume-matched normal saline (Group C) over 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of ED within 30 minutes after extubation. Other outcomes were the incidence of pain, extubation time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay after extubation, adverse events, and the incidence of negative postoperative behavioral changes (NPOBCs). Ninety children completed the study. Compared with the control group (Group C), dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of ED (31.1% vs 53.3%; =0.033) and pain (28.9% vs 57.8%; =0.006), but it prolonged extubation time ( ⩽0.001). PACU length of stay after extubation and the percentage of adverse events were similar between groups. The incidence of NPOBCs in Group D was significantly lower at 1 and 7 days after discharge (33.3% vs 60.0%; =0.011% and 24.4% vs 46.7%; =0.028, respectively) than it was in Group C, but no significant difference was found at the 30th day. Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg reduced the incidence of ED after sevoflurane anesthesia and might be used to prevent NPOBCs. ChiCTR1800016828.

Safe perioperative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is crucial. Remimazolam is a newly developed short-acting benzodiazepine. We hypothesized that combining remimazolam and flumazenil would reduce emergence time compared with sevoflurane in patients undergoing general anesthesia for TAVI. We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel-design, open-label, single-centre clinical trial between June 2022 and August 2023 at Kagoshima University Hospital. We allocated patients randomly to either the remimazolam/flumazenil group or the sevoflurane group. Patients in the remimazolam group received iv remimazolam whereas patients in the sevoflurane group received sevoflurane for general anesthesia maintenance. Patients in both groups received a remifentanil infusion throughout the TAVI procedure (0.2 μg·kg ·min iv). Remimazolam and sevoflurane were adjusted to maintain a Bispectral Index™ (Covidien/Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) of 40-60. In the remimazolam group, flumazenil (0.2 mg iv) was administered immediately after remimazolam discontinuation. The primary outcome was time to extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative variables (hemodynamic variables and vasopressor dose), rate of intra- and postoperative complications, and recovery of muscle strength. Overall, 60 patients were enrolled, and data from 56 were included. The median [interquartile range] time to extubation was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (6.5 [5.1-8.1] min vs 14.2 [10.9-15.9] min; difference in medians, -6.9 min; 95% confidence interval, -8.7 to -5.0; P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed in the perfusion index (P = 0.03) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (P = 0.03) between the groups. No significant differences between the two groups were seen in other secondary outcomes. Compared with sevoflurane, a combination of remimazolam and flumazenil significantly reduced the time to extubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia for TAVI. Therefore, remimazolam may be a suitable choice for general anesthesia in patients undergoing TAVI. UMIN.ac.jp ( UMIN000047892 ); first posted 30 May 2022.

Sleep disturbances are common in older patients following major surgery. Both propofol and sevoflurane are frequently used anesthetics. In this study, we compared the effect of propofol- versus sevoflurane-based anesthesia on postoperative sleep quality in this patient population. A randomized clinical trial. A university hospital. Patients aged 65 to 90 years who were scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery. Enrolled patients were randomized to receive either propofol-based intravenous anesthesia or sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia. Primary endpoint was total sleep time monitored by actigraphy on the first postoperative night. Secondary endpoints included plasma orexin-A concentrations at various timepoints from baseline (before anesthesia) until the second postoperative morning. From May 23, 2022 to April 3, 2023, 144 patients (mean age 72.9 years; 58.3 % male) were enrolled and randomly assigned. Total sleep time on the first postoperative night was longer with propofol anesthesia (median 150 min [interquartile range 99 to 200]) than with sevoflurane anesthesia (111 min [80 to 160]; median difference 29 min [95 % CI 4 to 53]; P = 0.025). Plasma orexin-A concentration was lower in the propofol group at 1 h after anesthesia induction (median difference − 31.3 pg/mL [95 % CI −58.1 to −2.2]; P = 0.033) and 6:00 on the first postoperative morning (median difference − 29.8 pg/mL [95 % CI -58.3 to −2.3]; P = 0.036). Among older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, propofol anesthesia, compared with sevoflurane anesthesia, was associated with a longer total sleep time on the first postoperative night. This difference may be partially attributable to lowered plasma orexin-A level. Trial registration: This randomized trial was approved by Biomedical Research Ethical Committee of Peking University First Hospital (No.2022-155) on April 26, 2022. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200060120) URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=169584, May 19, 2022. •Sleep disturbances are common in older patients after major surgery.•Impact of propofol versus sevoflurane on postoperative sleep remains uncertain.•We found that sleep time on the first night was longer after propofol anesthesia.•Effect of propofol on sleep might be partially related to plasma orexin-A level.

The effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in cardiac surgery have been inconsistent. We investigated whether anesthesia or beta-blockers interfere with RIPC cardioprotection. Fifty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to receive limb RIPC (four cycles of 5-min of upper arm cuff inflation/deflation) in the awake state (no-anesthesia; n = 17), or under sevoflurane (n = 17) or propofol (n = 16) anesthesia. In a separate crossover study, 11 healthy volunteers received either carvedilol or no medication prior to RIPC. Plasma dialysates were obtained and perfused through an isolated male Sprague–Dawley rat heart subjected to 30-min ischemia/60-min reperfusion, following which myocardial infarct (MI) size was determined. In the cardiac surgery study, pre-RIPC MI sizes were similar among the groups (39.7 ± 4.5% no-anesthesia, 38.9 ± 5.3% sevoflurane, and 38.6 ± 3.6% propofol). However, post-RIPC MI size was reduced in the no-anesthesia group (27.5 ± 8.0%; p < 0.001), but not in the anesthesia groups (35.7 ± 6.9% sevoflurane and 35.8 ± 5.8% propofol). In the healthy volunteer study, there was a reduction in MI size with RIPC in the no-carvedilol group (41.7 ± 4.3% to 30.6 ± 8.5%; p < 0.0001), but not in the carvedilol group (41.0 ± 4.0% to 39.6 ± 5.6%; p = 0.452). We found that the cardioprotective effects of limb RIPC were abolished under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia and in the presence of carvedilol therapy.

Propofol and sevoflurane are two anesthetic agents widely used to induce and maintain general anesthesia (GA). Their intrinsic antinociceptive properties remain unclear and are still debated. To determine whether propofol presents stronger antinociceptive properties than sevoflurane using intraoperative clinical and experimental noxious stimulations and evaluating postoperative pain outcomes. A prospective randomized monocentric trial. Perioperative care. 60 adult patients with ASA status I to III who underwent elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery under GA were randomized either in propofol or sevoflurane group to induce and maintain GA. We used clinical and experimental noxious stimulations (intubation, tetanic stimulation) to assess the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane in patients under GA and monitored using the NOL index, BIS index, heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure. We measured the difference in the NOL index alterations after intubation and tetanic stimulation during either intravenous anesthesia (propofol) or inhaled anesthesia (sevoflurane). We also intraoperatively measured the NOL index and remifentanil consumption and recorded postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit. Intraoperative management was standardized by targeting similar values of depth of anesthesia (BIS index), hemodynamic (HR and MAP), NOL index values (below the threshold of 20), same multimodal analgesia and type of surgery. We found the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane similar. The only minor difference was after tetanic stimulation: the delta NOL was higher in the sevoflurane group (39 ± 13 for the propofol group versus 47 ± 15 for sevoflurane; P = 0.04). Intraoperative and postoperative pain outcomes and opioid consumption were similar between groups. Despite a precise intraoperative experimental and clinical protocol using the NOL index, propofol does not provide a higher level of antinociception during anesthesia or analgesia after surgery when compared to sevoflurane. Anesthesiologists may prefer propofol over sevoflurane to reduce PONV or anesthesia-related pollution, but not for superior antinociceptive properties. •Propofol and sevoflurane's intrinsic antinociceptive properties are not yet clear.•Objective measurement of intraoperative nociception using the multiparametric NOL index helps precisely evaluate noxious stimulations.•Propofol and sevoflurane intraoperative antinociceptive properties were found to be similar.•No difference was observed in postoperative pain scores and consumption of analgesics.

Elderly patients undergoing pathophysiological changes necessitate clinical tools for cerebral monitoring. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to explore how cerebral monitoring using Δo2Hbi, ΔHHbi, and ΔcHbi manifests in elderly patients under either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Single-center, prospective, randomization. A single tertiary hospital (Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea). Enrolled 100 patients scheduled for urologic surgery under general anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were (a) age 70–80 years, (b) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II. Patients were double-blind randomized to receive propofol-based or sevoflurane anesthesia. Cerebral oximetry-related parameters were measured at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min in a setting devoid of surgery-related factors. The primary outcome focused on the Δo2Hbi pattern in the left and right sides within the propofol and sevoflurane groups. We analyzed 100 patients, 50 patients in each group. In the propofol group, the left Δo2Hbi decreased from 1.4 (3.7) at 5 min to −0.1 (1.8) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo2Hbi decreased from 2.9 (4.2) at 5 min to −0.06 (2.3) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). In the sevoflurane group, the left Δo2Hbi decreased from 1.1 (3.4) at 5 min to −1.4 (4.4) at 30 min (P < 0.0001), and the right Δo2Hbi decreased from 2.0 (3.2) at 5 min to −1.2 (3.9) at 30 min (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups. ΔHHbi did not exhibit significant changes after an initial decrease at 5 min and showed no significant differences between the two groups. In cerebral oximetry, Δo2Hbi and ΔHHbi could emerge as a valuable approach for discerning changes in the underlying baseline status of the brain in elderly patients during anesthesia. •The monitoring of Δo2Hbi, ΔHHbi, and ΔcHbi in cerebral oximeter could detect alterations in the baseline status of cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolic rate among elderly patients undergoing anesthesia.•Changes in Δo2Hbi and ΔHHbi could facilitate etiology-based management of cerebral desaturation by explicitly identifying the underlying causes of such desaturation.•The combined use of these modalities has demonstrated a more favorable prognosis compared to employing each independently.

IntroductionMotor-evoked potentials (MEP) are widely used to mitigate the risk of nerve injury resulting from surgical manipulation. Infants are more susceptible to anaesthetics that suppress MEP because of the immaturity of their nervous structures. Current evidence of the impact of the interaction between a small dose of sevoflurane and propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on MEP in infants is controversial. This current study aims to evaluate the impact of the coadministration of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol-based TIVA on MEP in infants.Methods and analysisA randomised controlled study will be conducted at a single tertiary care children’s hospital in Japan between July 2024 and June 2029. Children between 35 and 87 weeks of postconceptual age undergoing spinal surgery requiring MEP under general anaesthesia will be enrolled in this study. The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: propofol+remifentanil with (intervention group) or without (control group) low-dose sevoflurane (0.10–0.15 age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration). MEP top-to-bottom amplitudes will be measured at two chronological points: T1 (first transcranial MEP (TcMEP) recording), T2 (second TcMEP recording) in the same patient. The primary and secondary endpoints will be a reduction in MEP amplitudes (T1–T2) in the right upper and lower extremities between the control and intervention groups, respectively. The sample size was calculated to be a total of 40 based on the preliminary data of 10 infants, which showed a 35% reduction in mean values of MEP amplitudes in the right adductor muscle (SD=31) with a 10% assumed dropout rate.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Aichi Children’s Health and Medical Center (2022058). The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal at the relevant academic conference.Trial registration numberjRCT1041230094.

The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100B concentrations. Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Operating room. 190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries. Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5. The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day. 95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; p = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (p = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (p = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (p = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100B concentrations (p = 0.821) between the groups. Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults. •Older adults are at-risk for prolonged recovery after volatile anesthesia.•The effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane on recovery is not entirely clear.•Postoperative recovery was not significantly faster after desflurane anesthesia.•PONV, delirium and cognitive dysfunction were similar between the groups.

Introduction Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common postoperative complication and is associated with numerous adverse outcomes. Advanced age and hip surgery are high risk factors for POD. Both remimazolam tosilate for injection and sevoflurane can be used as sedatives for the maintenance of general anesthesia, but the comparison of their impacts on the incidence of POD has not been reported. This study aims to compare the effect of remimazolam tosilate vernus sevoflurane on the incidence of POD in older patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Methods and analysis This is a two-arm, parallel, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. A total of 456 older patients at six clinical trial centers in China will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive general anesthesia with remimazolam tosilate or sevoflurane as sedative. The primary outcome measure is the prevalence of POD during the first 4 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include cognitive function [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)], perioperative pain degree [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 4 days after surgery, recovery time after drug withdrawal, the amount of vasoactive drugs used during operation, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital complications. Ethics and dissemination The Research Ethics Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University has approved the study protocol (REF: KYLL-202206-25), which is applicable to all research centers. Participant recruitment begins in August 2022. Written informed consent will be obtained from each patient before randomization. The findings will be published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal. Trial registration The trial has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200062455; date of registration: 2022-08-08.