Explore the vast range of titles available.

The objective of the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health expert consensus panel was to develop a concise, clinically relevant, evidence-based review of the epidemiology, physiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), a sexual dysfunction affecting approximately 10% of adult women. Etiologic factors include conditions or drugs that decrease brain dopamine, melanocortin, oxytocin, and norepinephrine levels and augment brain serotonin, endocannabinoid, prolactin, and opioid levels. Symptoms include lack or loss of motivation to participate in sexual activity due to absent or decreased spontaneous desire, sexual desire in response to erotic cues or stimulation, or ability to maintain desire or interest through sexual activity for at least 6 months, with accompanying distress. Treatment follows a biopsychosocial model and is guided by history and assessment of symptoms. Sex therapy has been the standard treatment, although there is a paucity of studies assessing efficacy, except for mindfulness-based cognitive behavior therapy. Bupropion and buspirone may be considered off-label treatments for HSDD, despite limited safety and efficacy data. Menopausal women with HSDD may benefit from off-label testosterone treatment, as evidenced by multiple clinical trials reporting some efficacy and short-term safety. Currently, flibanserin is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved medication to treat premenopausal women with generalized acquired HSDD. Based on existing data, we hypothesize that all these therapies alter central inhibitory and excitatory pathways. In conclusion, HSDD significantly affects quality of life in women and can effectively be managed by health care providers with appropriate assessments and individualized treatments.

Key PointsSexual Dysfunction in WomenSexual dysfunction in women is common and is associated with impaired well-being and quality of life.Many women with sexual dysfunction will not seek care unless prompted by their health care provider. However, there are no evidence-based screening recommendations for sexual dysfunction as part of routine care.Sexual well-being is determined by a complex interplay of biologic, psychological, and sociocultural factors. Therefore, an assessment of sexual dysfunction involves a comprehensive review of the patient’s general health and psychosocial circumstances and a history of the patient’s use of prescription and nonprescription medications and other drugs.Management pathways for sexual dysfunction include lifestyle modification, counseling and psychosexual therapies, physical therapy, and pharmacologic therapy.

Background: Several factors affect sexual function, including cancer development and treatment. This study summarized the risk of women with cancer of developing sexual dysfunctions. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the descriptors cancer, neoplasms, sexual dysfunction, sexual function, and women. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of studies. Results: Sixteen studies were included in this review. Women with cancer presented sexual dysfunctions in 14 out of 16 included studies. The incidence of sexual dysfunctions ranged from 30% to 80%, while the risk of developing sexual dysfunction increased 2.7- and 3.5-fold in women with cervical and breast cancer, respectively. Conclusion: Different cancer treatments increase the risk of developing sexual dysfunction in women, especially desire, arousal, and orgasm, leading to biopsychosocial changes in the health of this population.

To demonstrate the burden of sexual dysfunction (SD) among females with rheumatic diseases, we conducted a cross-sectional comparative study in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and Behçet’s syndrome (BS) along with suitable healthy controls (HCs). Age-matched female patients with SSc (n = 50), SLE (n = 49), and BS (n = 54), along with 52 female HCs were included in this study between April and October, 2021. Sociodemographic features were recorded, and psychometric tests, i.e., female sexual function index (FSFI), Beck depression inventory (BDI), body cathexis scale, and marital adjustment test (MAT) were performed. Scale scores were compared, and binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors for SD in the whole group. The total FSFI and body cathexis scores among the patient groups were significantly lower than those of the HCs (p < 0.001). Depression was significantly more frequent in the patient groups. MAT scores did not differ significantly between the study groups. Patients with SSc had the worst scores in each psychometric index, including MAT. Decreased body cathexis score [OR 0.974, 95% CI (0.957–0.991), p = 0.003] and low MAT score [OR 0.937, 95% CI (0.896–0.980), p = 0.005], and being diagnosed with SSc [OR 6.6, 95% CI (1.975–22.498), p = 0.002], SLE [OR 2.7, 95% CI (0.998–7.753), p = 0.050], and BS [OR 2.8, 95% CI (1.100–7.359), p = 0.031], were identified as independent predictors for SD. Body cathexis seems to be the most important independent predictor for SD, and the burden of SD appears heavier in patients with SSc, probably due to poor body image satisfaction.

Delayed orgasm (DO) is defined as increased latency of orgasm despite adequate sexual stimulation and desire. Anorgasmia (AO) is characterized as the absence of orgasm. Etiologies of DO/AO include medication-induced, psychogenic, endocrine, and genitopelvic dysesthesia. Given the multifactorial complex nature of this disorder, a thorough history and physical examination represent the most critical components of patient evaluation in the clinical setting. Treating DO/AO can be challenging due to the lack of standardized FDA-approved pharmacotherapies. There is no standardized treatment plan for DO/AO, though common treatments plans are often multidisciplinary and may include adjustment of offending medications and sex therapy. In this review, we summarize the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of DO/AO.

Introduction The pelvic floor is exposed to differing stresses and trauma depending on the mode of birth. At the same time, the pelvic floor plays a crucial role in female sexual functioning (FSF). Whereby FSF encompasses different dimensions, from subjective satisfaction to physiological aspects, such as lack of pain and orgasm ability. The aim of the study presented here is to assess FSF in relationship to postpartum pelvic floor disorder based on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA‐Revised (PISQ‐IR), in a large convenience sample and to identify whether there is an association between mode of birth as well as perineal injuries and FSF of women up to 24 months postpartum. Material and Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional online survey and recruited via social media women up to 24 months after birth of their last child. FSF was surveyed using the PISQ‐IR. Details were also collected on all previous births and birth‐related perineal trauma, as well as current breastfeeding, obesity, and socio‐demographics. Multivariate models were then calculated to determine a possible association between FSF and birth mode. Results The data basis is the responses of 2106 survey participants within the first 24 months postpartum. Even 12–24 months postpartum, 21% of respondents are not sexually active, which burdens almost 44% of these women. With regard to mode of delivery, differences in FSF are only evident in individual dimensions of the PISQ‐IR. The dimensions “Condition Impact” and “Condition Specific” were significantly associated with more impairments in sexually active respondents up to 12 months postpartum whose last mode of delivery was forceps or vacuum extraction. If a perineal tear had occurred during last birth, this was significantly associated with a lower PISQ‐IR subscore in the “Condition Impact,” “Condition‐Specific,” “Global Quality,” “Partner‐Related,” and “Arousal” models. The low variance explanation shows that further relevant factors on female sexuality may exist. Conclusions The issue of impairments in FSF following childbirth, persisting for an extended period of time, is a significant postpartum concern. Due to the very different dimensions of FSF, the influence of the mode of delivery must be considered in a differentiated way. The data of 2106 women participating in our survey whose last birth occurred less than 25 months prior to the survey show that impairments in FSF following childbirth, persisting for an extended period of time, is a significant postpartum concern. Due to the very different dimensions of FSF, the influence of the mode of delivery must be considered in a differentiated way.

While previous literature has continuously demonstrated the negative effects of cancer and its treatment on fertility and sexuality, evidence-based interventions to alleviate fertility-related distress and sexual dysfunction are lacking. This study protocol describes the internal pilot study and randomized controlled trial of an internet-delivered psychoeducational intervention: Fex-Can 2.0. The primary objective is to determine efficacy of Fex-Can 2.0 in terms of reduction of fertility-related distress and sexual dysfunction at end of the 12-week intervention. The internal pilot study will assess feasibility of the study, determined according to pre-specified progression criteria and individual interviews. The study has a randomized controlled design, with an internal pilot phase. The intervention group will receive Fex-Can 2.0, consisting of psychoeducational- and behavior change content. The control group will be allocated to standard care. Primary outcomes are fertility-related distress (RCAC) and sexual function and satisfaction (PROMIS SexFS Brief Sexual Profile). Secondary outcomes include body image (BIS), emotional distress (HADS), health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), need satisfaction and frustration scale (NSFS), fertility- and sex-related knowledge, and self-efficacy related to fertility and sex life. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, directly after the intervention, and 12 weeks later. During the internal pilot, data on trial recruitment, data collection, drop out, and adherence will be collected to assess feasibility. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to further assess acceptability of Fex-Can 2.0. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether Fex-Can 2.0 is superior to standard care, in terms of reducing fertility-related distress and sexual dysfunction in young adults diagnosed with cancer. If proven efficacious, the Fex-Can 2.0 intervention may be a valuable resource in health care, with the potential to significantly improve the care of young adults experiencing fertility-related distress and/or sexual dysfunction following cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN18040643.

Sexual dysfunction in female cancer patients remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. As sexual dysfunction is becoming an increasingly common side effect of cancer treatments, it is imperative for healthcare providers and especially gynecologic oncologists to include a comprehensive evaluation of sexual health as a routine part of the workup of such patients. Although most oncologists are not experienced in treating sexual dysfunctions, simple tools can be incorporated into clinical practice to improve the management of these conditions. In this review, we propose a practical approach to selecting proper treatment for sexual dysfunctions in female cancer patients. This includes three main steps: knowledge, diagnosis, and sexual counseling. Knowledge can be acquired through a specific updating about sexual issues in female cancers, and with a medical training in female sexual dysfunctions. Diagnosis requires a comprehensive history and physical examination. Sexual counseling is one of the most important interventions to consider and, in some cases, it may be the only intervention needed to help cancer patients tolerate their symptoms. Sexual counseling should be addressed by oncologists; however, select patients should be referred for qualified psychological or sexological interventions where appropriate. Finally, a multidisciplinary team approach may be the best way to address this challenging issue.

Hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism are observationally associated with sex hormone concentrations and sexual dysfunction, but causality is unclear. We investigated whether TSH, fT4, hypo- and hyperthyroidism are causally associated with sex hormones and sexual function. We used publicly available summary statistics from genome-wide association studies on TSH and fT4 and hypo- and hyperthyroidism from the ThyroidOmics Consortium (N ≤ 54,288). Outcomes from UK Biobank (women ≤ 194,174/men ≤ 167,020) and ReproGen (women ≤ 252,514) were sex hormones (sex hormone binding globulin [SHBG], testosterone, estradiol, free androgen index [FAI]) and sexual function (ovulatory function in women: duration of menstrual period, age at menarche and menopause, reproductive lifespan, and erectile dysfunction in men). We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses on summary level, and unweighted genetic risk score (GRS) analysis on individual level data. One SD increase in TSH was associated with a 1.332 nmol/L lower (95% CI: − 0.717,− 1.946; p = 2 × 10–5) SHBG and a 0.103 nmol/l lower (− 0.051,V0.154; p = 9 × 10–5) testosterone in two-sample MR, supported by the GRS approach. Genetic predisposition to hypothyroidism was associated with decreased and genetic predisposition to hyperthyroidism with increased SHBG and testosterone in both approaches. The GRS for fT4 was associated with increased testosterone and estradiol in women only. The GRS for TSH and hypothyroidism were associated with increased and the GRS for hyperthyroidism with decreased FAI in men only. While genetically predicted thyroid function was associated with sex hormones, we found no association with sexual function.

ABSTRACT Background The literature provides conflicting data on sexual function in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aim to describe sexual function at baseline and over time in a prospective inception cohort of adult women with IBD. Methods Women age 18 years or older enrolled in the Ocean State Crohn’s & Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR) with 2 years of prospective follow-up were included in the study. All subjects were enrolled within 1 year of IBD diagnosis. Female sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Linear mixed effects models were used to assess changes in FSFI by various demographic and clinical factors. Results One hundred sixteen of 130 eligible women (89%) were included in the study. Ninety-seven percent of women had sexual dysfunction, defined as an FSFI score of <26.55, with a baseline mean FSFI score (SD) of 16.4 (8.4) overall (15.5 [8.6] in Crohn’s disease, 17.4 [8.1] in UC, P = 0.22). Despite improvement in overall disease activity, there was no significant change in the FSFI score or individual domain scores over the entire 2-year study period. Among all women with IBD, older age, nonsingle marital status, lower Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary score, and the use of biologics were independent risk factors for sexual dysfunction. Conclusions Almost all women experienced sexual dysfunction that did not improve over time despite improvement in overall disease activity. Future studies are warranted to identify underlying mechanisms that explain the associations between demographic and clinical factors and sexual dysfunction among newly diagnosed women. Video Abstract 10.1093/ibd/izy397_video Video Abstract izy397_video 5999187279001