Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The aims of this study were to evaluate treatment failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) treatment with a standardized treatment algorithm within the reality of a level-1 trauma center and to identify predictors of subsequent surgery. Materials and methods The medical database of a level-1 trauma center was screened for all primary treatments of PHFs between January 2009 and June 2012. Medical records and imaging were analyzed to identify the fracture morphology, pre-existing diseases, revision surgeries and treatment failures (conversion to another treatment). The patients were asked about subsequent surgeries by phone. A functional outcome questionnaire was mailed to participating patients. Results Follow-up data were available for 423 of 521 patients (312 females, 111 males). The mean age at the time of primary treatment was 68.3 years; mean follow-up was 24.6 ± 12.3 months. The overall rate of mandatory re-operations was 15.6%, including a failure rate of 8.3%; another 7.6% of patients had additional arthroscopic surgeries. Treatment with anatomic hemi-prostheses was associated with the highest re-operation rates, and lowest outcomes. Involvement of the medial calcar region, complex fracture morphologies, cigarette smoking and alcohol-abuse were predictors for subsequent surgery. Patients without subsequent surgery had significantly higher functional outcome scores than patients with additional surgery. Conclusions With the use of a standardized treatment algorithm no treatment modality was at significantly higher risk for having additional surgery. Complex fracture types, involvement of the medial calcar, cigarette-smoking and alcohol-abuse were associated with subsequent surgeries. Level of evidence Level IV case series.

Background Although the Neer and AO/OTA classifications have been widely accepted, observer reliability studies of these two classifications have questioned their reliability and reproducibility to date. We developed an entirely new classification, the Mitsuzawa classification, for dislocated and displaced proximal humeral fractures and tested all three classifications for their intra- and interobserver reliability. Methods Two experienced shoulder surgeons and two orthopedic residents independently evaluated the Xray (xR) values of 100 proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). The inclusion criteria for PHFs were (1) fracture-dislocation of the glenohumeral joint, (2) severely displaced fracture that required arthroplasty, such as hemi-arthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and (3) age > 18 years. Four reviewers classified all 100 fractures according to the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications on two occasions. The intraobserver reliability was calculated using a Cohen κ statistic, while the interobserver reliability was calculated using a Fleiss κ statistic. Results The average intraobserver agreements for the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications were 0.57 (moderate), 0.67 (substantial), and 0.77 (substantial), respectively. The average interobserver agreements for the Neer, AO/OTA, and Mitsuzawa classifications were 0.49 (moderate), 0.56 (moderate), and 0.73 (substantial), respectively. The most common fracture type in each classification was an anterior dislocated fracture with a greater tuberosity fragment, which corresponded to A3a (57 cases) in the Mitsuzawa classification. Conclusions The Mitsuzawa classification of PHF incorporates different perspectives regarding glenohumeral compatibility, assessment before and after shoulder dislocation reduction, and the degree of displacement of the proximal stump of the humeral shaft. Compared with the Neer and AO/OTA classifications, our new classification system adopted a user-friendly flowchart format and provided satisfactory intra- and interobserver reliability. Level of evidence Level IV.

Introduction To evaluate the relationship between initial displacement in proximal humeral fractures and fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff measured by CT according to the Goutallier classification. Material and methods This cross-sectional observational study evaluated patients with proximal humeral fractures over a six-month period. The study included patients ≥ 18 years old with complete radiological views (anteroposterior, lateral, and Grashey) and a CT scan of the affected shoulder; previous fracture or ipsilateral shoulder surgery were excluded. Neer’s classification system and Goutallier stages were used to evaluate the patients. Demographic data were collected and, two groups were analysed according to age (≤ 50 years and > 50 years). Results Sixty-two patients were included (m = 36, f = 26, ratio 1.3:1); seven patients were excluded. Male patients (36, 58.1%), patients older than 50 years (33, 53.2%) and a low-energy injury mechanism (36, 58.1%) were the most frequent cases. According to the Neer system, the most common proximal humerus fracture was fracture-dislocation in 17 (27.4%) cases. The most common stage in Goutallier’s classification was I (some fatty streaks) in 22 (35.4%) cases. Younger patients (≤ 50 years) had more displaced fractures with low fatty degeneration ( p  = < 0.001) than older patients (> 50 years), who had minimally displaced fractures with greater fatty degeneration ( p  = 0.567). Conclusions High-energy mechanisms are associated with younger patients and a more displaced fracture according to the Neer classification. Older patients had a more advanced Goutallier stage and lesser displaced fracture. We should consider a more aggressive approach in the treatment of non-displaced fractures in elderly patients, less conservative and more surgical management, to obtain a better clinical evolution after the treatment of these kinds of fractures. Level of evidence IV.

Purpose Proximal humeral fractures are common and frequently associated with osteoporosis. Little is known about the association between the patho-anatomical fracture pattern of proximal humeral fractures and patient characteristics. The purpose of this six year longitudinal registry analysis of proximal humeral fractures was to study overall numbers, certain predefined pathoanatomical patterns and distribution compared with specific patient characteristics. Methods Data of patients treated between 2006 and 2011 in a country hospital that provides care >95 % of the city’s hospitalised patients with fractures was retrospectively reviewed. Data were analysed according to patient characteristics of age, gender, comorbidity, accompanying injuries and radiological analysis of pathoanatomical fracture patterns based on Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification. Results Eight hundred and fifteen proximal humeral fractures (67 % women/33 % men; mean age 66 years, range 19–99) were analysed. During the study period, an overall increase of 42.5 % was found: according to AO classification, 46 % were type A, 22 % type B and 32 % type C. Based on the Neer classification, 86 % were displaced, and 49 % were complex with more than three parts. Of complex fractures, 57 % were female patients >60 years. The number of complex fractures was five times higher in women >60 years than in men of the same age group. Conclusions An overall increase of inpatients with displaced proximal tibial fractures was documented. Interestingly, complex displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially in older women with comorbidities, accounted for the majority of cases. These results suggest that health-care planning and hospital-based therapeutic strategies should focus on this patient group.

Purpose This study aims to (1) devise a classification system to categorize and manage ballistic fractures of the knee, hip, and shoulder; (2) assess the reliability of this classification compared to current classification schemas; and (3) determine the association of this classification with surgical management. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected trauma database at an urban level 1 trauma centre. The study included 147 patients with 169 articular fractures caused by ballistic trauma to the knee, hip, and shoulder. Injuries were selected based on radiographic criteria from plain radiographs and CT scans. The AO/OTA classification system’s reliability was compared to that of the novel ballistic articular injury classification system (BASIC), developed using a nominal group approach. The BASIC system’s ability to guide surgical decision-making, aiming to achieve stable fixation and minimize post-traumatic arthritis, was also evaluated. Results The BASIC system was created after analysing 73 knee, 62 hip, and 34 shoulder fractures. CT scans were used in 88% of cases, with 44% of patients receiving surgery. The BASIC classification comprises five subgroups, with a plus sign indicating the need for soft tissue intervention. Interrater reliability showed fair agreement for AO/OTA ( k  = 0.373) and moderate agreement for BASIC ( k  = 0.444). The BASIC system correlated strongly with surgical decisions, with an 83% concurrence in treatment choices based on chart reviews. Conclusions Conventional classification systems provide limited guidance for ballistic articular injuries. The BASIC system offers a pragmatic and reproducible alternative, with potential to inform treatment decisions for knee, hip, and shoulder ballistic injuries. Further research is needed to validate this system and its correlation with patient outcomes. Level of evidence Level III, Diagnostic Study.

BackgroundThe classification systems for proximal humeral fractures routinely used in clinical practice include the Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 2007 systems. Currently used systems have low inter- and intraobserver reliability. In 2018, AO/OTA introduced a new classification system with the aim of simplifying the coding process, in which the Neer four-part classification was integrated into the fracture description. The aim of the present work is to assess the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the new AO/OTA 2018 compared with the Neer and AO/OTA 2007 classifications.Materials and methodsA total of 116 radiographs of consecutive patients with proximal humeral fracture were selected and classified by three observers with different levels of experience. All three observers independently reviewed and classified the images according to the Neer, AO/OTA 2007, and new AO/OTA 2018 systems. To determine the intraobserver agreement, the observers reviewed the same set of radiographs after an interval of 8 weeks. The inter- and intraobserver agreement were determined through Cohen’s kappa coefficient analysis.ResultsThe new AO/OTA 2018 classification showed substantial mean inter- (k = 0.67) and intraobserver (k = 0.75) agreement. These results are similar to the reliability observed for the Neer classification (interobserver, k = 0.67; intraobserver, k = 0.85) but better than those found for the AO/OTA 2007 system, which showed only moderate inter- (k = 0.57) and intraobserver (k = 0.58) agreement. The two more experienced observers showed better overall agreement, but no statistically significant difference was found. No differences were found between surgical experience and agreement regarding specific fracture types or groups.ConclusionsThe results showed that the Neer system still represents the more reliable and reproducible classification. However, the new AO/OTA 2018 classification improved the agreement among observers compared with the AO/OTA 2007 system, while still maintaining substantial descriptive power and simplifying the coding process. The universal modifiers and qualifications, despite their possible complexity, allowed a more comprehensive fracture definition without negatively affecting the reliability or reproducibility of the classification system.Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic studies

Introduction Successful treatment of periprosthetic shoulder fractures depends on the right strategy, starting with a well-structured classification of the fracture. Unfortunately, clinically relevant factors for treatment planning are missing in the pre-existing classifications. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe a new specific classification system for periprosthetic shoulder fractures including a structured treatment algorithm for this important fragility fracture issue. Methods The classification was established, focussing on five relevant items, naming the prosthesis type, the fracture localisation, the rotator cuff status, the anatomical fracture region and the stability of the implant. After considering each single item, the individual treatment concept can be assessed in one last step. To evaluate the introduced classification, a retrospective analysis of pre- and post-operative data of patients, treated with periprosthetic shoulder fractures, was conducted by two board certified trauma surgery consultants. Results The data of 19 patients (8 male, 11 female) with a mean age of 74 ± five years have been analysed in our study. The suggested treatment algorithm was proven to be reliable, detected by good clinical outcome in 15 of 16 (94%) cases, where the suggested treatment was maintained. Only one case resulted in poor outcome due to post-operative wound infection and had to be revised. Conclusions The newly developed six-step classification is easy to utilise and extends the pre-existing classification systems in terms of clinically-relevant information. This classification should serve as a simple tool for the surgeon to consider the optimal treatment for his patients.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the minimally invasive locking plate technique (Philos plate) and interlocking intramedullary nailing technique (TRIGEN intramedullary nail) in the treatment of Neer two-part and three-part proximal humeral fractures. Methods and materials The clinical data of 60 patients with Neer two-part and three-part proximal humerus fractures admitted to the hospital from April 2017 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-two patients were treated with the minimally invasive locking plate technique (minimally invasive plate group), and 28 patients were treated with the interlocking intramedullary nailing technique (intramedullary nail group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, fracture healing time, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The ASES score and Constant–Murley score were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function of the two groups one year after surgery. Results All 60 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, with an average of 16 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, or fracture healing time between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the intramedullary nail group was significantly lower than that in the minimally invasive steel plate group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant ( P  < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the ASES score or Constant–Murley score between the two groups one year after surgery ( P  > 0.05). Conclusion The use of the minimally invasive locking plate technique and interlocking intramedullary nailing technique in the treatment of Neer two-part and three-part proximal humerus fractures has the advantages of a small incision, less blood loss, and a high fracture healing rate, and both can achieve satisfactory clinical effects. The internal nail technique is more convenient than the minimally invasive locking plate technique in controlling postoperative complications.

In this study, we investigated the correlation between fracture classification and secondary screw penetration. We retrospectively identified 189 patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures treated by ORIF at our hospital between June 2006 and June 2013. All fractures were classified radiographically before surgery and follow-up for least 2 years after surgery was recommended. At each follow-up, radiographs were taken in three orthogonal views to evaluate secondary screw penetration. The study population consisted of 189 patients. Of these, 70 were male and 119 female, with a mean age of 59.1 years; the mean follow-up time was 28.5 months. Secondary screw penetration occurred in 26 patients. The risk of developing secondary screw penetration was 11.3-fold higher in four-part fractures than two-part fractures (P < 0.05), 8.6-fold higher for type C fractures than type A fractures (P < 0.05) and 11.0-fold higher for medial hinge disruption group than intact medial hinge group fractures (P < 0.05). However there was no difference between three-part fractures and two-part fractures (P = 0.374), and between type B and type A fractures (P = 0.195). Age, gender, time to surgery and the number of screw in humeral head had no influence on the secondary screw penetration rate (P > 0.05). Patients with four-part fractures, type C fractures and medial hinges disruption are vulnerable to secondary screw penetration. This allows additional precautions to be instituted and measures to be taken as needed.