Explore the vast range of titles available.

Treatment with painful eccentric muscle training has been demonstrated to give good clinical results in patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis. The pain mechanisms in chronic painful shoulder impingement syndrome have not been scientifically clarified, but the histological changes found in the supraspinatus tendon have similarities with the findings in Achilles tendinosis. In this pilot study, nine patients (five females and four males, mean age 54 years) with a long duration of shoulder pain (mean 41 months), diagnosed as having shoulder impingement syndrome and on the waiting list for surgical treatment (mean 13 months), were included. Patients with arthrosis in the acromio‐clavicular joint or with large calcifications causing mechanical impingement during horizontal shoulder abduction were not included. We prospectively studied the effects of a specially designed painful eccentric training programme for the supraspintus and deltoideus muscles (3×15 reps, 2 times/day, 7 days/week, for 12 weeks). The patients evaluated the amount of shoulder pain during horizontal shoulder activity on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and satisfaction with treatment. Constant score was assessed. After 12 weeks of treatment, five patients were satisfied with treatment, their mean VAS had decreased (62–18, P <0.05), and their mean Constant score had increased (65–80, P <0.05). At 52‐week follow‐up, the same five patients were still satisfied (had withdrawn from the waiting list for surgery), and their mean VAS and Constant score were 31 and 81, respectively. Among the satisfied patients, two had a partial suprasinatus tendon rupture, and three had a Type 3 shaped acromion. In conclusion, the material in this study is small and the follow‐up is short, but it seems that although there is a long duration of pain, together with bone and tendon abnormalities, painful eccentric supraspinatus and deltoideus training might be effective. The findings motivate further studies.

Background Subacromial impingement syndrome is a common problem in primary healthcare. It often include tendinopathy. While exercise therapy is effective for this condition, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most effective. Eccentric exercises has proven effective for treating similar tendinopathies in the lower extremities. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to investigate the effects of eccentric exercise on pain and function in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome compared with other exercise regimens or interventions. A secondary aim was to describe the included components of the various eccentric exercise regimens that have been studied. Methods Systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library and PEDro by two independent authors. Included studies were assessed using the PEDro scale for quality and the Cochrane scale for clinical relevance by two independent authors. Data were combined in meta-analyses. GRADE was applied to assess the certainty of evidence. Results Sixty-eight records were identified. Seven studies (eight articles) were included, six were meta-analysed ( n  = 281). Included studies were of moderate quality (median PEDro score 7, range 5–8). Post-treatment pain was significantly lower after eccentric exercise compared with other exercise: MD -12.3 (95% CI − 17.8 to − 6.8, I 2  = 7%, p  < 0.001), but this difference was not clinically important. Eccentric exercise provided no significant post-treatment improvement in function compared with other exercise: SMD -0.10 (95% CI − 0.79 to 0.58, I 2  = 85%, p  = 0.76). Painful eccentric exercise showed no significant difference compared to pain-free eccentric exercise. Eccentric training regimes showed both similarities and diversity. Intervention duration of 6–8 weeks was almost as effective as 12 weeks. Conclusions Evidence of low certainty suggests that eccentric exercise may provide a small but likely not clinically important reduction in pain compared with other types of exercise in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. It is uncertain whether eccentric exercise improves function more than other types of exercise (very low certainty of evidence). Methodological limitations of existing studies make these findings susceptible to change in the future. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42019126917 , date of registration: 29-03-2019.

Rehabilitation of the patient with glenohumeral impingement requires a complete understanding of the structures involved and the underlying mechanism creating the impingement response. A detailed clinical examination and comprehensive treatment programme including specific interventions to address pain, scapular dysfunction and rotator cuff weakness are recommended. The inclusion of objective testing to quantify range of motion and both muscular strength and balance in addition to the manual orthopaedic clinical tests allows clinicians to design evidencebased rehabilitation programmes as well as measure progression and patient improvement.

ObjectivesTo assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison).MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35–65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry.ResultsIn the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were −2.0 (95% CI −8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and −8.0 (−17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (−5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and −3.9 (−12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events.ConclusionsASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of a scapular-focused treatment with a control therapy in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial with a blinded assessor was used in 22 patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. The primary outcome measures included self-reported shoulder disability and pain. Next, patients were evaluated regarding scapular positioning and shoulder muscle strength. The scapular-focused treatment included stretching and scapular motor control training. The control therapy included stretching, muscle friction, and eccentric rotator cuff training. Main outcome measures were the shoulder disability questionnaire, diagnostic tests for shoulder impingement syndrome, clinical tests for scapular positioning, shoulder pain (visual analog scale; VAS), and muscle strength. A large clinically important treatment effect in favor of scapular motor control training was found in self-reported disability (Cohen’s d  = 0.93, p  = 0.025), and a moderate to large clinically important improvement in pain during the Neer test, Hawkins test, and empty can test (Cohen’s d 0.76, 1.04, and 0.92, respectively). In addition, the experimental group demonstrated a moderate (Cohen’s d  = 0.67) improvement in self-experienced pain at rest (VAS), whereas the control group did not change. The effects were maintained at three months follow-up.

Background Although patients with shoulder complaints are frequently referred to physiotherapy, putative predictive factors for outcomes are still unclear. In this regard, only a limited amount of scientific data for patients with subacromial pain syndrome exist, with inconsistent results. An improved knowledge about the ability of baseline variables to predict outcomes could help patients make informed treatment decisions, prevent them from receiving ineffective treatments, and minimize the risk of developing chronic pain. Aim The aims of this secondary longitudinal analysis are threefold: First, to investigate baseline differences between patients with and without successful long-term outcomes following physiotherapy. Second, to compare the predictive ability of two sets of putative predictive variables on outcomes, one based on the literature and one based on the data of the original trial. Third, to explore the contribution of short-term follow-up data to predictive models. Methods Differences between responders and nonresponders were calculated. The predictive ability of variables defined through literature and of variables based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) from the original trial dataset on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and the Patients’ Global Impression of Change at the one-year follow-up were analyzed. To test the robustness of the results, different statistical models were used. To investigate the contribution of follow-up data to prediction, short-term data were included in the analyses. Results A sample of 87 patients with subacromial pain syndrome was analyzed. 77% ( n  = 67) of these participants were classified as responders. Higher expectations and short-term change scores were positive, and higher fear avoidance beliefs, greater baseline disability and pain levels were negative predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Conclusions Although our results are in line with previous research and support the use of clinical factors for prediction, our findings suggest that psychological factors, especially patient expectations and fear avoidance beliefs, also contribute to long-term outcomes and should therefore be considered in the clinical context and further research. However, the hypotheses and recommendations generated from our results need to be confirmed in further studies due to their explorative nature. Trial registration The original trial was registered at Current Controlled Trials under the trial registration number ISRCTN86900354 on March 17, 2010.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of scapular-focused treatment with (SFTF) and without (SFT) feedback on pain, function, and scapular kinematics in patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome (SIS). Methods Seventy-five males and females with SIS were randomly assigned into SFTF ( n  = 25), SFT ( n  = 25) and control ( n  = 25) groups. The primary outcome was pain, assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were function and scapular kinematics, assessed by DASH Questionnaire and a 3-D motion capture, respectively. All outcomes were measured at the baseline and after the 8-week interventions. Results A post hoc analysis performed to show significant differences between groups after the 8-week interventions. For pain, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = − 0.3(− 0.4 to − 0.1); P  = 0.04), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 1.3(0.7–1.9); P  = 0.01). For DASH, also, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = 1.8(1.1–2.4); P  = 0.03), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 4.4(3.3–5.4); P  = 0.01), and SFT vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 2.6(1.8–3.4); P  = 0.01). For scapular internal rotation (the sagittal or scapular planes), scapular upward rotation, and the scapular tilt, however, there were no differences between SFTF vs. SFT. Conclusion Based on the study results, a rehabilitation program integrated with verbal feedbacks is effective to relieve pain, and improve function and scapular kinematics in patients with SIS. Adding feedback to an exercise therapy could clinically enhance outcomes in patients with SIS. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration This study was prospectively registered at UMIN-CTR website, and the unique trail number is UMIN000036399.

Objectives To assess whether the combination of scapular-focused training and mulligan mobilization (SFTMM) improves pain and proprioception compared to scapular-focused training (SFT) and a control group in female rock climbers with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). Design Three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting Outpatient setting. Subjects Individuals were randomly assigned to SFTMM, SFT alone, and control group. Interventions 8 weeks of SFTMM and SFT. Main measures Outcome measures were pain and proprioception. Results The results revealed significant differences in pain scores and proprioception among female rock climbers with SIS who participated in SFTMM, SFT, and a control group (F(2, 32) = 81.01, p  = 0.001, η2 = 0.83 for pain scores; F(2, 32) = 178.2, p  = 0.001, η2 = 0.91 for proprioception scores). Post-hoc tests via the Bonferroni test indicated that both SFTMM and SFT significantly reduced pain levels ( p  = 0.001) and improved proprioception levels ( p  = 0.001) compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in pain scores and proprioception between the SFTMM group and the SFT group ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions In conclusion, the study indicates that SFTMM significantly reduces pain and improves proprioception in female rock climbers with SIS, as shown by notable changes compared to the control group. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the SFTMM (combined intervention) and SFT alone. Therefore, while the incorporation of SFT and MM shows promise; further research is needed to fully understand its long-term benefits and clinical implications. Ethical Code Registration The study was approved at Ethics.research.ac.ir, code: IR.SSRC.REC.1402.170 on 2023-10-22.

Background and Objectives: Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems affecting the shoulder joint. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program targeting humeral head depressor muscles on symptoms in individuals with SAPS. Materials and Methods: Participants were sequentially assigned to study and control groups in a quasi-randomized design. While the control group received standard physical therapy and rehabilitation, the study group underwent a combined progressive exercise program, including humeral head depressor strengthening, peri-articular muscle exercises, scapular stabilization, and proprioceptive training. Acromio–humeral distance (AHD) and tendon thickness measurements were evaluated via ultrasonography (USG), while pain intensity, upper-extremity disability, and kinesiophobia were measured using the VAS and McGill Pain Questionnaire, DASH-T, and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, respectively. Results: Both the study and control groups showed statistically significant increments in AHD compared to the baseline. The first and final measurements changed from 7.92 mm to 10.54 mm and from 7.72 mm to 8.41 mm, respectively. However, the increase in AHD was greater in the study group relative to the control group, and the value was statistically significant. The study group showed significant improvements in pain and disability. Kinesiophobia levels, on the other hand, decreased in both groups, but a greater decrease was observed in the study group. Conclusions: In this study, both the study and control groups showed an increase in AHD, but the combined exercise program targeting humeral head depressor muscles resulted in a greater improvement. Reduced tendon thickness indicated the eased motion of the rotator cuff, supporting the improvements in pain and disability. The program had a positive impact on psychosocial parameters, including pain-related kinesiophobia. Given the limited literature on the effects of such exercises on AHD and tendon thickness, this study provides an original contribution. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07228455.

The rotator cuff performs multiple functions during shoulder exercises, including glenohumeral abduction, external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR). The rotator cuff also stabilizes the glenohumeral joint and controls humeral head translations. The infraspinatus and subscapularis have significant roles in scapular plane abduction (scaption), generating forces that are two to three times greater than supraspinatus force. However, the supraspinatus still remains a more effective shoulder abductor because of its more effective moment arm. Both the deltoids and rotator cuff provide significant abduction torque, with an estimated contribution up to 35–65% by the middle deltoid, 30% by the subscapularis, 25% by the supraspinatus, 10% by the infraspinatus and 2% by the anterior deltoid. During abduction, middle deltoid force has been estimated to be 434 N, followed by 323N from the anterior deltoid, 283N from the subscapularis, 205N from the infraspinatus, and 117N from the supraspinatus. These forces are generated not only to abduct the shoulder but also to stabilize the joint and neutralize the antagonistic effects of undesirable actions. Relatively high force from the rotator cuff not only helps abduct the shoulder but also neutralizes the superior directed force generated by the deltoids at lower abduction angles. Even though anterior deltoid force is relatively high, its ability to abduct the shoulder is low due to a very small moment arm, especially at low abduction angles. The deltoids are more effective abductors at higher abduction angles while the rotator cuff muscles are more effective abductors at lower abduction angles. During maximum humeral elevation the scapula normally upwardly rotates 45–55°, posterior tilts 20–40° and externally rotates 15–35°. The scapular muscles are important during humeral elevation because they cause these motions, especially the serratus anterior, which contributes to scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt and ER. The serratus anterior also helps stabilize the medial border and inferior angle of the scapular, preventing scapular IR (winging) and anterior tilt. If normal scapular movements are disrupted by abnormal scapular muscle firing patterns, weakness, fatigue, or injury, the shoulder complex functions less efficiency and injury risk increases. Scapula position and humeral rotation can affect injury risk during humeral elevation. Compared with scapular protraction, scapular retraction has been shown to both increase subacromial space width and enhance supraspinatus force production during humeral elevation. Moreover, scapular IR and scapular anterior tilt, both of which decrease subacromial space width and increase impingement risk, are greater when performing scaption with IR (‘empty can’) compared with scaption with ER (‘full can’). There are several exercises in the literature that exhibit high to very high activity from the rotator cuff, deltoids and scapular muscles, such as prone horizontal abduction at 100° abduction with ER, flexion and abduction with ER, ‘full can’ and ‘empty can’, D1 and D2 diagonal pattern flexion and e The serratus anterior also helps stabilize the medial border and inferior angle of the scapular, preventing scapular IR (winging) and anterior tilt. If normal scapular movements are disrupted by abnormal scapular muscle firing patterns, weakness, fatigue, or injury, the shoulder complex functions less efficiency and injury risk increases. Scapula position and humeral rotation can affect injury risk during humeral elevation. Compared with scapular protraction, scapular retraction has been shown to both increase subacromial space width and enhance supraspinatus force production during humeral elevation. Moreover, scapular IR and scapular anterior tilt, both of which decrease subacromial space width and increase impingement risk, are greater when performing scaption with IR (‘empty can’) compared with scaption with ER (‘full can’). There are several exercises in the literature that exhibit high to very high activity from the rotator cuff, deltoids and scapular muscles, such as prone horizontal abduction at 100° abduction with ER, flexion and abduction with ER, ‘full can’ and ‘empty can’, D1 and D2 diagonal pattern flexion and extension, ER and IR at 0° and 90° abduction, standing extension from 90–0°, a variety of weight-bearing upper extremity exercises, such as the push-up, standing scapular dynamic hug, forward scapular punch, and rowing type exercises. Supraspinatus activity is similar between ‘empty can’ and ‘full can’ exercises, although the ‘full can’ results in less risk of subacromial impingement. Infraspinatus and subscapularis activity have generally been reported to be higher in the ‘full can’ compared with the ‘empty can’, while posterior deltoid activity has been reported to be higher in the ‘empty can’ than the ‘full can’.