Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background This randomized phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-eight gastric PC patients were randomized into CRS alone ( n  = 34) or CRS + HIPEC ( n  = 34) receiving cisplatin 120 mg and mitomycin C 30 mg each in 6000 ml of normal saline at 43 ± 0.5°C for 60–90 min. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were safety profiles. Results Major clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups. The PC index was 2–36 (median 15) in the CRS + HIPEC and 3–23 (median 15) in the CRS groups ( P  = 0.489). The completeness of CRS score (CC 0–1) was 58.8% (20 of 34) in the CRS and 58.8% (20 of 34) in the CRS + HIPEC groups ( P  = 1.000). At a median follow-up of 32 months (7.5–83.5 months), death occurred in 33 of 34 (97.1%) cases in the CRS group and 29 of 34 (85.3%) cases of the CRS + HIPEC group. The median survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval 4.8–8.2 months) in CRS and 11.0 months (95% confidence interval 10.0–11.9 months) in the CRS + HIPEC groups ( P  = 0.046). Four patients (11.7%) in the CRS group and 5 (14.7%) patients in the CRS + HIPEC group developed serious adverse events ( P  = 0.839). Multivariate analysis found CRS + HIPEC, synchronous PC, CC 0–1, systemic chemotherapy ≥ 6 cycles, and no serious adverse events were independent predictors for better survival. Conclusions For synchronous gastric PC, CRS + HIPEC with mitomycin C 30 mg and cisplatin 120 mg may improve survival with acceptable morbidity.

Background: The aim of our study was to develop a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). Methods: GSRC patients from 2004 to 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly assigned to the training and validation sets. Multivariate Cox regression analyses screened for OS and CSS independent risk factors and nomograms were constructed. Results: A total of 7,149 eligible GSRC patients were identified, including 4,766 in the training set and 2,383 in the validation set. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that gender, marital status, race, AJCC stage, TNM stage, surgery and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for both OS and CSS. Based on the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis, prognostic nomograms were constructed for OS and CSS. In the training set, the C-index was 0.754 (95% CI = 0.746-0.762) for the OS nomogram and 0.762 (95% CI: 0.753-0.771) for the CSS nomogram. In the internal validation, the C-index for the OS nomogram was 0.758 (95% CI: 0.746-0.770), while the C-index for the CSS nomogram was 0.762 (95% CI: 0.749-0.775). Compared with TNM stage and SEER stage, the nomogram had better predictive ability. In addition, the calibration curves also showed good consistency between the predicted and actual 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS. Conclusion: The nomogram can effectively predict OS and CSS in patients with GSRC, which may help clinicians to personalize prognostic assessments and clinical decisions.

Application of the principles of total mesorectal excision to colon cancer by undertaking complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed to improve oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether implementation of CME improved disease-free survival compared with conventional colon resection. Data for all patients who underwent elective resection for Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I–III colon adenocarcinomas in the Capital Region of Denmark between June 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2011, were retrieved for this population-based study. The CME group consisted of patients who underwent CME surgery in a centre validated to perform such surgery; the control group consisted of patients undergoing conventional colon resection in three other hospitals. Data were collected from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database and medical charts. Patients were excluded if they had stage IV disease, metachronous colorectal cancer, rectal cancer (≤15 cm from anal verge) in the absence of synchronous colon adenocarcinoma, tumour of the appendix, or R2 resections. Survival data were collected on Nov 13, 2014, from the DCCG database, which is continuously updated by the National Central Office of Civil Registration. The CME group consisted of 364 patients and the non-CME group consisted of 1031 patients. For all patients, 4-year disease-free survival was 85·8% (95% CI 81·4–90·1) after CME and 75·9% (72·2–79·7) after non-CME surgery (log-rank p=0·0010). 4-year disease-free survival for patients with UICC stage I disease in the CME group was 100% compared with 89·8% (83·1–96·6) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0·046). For patients with UICC stage II disease, 4-year disease-free survival was 91·9% (95% CI 87·2–96·6) in the CME group compared with 77·9% (71·6–84·1) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0·0033), and for patients with UICC stage III disease, it was 73·5% (63·6–83·5) in the CME group compared with 67·5% (61·8–73·2) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0·13). Multivariable Cox regression showed that CME surgery was a significant, independent predictive factor for higher disease-free survival for all patients (hazard ratio 0·59, 95% CI 0·42–0·83), and also for patients with UICC stage II (0·44, 0·23–0·86) and stage III disease (0·64, 0·42–1·00). After propensity score matching, disease-free survival was significantly higher after CME, irrespective of UICC stage, with 4-year disease-free survival of 85·8% (95% CI 81·4–90·1) after CME and 73·4% (66·2–80·6) after non-CME (log-rank p=0·0014). Our data indicate that CME surgery is associated with better disease-free survival than is conventional colon cancer resection for patients with stage I–III colon adenocarcinoma. Implementation of CME surgery might improve outcomes for patients with colon cancer. Tvergaards Fund and Edgar and Hustru Gilberte Schnohrs Fund.

Background MOC31PE immunotoxin was developed to rapidly kill cells expressing the tumor-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule, which is highly expressed in colorectal cancer. Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer long-term survival to patients with peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC), most patients experience disease relapse and novel therapeutic options are needed. On this basis, MOC31PE is being developed as a novel therapeutic principle to target PM-CRC. Methods This was a dose-escalating phase I trial to evaluate the safety and toxicity (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetic profile, and neutralizing antibody response (secondary endpoints) upon intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE in patients with PM-CRC undergoing CRS-HIPEC with Mitomycin C. Fifteen patients received the study drug at four dose levels (3+3+3+6), administered intraperitoneally as a single dose the day after CRS-HIPEC. Results No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. There was negligible systemic absorption of the study drug. Drug concentrations in peritoneal fluid samples were in the cytotoxic range and increased in a dose-dependent manner. MOC31PE recovered from peritoneal cavity retained its cytotoxic activity in cell-based assays. All patients developed neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions Intraperitoneal administration of MOC31PE was safe and well tolerated, and combined with low systemic uptake, MOC31PE seems ideal for local intraperitoneal treatment. The drug will be further evaluated in an ongoing phase II expansion cohort.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the prognosis of disseminated mucinous appendiceal neoplasms is highly dependent upon tumor grade. Reflecting this, the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system now incorporates a three-tier grading system for prognostic staging of mucinous appendiceal tumors. However, the grading criteria are not well described. In order to address this issue, we evaluated clinicopathologic and molecular features of 219 cases from 151 patients with widely disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasia treated at our institution between 2004 and 2012. We identified histologic features that were associated with worse overall survival on univariate analysis: destructive invasion, high cytologic grade, high tumor cellularity, angiolymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, and signet ring cell component (all with P<0.0001). We used these morphologic characteristics to classify neoplasms into three grades: AJCC grade G1 lacked all adverse histologic features; AJCC grade G2 had at least one adverse histologic feature (except a signet ring cell component); and AJCC grade G3 were defined by the presence of a signet ring cell component. Patients with AJCC grade G2 and grade G3 adenocarcinomas had a significantly worse prognosis compared with AJCC grade G1 (P<0.0001 for each). A trend toward worse overall survival was identified for patients with AJCC grade G3 adenocarcinomas compared with AJCC grade G2 adenocarcinomas (P=0.07). Our multivariate analysis found that this three-tier grading system was a significant predictor of outcome (P=0.008), independent of other prognostic variables. After controlling for other prognostic variables, AJCC grade G2 was associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk of death (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–6.2) and AJCC grade G3 was associated with a 5.1-fold increased risk of death (95% CI, 1.7–14) relative to grade G1 tumors. Our results indicate that evaluation of a limited set of adverse histologic features allows for the separation of disseminated mucinous neoplasms of appendiceal origin into three morphologically defined and prognostically relevant grades as advocated by the AJCC.

Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma (SRCA) of the appendix is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis and limited information to help guide treatment. We reviewed patients diagnosed with SRCA between 1998 and 2024 ​at all Mayo Clinic sites. Among 84 patients, the most common presentation was non-specific abdominal pain (31 ​%). The majority of tumors were high grade (81 ​%), and most patients had metastatic disease (69 ​%). The best overall survival at 5 years was 25 ​% with complete cytoreduction, which was not significantly improved with the addition of systemic therapy. The addition of HIPEC to cytoreduction surgery showed a clinically significant but not a statistically significant improvement in 5-year survival (20 ​% vs 5 ​%, p ​= ​0.059). Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC showed the best survival outcomes for SRCA, with no demonstrated efficacy for systemic chemotherapy. Overall outcomes remain poor and new treatment modalities are needed. •Signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix is associated with a poor prognosis and low 5-year survival.•The standard treatment approach of cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS/HIPEC) provided a survival advantage.•Systemic chemotherapy offered no survival benefits in patients with or without CRS/HIPEC.

Recent literature suggests an increasing incidence of colorectal carcinoma in young patients. We performed a histologic, molecular, and immunophenotypic analysis of patients with sporadic early-onset (≤40 years of age) colorectal carcinoma seen at our institution from the years 2000–2010 and compared these tumors to a cohort of consecutively resected colorectal carcinomas seen in patients >40 years of age. A total of 1160 primary colorectal adenocarcinomas were surgically resected for the years 2000 through 2010. Of these, 75 (6%) were diagnoses in patients ≤40 years of age of which 13 (17%) demonstrated abnormalities in DNA mismatch repair, 4 (5%) were in patients with known germline genetic disorders (two patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, one patient with juvenile polyposis, and one patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome), and three patients (4%) had long-standing chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The sporadic early-onset colorectal carcinoma group comprised a total of 55 patients (55/1160, 5%) and were compared with a control group comprising 73 consecutively resected colorectal carcinomas with proficient DNA mismatch repair in patients >40 years of age. For the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group, most cases (33/55, 60%) were diagnosed between the age of 35 and 40 years of age. Compared with the control group, the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group was significantly different with respect to tumor location (P<0.007) with 80% (44/55 cases) identified in either the sigmoid colon (24/55, 44%) or rectum (20/55, 36%). Morphologically, early-onset colorectal carcinomas more frequently displayed adverse histologic features compared with the control colorectal carcinoma group such as signet ring cell differentiation (7/55, 13% vs 1/73, 1%, P=0.021), perineural invasion (16/55, 29% vs 8/73, 11%, P=0.009) and venous invasion (12/55, 22% vs 4/73, 6%, P=0.006). A precursor adenomatous lesion was less frequently identified in the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group compared with the control group (19/55, 35% vs 39/73, 53%, P=0.034). Of the early-onset colorectal carcinomas, only 2/45 cases (4%) demonstrated KRAS mutations compared with 11/73 (15%) of the control group colorectal adenocarcinomas harboring KRAS mutations, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.13). BRAF V600E mutations were not identified in the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group. No difference was identified between the two groups with regard to tumor stage, tumor size, number of lymph node metastases, lymphatic invasion, tumor budding, mucinous histology, or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Both groups had similar recurrence-free (P=0.28) and overall survival (P=0.73). However, patients in the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group more frequently either presented with or developed metastatic disease during their disease course compared with the control colorectal carcinoma group (25/55, 45% vs 18/73, 25%, P=0.014). In addition, 8/55 patients (15%) in the early-onset colorectal carcinoma group developed local recurrence of their tumor while no patients in the control colorectal carcinoma group developed local recurrence (P<0.001), likely due to the increased incidence of rectal carcinoma in the patients with early-onset colorectal carcinoma. Our study demonstrates that colorectal carcinoma is not infrequently diagnosed in patients ≤40 years of age and is not frequently the result of underlying Lynch syndrome or associated with other cancer-predisposing genetic conditions or chronic inflammatory conditions. These tumors have a striking predilection for the distal colon, particularly the sigmoid colon and rectum and are much more likely to demonstrate adverse histologic factors, including signet ring cell differentiation, venous invasion, and perineural invasion.

Colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC) with unique characteristics. Due to the limited researches on it, a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of this subtype is still lacking. In this article, we summarize the clinicopathological features and molecular characteristics of colorectal SRCC based on a literature review. Clinically, SRCC has been associated with young age, proximal site preference, advanced tumor stage, high histological grade, high rate of lymph node involvement, frequent peritoneal metastasis, and a significantly poor prognosis. Regarding molecular characteristics, in SRCC, the mutation burden of the classic signaling pathways that include WNT/β-catenin, RAS/RAF/MAPK, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways are generally reduced. In contrast, some genes related to the “epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process” and the “stem cell properties”, including RNF43 , CDH1 , and SMAD4 , as well as the related TGF-β signaling pathway have been observed more frequently altered in SRCC than in conventional adenocarcinoma (AC). In many studies but not in others, SRCC showed a higher frequency of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) positive status compared to AC. It has been proposed that colorectal SRCC consists of two subtypes, in which the MSI + /CIMP + / BRAF + /CD3 + /PD-L1 + hypermethylated genotype is more common in the proximal colon, and may represent the potential candidate for immunotherapy. Understanding the special molecular mechanisms related to the aggressive biology of SRCC is of great importance, which may provide a theoretical basis for the development of more targeted and effective treatments for this refractory disease.

Gastric cancer is rare in pediatric populations, with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) being an exceptionally infrequent subtype. We report a case of GSRCC in a 10‐year‐old Chinese boy with no family history of cancer. The diagnosis was established via gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and imaging examinations. Early detection allowed a successful distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative whole‐exome sequencing (WES) revealed no clinically significant mutations but identified some somatic alterations. Notably, gastric biopsy pathology demonstrated strong positivity for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Additionally, we comprehensively reviewed the existing pediatric GSRCC cases, suggesting the potential role of H. pylori infection in the pathogenesis of pediatric gastric cancer. A case report and literature review of pediatric gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) suggest the potential role of H. pylori infection in the pathogenesis of pediatric GSRCC.

Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma (GSRCC) is an increasingly recognized subtype of gastric cancer, particularly prevalent in South Asian populations and regions within India. This carcinoma is distinguished by its abundant cytoplasmic mucinous cells and aggressive clinical behavior, often affecting younger individuals and leading to a poor prognosis due to its advanced‐stage presentation and resistance to standard treatments. A critical factor in its progression is the tumor's uniquely immunosuppressive and stromal‐rich microenvironment, characterized by dysfunctional immune infiltrates, activation of cancer‐associated fibroblasts, extracellular matrix remodeling, and complement cascade dysfunction. Recent research has highlighted the significance of key biomarkers, including MSMB, AGR2, CLDN18.2, and notably GRIN2D, which play roles in tumor angiogenesis, immune evasion, and metabolic reprogramming. The interaction of these elements contributes to therapeutic resistance and immune escape, thereby reducing the effectiveness of chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies. Innovative strategies that integrate stromal‐targeting agents, complement modulators, anti‐CLDN18.2 antibodies, and novel GRIN2D‐targeted therapies, along with precision molecular profiling, offer potential for enhancing patient outcomes. Tailored approaches that incorporate early detection and dynamic biomarker monitoring may ultimately transform GSRCC management toward personalized, evidence‐based therapies and prevention.