Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background To compare electrical impedance myography (EIM) and MRI in assessing lumbar skeletal muscle composition. Methods One hundred forty-one patients (78 females, mean age 57 ± 19 years) were prospectively enrolled and underwent lumbar spine MRI, EIM with Skulpt®, and clinical evaluation including the questionnaire SARC-F. MRIs were reviewed to assess the Goutallier score of paravertebral muscles at L3 level and to calculate the cross sectional area (CSA) of both psoas, quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles on a single axial slice at L3 level, in order to calculate the skeletal muscle index (SMI=CSA/height 2 ). We tested the correlation between EIM-derived parameters [body fat percentage (BF%) and muscle quality] and body mass index (BMI), Goutallier score (1–4), SMI, and SARC-F scores (0–10) using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The strength of association was considered large (0.5 to 1.0), medium (0.3 to 0.5), small (0.1 to 0.3). Results Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed small (0.26) but significant ( p  < 0.01) positive correlation between BF% obtained with EIM and Goutallier score. Small negative correlation (− 0.22, p  < 0.01) was found between EIM muscle quality and Goutallier Score. Large negative correlation (− 0.56, p  < 0.01) was found between SMI and Goutallier Score, while SMI showed small negative correlation with SARC-F (− 0.29, p  < 0.01). Medium positive correlation was found between Goutallier Score and SARC-F (0.41, p  < 0.01). BMI showed medium positive correlation with SMI (r = 0.369, p  < 0.01) and small correlation with EIM muscle quality (r = − 0.291, p  < 0.05) and BF% (r = 0.227, p  < 0.05). We found a substantial increase of the strength of associations of BF% and muscle quality with Goutallier in the 18–40 years (r = 0.485 and r = − 0.401, respectively) and in the 41–70 years group (r = 0.448 and r = − 0.365, respectively). Conclusions Muscle quality and BF% measured by EIM device showed only small strength of correlation with other quantitative parameters for assessing muscle mass and fat infiltration. Interesting results have been found in younger patients, but Skulpt Chisel™ should be applied cautiously to assess lumbar skeletal muscle composition. This point deserves further investigation and other studies are warranted. Trial registration The registration number of this study is 107/INT/2019.

We evaluated the correlation of electrical impedance myography (EIM) measurements of knee muscles composition using Skulpt ChiselTM with MRI data retrieved from muscles segmentation. A total of 140 patients (71 females, 52 ± 21 years) underwent knee MRI, EIM with Skulpt®, and clinical evaluation (SARC-F questionnaire). MRIs were reviewed to assess the cross-sectional area (CSA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI = CSA/height2) of vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, biceps, semimembranosus, and sartorius. We tested the correlations of EIM-derived parameters [body fat-percentage (BF%) and muscle quality] with total CSA, CSA of each muscle, SMI, and SARC-F scores (0–10) using Pearson correlation coefficient. We found medium negative correlation of BF% with SMI (r = −0.430, p < 0.001) and total CSA (r = −0.445, p < 0.001), particularly with biceps (r = −0.479, p < 0.001), sartorius (r = −0.440, p < 0.001), and semimembranosus (r = −0.357, p < 0.001). EIM-derived muscle quality showed small-to-medium positive correlation with MRI measurements, ranging from r = 0.234 of biceps (p = 0.006) to r = 0.302 of total CSA (p < 0.001), except for vastus lateralis (r = 0.014, p = 0.873). SARC-F scores showed small correlations with EIM and MRI data, ranging from r = −0.132 (p = 0.121) with EIM muscle quality to r = −0.288 (p = 0.001) with CSA of vastus medialis. Hence, we observed small-to-medium correlations of muscle parameters derived from Skulpt ChiselTM with SARC-F scores and MRI parameters. We recommend using Skulpt ChiselTM with caution for assessing knee skeletal muscles composition.