Explore the vast range of titles available.

WHO recommends treating hepatitis C infection with one of three antiviral combinations for 8–12 weeks. No randomised trials have compared these regimens, and high cure rates might be achievable with shorter durations of therapy. We aimed to compare sofosbuvir–daclatasvir with sofosbuvir–velpatasvir, and to evaluate potential novel treatment strategies. We conducted a multi-arm, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in two public hospitals in Viet Nam. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with chronic hepatitis C infection and mild-to-moderate liver fibrosis were eligible. Recruitment was stratified by centre and viral genotype (1–5 vs 6) with 1:1 random allocation to an oral fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir 400 mg plus daclatasvir 60 mg (sofosbuvir–daclatasvir) or sofosbuvir 400 mg plus velpatasvir 100 mg (sofosbuvir–velpatasvir). Participants were simultaneously factorially randomly assigned to one of four treatment strategies: 12 weeks’ standard of care (SOC); 4 weeks’ therapy with four weekly PEGylated interferon alfa-2a subcutaneous injections; induction and maintenance therapy with 2 weeks’ standard therapy followed by 10 weeks’ therapy 5 days a week; and response-guided therapy (RGT) for 4, 8, or 12 weeks determined by viral load on day 7. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after treatment completion, analysed in all evaluable participants regardless of actual treatment received. We chose a 5% non-inferiority margin for the drug comparison, and a 10% non-inferiority margin for the treatment strategy comparisons. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, 61522291, and is completed. Between June 19, 2020, and May 10, 2023, 624 participants were randomised (470 [75%] were male and 154 [25%] were female). 296 (47%) had genotype 6 and 328 (53%) had genotypes 1–5. The primary outcome was assessable in 609 (98%) participants. SVR occurred in 294 (97%) of 302 participants in the sofosbuvir–daclatasvir group and 292 (95%) of 307 participants in the sofosbuvir–velpatasvir group (risk difference 2·2%, 90% credible interval [CrI] –0·2 to 4·8, within the 5% non-inferiority margin; 93% probability that sofosbuvir–daclatasvir is superior to sofosbuvir–velpatasvir). SVR occurred in 148 (99%) of 150 in the SOC group, 143 (94%) of 152 in the 4-week antiviral plus interferon group (–4·5%, 90% CrI –8·3 to –1·3), 151 (99%) of 152 in the induction–maintenance group (0·6%, –1·1 to 2·7), and 144 (93%) of 155 in the RGT group (–5·7%, –9·6 to –2·3); all risk differences were within the 10% non-inferiority margin. Serious adverse events were rare (11 [4%] of 313 participants in the sofosbuvir–velpatasvir group vs six [2%] of 311 in the sofosbuvir–daclatasvir group; risk difference –1·6% [95% CrI –4·2 to 0·8]) with no evidence of differences between regimens or strategies, but adverse reactions were very common in the 4-week antiviral plus interferon group compared with the other treatment strategies (risk difference vs SOC group, 66·8% [59·2 to 74·0]; p<0·0001). Sofosbuvir–daclatasvir was non-inferior to sofosbuvir–velpatasvir. High efficacy was seen with novel strategies, which might help to inform approaches to treatment for harder-to-reach populations. Wellcome Trust.

ObjectiveWe assessed the effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in a large real-world cohort, including patients with advanced liver disease.DesignAdults with chronic HCV infection at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months and with no available treatment options were treated in a European compassionate use programme. The recommended regimen was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg for 24 weeks; RBV addition or shorter duration was allowed at physicians' discretion. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12).ResultsOf the 485 evaluable patients, 359 received DCV+SOF and 126 DCV+SOF+RBV. Most patients were men (66%), white (93%) and treatment-experienced (70%). The most frequent HCV genotypes were 1b (36%), 1a (33%) and 3 (21%), and 80% of patients had cirrhosis (42% Child–Pugh B/C; 46% Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score >10). SVR12 (modified intention-to-treat) was achieved by 91% of patients (419/460); 1 patient had virological breakthrough and 13 patients relapsed. Virological failure was not associated with treatment group (adjusted risk difference DCV+SOF minus DCV+SOF+RBV: 1.06%; 95% CI −2.22% to 4.35%). High SVR12 was observed regardless of HCV genotype or cirrhosis, liver transplant or HIV/HCV coinfection status. Twenty eight patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (n=18) or death (n=10) and 18 died during follow-up. Deaths and most safety events were associated with advanced liver disease and not considered treatment related.ConclusionsDCV+SOF with or without RBV achieved high SVR12 and was well tolerated in a diverse cohort of patients with severe liver disease.Trial registration numberNCT0209966.

Background. Interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is safe and effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but treatment uptake remains low. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of OST and drug use during therapy on completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin. Methods. The phase 3 ION studies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. People with clinically significant drug use (prior 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening by urine drug tests (not explained by prescriptions) were ineligible. Stored samples were available from ION-1 for retrospective testing for illicit drugs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. Among 1952 patients enrolled in the ION studies, 4% (n = 70) were receiving OST. Among those receiving (n = 70) and not receiving OST (n = 1882), there was no difference in treatment completion (97% vs 98%; P = .40), ≥80% adherence (93% vs 92%; P = 1.00), SVR12 (94% vs 97%; P = .28), and serious adverse events (4% vs 3%; P = .43), respectively. Among participants in the ION-1 trial, 23% (n = 196) used illicit drugs during therapy (15% cannabinoids alone; 8% other illicity drugs ± cannabinoids). There was no difference in treatment completion, ≥80% adherence, SVR12, or serious AEs in those with no drug use during treatment compared with those who used cannabinoids and/or other illicit drugs. No cases of HCV reinfection were observed in the 24 weeks following treatment. Conclusions. OST and drug use during HCV therapy did not impact treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, or safety. Clinical Trials Registration. ION-1 (NCT01701401); ION-2 (NCT01768286); and ION-3 (NCT01851330).

In this analysis of the ASTRAL trials (non-opioid substitution therapy [OST], n = 984; OST, n = 51) evaluating the once-daily, pan-genotypic regimen of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection, OST did not impact completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), or safety. SVR12 was 96% (95% confidence interval, 87%, >99%) in those receiving OST.

BackgroundIn Japan, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis currently have no treatment options. In this Phase 3 study, we evaluated sofosbuvir–velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in patients with any HCV genotype and decompensated cirrhosis [Child–Pugh–Turcotte (CPT) class B or C] in Japan.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir–velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by CPT class and genotype. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks following completion of treatment (SVR12) was the primary efficacy endpoint.ResultsOf the 102 patients enrolled, 57% were treatment naive, 78% and 20% had genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection, respectively, and 77% and 20% had CPT class B and C cirrhosis, respectively, at baseline. Overall, 61% of patients were female and the mean age was 66 years (range 41–83). SVR12 rates were 92% (47/51) in each group. Among patients who achieved SVR12, 26% had improved CPT class from baseline to posttreatment week 12. Most adverse events (AEs) were consistent with clinical sequelae of advanced liver disease or known toxicities of ribavirin. Four patients (8%) who received sofosbuvir–velpatasvir and seven (14%) who received sofosbuvir–velpatasvir plus ribavirin experienced a serious AE. The 3 deaths (bacterial sepsis, gastric varices hemorrhage, hepatocellular carcinoma) were attributed to liver disease progression.ConclusionSofosbuvir–velpatasvir for 12 weeks provides a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy for Japanese patients with HCV and decompensated cirrhosis. Ribavirin did not improve efficacy but increased toxicity.

Early treatment of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with interferon alfa is highly effective, but can be associated with frequent side-effects. We investigated the safety and efficacy of an interferon-free regimen for treatment of acute HCV infection. In this prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm pilot study, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with acute HCV genotype 1 monoinfection from ten centres in Germany. Patients were given ledipasvir (90 mg) plus sofosbuvir (400 mg) as a fixed-dose combination tablet once daily for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained virological response (defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment; other primary outcomes were safety and tolerability of ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir. The primary analysis population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety was also assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02309918. Between Nov 19, 2014, and Nov 10, 2015, we enrolled 20 patients. Median HCV RNA viral load at baseline was 4·04 log10 IU/mL (1·71–7·20); 11 patients were infected with HCV genotype 1a and nine patients with genotype 1b. All patients achieved a sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (20 [100%] of 20 patients). Treatment was well tolerated; there were no drug-related serious adverse events. Up to 12 weeks after treatment, 22 possible or probable drug-related adverse events were reported. There was one serious adverse event, which was judged unrelated to the study drug; one patient was admitted to hospital for surgery of a ruptured cruciate ligament. Treatment for 6 weeks with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir was well tolerated and highly effective in patients with acute HCV genotype 1 monoinfection. Short-duration treatment of acute hepatitis C might prevent the spread of HCV in high-risk populations. Gilead Sciences, HepNet Study-House/German Liver Foundation, and German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF).

Background. Highly effective hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapies that do not require modification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral regimens are needed. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir (DCV + SOF) for 12 weeks by antiretroviral (ARV) regimen in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. Methods. In the randomized, open-label ALLY-2 study, HIV-HCV-coinfected patients received 8 or 12 weeks of once-daily DCV 60 mg (dose-adjusted as-necessary for concomitant ARVs) + SOF 400 mg. Results were stratified by ARV class for the 151 patients who received 12 weeks of DCV + SOF. Results. Fifty-one patients were HCV treatment experienced, 100 were treatment naive, 89% male and 33% black. HCV genotypes were: genotype la (GT1a; 69%), GT1b (15%), GT2 (8%), GT3 (6%), and GT4 (2%). Sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) was 97% and was similar across ARV regimens (P = .774): protease inhibitor-based, 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-99.7%); nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based, 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%); and integrase inhibitor based, 95% (95% CI, 83%-99.4%). SVR12 among patients receiving either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir as part of their antiretroviral therapy regimen was 98% (95% CI, 93%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 85%-100%), respectively. Age, gender, race, cirrhosis, HCV treatment history, GT, and baseline HCV RNA did not affect SVR12. No discontinuations were attributed to treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions. DCV + SOF ×12 weeks is a highly efficacious, all-oral, pan-GT HCV treatment for HIV-HCV coinfected patients across a broad range of ARV regimens. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02032888.

Data about the response of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 5 to approved and experimental treatment regimens are scarce. We assessed the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir in patients with HCV genotype 5. We did this open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial at five hospitals in France. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old and had chronic infection with HCV genotype 5, with plasma HCV RNA of at least 10 000 IU/mL. We used BLAST analyses of NS5B partial sequences to establish the genotype and subtype at screening. Patients were given a fixed-dose combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir orally once per day for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a sustained viral response, defined as HCV RNA concentration less than 15 IU/mL at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). We analysed efficacy and safety in all patients who received at least one dose of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2013-003978-27, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02081079. From March 7 to June 10, 2014, we recruited 41 patients, including 21 who were treatment naive and 20 who were treatment experienced. All patients were of white ethnic origins. All 41 patients who started treatment completed the full 12 weeks of treatment and had undetectable HCV RNA at their final treatment visit. In the overall study population, 39 (95%, 95% CI 83–99) of 41 patients achieved SVR12. SVR12 was achieved by 20 (95%, 76–100) of the 21 patients who were treatment naive and 19 (95%, 75–100) of the 20 patients who were treatment experienced. Eight (89%) of nine patients with cirrhosis achieved SVR12, whereas 31 (97%) of the 32 patients without cirrhosis achieved SVR12. The two patients who did not reach SVR12 both had IL28B TT genotype and had viral relapse within 4 weeks of the end of treatment. The most common adverse events were asthenia (16 [39%] patients), headache (11 [27%] patients), and fatigue (four [10%] patients). One patient had a serious adverse event, worsening depression, which we judged to be unrelated to study treatment. The oral regimen of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCV genotype 5 infection who are treatment naive or treatment experienced. Gilead Sciences.

Background The optimal retreatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is undetermined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12-week retreatment with ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) with add-on ribavirin (RBV) for patients who previously failed to respond to HCV-NS5A inhibitor, daclatasvir (DCV), and HCV-NS3 inhibitor, asunaprevir (ASV), therapy. Methods This multicenter, prospective study enrolled 15 patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV/ASV combination therapy. They were retreated with SOF, LDV, and RBV for 12 weeks and underwent physical examinations and blood tests at baseline, during treatment, and after therapy. At baseline and relapse, NS3/NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were evaluated. Results Of the 15 enrolled patients, 73.3% (11/15), 86.7% (13/15), and 0% (0/15) had RAVs in NS3 D168A/V/T/E, NS5A L31I/M/F/V plus Y93H, and NS5B S282T, respectively. Overall, 86.7% (13/15) of patients achieved a sustained viral response, and all patients completed therapy. No patients experienced severe adverse events. Two patients who failed to respond to SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy were elderly women, had the IL28B non-TT genotype, and NS5A RAVs in L31I/Y93H or NS5A A92 K at baseline. Conclusions This study revealed that SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy was effective and well-tolerated for patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV and ASV combination therapy. Thus, RBV added to DAA therapy for difficult-to-treat patients might improve treatment outcomes.

Background/purposeIn Japan, there is a growing population of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed a direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimen. In this Phase 3 study, we evaluated sofosbuvir–velpatasvir plus ribavirin in Japanese patients with genotype 1 or 2 HCV infection who previously received DAAs.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir–velpatasvir plus ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks. Randomization was stratified by HCV genotype and presence of cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12-week post-treatment (SVR12).ResultsOf 117 participants, 81% had HCV genotype 1 infection, 33% had cirrhosis, and 95% had NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) at baseline. Overall, SVR12 rates were 97% (58/60; 95% CI 88–100%) with 24 weeks of treatment and 82% (47/57; 95% CI 70–91%) with 12 weeks. For HCV genotype 1 and 2 infected patients, the SVR12 rates with 24 weeks of treatment were 98% and 92%, respectively. In both treatment groups, SVR12 rates in HCV genotype 1 patients were statistically superior to a historical control rate of 50% (p < 0.001). For patients with NS5A RASs at baseline, 85% (46/54) in the 12-week group and 96% (54/56) in the 24-week group achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract viral infection, anemia, and headache. Three (2.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events.ConclusionSofosbuvir–velpatasvir plus ribavirin was highly effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients who previously failed a DAA-based regimen. Baseline NS5A RASs did not affect treatment outcomes.