Explore the vast range of titles available.

In two trials involving patients with hepatitis C in whom previous treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents failed, treatment for 12 weeks with sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir achieved high rates of sustained virologic response. The majority of patients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can now be successfully treated with drugs that directly target viral replication. 1 , 2 Combination regimens of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) provide rates of sustained virologic response exceeding 90%, regardless of HCV genotype, disease stage, or treatment history. 3 The proportion of patients who do not have a sustained virologic response to treatment with approved regimens is small, but given the size of the infected population — estimates range up to 150 million people worldwide 4 — the absolute number of such patients is substantial and will increase as more . . .

In two randomized, open-label trials, the combination of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir given once daily for 8 or 12 weeks achieved high rates of sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 3 infection who did not have cirrhosis.

In this phase 3 study involving patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, or 6 and decompensated cirrhosis, sofosbuvir–velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks or sofosbuvir–velpatasvir for 24 weeks resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response. The number of patients with decompensated cirrhosis caused by chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is projected to rise in the coming decade. 1 For many years, the only treatment option for such patients was liver transplantation. Recently, however, clinical trials of newly approved direct-acting antiviral agents have shown that it is possible to treat HCV infection safely and effectively in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and that successful treatment is associated with early improvement in liver function. 2 – 11 The possible long-term benefits of treatment on existing liver disease remain unknown. The only regimen that is currently approved for the . . .

In two phase 3 trials involving patients with hepatitis C virus infection, including those with cirrhosis, 12 weeks of sofosbuvir–velpatasvir resulted in a sustained virologic response in 99% of patients with genotype 2 and 95% of those with genotype 3. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 and 3 account for an estimated 35% of global HCV infections, affecting up to 58 million persons. 1 , 2 Unlike HCV genotype 1, genotypes 2 and 3 are common in low-income regions in Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. 1 Before the advent of direct-acting antiviral agents, HCV genotypes 2 and 3 were grouped together in treatment guidelines as “easy-to-treat” genotypes. However, recent studies have shown that HCV genotype 3 is associated with more rapid disease progression and lower rates of response to treatment than is HCV genotype 2, especially in patients with cirrhosis . . .

ObjectiveWe assessed the effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in a large real-world cohort, including patients with advanced liver disease.DesignAdults with chronic HCV infection at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months and with no available treatment options were treated in a European compassionate use programme. The recommended regimen was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg for 24 weeks; RBV addition or shorter duration was allowed at physicians' discretion. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12).ResultsOf the 485 evaluable patients, 359 received DCV+SOF and 126 DCV+SOF+RBV. Most patients were men (66%), white (93%) and treatment-experienced (70%). The most frequent HCV genotypes were 1b (36%), 1a (33%) and 3 (21%), and 80% of patients had cirrhosis (42% Child–Pugh B/C; 46% Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score >10). SVR12 (modified intention-to-treat) was achieved by 91% of patients (419/460); 1 patient had virological breakthrough and 13 patients relapsed. Virological failure was not associated with treatment group (adjusted risk difference DCV+SOF minus DCV+SOF+RBV: 1.06%; 95% CI −2.22% to 4.35%). High SVR12 was observed regardless of HCV genotype or cirrhosis, liver transplant or HIV/HCV coinfection status. Twenty eight patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (n=18) or death (n=10) and 18 died during follow-up. Deaths and most safety events were associated with advanced liver disease and not considered treatment related.ConclusionsDCV+SOF with or without RBV achieved high SVR12 and was well tolerated in a diverse cohort of patients with severe liver disease.Trial registration numberNCT0209966.

Background. Interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is safe and effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but treatment uptake remains low. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of OST and drug use during therapy on completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin. Methods. The phase 3 ION studies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. People with clinically significant drug use (prior 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening by urine drug tests (not explained by prescriptions) were ineligible. Stored samples were available from ION-1 for retrospective testing for illicit drugs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. Among 1952 patients enrolled in the ION studies, 4% (n = 70) were receiving OST. Among those receiving (n = 70) and not receiving OST (n = 1882), there was no difference in treatment completion (97% vs 98%; P = .40), ≥80% adherence (93% vs 92%; P = 1.00), SVR12 (94% vs 97%; P = .28), and serious adverse events (4% vs 3%; P = .43), respectively. Among participants in the ION-1 trial, 23% (n = 196) used illicit drugs during therapy (15% cannabinoids alone; 8% other illicity drugs ± cannabinoids). There was no difference in treatment completion, ≥80% adherence, SVR12, or serious AEs in those with no drug use during treatment compared with those who used cannabinoids and/or other illicit drugs. No cases of HCV reinfection were observed in the 24 weeks following treatment. Conclusions. OST and drug use during HCV therapy did not impact treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, or safety. Clinical Trials Registration. ION-1 (NCT01701401); ION-2 (NCT01768286); and ION-3 (NCT01851330).

WHO recommends treating hepatitis C infection with one of three antiviral combinations for 8–12 weeks. No randomised trials have compared these regimens, and high cure rates might be achievable with shorter durations of therapy. We aimed to compare sofosbuvir–daclatasvir with sofosbuvir–velpatasvir, and to evaluate potential novel treatment strategies. We conducted a multi-arm, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in two public hospitals in Viet Nam. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with chronic hepatitis C infection and mild-to-moderate liver fibrosis were eligible. Recruitment was stratified by centre and viral genotype (1–5 vs 6) with 1:1 random allocation to an oral fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir 400 mg plus daclatasvir 60 mg (sofosbuvir–daclatasvir) or sofosbuvir 400 mg plus velpatasvir 100 mg (sofosbuvir–velpatasvir). Participants were simultaneously factorially randomly assigned to one of four treatment strategies: 12 weeks’ standard of care (SOC); 4 weeks’ therapy with four weekly PEGylated interferon alfa-2a subcutaneous injections; induction and maintenance therapy with 2 weeks’ standard therapy followed by 10 weeks’ therapy 5 days a week; and response-guided therapy (RGT) for 4, 8, or 12 weeks determined by viral load on day 7. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after treatment completion, analysed in all evaluable participants regardless of actual treatment received. We chose a 5% non-inferiority margin for the drug comparison, and a 10% non-inferiority margin for the treatment strategy comparisons. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, 61522291, and is completed. Between June 19, 2020, and May 10, 2023, 624 participants were randomised (470 [75%] were male and 154 [25%] were female). 296 (47%) had genotype 6 and 328 (53%) had genotypes 1–5. The primary outcome was assessable in 609 (98%) participants. SVR occurred in 294 (97%) of 302 participants in the sofosbuvir–daclatasvir group and 292 (95%) of 307 participants in the sofosbuvir–velpatasvir group (risk difference 2·2%, 90% credible interval [CrI] –0·2 to 4·8, within the 5% non-inferiority margin; 93% probability that sofosbuvir–daclatasvir is superior to sofosbuvir–velpatasvir). SVR occurred in 148 (99%) of 150 in the SOC group, 143 (94%) of 152 in the 4-week antiviral plus interferon group (–4·5%, 90% CrI –8·3 to –1·3), 151 (99%) of 152 in the induction–maintenance group (0·6%, –1·1 to 2·7), and 144 (93%) of 155 in the RGT group (–5·7%, –9·6 to –2·3); all risk differences were within the 10% non-inferiority margin. Serious adverse events were rare (11 [4%] of 313 participants in the sofosbuvir–velpatasvir group vs six [2%] of 311 in the sofosbuvir–daclatasvir group; risk difference –1·6% [95% CrI –4·2 to 0·8]) with no evidence of differences between regimens or strategies, but adverse reactions were very common in the 4-week antiviral plus interferon group compared with the other treatment strategies (risk difference vs SOC group, 66·8% [59·2 to 74·0]; p<0·0001). Sofosbuvir–daclatasvir was non-inferior to sofosbuvir–velpatasvir. High efficacy was seen with novel strategies, which might help to inform approaches to treatment for harder-to-reach populations. Wellcome Trust.

BackgroundIn Japan, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis currently have no treatment options. In this Phase 3 study, we evaluated sofosbuvir–velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks in patients with any HCV genotype and decompensated cirrhosis [Child–Pugh–Turcotte (CPT) class B or C] in Japan.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive sofosbuvir–velpatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by CPT class and genotype. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks following completion of treatment (SVR12) was the primary efficacy endpoint.ResultsOf the 102 patients enrolled, 57% were treatment naive, 78% and 20% had genotype 1 and 2 HCV infection, respectively, and 77% and 20% had CPT class B and C cirrhosis, respectively, at baseline. Overall, 61% of patients were female and the mean age was 66 years (range 41–83). SVR12 rates were 92% (47/51) in each group. Among patients who achieved SVR12, 26% had improved CPT class from baseline to posttreatment week 12. Most adverse events (AEs) were consistent with clinical sequelae of advanced liver disease or known toxicities of ribavirin. Four patients (8%) who received sofosbuvir–velpatasvir and seven (14%) who received sofosbuvir–velpatasvir plus ribavirin experienced a serious AE. The 3 deaths (bacterial sepsis, gastric varices hemorrhage, hepatocellular carcinoma) were attributed to liver disease progression.ConclusionSofosbuvir–velpatasvir for 12 weeks provides a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy for Japanese patients with HCV and decompensated cirrhosis. Ribavirin did not improve efficacy but increased toxicity.

In this analysis of the ASTRAL trials (non-opioid substitution therapy [OST], n = 984; OST, n = 51) evaluating the once-daily, pan-genotypic regimen of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection, OST did not impact completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), or safety. SVR12 was 96% (95% confidence interval, 87%, >99%) in those receiving OST.

Background. Highly effective hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapies that do not require modification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral regimens are needed. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir + sofosbuvir (DCV + SOF) for 12 weeks by antiretroviral (ARV) regimen in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. Methods. In the randomized, open-label ALLY-2 study, HIV-HCV-coinfected patients received 8 or 12 weeks of once-daily DCV 60 mg (dose-adjusted as-necessary for concomitant ARVs) + SOF 400 mg. Results were stratified by ARV class for the 151 patients who received 12 weeks of DCV + SOF. Results. Fifty-one patients were HCV treatment experienced, 100 were treatment naive, 89% male and 33% black. HCV genotypes were: genotype la (GT1a; 69%), GT1b (15%), GT2 (8%), GT3 (6%), and GT4 (2%). Sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) was 97% and was similar across ARV regimens (P = .774): protease inhibitor-based, 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%-99.7%); nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based, 100% (95% CI, 91%-100%); and integrase inhibitor based, 95% (95% CI, 83%-99.4%). SVR12 among patients receiving either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir as part of their antiretroviral therapy regimen was 98% (95% CI, 93%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 85%-100%), respectively. Age, gender, race, cirrhosis, HCV treatment history, GT, and baseline HCV RNA did not affect SVR12. No discontinuations were attributed to treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions. DCV + SOF ×12 weeks is a highly efficacious, all-oral, pan-GT HCV treatment for HIV-HCV coinfected patients across a broad range of ARV regimens. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02032888.