Explore the vast range of titles available.

Spinal metastases are becoming increasingly common because patients with metastatic disease are living longer. The close proximity of the spinal cord to the vertebral column limits many conventional therapeutic options that can otherwise be used to treat cancer. In response to this problem, an innovative multidisciplinary approach has been developed for the management of spinal metastases, leveraging the capabilities of image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery, separation surgery, vertebroplasty, and minimally invasive local ablative approaches. In this Review, we discuss the variables that should be considered during the management of these patients and review the role of each discipline and their respective management options to provide optimal care. This work is synthesised into a practical algorithm to aid clinicians in the management of patients with spinal metastasis.

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) can lead to immediate neurological impairment. In order to preserve and, optimally, restore neurological functions, urgent treatment (usually, within 24 h) is necessary. Treatment options mainly consist of decompressive surgery (DS) and / or radiotherapy (RT) combined with steroids. Whereas historically, RT was the treatment of choice, DS has become standard of care, where applicable. Despite a variety of excellent studies, real world data of treatment in a large academic center is currently underrepresented. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated for MSCC in our department of radiotherapy between 1998 and 2018 ( n  = 131), evaluating treatment, achievement of clinically determined improvement of neurological functions as well as overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival statistics, log rank test for survival time comparisons, univariable and multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression for assessing potential impacts of variables on survival and symptom relief. 42.7% of patients had DS before RT ( n  = 56), 57.3% ( n  = 75) received RT without DS. Symptom relief was achieved in 41.2% of all patients ( n  = 54, n  = 26 of those had DS before RT, p  = 0.12). RT completed as intended ( p  < 0.001) was statistically significant for symptom relief, wherein symptom relief ( p  < 0.001), completion of RT course as intended ( p  = 0.01) and more recent treatment dates ( p  = 0.002) were independent predictors for OS. We herein present a large cohort of patients treated for MSCC in our academic center, representing real world treatment data currently lacking in literature.

BackgroundSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious treatment for various refractory chronic pain syndromes. Serious complications including spinal cord compression (SCC) are rare with 19 previous reports which are mainly attributed to fibrotic scar tissue formation at the distal end of the leads at the location of the contacts. We report a case of SCC following SCS implantation at the lead entry location secondary to a delayed progression of spinal canal stenosis.Case presentationA patient in her early 70s underwent SCS implantation with adequate therapeutic benefit for approximately 2 years before citing complaints of increasing lower back pain and lower extremity radicular pain. Lumbar spine X-rays excluded lead migration as a causative factor. An MRI of the lumbar spine obtained 30 months following SCS implantation demonstrated a marked interval progression of central canal stenosis secondary to facet and ligamentous hypertrophy manifesting in compression of the spinal cord at the lead entry location. An L1–L2 decompressive laminectomy with hardware removal resulted in the resolution of her symptoms. A literature search conducted with the PubMed database identified previously published cases of SCC following SCS implantation which highlighted the rarity of this complication.ConclusionOur case report urges physicians of SCS patients, noting a loss of therapeutic benefit with their device, to investigate new pathologies including SCC. Furthermore, our case highlights clinical symptoms and surgical treatments of SCC. Paddle leads are more commonly implicated in published cases of SCC than percutaneous leads. Lastly, MRI conditionality is critical to identifying cases of SCC.

AbstractObjectivesTo analyze the prognostic and risk factors related to surgical treatment of central spinal cord syndrome (CSS) and to find out the optimal timing of operative management. MethodsFrom January 2011 to January 2019, a consecutive series of 128 patients with CSS confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively analyzed including their clinical records and radiologic data from a prospectively maintained database in a single center. ResultsAccording to the prognosis evaluated by the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score (AMS), and ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade, the overall postoperative outcome was good. Finally, it was found that surgical timing, presence of myelopathy or not at baseline, AMS at admission, and compression ratio were independent factors affecting the prognosis. Surgery as soon as possible after the occurrence of CSS is still advocated. ConclusionCervical myelopathy at baseline, compression ratio, and AMS score on admission were independent prognostic factors for the surgical treatment of CSS. If surgical indications are clear, early surgical intervention should be actively considered.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy represents the most common form of non-traumatic spinal cord injury. This trial investigated whether riluzole enhances outcomes in patients undergoing decompression surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial was done at 16 university-affiliated centres in Canada and the USA. Patients with moderate-to-severe degenerative cervical myelopathy aged 18–80 years, who had a modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score of 8–14, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral riluzole (50 mg twice a day for 14 days before surgery and then for 28 days after surgery) or placebo. Randomisation was done using permuted blocks stratified by study site. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors remained masked to treatment group allocation. The primary endpoint was change in mJOA score from baseline to 6 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all individuals who underwent randomisation and surgical decompression. Adverse events were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all patients who underwent randomisation, including those who did not ultimately undergo surgical decompression. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01257828. From Jan 31, 2012, to May 16, 2017, 408 patients were screened. Of those screened, 300 were eligible (mITT population); 290 patients underwent decompression surgery (ITT population) and received either riluzole (n=141) or placebo (n=149). There was no difference between the riluzole and placebo groups in the primary endpoint of change in mJOA score at 6-month follow-up: 2·45 points (95% CI 2·08 to 2·82 points) versus 2·83 points (2·47 to 3·19), difference −0·38 points (−0·90 to 0·13; p=0·14). The most common adverse events were neck or arm or shoulder pain, arm paraesthesia, dysphagia, and worsening of myelopathy. There were 43 serious adverse events in 33 (22%) of 147 patients in the riluzole group and 34 serious adverse events in 29 (19%) of 153 patients in the placebo group. The most frequent severe adverse events were osteoarthrosis of non-spinal joints, worsening of myelopathy, and wound complications. In this trial, adjuvant treatment for 6 weeks perioperatively with riluzole did not improve functional recovery beyond decompressive surgery in patients with moderate-to-severe degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether riluzole has other benefits in this patient population merits further study. AOSpine North America.

The mainstay treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is surgical decompression. Not all cases, however, are suitable for surgery. Recent international guidelines advise surgery for moderate to severe disease as well as progressive mild disease. The goal of this study was to examine the factors in current practice that drive the decision to operate in DCM. Retrospective cohort study. 1 year of cervical spine MRI scans (N = 1123) were reviewed to identify patients with DCM with sufficient clinical documentation (N = 39). Variables at surgical assessment were recorded: age, sex, clinical signs and symptoms of DCM, disease severity, and quantitative MRI measures of cord compression. Bivariate correlations were used to compare each variable with the decision to offer the patient an operation. Subsequent multivariable analysis incorporated all significant bivariate correlations. Of the 39 patients identified, 25 (64%) were offered an operation. The decision to operate was significantly associated with narrower non-pathological canal and cord diameters as well as cord compression ratio, explaining 50% of the variance. In a multivariable model, only cord compression ratio was significant (p = 0.017). Examination findings, symptoms, functional disability, disease severity, disease progression, and demographic factors were all non-significant. Cord compression emerged as the main factor in surgical decision-making prior to the publication of recent guidelines. Newly identified predictors of post-operative outcome were not significantly associated with decision to operate.

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite major advances in radiation and systemic treatments, surgery remains a critical step in the multidisciplinary treatment of metastatic spinal cord tumors. OBJECTIVE To describe the indications, rationale, and technique of “hybrid therapy” (separation surgery and concomitant spine stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]) along with practical nuances. METHODS Separation surgery describes a posterolateral approach for circumferential epidural decompression and stabilization. The goal is to decompress the spinal cord, stabilize the spine, and create adequate separation between the neural elements and the tumor for SRS to achieve durable tumor control. RESULTS A transpedicular route to achieve ventrolateral access and limited resection of the tumorous vertebral body is carried out. In the setting of high-grade cord compression, caution must be taken when performing the tumor decompression. “Separation” of the ventral epidural tumor component anteriorly creates space for concomitant SRS while a simple laminectomy would not adequately achieve this goal. Dissection of the posterior longitudinal ligament allows maximal ventral decompression. Gross total tumor resection is not crucial for durable tumor control using the “hybrid therapy” model. Thus, attempts at ventral tumor resection may unnecessarily increase operative morbidity. Cement augmentation of the construct or vertebral body may improve construct stability. CT myelogram is the preferred exam for postoperative SRS planning. Radiosurgical planning constitutes a multidisciplinary effort and guidelines for contouring in the postoperative setting have recently become available. CONCLUSION Separation surgery is an effective, well-tolerated, and reproducible surgery. It provides safe margins for concomitant SRS. Combined, this “Hybrid Therapy” allows durable local control, maintenance of spinal stability, and palliation of symptoms, while minimizing operative morbidity.

This report highlights an unusual case of a woman in her 70s who presented with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and an initial symptom of spinal cord compression and associated spinal degeneration. She presented with progressive thoracolumbar pain, bilateral lower limb weakness, and sensory deficits. Imaging showed continuous osteophytes in the anterior and lateral spine, multiple levels of intervertebral space narrowing, marked ligament ossification at T10/11, and severe spinal stenosis. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis was diagnosed and spinal cord compression was significantly reduced after laminectomy. Although diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis is relatively common in elderly patients, cases of spinal cord compression are still rare, and the combination of intervertebral space stenosis, and ossification of the ligamentum flavum may be misdiagnosed as degenerative spondylopathy. This case suggests the possibility of intervertebral stenosis and ossification of the thoracic ligamentum flavum coexisting with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, highlighting the importance of diagnostic imaging in the early stage of patient management.

Reports on the effects of timing of the surgery on the patient survival rate or the results of palliative laminectomy are limited. The aim of the study was to investigate the postoperative ambulatory status of neurologically impaired metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients who underwent laminectomy and evaluate predictors of postoperative ambulation recovery after laminectomy for MSCC. We included 175 patients who underwent decompressive surgery for MSCC. Changes in the Frankel grade (FG) were evaluated perioperatively. Among all patients, 113 were unable to walk preoperatively and were divided into two groups: 70 and 43 patients in the ambulation-regained and ambulation-not regained postoperatively groups, respectively. The percentage of patients eligible for postoperative chemotherapy and overall survival rate in each group were investigated. Furthermore, predictors of postoperative ambulation recovery after laminectomy for MSCC were examined. The most common primary tumor sites were the lung, prostate, and breast. FG improved with surgery in 80 cases, remained unchanged in 94 cases, and worsened in one case. In the ambulation-regained group, 70% were eligible for postoperative chemotherapy, while only 26% of the not-regained group were eligible for postoperative chemotherapy. The postoperative survival rate of the ambulation-regained group was significantly better than that of the not-regained group. Univariate predictors for not regaining the ability to walk were Karnofsky Performance Status ≤40 prior to surgery, FG B prior to surgery, and time to surgery since the inability to walk >48 h. Decompressive surgery benefits motor function postoperatively. Both good neurological status prior to surgery and prompt surgery for non-ambulatory MSCC are important predictors of improved functional outcome.

Abstract Degenerative spinal deformity afflicts a significant portion of the elderly and is increasing in prevalence. Recent evidence has revealed sagittal plane malalignment to be a key driver of pain and disability in this population and has led to a significant shift toward a more evidence-based management paradigm. In this narrative review, we review the recent literature on the epidemiology, evaluation, management, and outcomes of degenerative adult spinal deformity (ASD). ASD is increasing in prevalence in North America due to an aging population and demographic shifts. It results from cumulative degenerative changes focused in the intervertebral discs and facet joints that occur asymmetrically to produce deformity. Deformity correction focuses on restoration of global alignment, especially in the sagittal plane, and decompression of the neural elements. General realignment goals have been established, including sagittal vertical axis <50 mm, pelvic tilt <22°, and lumbopelvic mismatch <±9°; however, these should be tailored to the patient. Operative management, in carefully selected patients, yields satisfactory outcomes that appear to be superior to nonoperative strategies. ASD is characterized by malalignment in the sagittal and/or coronal plane and, in adults, presents with pain and disability. Nonoperative management is recommended for patients with mild, nonprogressive symptoms; however, evidence of its efficacy is limited. Surgery aims to restore global spinal alignment, decompress neural elements, and achieve fusion with minimal complications. The surgical approach should balance the desired correction with the increased risk of more aggressive maneuvers. In well-selected patients, surgery yields excellent outcomes.