Explore the vast range of titles available.

The course, treatment response, and recovery potential after acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) have been shown to differ depending on the neurological level of injury. There are limited data focused on thoracic-level injuries, however. A cohort of 86 patients from the prospectively maintained North American Clinical Trials Network SCI registry were identified and studied to characterize the patterns of neurological recovery and to determine rates of acute hospital death and pulmonary complications. Regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between timing of surgery and administration of methylprednisolone on neurologic and clinical outcomes. Neurological conversion (≥1 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] grade improvement) was poorest for AIS grade A patients; 14.3% converted at last available follow-up (mean eight months). While rates of conversion were more optimistic for AIS-B patients (54.5%) and AIS C injuries (77.8%) at the same time point, none of the AIS grade D patients converted to AIS E. At last available follow-up (mean eight months), the magnitudes of lower motor extremity score (LEMS) change were highest for AIS C injuries (21.9 points), then AIS B (17.7 points), AIS D (16.4 points), and finally AIS A (2.5 points) (p < 0.05). Early surgical intervention (<24 h post-injury) was independently associated with an additional seven points in motor recovery and a 60% decreased incidence of pulmonary events (p < 0.05). Methylprednisolone administration was not an independent predictor of neurological outcome or pulmonary complications. Evaluation of this cohort obtained from a modern multi-center SCI registry provides an update on the natural history, acute death, and incidence of pulmonary complications after traumatic thoracic SCI. Although small sample size limited the extent of analyses possible, early surgical treatment was associated with significantly larger motor recovery and lower rates of pulmonary complications.

With a reported incidence of up to 10% compared to all spinal trauma, spinal injuries in children are less common than in adults. Children can have spine fractures with or without myelopathy, or spinal cord injuries without radiological abnormalities (SCIWORA). We retrospectively reviewed the cases of children with spinal injuries treated at a level 1 pediatric trauma centre between 1990 and 2013. A total of 275 children were treated during the study period. The mean age at admission was 12 ± 4.5 years, and the male:female ratio was 1.4:1. Spinal injuries were more common in children of ages 12–16 years, with most injuries among ages 15–16 years. The top 3 mechanisms of spinal injury were motor vehicle–related trauma (53%), sports (28%) and falls (13%). Myelopathy occurred in 12% and SCIWORA occurred in 6%. The most common spine levels injured were L2–sacrum, followed by O–C2. Associated injuries, including head injuries (29%), and fractures/dislocations (27%) occurred in 55% of children. Overall mortality was 3%. Surgical intervention was required in 14%. The creation of a pediatric spinal injury database using this 23-year retrospective review helped identify important clinical concepts; we found that active adolescent boys had the highest risk of spine injury, that noncontiguous spine injuries occured at a rate higher than reported previously and that nonaccidental spine injuries in children are under-reported. Our findings also emphasize the importance of maintaining a higher index of suspicion with trauma patients with multiple injuries and of conducting detailed clinical and radiographic examinations of the entire spine in children with a known spinal injury. Les traumatismes médullaires sont moins fréquents chez l’enfant que chez l’adulte, avec une incidence d’au plus 10% de tous les cas déclarés. Les enfants peuvent subir des fractures de la colonne vertébrale avec ou sans myélopathie, ou un traumatisme médullaire sans anomalie radiologique visible (SCIWORA). Nous avons effectué une analyse rétrospective des cas d’enfants atteints d’un traumatisme médullaire admis dans un centre de traumatologie spécialisé en pédiatrie de niveau 1 entre 1990 et 2013. Au total, 275 enfants ont été traités durant la période de l’étude. L’âge moyen au moment de l’hospitalisation était de 12 ± 4,5 ans, et le ratio garçons:filles était de 1,4:1. Les adolescents de 12 à 16 ans formaient le groupe le plus représenté, et l’incidence de traumatisme la plus élevée a été observée chez les jeunes de 15 et 16 ans. Les 3 mécanismes lésionnels les plus fréquents étaient les accidents de la route (53%), la pratique d’un sport (28%) et les chutes (13%). Le taux d’incidence de la myélopathie était de 12%, et celui du SCIWORA, de 6%. La section du rachis touchée le plus fréquemment s’étendait de L2 au sacrum, les vertèbres entre l’occiput et C2 arrivant au deuxième rang. Des lésions concomitantes, dont des blessures à la tête (29%) et des fractures et luxations (27%), ont été observées chez 55% des enfants. Le taux global de mortalité était de 3%. L’intervention chirurgicale a été nécessaire chez 14%. La création à partir de cette étude rétrospective d’une base de données sur les traumatismes médullaires chez l’enfant a mis en évidence quelques constatations cliniques dignes d’intérêt : les garçons adolescents actifs présentent le risque le plus élevé de traumatisme médullaire; les lésions médullaires non contiguës surviennent plus fréquemment que ce qui avait été rapporté précédemment; les traumatismes médullaires non accidentels chez l’enfant sont sous-déclarés. Nos conclusions viennent aussi souligner l’importance de maintenir un indice de suspicion élevé dans le cas de patients atteints de lésions multiples et d’effectuer un examen clinique et radiographique détaillé de la totalité de la colonne vertébrale des enfants ayant une lésion médullaire connue.

IntroductionIn recent years, on the one hand, the mortality rates of upper cervical spine injuries, such as odontoid fractures, were suggested to be not so high, but on the other hand reported to be significantly high. Furthermore, it has not been well documented the relationship between survival rates and various clinical features in those patients during the acute phase of injury because of few reports. This study aimed to evaluate survival rates and acute-phase clinical features of upper cervical spine injuries.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all patients who were transported to the advanced emergency medical center and underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine at our hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. We excluded the patients who were discovered in a state of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) and could not be resuscitated after transportation. Of the 215 consecutive patients with cervical spine injuries, we examined 40 patients (18.6%) diagnosed with upper cervical spine injury (males, 28; females, 12; median age, 58.5 years). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, degree of paralysis, the level of cervical injury, injury severity score (ISS), and incidence of CPA at discovery were evaluated and compared among patients classified into the survival and mortality groups.ResultsThe survival rate was 77.5% (31/40 patients). In addition, complete paralysis was observed in 32.5% of patients. The median of ISS was 34.0 points, and 14 patients (35.0%) presented with CPA at discovery. Age, the proportion of patients with complete paralysis, a high ISS, and incidence of CPA at discovery were significantly higher in the mortality group (p = 0.038, p = 0.038, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsElderly people were more likely to experience upper cervical spine injuries, and their mortality rate was significantly higher than that in injured younger people. In addition, complete paralysis, high ISS, a state of CPA at discovery, was significantly higher in the mortality group.

An injury to the spine — the long bony assemblage that supports the upper body and the spinal cord that carries nerve signals — can be grim and costly. By Bill Cannon.

Background Previous studies of glycemic control in non-neurologic ICU patients have shown conflicting results. The purpose was to investigate whether intensive insulin therapy (IIT) to keep blood glucose levels from 80 to 110 mg/dl or conventional treatment to keep levels less than 151 mg/dl was associated with a reduction of mortality and improved functional outcome in critically ill neurologic patients. Methods Within 24 h of ICU admission, mechanically ventilated adult neurologic patients were enrolled after written informed consent and randomized to intensive or conventional control of blood glucose levels with insulin. Primary outcome measure was death within 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, ICU, and hospital LOS. Results 81 patients were enrolled. The proportion of deaths was higher among IIT patients but this was not statistically significant (36 vs. 25%, P  = 0.34). When good versus poor outcome at 3 months was dichotomized to mRS score 0–2 versus 3–6, respectively, there was no difference in outcome between the two groups (76.2 vs. 75% had a poor 3-month outcome, P  = 1.0). There was also no difference in ICU or hospital LOS. Hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dl) and severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl) were more common in the intensive arm (48 vs. 11%, P  = 0.0006; and 4 vs. 0%, P  = 0.5, respectively). Conclusion There was no benefit to IIT in this small critically ill neurologic population. This is the first glycemic control study to specifically examine both critically ill stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and functional outcome. Given these results, IIT cannot be recommended over conventional control.

Background People who sustain spinal cord injuries in low- and middle-income countries are vulnerable to life-threatening complications after discharge. The aim of this trial is to determine the effect on all-cause mortality of a sustainable model of community-based care provided over the first 2 years after discharge. Methods and analysis The CIVIC trial is a single centre, parallel group trial with concealed and stratified randomisation. The protocol has been previously published ( BMJ Open 2016;6:e010350). This paper provides the accompanying detailed statistical plan. In total, 410 people with recent spinal cord injury who are wheelchair dependent and about to be discharged from the Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed in Bangladesh are randomised to intervention or control groups. Participants assigned to the intervention group receive a model of community-based care in which a case manager provides ongoing telephone-based support and visits participants in their homes over a 2-year period. Participants assigned to the control group receive usual care which may involve a follow-up phone call or a home visit. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 2 years as determined by a blinded assessor (Bangladesh does not have a death registry). The primary effectiveness analysis will compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves (time from allocation to death) in the intervention and control groups using the log-rank test (two-tailed α = 0.05). Participants will be censored at the time they were last known to be alive or at the time of the follow-up assessment. Recruitment finished in March 2018 and the last assessment will be conducted in March 2020. Discussion The CIVIC trial will provide unbiased and precise estimates of the effectiveness of a model of community-based care for people with spinal cord injuries in Bangladesh. The results will have implications for provision of health services for people with spinal cord injuries and other conditions that cause serious disability in low-income and middle-income countries. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN12615000630516, U1111-1171-1876. Registered on 17 June 2015.

IntroductionIn low-income and middle-income countries, people with spinal cord injury (SCI) are vulnerable to life-threatening complications after they are discharged from hospital. The aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an inexpensive and sustainable model of community-based care designed to prevent and manage complications in people with SCI in Bangladesh.Methods and analysisA pragmatic randomised controlled trial will be undertaken. 410 wheelchair-dependent people with recent SCI will be randomised to Intervention and Control groups shortly after discharge from hospital. Participants in the Intervention group will receive regular telephone-based care and three home visits from a health professional over the 2 years after discharge. Participants in the Control group will receive standard care, which does not involve regular contact with health professionals. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 2 years. Recruitment started on 12 July 2015 and the trial is expected to take 5 years to complete.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at the site in Bangladesh and from the University of Sydney, Australia. The study will be conducted in compliance with all stipulations of its protocol, the conditions of ethics committee approval, the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007), the Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH-135/95) and the Bangladesh Guidance on Clinical Trial Inspection (2011). The results of the trial will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at scientific conferences.Trial registration numbersACTRN12615000630516, U1111-1171-1876.

To present recommendations for the prevention and screening, recognition, and treatment of the most common conditions resulting in sudden death in organized sports. Cardiac conditions, head injuries, neck injuries, exertional heat stroke, exertional sickling, asthma, and other factors (eg, lightning, diabetes) are the most common causes of death in athletes. These guidelines are intended to provide relevant information on preventing sudden death in sports and to give specific recommendations for certified athletic trainers and others participating in athletic health care.

Background Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of discussion. From a biological point of view early surgery could prevent secondary damage due to ongoing compression of the already damaged spinal cord. Historically, however, conservative treatment was propagated with good clinical results. Proponents for early surgery as well those favoring conservative treatment are still in debate. The proposed trial will contribute to the discussion and hopefully also to a decrease in the variability of clinical practice. Methods/Design A randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the clinical outcome of early surgical strategy versus a conservative approach. The primary outcome is clinical outcome according to mJOA. This also measured by ASIA score, DASH score and SCIM III score. Other endpoints are duration of the stay at a high care department (medium care, intensive care), duration of the stay at the hospital, complication rate, mortality rate, sort of rehabilitation, and quality of life. A sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated to reach a power of 95%. The data will be analyzed as intention-to-treat at regular intervals, but the end evaluation will take place at two years post-injury. Discussion At the end of the study, clinical outcomes between treatments attitudes can be compared. Efficacy, but also efficiency can be determined. A goal of the study is to determine which treatment will result in the best quality of life for the patients. This study will certainly contribute to more uniformity of treatment offered to patients with a special sort of spinal cord injury. Trial Registration Gov: NCT01367405

Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) is a disease of significant global health burden, particularly in low and middle-income countries where road traffic-related trauma is increasing. This study compared the demographics, injury patterns, and outcomes of TSI caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs) to non-traffic related TSI. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a neurotrauma registry from the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute (MOI) in Tanzania, a national referral center for spinal injuries. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, injury level, and severity were compared across mechanisms of injury. Neurological improvement, neurological deterioration, and mortality were compared between those sustaining TSI through an RTA versus non-RTA, using univariable and multivariable analyses. A total of 626 patients were included, of which 302 (48%) were RTA-related. The median age was 34 years, and 532 (85%) were male. RTAs had a lower male preponderance compared to non-RTA causes (238/302, 79% vs. 294/324, 91%, p<0.001) and a higher proportion of cervical injuries (144/302, 48% vs. 122/324, 38%, p<0.001). No significant differences between RTA and non-RTA mechanisms were found in injury severity, time to admission, length of hospital stay, surgical intervention, neurological outcomes, or in-hospital mortality. Improved neurological outcomes were associated with incomplete injuries (AIS B-D), while higher mortality rates were linked to cervical injuries and complete (AIS A) injuries. Our study in urban Tanzania finds no significant differences in outcomes between spinal injuries from road traffic accidents (RTAs) and non-RTA causes, suggesting the need for equitable resource allocation in spine trauma programs. Highlighting the critical link between cervical injuries and increased mortality, our findings call for targeted interventions across all causes of traumatic spinal injuries (TSI). We advocate for a comprehensive trauma care system that merges efficient pre-hospital care, specialized treatment, and prevention measures, aiming to enhance outcomes and ensure equity in trauma care in low- and middle-income countries.