Explore the vast range of titles available.

In the pivotal RESPONSE study, ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor, was superior to best available therapy at controlling haematocrit and improving splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with polycythaemia vera with splenomegaly who were inadequately controlled with hydroxyurea. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in controlling disease in patients with polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly who need second-line therapy. RESPONSE-2 is a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study assessing ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera done in 48 hospitals or clinics across 12 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with polycythaemia vera, no palpable splenomegaly, and hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance were stratified by their hydroxyurea therapy status (resistance vs intolerance) and randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive response technology provider using a validated system to receive either oral ruxolitinib 10 mg twice daily or investigator-selected best available therapy (hydroxyurea [at the maximum tolerated dose], interferon or pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, approved immunomodulators, or no cytoreductive treatment). Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment assignment; however, the study sponsor was masked to treatment assignment until database lock. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving haematocrit control at week 28. Analyses were done according to an intention-to-treat principle, including data from all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02038036) and is ongoing but not recruiting patients. Between March 25, 2014, and Feb 11, 2015, of 173 patients assessed for eligibility, 74 patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib and 75 to receive best available therapy. At randomisation, best available therapy included hydroxyurea (37 [49%] of 75 in the best available therapy group), interferon or pegylated interferon (ten [13%] of 75), pipobroman (five [7%] of 75), lenalidomide (one [1%] of 75), no treatment (21 [28%] of 75), and other (one [1%] of 75). Haematocrit control was achieved in 46 (62%) of 74 ruxolitinib-treated patients versus 14 (19%) of 75 patients who received best available therapy (odds ratio 7·28 [95% CI 3·43–15·45]; p<0·0001). The most frequent haematological adverse events of any grade were anaemia (ten [14%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group vs two [3%] of 75 in the best available therapy group) and thrombocytopenia (two [3%] vs six [8%]). No cases of grade 3–4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia occurred with ruxolitinib; one patient (1%) reported grade 3–4 anaemia and three patients (4%) reported grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in the group receiving best available therapy. Frequent grade 3–4 non-haematological adverse events were hypertension (five [7%] of 74 vs three [4%] of 75) and pruritus (0 of 74 vs two [3%] of 75). Serious adverse events occurring in more than 2% of patients in either group, irrespective of cause, included thrombocytopenia (none in the ruxolitinib group vs two [3%] of 75 in the best available therapy group) and angina pectoris (two [3%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group vs none in the best available therapy group). Two deaths occurred, both in the best available therapy group. RESPONSE-2 met its primary endpoint. The findings of this study indicate that ruxolitinib could be considered a standard of care for second-line therapy in this post-hydroxyurea patient population. Novartis.

This trial showed clinically significant responses in spleen size and quality of life among patients with myelofibrosis receiving ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor. The agent has some myelotoxicity, but this study showed a survival advantage with ruxolitinib. Myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm, is manifested by abnormal blood counts (anemia, thrombocytosis or thrombocytopenia, and leukocytosis or leukopenia), splenomegaly, and debilitating symptoms (e.g., fatigue, weakness, abdominal pain, cachexia, weight loss, pruritus, night sweats, and bone pain), which are thought to be caused by the combined effects of massive splenomegaly and elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines. 1 Survival ranges from approximately 2 to 11 years, depending on defined prognostic factors. 2 Traditional therapeutic options, including splenectomy, have limited benefit. 3 Although allogeneic stem-cell transplantation may cure myelofibrosis, few patients are eligible for this treatment. Although the gain-of-function mutation in the gene encoding Janus kinase . . .

Patients with myelofibrosis who were treated with ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, showed significant responses with respect to spleen size and quality of life. No effect on overall survival was seen, but one third of the patients assigned to the best available therapy could not be evaluated. Myelofibrosis, which can present as a primary disease or can evolve from polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia, 1 is characterized by marrow fibrosis, progressive anemia, and extramedullary hematopoiesis, manifested primarily as splenomegaly. Severe constitutional symptoms (e.g., night sweats and weight loss), pruritus, fatigue, and sequelae of splenomegaly are common. 2 The median survival from the time of diagnosis is 4 years for patients with intermediate-2–risk disease and 2 years for patients with high-risk disease. 3 Apart from allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, treatment is palliative and does not address the characteristic abnormality identified in myelofibrosis, a dysregulation of Janus kinase (JAK)–mediated cytokine and growth-factor signal . . .

Background The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial evaluated the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-2/high-risk myelofibrosis. The primary and planned 3-year analyses of COMFORT-I data demonstrated that ruxolitinib—the first myelofibrosis-approved therapy—reduced splenomegaly and prolonged overall survival versus placebo. Here, we present the final 5-year results. Methods Patients managed in Australia, Canada, and the USA were randomized centrally (interactive voice response system) 1:1 to oral ruxolitinib twice daily (15 or 20 mg per baseline platelet counts) or placebo. Investigators and patients were blinded to treatment. The secondary endpoints evaluated in this analysis were durability of a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume (spleen response) and overall survival, evaluated in the intent-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in patients who received study treatment. Results Patients were randomized (September 2009–April 2010) to ruxolitinib ( n  = 155) or placebo ( n  = 154). At termination, 27.7% of ruxolitinib-randomized patients and 25.2% (28/111) who crossed over from placebo were on treatment; no patients remained on placebo. Patients randomized to ruxolitinib had a median spleen response duration of 168.3 weeks and prolonged median overall survival versus placebo (ruxolitinib group, not reached; placebo group, 200 weeks; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50–0.96; P  = 0.025) despite the crossover to ruxolitinib. The ruxolitinib safety profile remained consistent with previous analyses. The most common new-onset all-grade nonhematologic adverse events starting <12 versus ≥48 months after ruxolitinib initiation were fatigue (29.0 vs 33.3%) and diarrhea (27.8 vs 14.6%). New-onset grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia both primarily occurred within the first 6 months, with no cases after 42 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event-related deaths in the ruxolitinib-randomized group were sepsis (2.6%), disease progression (1.9%), and pneumonia (1.9%). Conclusion The final COMFORT-I results continue to support ruxolitinib as an effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2/high-risk MF. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00952289

The treatment landscape for myelofibrosis (MF) has reached the molecular era by targeting different pathways that are implied in this myeloproliferative neoplasm. A few years ago, the first-in-class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, demonstrated reductions in both constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, leading to the US FDA approval. The development or worsening of cytopenias in patients receiving ruxolitinib uncovered an unmet need that has been addressed by alternative approaches. Pacritinib, a dual JAK2 and FLT3 inhibitor which also inhibits IRAK1, has demonstrated the ability to favorably impact MF-associated splenomegaly and symptom burden, while having limited myelosuppression with manageable gastrointestinal toxicity. Herein, we provide an overview of pacritinib, from early preclinical studies to the latest and ongoing PAC203 trial, as an emerging therapy for MF.

Spleen enlargement is often detected in patients with liver cirrhosis, but the precise pathogenetic mechanisms behind the phenomenon have not been clearly elucidated. We investigated the pathogenetic mechanisms of splenomegaly in both portal hypertensive patients and rats, and tried to identify the possible therapy for this disease. Spleen samples were collected from portal hypertensive patients after splenectomy. Rat models of portal hypertension were induced by common bile duct ligation and partial portal vein ligation. Spleen samples from patients and rats were used to study the characteristics of splenomegaly by histological, immunohistochemical, and western blot analyses. Rapamycin or vehicle was administered to rats to determine the contribution of mTOR signaling pathway in the development of splenomegaly. We found that not only spleen congestion, but also increasing angiogenesis, fibrogenesis, inflammation and proliferation of splenic lymphoid tissue contributed to the development of splenomegaly in portal hypertensive patients and rats. Intriguingly, splenomegaly developed time-dependently in portal hypertensive rat that accompanied with progressive activation of mTOR signaling pathway. mTOR blockade by rapamycin profoundly ameliorated splenomegaly by limiting lymphocytes proliferation, angiogenesis, fibrogenesis and inflammation as well as decreasing portal pressure. This study provides compelling evidence indicating that mTOR signaling activation pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of splenomegaly in both portal hypertensive patients and rats. Therapeutic intervention targeting mTOR could be a promising strategy for patients with portal hypertension and splenomegaly.

A Man with Recurrent Fever and Liver LesionsA 73-year-old man was admitted because of 22 months of recurrent fever and progressive hypodensities in the liver. A liver-biopsy specimen showed nonnecrotizing granulomas. A diagnosis was made.

We previously reported that SM934, a water-soluble artemisinin derivative, was a viable treatment in murine lupus models. In the current study, we further investigated the therapeutic effects of a modified dosage regimen of SM934 on lupus-prone MRL/ lpr mice and explored its effects on B cell responses, a central pathogenic event in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). When orally administered twice-daily, SM934 significantly prolonged the life-span of MRL/ lpr mice, ameliorated the lymphadenopathy symptoms and decreased the levels of serum anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) and of the pathogenic cytokines IL-6, IL-10 and IL-21. Furthermore, SM934 treatment restored the B-cell compartment in the spleen of MRL/ lpr mice by increasing quiescent B cell numbers, maintaining germinal center B-cell numbers, decreasing activated B cell numbers and reducing plasma cell (PC) numbers. Ex vivo , SM934 suppressed the Toll-like receptor (TLR)-triggered activation and proliferation of B cells, as well as antibody secretion. Moreover, the present study demonstrated that SM934 interfered with the B-cell intrinsic pathway by downregulating TLR7/9 mRNA expression, MyD88 protein expression and NF-κB phosphorylation. In human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), consistent with the results in MRL/ lpr mice, SM934 inhibited TLR-associated B-cell activation and PC differentiation. In conclusion, a twice daily dosing regimen of SM934 had therapeutic effects on lupus-prone MRL/ lpr mice by suppressing B cell activation and plasma cell formation.

Background & aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play an increasingly important role in the treatment of primary liver cancer (PLC). Some patients with PLC experience symptoms of splenomegaly. Splenomegaly may affect the efficacy of ICIs due to an imbalance of the immune microenvironment. Currently, there is a lack of evidence on the relationship between splenomegaly and prognosis in patients with PLC treated with ICIs. This study analyzed the relationship between splenomegaly and prognosis in patients with PLC treated with ICIs. Methods In this retrospective cohort study of 161 patients with PLC treated with ICIs, splenomegaly was diagnosed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and the impact of splenomegaly on patient survival was analyzed. Results Through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we determined that splenomegaly was associated with shortened overall survival (p = 0.002) and progression‐free survival (p = 0.013) in patients with PLC treated with ICIs. Kaplan–Meier analysis further validated our results. The overall survival and progression‐free survival of patients with splenomegaly were significantly shorter than those of patients without splenomegaly (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions We concluded that splenomegaly was a predictor of prognosis in patients with PLC treated with ICIs. This is the first study to report this important finding. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with splenomegaly had worse OS than those without splenomegaly.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by mutations (most frequently in JAK2, CALR, or MPL), burdensome symptoms, splenomegaly, cytopenia, and shortened life expectancy. In addition to other clinical manifestations, patients with MF often develop anemia, which can either be directly related to MF pathogenesis or a result of MF treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib. Although symptoms and clinical manifestations can be similar between the 2 anemia types, only MF-related anemia is prognostic of reduced survival. In this review, I detail treatment and patient management approaches for both types of anemia presentations and provide recommendations for the treatment of MF in the presence of anemia.