Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Each year, 45,000 women worldwide develop vulvar cancer, often occurred from vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (vHSIL), a precancerous stage associated with high- risk human papillomavirus (HPV). Recurrent vHSIL, experienced by over 30% of patients despite treatment, conducting in significant physical and psychosocial challenges. With no established method to reduce recurrence, our study investigates the potential of adjuvant HPV vaccination during treatment. We aim to determine whether nonavalent HPV vaccination can effectively prevent vHSIL recurrence in women treated for vulvar HSIL. Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study protocol involving 498 women diagnosed with vHSIL. Participants will be randomized to receive either the nonavalent HPV vaccine or a placebo in addition to standard treatment. The primary outcome is the recurrence of vHSIL within 24 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints are treatment effectiveness, immune response, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life. Long-term follow-up examines vaccine effect after 5 and 10 years, along with the occurrence of vulvar malignancies. Relative risk between vaccinated and placebo groups will be evaluated, employing intention-to-treat principles. Discussion This study is designed to investigate the potential benefits of HPV vaccination in managing vHSIL. Results from the trial will provide evidence on the vaccine’s impact on recurrence rates, treatment outcomes, and long-term prevention of vulvar malignancies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT06052696. Registered 12 January 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06052696 .

Cervical cancer (CC) was considered to be the most common gynaecological cancer, with an estimated 342,000 deaths worldwide each year, as the majority of patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of multi-locus methylation assay for the early detection of CC. The cervical exfoliated cell samples from 492 HPV-positive females with cervical lesions were collected and subjected to methylation detection of gene FAM19A4, EPB41L3 and PAX1 after bisulfite conversion. The levels of gene methylation in patients with different severity of cervical lesions were evaluated and compared. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was established and efficacy indexes such as sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of DNA methylation detection at multiple gene loci for CC. The methylation levels of FAM19A4, EPB41L3 and PAX1 were significantly increased with the grade of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. The sensitivities of FAM19A4, EPB41L3 and PAX1 alone for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and CC diagnosis were 84.6%, 86.3% and 88.0%, respectively; when three markers were combined by a logistic regression model, the sensitivity was 88.0%, with a high specificity of 97.7% and AUC of 0.957 (95% CI 0.937–0.977). Methylation status of FAM19A4, EPB41L3 and PAX1 were highly specific and effective for monitoring the progression of cervical lesions and the tri-gene methylation assay could be used as a triage tool for CC early screening.

Objective To assess the clinical value of DNA methylation measurement in exfoliated cervical cells for distinguishing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) from other cervical abnormalities. Methods A total of 276 patients were enrolled, and general clinical information was collected. Exfoliated cervical cells were obtained to assess human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, conduct ThinPrep cytology tests (TCT), and measure methylation levels of JAM3 (△CtJ) and PAX1 (△CtP). Logistic regression was performed to identify factors significantly associated with HSIL diagnosis. A conditional inference tree model and the area under the curve (AUC) were employed to evaluate the efficacy of JAM3 and PAX1 methylation in detecting HSIL. Results Independent risk factors for HSIL diagnosis included △CtJ, △CtP, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and HPV16 infection. The conditional inference tree indicated that 96.4% of patients were non-HSIL when △CtJ > 11.66, and 99.1% were non-HSIL when △CtP > 10.97. The diagnostic performance of △CtJ/△CtP surpassed that of TCT/HPV alone. Among six methods, the combination of △CtP, TCT, and high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) testing achieved the highest sensitivity (91.2%), positive predictive value (50.0%), negative predictive value (98.6%), and AUC (0.932). Conclusion In women with hr-HPV infection, DNA methylation analysis of cervical cytology outperformed traditional TCT or HPV testing. The combination of △CtP with TCT and HPV may offer the most accurate screening approach for HSIL.

Background Cervical cancer screening programs are increasingly relying on sensitive molecular approaches as primary tests to detect high-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPV), the causative agents of cervix cancer. Although hrHPV infection is a pre-requisite for the development of most precancerous lesions, the mere detection of viral nucleic acids, also present in transient infections, is not specific of the underlying cellular state, resulting in poor positive predictive values (PPV) regarding lesional states. There is a need to increase the specificity of molecular tests for better stratifying individuals at risk of cancer and to adapt follow-up strategies. Methods HPV-RNA-SEQ, a targeted RNA next generation sequencing assay allowing the detection of up to 16 hrHPV splice events and key human transcripts, has previously shown encouraging PPV for the detection of precancerous lesions. Herein, on 302 patients with normal cytology (NILM, n  = 118), low-grade (LSIL, n  = 104) or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL, n  = 80), machine learning-based model improvement was applied to reach 2-classes (NILM vs HSIL) or 3-classes (NILM, LSIL, HSIL) predictive models. Results Linear (elastic net) and nonlinear (random forest) approaches resulted in five 2-class models that detect HSIL vs NILM in a validation set with specificity up to 0.87, well within the range of PPV of other competing RNA-based tests in a screening population. Conclusions HPV-RNA-SEQ improves the detection of HSIL lesions and has the potential to complete and eventually replace current molecular approaches as a first-line test. Further performance evaluation remains to be done on larger and prospective cohorts.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative human papillomavirus (IOP-HPV) testing for the prediction of postoperative treatment failure in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) undergoing loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP). Methods A total of 114 women diagnosed with HSIL by biopsy and/or endocervical curettage who underwent LEEP were included in a prospective cohort study. IOP-HPV testing was performed immediately after the procedure. Patients were followed up for 24 months. Logistic regression was used to analyse the factors influencing the residual or recurrent lesions. Further stratified analyses were performed to investigate the differences in prognosis of IOP-HPV positivity in patients of different age and menopausal status. Results 1. Of the 114 patients, 6 (5.26%) were pathologically upgraded to cervical cancer, and 21 (18.42%) were lost to follow-up. Recurrence or residual HSIL lesions occurred in 9.20% (8/87) of cases. Of the 8 women who developed post-treatment HSIL, 7 (26.92%) were positive for IOP-HPV, and only 1 (1.64%) was negative for IOP-HPV (< 0.01). 2. Transformation zones of type 2 ( P  = 0.0306) or type 3 ( P  = 0.0446), diagnosed as LSIL/negative by cervical biopsy ( P  = 0.0396), margin involvement ( P  = 0.0233), positive endocervical curettage after conisation ( P  = 0.0028), intraoperative HPV-positive ( P  < 0.01), cytological abnormalities ( P  = 0.0038), DNA ploidy positivity ( P  = 0.0172), postoperative HPV ( P  < 0.01) and DNA ploidy ( P  = 0.0078) positivity at 6 months were associated with higher risk of residual or recurrent lesions.  3. The results of the multivariate regression analysis showed that IOP-HPV positivity was the independent risk factor for residual or recurrent lesions (OR=10.69 , 95% CI:3.41, 33.51, P<0.01). IOP-HPV positivity was strongly associated with the occurrence of residual/recurrent LSIL (OR=6.42 , 95% CI:1.74, 23.70, P =0.0053) and HSIL (OR=32.08 , 95% CI:3.60, 285.64, P =0.0019). 4. Stratified analyses showed that IOP-HPV positive in patients younger than 50 years or premenopausal patients was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence or residual lesions ( p <0.05). Conclusions IOP-HPV positivity is an independent risk factor for residual or recurrent HSIL lesions. In addition, IOP-HPV positivity was more associated with residual or recurrent lesions in those younger than 50 years or premenopausal. IOP-HPV testing may be of critical clinical value in providing the early and accurate prediction of residual or recurrent lesions.

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) significantly reduces the incidence of HPV-related lesions worldwide. Considering the increasingly young age of patients in gynecological offices and earlier sexual initiation and potential contact with the HPV virus, doctors need the tools to verify diagnoses. Currently, women plan to pursue motherhood later, so it is necessary to consider whether sexual treatment in the form of, among others, loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEPs) may increase the risk of premature birth or difficulty dilating the cervix during labour. For this reason, to avoid the overtreatment of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), methylation testing may be considered. In patients with histopathologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) during biopsy and, ultimately, a lower diagnosis, i.e., LSIL or no signs of atypia, methylation was found to be a useful tool. We performed a Pap smear, HPV genotyping, a punch biopsy, LEEP-conization (if needed), and methylation tests on 108 women admitted to the District Public Hospital in Poland. Women with a negative methylation test result were significantly more likely to be ultimately diagnosed with LSIL (p = 0.013). This means that in 85.7% of the patients with HSIL, major cervical surgery could be avoided if the methylation test was negative. Methylation testing, as well as dual-staining and diagnostics detecting the mRNA transcripts of highly oncogenic types of HPV, might be used in the future in the diagnosis of pre-cancerous conditions, mainly of the cervix, and in HPV-dependent cervical cancer screening. The methylation test may also be used in the diagnosis and identification of lesions within the cervical canal, including those located deep within the frontal crypts, not visible even during a professional colposcopic evaluation of the cervix.

Using a retrospective cohort of 21,282 individuals aged 10–89 years (634 males, 20,648 females) from Jilin Province between October 2017 and September 2019, we performed HPV genotyping and colposcopy-directed biopsy to delineate age- and genotype-specific infection patterns. High-risk HPV prevalence peaked in adolescence (≤ 18 years) and declined thereafter, whereas low-risk types showed modest age trends ( P  < 0.001); women had higher rates than men at every age ( P  < 0.001). HPV16, 18, 33 and 58 were strongly linked to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or cervical cancer, with adjusted ORs (Model II) of 2.41, 0.53, 2.32 and 1.72, respectively. A U-shaped, nonlinear age relationship emerged, with infection risk threshold ages (fold K) at 26, 42, 30 and 37 years. These findings indicate that HPV vaccination and screening should prioritize women ≤ 26 years and re-engage those > 37 years.

Using primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening increases detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplastic lesions and invasive cancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) compared to cytology, but no evaluation has been conducted in a population previously offered HPV vaccination. We aimed to assess colposcopy referral and CIN2+ detection rates for HPV-screened versus cytology-screened women in Australia's HPV-vaccinated population (by 2014, resident women ≤33 years had been age-eligible for HPV vaccination, with 3-dose uptake across age cohorts being about 50%-77%). Compass is an open-label randomised trial of 5-yearly HPV screening versus 2.5-yearly liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening. In the first phase, consenting women aged 25-64 years presenting for routine screening at 47 primary practices in Victoria, Australia, provided a cervical sample and were randomised at a central laboratory at a 1:2:2 allocation to (i) image-read LBC screening with HPV triage of low-grade cytology ('LBC screening'), (ii) HPV screening with those HPV16/18 positive referred to colposcopy and with LBC triage for other oncogenic (OHR) types ('HPV+LBC triage'), or (iii) HPV screening with those HPV16/18 positive referred to colposcopy and with dual-stained cytology triage for OHR types ('HPV+DS triage'). A total of 5,006 eligible women were recruited from 29 October 2013 to 7 November 2014 (recruitment rate 58%); of these, 22% were in the group age-eligible for vaccination. Data on 4,995 participants were analysed after 11 withdrawals; 998 were assigned to, and 995 analysed (99.7%) in, the LBC-screened group; 1,996 assigned to and 1,992 analysed (99.8%) in the HPV+LBC triage group; and 2,012 assigned to and 2,008 analysed (99.8%) in the HPV+DS triage group. No serious trial-related adverse events were reported. The main outcomes were colposcopy referral and detected CIN2+ rates at baseline screening, assessed on an intention-to-treat basis after follow-up of the subgroup of triage-negative women in each arm referred to 12 months of surveillance, and after a further 6 months of follow-up for histological outcomes (dataset closed 31 August 2016). Analysis was adjusted for whether women had been age-eligible for HPV vaccination or not. For the LBC-screened group, the overall referral and detected CIN2+ rates were 27/995 (2.7% [95% CI 1.8%-3.9%]) and 1/995 (0.1% [95% CI 0.0%-0.6%]), respectively; for HPV+LBC triage, these were 75/1,992 (3.8% [95% CI 3.0%-4.7%]) and 20/1,992 (1.0% [95% CI 0.6%-1.5%]); and for HPV+DS triage, these were 79/2,008 (3.9% [95% CI 3.1%-4.9%]) and 24/2,008 (1.2% [95% CI 0.8%-1.6%]) (p = 0.09 for difference in referral rate in LBC versus all HPV-screened women; p = 0.003 for difference in CIN2+ detection rate in LBC versus all HPV-screened women, with p = 0.62 between HPV screening groups). Limitations include that the study population involved a relatively low risk group in a previously well-screened and treated population, that individual women's vaccination status was unknown, and that long-term follow-up data on disease detection in screen-negative women are not yet available. In this study, primary HPV screening was associated with significantly increased detection of high-grade precancerous cervical lesions compared to cytology, in a population where high vaccine uptake was reported in women aged 33 years or younger who were offered vaccination. It had been predicted that increased disease detection might be associated with a transient increase in colposcopy referral rates in the first round of HPV screening, possibly dampened by HPV vaccine effect; in this study, although the point estimates for referral rates in women in each HPV-screened group were 41%-44% higher than in cytology-screened women, the difference in referral rate between cytology- and HPV-screened women was not significant. These findings provide initial support for the implementation of primary HPV screening in vaccinated populations. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001207707.

Cervical cancer is the most common female malignancy in the developing nations and the third most common cancer in women globally. An effective, inexpensive and self-applied topical treatment would be an ideal solution for treatment of screen-detected, pre-invasive cervical disease in low resource settings. Between 01/03/2013 and 01/08/2013, women attending Kenyatta National Hospital's Family Planning and Gynaecology Outpatients clinics were tested for HIV, HPV (Cervista®) and liquid based cervical cytology (LBC-ThinPrep®). HIV negative women diagnosed as high-risk HPV positive with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were examined by colposcopy and given a 2 week course of 1 capsule of Lopimune (CIPLA) twice daily, to be self-applied as a vaginal pessary. Colposcopy, HPV testing and LBC were repeated at 4 and 12 weeks post-start of treatment with a final punch biopsy at 3 months for histology. Primary outcome measures were acceptability of treatment with efficacy as a secondary consideration. A total of 23 women with HSIL were treated with Lopimune during which time no adverse reactions were reported. A maximum concentration of 10 ng/ml of lopinavir was detected in patient plasma 1 week after starting treatment. HPV was no longer detected in 12/23 (52.2%, 95%CI: 30.6-73.2%). Post-treatment cytology at 12 weeks on women with HSIL, showed 14/22 (63.6%, 95%CI: 40.6-82.8%) had no dysplasia and 4/22 (18.2%, 95%CI: 9.9-65.1%) were now low grade demonstrating a combined positive response in 81.8% of women of which 77.8% was confirmed by histology. These data are supported by colposcopic images, which show regression of cervical lesions. These results demonstrate the potential of Lopimune as a self-applied therapy for HPV infection and related cervical lesions. Since there were no serious adverse events or detectable post-treatment morbidity, this study indicates that further trials are clearly justified to define optimal regimes and the overall benefit of this therapy. ISRCTN Registry 48776874.

Abstract Background Screening and treating premalignant cervical lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ [CIN2+]) is an effective way to prevent cervical cancer, and recommendations exist for the monitoring of treatment success. Yet, there is no specific recommendation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women, who are at a known, increased risk of cervical cancer. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies published from January 1980 through May 2018. Eligible studies described the prevalence of histologically- and/or cytologically-defined lesions in HIV-infected women at least 6 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as the presence of residual and/or recurrent high-grade CIN2+/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions post-treatment. The pooled prevalence in HIV-infected women and the odds ratios (ORs) for HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected women were estimated using random-effects models. Results Among 40 eligible studies, the pooled prevalence of treatment failure in HIV-infected women was 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8–27.0). There was no significant difference in the treatment failure prevalence for cryotherapy (13.9%, 95% CI 6.1–21.6) versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure (13.8%, 95% CI 8.9–18.7; P = .9), but the treatment failure prevalence was significantly higher in women with positive (47.2%, 95% CI 22.0–74.0) than with negative (19.4%, 95% CI 11.8–30.2) excision margin (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5–7.7). Treatment failure was significantly increased in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected women, both overall (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0–3.5) and in all sub-group analyses. Conclusions There is strong evidence for an increased risk of treatment failure in HIV-infected women, in comparison to their HIV-negative counterparts. The only significant predictor of treatment failure in HIV-infected women was a positive margin status, but further data is needed on long-term outcomes after ablative treatment in HIV-infected women. Residual or recurrent premalignant cervical lesions are detected in around one-fifth of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women treated for precancerous cervical lesions, who are twice as likely to suffer treatment failure as HIV-uninfected women, regardless of the treatment method.