Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background. Community-associated Staphylococcus aureus infections often affect multiple members of a household. We compared 2 approaches to S. aureus eradication: decolonizing the entire household versus decolonizing the index case alone. Methods. An open-label, randomized trial enrolled 183 pediatric patients (cases) with community-onset S. aureus skin abscesses and colonization of anterior nares, axillae, or inguinal folds from 2008 to 2009 at primary and tertiary centers. Participants were randomized to decolonization of the case alone (index group) or of all household members (household group). The 5-day regimen included hygiene education, twice-daily intranasal mupirocin, and daily chlorhexidine body washes. Colonization of cases and subsequent skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) in cases and household contacts were ascertained at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results. Among 147 cases with 1-month colonization data, modified intention-to-treat analysis revealed S. aureus eradication in 50% of cases in the index group and 51% in the household group (P = 1.00). Among 126 cases completing 12-month follow-up, S. aureus was eradicated from 54% of the index group versus 66% of the household group (P = .28). Over 12 months, recurrent SSTI was reported in 72% of cases in the index group and 52% in the household group (P = .02). SSTI incidence in household contacts was significantly lower in the household versus index group during the first 6 months; this trend continued at 12 months. Conclusions. Household decolonization was not more effective than individual decolonization in eradicating community-associated S. aureus carriage from cases. However, household decolonization reduced the incidence of subsequent SSTI in cases and their household contacts. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00731783.

Staphylococcus aureus colonizes patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and exacerbates disease by promoting inflammation. The present study investigated the safety and mechanisms of action of Staphylococcus hominis A9 ( Sh A9), a bacterium isolated from healthy human skin, as a topical therapy for AD. Sh A9 killed S. aureus on the skin of mice and inhibited expression of a toxin from S. aureus ( psm α) that promotes inflammation. A first-in-human, phase 1, double-blinded, randomized 1-week trial of topical Sh A9 or vehicle on the forearm skin of 54 adults with S. aureus -positive AD (NCT03151148) met its primary endpoint of safety, and participants receiving Sh A9 had fewer adverse events associated with AD. Eczema severity was not significantly different when evaluated in all participants treated with Sh A9 but a significant decrease in S. aureus and increased Sh A9 DNA were seen and met secondary endpoints. Some S. aureus strains on participants were not directly killed by Sh A9, but expression of mRNA for psm α was inhibited in all strains. Improvement in local eczema severity was suggested by post-hoc analysis of participants with S. aureus directly killed by Sh A9. These observations demonstrate the safety and potential benefits of bacteriotherapy for AD. First-in-human test of topical application of a commensal bacterium on skin of individuals with atopic dermatitis reduces colonization by proinflammatory Staphylococcus aureus .

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a promising therapeutic modality for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections, but its application is mainly limited to personalized therapy due to the narrow host range of individual phages. While phage cocktails targeting all possible bacterial receptors could theoretically confer broad coverage, the extensive diversity of bacteria and the complexity of phage-phage interactions render this approach challenging. Here, using screening protocols for identifying “complementarity groups” of phages using non-redundant receptors, we generate effective, broad-range phage cocktails that prevent the emergence of bacterial resistance. We also discover characteristic interactions between phage complementarity groups and particular antibiotic classes, facilitating the prediction of phage-antibiotic as well as phage-phage interactions. Using this strategy, we create three phage-antibiotic cocktails, each demonstrating efficacy against ≥96% of 153 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, including biofilm cultures, and demonstrate comparable efficacy in an in vivo wound infection model. We similarly develop effective Staphylococcus aureus phage-antibiotic cocktails and demonstrate their utility of combined cocktails against polymicrobial (mixed P. aeruginosa/S. aureus ) cultures, highlighting the broad applicability of this approach. These studies establish a blueprint for the development of effective, broad-spectrum phage-antibiotic cocktails, paving the way for off-the-shelf phage-based therapeutics to combat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. The application of phage therapy for multidrug-resistant infections is mainly limited to personalized therapy due to the narrow host range of individual phages. Here, Kim et al. identify groups of phages that use non-redundant receptors, and present a blueprint for the development of effective, broad-spectrum phage-antibiotic combinations.

Background Periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a devastating complication. Reported rates of infection control range from 80% to 95% but mortality rates associated with treatment of infected THA are also substantial and we suspect underreported. Questions/Purposes For patients selected for two-stage treatment of infected THA we therefore determined (1) mortality; (2) rate of reimplantation; and (3) rate of reinfection. Methods We identified 202 patients (205 hips) with infected primary or revision THA treated with a two-stage protocol between 1996 and 2009 in our prospectively collected practice registry. Patients underwent two-stage treatment for infection, including removal of all implants and foreign material with implantation of an antibiotic-laden cement spacer in the first stage followed by intravenous culture-specific antibiotics for a minimum of 6 weeks. Second-stage reimplantation was performed if erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were trending toward normal and the wound was well healed. Thirteen patients (13 hips) were lost to followup before 24 months. The minimum followup in surviving patients was 24 months or failure (average, 53 months; range, 24–180 months). Results Fourteen patients (7%; 14 hips) died before reimplantation and two were not candidates because of medical comorbidities. The 90-day mortality rate after the first-stage débridement was 4% (eight patients). Of the 186 patients (189 hips) who underwent reimplantation, 157 (83%) achieved control of the infection. Including all patients who underwent the first stage, survival and infection control after two-stage reimplantation was 76%. Conclusion Two-stage treatment of deep infection in primary and revision THA is associated with substantial mortality and a substantial failure rate from both reinfection and inability to perform the second stage. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUNDNovel therapeutic approaches are critically needed for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs), particularly for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Exebacase, a first-in-class antistaphylococcal lysin, is a direct lytic agent that is rapidly bacteriolytic, eradicates biofilms, and synergizes with antibiotics.METHODSIn this superiority-design study, we randomly assigned 121 patients with S. aureus BSI/endocarditis to receive a single dose of exebacase or placebo. All patients received standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical outcome (responder rate) on day 14.RESULTSClinical responder rates on day 14 were 70.4% and 60.0% in the exebacase + antibiotics and antibiotics-alone groups, respectively (difference = 10.4, 90% CI [-6.3, 27.2], P = 0.31), and were 42.8 percentage points higher in the prespecified exploratory MRSA subgroup (74.1% vs. 31.3%, difference = 42.8, 90% CI [14.3, 71.4], ad hoc P = 0.01). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar in both groups. No AEs of hypersensitivity to exebacase were reported. Thirty-day all-cause mortality rates were 9.7% and 12.8% in the exebacase + antibiotics and antibiotics-alone groups, respectively, with a notable difference in MRSA patients (3.7% vs. 25.0%, difference = -21.3, 90% CI [-45.1, 2.5], ad hoc P = 0.06). Among MRSA patients in the United States, median length of stay was 4 days shorter and 30-day hospital readmission rates were 48% lower in the exebacase-treated group compared with antibiotics alone.CONCLUSIONThis study establishes proof of concept for exebacase and direct lytic agents as potential therapeutics and supports conduct of a confirmatory study focused on exebacase to treat MRSA BSIs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicaltrials.gov NCT03163446.FUNDINGContraFect Corporation.

In this double-blind, randomized trial, vancomycin was added to cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis for arthroplasty. Surgical-site infections occurred in 4.5% of vancomycin recipients and 3.5% of placebo recipients.

Abstract Rationale To identify pathogens that require different treatments in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), we propose an acronym, “PES” (P  seudomonas aeruginosa, E  nterobacteriaceae extended-spectrum β-lactamase–positive, and methicillin-resistant S  taphylococcus aureus). Objectives To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients with CAP caused by PES versus other pathogens, and to identify the risk factors associated with infection caused by PES. Methods We conducted an observational prospective study evaluating only immunocompetent patients with CAP and an established etiological diagnosis. We included patients from nursing homes. We computed a score to identify patients at risk of PES pathogens. Measurement and Main Results: Of the 4,549 patients evaluated, we analyzed 1,597 who presented an etiological diagnosis. Pneumonia caused by PES was identified in 94 (6%) patients, with 108 PES pathogens isolated (n = 72 P. aeruginosa, n = 15 E  nterobacteriaceae extended-spectrum β-lactamase positive, and n = 21 methicillin-resistant S  taphylococcus aureus). These patients were older (P = 0.001), had received prior antibiotic treatment more frequently (P < 0.001), and frequently presented with acute renal failure (P = 0.004). PES pathogens were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 2.51; 95% confidence interval = 1.20–5.25; P = 0.015). The area under the curve for the score we computed was 0.759 (95% confidence interval, 0.713–0.806; P < 0.001). Conclusions PES pathogens are responsible for a small proportion of CAP, resulting in high mortality. These pathogens require a different antibiotic treatment, and identification of specific risk factors could help to identify these microbial etiologies.

Colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is associated with increased infection risk after hospital discharge. In a multicenter, randomized trial, a program of MRSA decolonization at home led to a significantly lower risk of MRSA infection over a 1-year period than hygiene education alone.

In this trial involving 387 patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, ceftobiprole, a cephalosporin active against methicillin-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus , was noninferior to daptomycin.