Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
15,633 result(s) for "Still-birth"
Sort by:
Epidemiology of stillbirths in india: findings of a multisite hospital-based sentinel surveillance from 2016 to 2020 in North India
Background and aims Stillbirth rate is an indicator reflecting quality of maternal healthcare services available to a pregnant woman in a country. At the community and individual level, it continues to be a public health tragedy. This paper presents the stillbirth rate, its causes and characteristics of women who experienced stillbirth from five years data of hospital-based stillbirth surveillance system. We also attempted to study the association between number of antenatal check-ups and causes of stillbirths, period of gestation and maternal parameters like presence of anaemia at the time of delivery. Methodology A multisite hospital-based sentinel surveillance system for estimating the stillbirth rate and its causes was established across seven tertiary care government hospitals of Delhi, India in 2015. A standardized stillbirth form was used to record information, and data was collected using an online portal from all hospitals. The data from 2016 to 2020 was analysed for calculating the stillbirth rate, its causes and maternal characteristics using STATA version 17. Results Of the 12,569 stillbirths recorded among 416,677 deliveries, the still birth rate over the time period 2016–2020 was 29.3 per 1000 births. Nearly 50% women who experienced stillbirths did not receive any antenatal care. Antepartum stillbirths were more common (75.7%), the remaining were the intrapartum stillbirths (24.3%). Among antepartum causes, the most prevalent maternal cause was preterm labour (25.7%) followed by placental abruption/placenta previa/hemorrhage in 15.2%. Among foetal causes, majority of the still births were due to fetal growth restriction (31.2%) followed by congenital malformations (7%). Uterine rupture and eclampsia were reported as major intrapartum causes leading to still births in 11% and 8.3% cases, respectively. Conclusions The stillbirth rate of 29.3 per 1,000 births from hospital data underscores the need for community-based surveillance. Nearly half of pregnant women lacked antenatal care, and 75% of stillbirths were antepartum, stressing the need to strengthen antenatal care- both coverage and quality. Routine symphysio-fundal height measurements, mandatory third-trimester ultrasounds, and partograph use may help reduce intrapartum stillbirths.
Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences
Background 2.7 million babies were stillborn in 2015 worldwide; behind these statistics lie the experiences of bereaved parents. The first Lancet series on stillbirth in 2011 described stillbirth as one of the “most shamefully neglected” areas of public health, recommended improving interaction between families and frontline caregivers and made a plea for increased investment in relevant research. Methods A systematic review of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies researching parents and healthcare professionals experiences of care after stillbirth in high-income westernised countries (Europe, North America, Australia and South Africa) was conducted. The review was designed to inform research, training and improve care for parents who experience stillbirth. Results Four thousand four hundred eighty eight abstracts were identified; 52 studies were eligible for inclusion. Synthesis and quantitative aggregation (meta-summary) was used to extract findings and calculate frequency effect sizes (FES%) for each theme (shown in italics), a measure of the prevalence of that finding in the included studies. Researchers’ areas of interest may influence reporting of findings in the literature and result in higher FES sizes, such as; support memory making (53 %) and fathers have different needs (18 %). Other parental findings were more unexpected; Parents want increased public awareness (20 %) and for stillbirth care to be prioritised (5 %). Parental findings highlighted lessons for staff; prepare parents for vaginal birth (23 %), discuss concerns (13 %), give options & time (20 %), privacy not abandonment (30 %), tailored post-mortem discussions (20 %) and post-natal information (30 %). Parental and staff findings were often related; behaviours and actions of staff have a memorable impact on parents (53 %) whilst staff described emotional, knowledge and system-based barriers to providing effective care (100 %). Parents reported distress being caused by midwives hiding behind ‘doing’ and ritualising guidelines whilst staff described distancing themselves from parents and focusing on tasks as coping strategies. Parents and staff both identified the need for improved training (parents 25 % & staff 57 %); continuity of care (parents 15 % & staff 36 %); supportive systems & structures (parents 50 %); and c lear care pathways (parents 5 %). Conclusions Parents’ and healthcare workers’ experiences of stillbirth can inform training, improve the provision of care and highlight areas for future research.
From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride – a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth
Background Despite improvements in maternity healthcare services over the last few decades, more than 2.7 million babies worldwide are stillborn each year. The global health agenda is silent about stillbirth, perhaps, in part, because its wider impact has not been systematically analysed or understood before now across the world. Our study aimed to systematically review, evaluate and summarise the current evidence regarding the psychosocial impact of stillbirth to parents and their families, with the aim of improving guidance in bereavement care worldwide. Methods Systematic review and meta-summary (quantitative aggregation of qualitative findings) of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. All languages and countries were included. Results Two thousand, six hundred and nineteen abstracts were identified; 144 studies were included. Frequency effect sizes (FES %) were calculated for each theme, as a measure of their prevalence in the literature. Themes ranged from negative psychological symptoms post bereavement (77 · 1) and in subsequent pregnancies (27 · 1), to disenfranchised grief (31 · 2), and incongruent grief (28 · 5), There was also impact on siblings (23 · 6) and on the wider family (2 · 8). They included mixed-feelings about decisions made when the baby died (12 · 5), avoidance of memories (13 · 2), anxiety over other children (7 · 6), chronic pain and fatigue (6 · 9), and a different approach to the use of healthcare services (6 · 9). Some themes were particularly prominent in studies of fathers; grief suppression (avoidance)(18 · 1), employment difficulties, financial debt (5 · 6), and increased substance use (4 · 2). Others found in studies specific to mothers included altered body image (3 · 5) and impact on quality of life (2 · 1). Counter-intuitively, Some themes had mixed connotations. These included parental pride in the baby (5 · 6), motivation for engagement in healthcare improvement (4 · 2) and changed approaches to life and death, self-esteem, and own identity (25 · 7). In studies from low/middle income countries, stigmatisation (13 · 2) and pressure to prioritise or delay conception (9) were especially prevalent. Conclusion Experiencing the birth of a stillborn child is a life-changing event. The focus of the consequences may vary with parent gender and country. Stillbirth can have devastating psychological, physical and social costs, with ongoing effects on interpersonal relationships and subsequently born children. However, parents who experience the tragedy of stillbirth can develop resilience and new life-skills and capacities. Future research should focus on developing interventions that may reduce the psychosocial cost of stillbirth.
Exploring pathways leading to stillbirths and gaps in postnatal care among affected women in a rural north Indian district: A qualitative study using the social autopsy lens
Globally, stillbirth is a silent yet significant contributor to perinatal mortality. India has several national maternal and child health programs, yet, the stillbirths remain poorly reviewed, subject to suboptimal surveillance, are under-reported, and often absent from many programmatic priorities. This study aimed to explore the pathways, delays leading to stillbirths and continuum of care in postpartum phase among affected women in a rural district of North India using a social autopsy tool. This qualitative study was a component of an ongoing implementation research to reduce stillbirth in Palwal district of Haryana. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 women who had experienced stillbirths using a specially designed social autopsy tool. Additionally, five healthcare providers were interviewed for getting a holistic insight on pathway leading to stillbirth. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 16 software, and both deductive (Three Delays Model framework) and inductive approaches were applied to identify delays and contextual factors influencing care-seeking, and postpartum experiences. The pathways identified as contributor stillbirths were: (i) low utilization of antenatal and delivery care, driven by cultural beliefs, low perceived risk, and gendered power dynamics; (ii) delays in accessing care due to poor transport, restrictive social norms, and infrastructural gaps; (iii) poor quality of care, characterized by disrespectful treatment, inappropriate referrals, and inadequate intrapartum management. Additionally, a complete absence of postpartum follow-up, grief support, or mental health care was found, reflecting a neglected dimension of postpartum maternal care following stillbirths. Stillbirths in this setting are the consequence of interlinked socio-cultural, health system, and gendered vulnerabilities. The implications of stillbirths extended beyond immediate consequences to include enduring mental health and social impacts, ultimately undermining women's confidence, well-being and preparedness for future pregnancies. There is an urgent need to integrate stillbirth reporting, respectful maternity care, and post-loss psychosocial support within India's maternal health programs. The primary implementation research was registered prospectively in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI): CTRI/2024/07/069796 [Registered on: 02/07/2024].
‘The grave must not be seen by anyone!’: Beliefs and practices about stillbirths in Eastern Uganda
Background Nearly half of all stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and accurate registration could inform reduction efforts. We explored the beliefs and practices surrounding stillbirths in Eastern Uganda, revealing cultural factors that could influence the accurate counting of stillbirths. Methods We conducted a qualitative study among women with a history of stillbirths, and men, women and community leaders with an experience of childbirth in Eastern Uganda. The study also included healthcare workers from three health facilities. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews and six focus group discussions to explore the beliefs and practices about stillbirths. All discussions and interviews were audio recorded and transcribed into English. Thematic analysis was done using NVivo R1 (2020) software for coding. Results We enrolled a total of 74 participants: 44 in six focus group discussions and 30 in in-depth interviews. Four themes emerged: first, the community believed that stillborn babies can be used for witchcraft or as a source of curses therefore stillbirths were hidden from the public. Second, women were useful in marriage only when they bore live children and were despised when they had a stillbirth leading to discord in marriage and stigma. Third, stillborn babies were not considered human and therefore, the baby was not named or buried in a coffin. Fourth, the spirit of the stillborn baby was considered harmful to the next siblings and their parents sought the services of traditional healers and witch doctors to protect these siblings. Conclusion The immediate tragedy of a stillbirth has long-term personal and societal effects on the mother, resulting in stigma, marital breakup and isolation. The secrecy about stillbirths may also contribute to underreporting of stillbirths. Efforts to improve documentation of stillbirths and support for families who have had stillbirths need to incorporate culturally sensitive interventions.
“Is she pregnant with Jesus?” exploring sociocultural obstacles to following medical advice in the context of stillbirth prevention in Nigeria
Background Each year 182,000 babies are stillborn in Nigeria, representing nearly 10% of the annual global stillbirth burden. Imo state in south-eastern Nigeria has one of the highest levels of maternal health service access in Nigeria, yet this has not translated into good pregnancy outcomes. Many stillbirth prevention initiatives in Nigeria focus on maternal health education but empirical evidence suggests that sociocultural factors impact healthcare choices and outcomes. This study aims to explore women’s and health workers’ perspectives of the sociocultural barriers to following medical advice during pregnancy and childbirth, and specifically how these barriers may contribute to an increased risk of stillbirth. This study is part of a broader community-based stillbirth prevention mixed-methods research in Imo State, Nigeria. Methods A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. 38 participants were purposively recruited; 20 women and 18 health workers. Audio recordings were transcribed, translated and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Four themes were identified: (1) trust, where scepticism about health worker motives or competence and trust in community informal networks were highlighted (2) power dynamics within families, with husbands and older female relatives influencing health decisions; (3) personal and community beliefs that undermine confidence in medical interventions, including a pervasive stigma associated with caesarean section; and (4) grassroots proposals for solutions, emphasising the importance of a whole-community approach to maternal health education, mobilising peer voices, engaging traditional leaders and training of traditional birth attendants. Conclusion This study provides insights into the sociocultural barriers to following medical advice during pregnancy in Nigeria, which include a lack of trust in health professionals, power dynamics within a woman’s family, and entrenched cultural and religious beliefs that oppose medical intervention. Women’s decisions about pregnancy and childbirth are heavily influenced by family and cultural norms. Culturally sensitive, community-wide interventions which aim to rebuild trust in the health system, involve women as decision-makers in antenatal care, and engage religious and traditional leaders would be beneficial for improving outcomes.
The application of the ICD-10 for antepartum stillbirth patients in a referral centre of Eastern China: a retrospective study from 2015 to 2022
Background The causes of some stillbirths are unclear, and additional work must be done to investigate the risk factors for stillbirths. Objective To apply the International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) for antepartum stillbirth at a referral center in eastern China. Methods Antepartum stillbirths were grouped according to the cause of death according to the International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) criteria. The main maternal condition at the time of antepartum stillbirth was assigned to each patient. Results Antepartum stillbirths were mostly classified as fetal deaths of unspecified cause, antepartum hypoxia. Although more than half of the mothers were without an identified condition at the time of the antepartum stillbirth, where there was a maternal condition associated with perinatal death, maternal medical and surgical conditions and maternal complications during pregnancy were most common. Of all the stillbirths, 51.2% occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation, the main causes of stillbirth at different gestational ages also differed. Autopsy and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were recommended in all stillbirths, but only 3.6% received autopsy and 10.5% underwent chromosomal microarray analysis. Conclusions The ICD-10 is helpful in classifying the causes of stillbirths, but more than half of the stillbirths in our study were unexplained; therefore, additional work must be done. And the ICD-10 score may need to be improved, such as by classifying stillbirths according to gestational age. Autopsy and CMA could help determine the cause of stillbirth, but the acceptance of these methods is currently low.
Understanding the clinical utility of stillbirth investigations: a scoping review
Background Investigating the causes of stillbirth is crucial for both parents and healthcare providers as it helps explain why the baby died, guides clinical care in future pregnancies, and aids in developing strategies to prevent stillbirth. The usefulness or utility of investigations for stillbirth is poorly defined and unclear. As a result, protocols for investigating the causes of stillbirth are currently based on clinical consensus and fail to prioritise investigative approaches that are most effective at determining a cause of death. Objectives The objectives of this scoping review were to identify the available evidence, key characteristics, and knowledge gaps regarding the utility of stillbirth investigations. Search strategy An a priori protocol was implemented and included a systematic search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane from inception until 28 May 2024. Selection criteria Studies examining stillbirth investigations, yield, and value were included. Data collection and analysis Data were collected using a purpose-built data extraction tool and an analysis was undertaken. Results 57 potentially eligible studies were identified, and 34 studies (with 11,410 stillbirths) were included. Three studies examined clinical utility using a comprehensive testing protocol. Definition of utility or value of investigations varied across the studies, classification system for cause of death and investigation protocols varied. Placental pathology was reported as the most useful investigation in 65%–96% of cases, identified a cause of death in 61–71% of cases and impacting the medical management in 36% of cases (13 studies, 5,169 stillbirths). Autopsy can identify the cause of death in 36–77% of cases and provided new information in 17–26% of cases (17 studies, 4,336 stillbirths). Genetic analysis was useful in 29% of cases (seven studies, 1,886 stillbirths). One study (512 stillbirths) examined the value of investigation by presenting clinical scenario. Conclusions This review indicates that Investigation protocols for stillbirth should include placental pathology, autopsy, and genetic testing. Future studies should address the value of tests by presenting clinical scenarios, use of a consistent definition of stillbirth, classification system and measurement of investigation value.
Trends in maternal mortality and stillbirths by county in health facility data, Kenya, 2011-2022
Background Reports on maternal deaths and stillbirths in health facilities are a critical but underutilized source of information to monitor the quality of care. In addition, with increasing coverage of deliveries by health facilities, such data can improve population estimates of maternal mortality and stillbirth rates. Data quality concerns, however, have often deterred use of facility data. This study aims to assess subnational trends in institutional mortality and examine its utility for improving population-based estimates of mortality. Methods Data from the routine monthly reporting system of the Ministry of Health in Kenya were used to assess levels and trends in maternal mortality and stillbirth rates in 47 counties from 2011 to 2022. Data quality was assessed using multiple methods, including consistency of annual reporting of live births, stillbirths and maternal deaths by counties, plausibility of the ratio of reported stillbirths to maternal death, the county institutional mortality in comparison to delivery coverage, socioeconomic development and health system characteristics. The consistency between institutional and population estimates of mortality was assessed using different scenarios. Results Institutional live birth coverage increased from 64.0% in 2014 to 87.8% in 2022, ranging from 49 to 99% in counties. Kenya and 39 of its 47 counties experienced a decline in institutional maternal mortality ratio and stillbirth rate during the study period 2011–2022. The national institutional maternal mortality decline stagnated from 2018 and was 99 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2022. Consistency of reported data by county was good over time but several indicators suggest that maternal death reporting was incomplete and more so in less-developed counties. Estimates of the population maternal mortality ratio, derived from the facility data, were much lower than global estimates or census results, while the stillbirth rates were consistent. Conclusion The health facility data on maternal death and stillbirths are an important data source for monitoring national and subnational institutional maternal mortality and stillbirth rates and can also inform population estimates. Systematic sustained assessment of reporting completeness will be critical to achieve the full potential of facility data-derived mortality monitoring.