Explore the vast range of titles available.

The dominant source of variance in line transect sampling is usually the encounter rate variance. Systematic survey designs are often used to reduce the true variability among different realizations of the design, but estimating the variance is difficult and estimators typically approximate the variance by treating the design as a simple random sample of lines. We explore the properties of different encounter rate variance estimators under random and systematic designs. We show that a design-based variance estimator improves upon the model-based estimator of Buckland et al. (2001, Introduction to Distance Sampling. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 79) when transects are positioned at random. However, if populations exhibit strong spatial trends, both estimators can have substantial positive bias under systematic designs. We show that poststratification is effective in reducing this bias.

A simple method to select a spatially balanced sample using equal or unequal inclusion probabilities is presented. For populations with spatial trends in the variables of interest, the estimation can be much improved by selecting samples that are well spread over the population. The method can be used for any number of dimensions and can hence also select spatially balanced samples in a space spanned by several auxiliary variables. Analysis and examples indicate that the suggested method achieves a high degree of spatial balance and is therefore efficient for populations with trends.

Survey sampling is a widely used technique for collecting data from a subset of a bigger population. Among its methods, stratified random sampling is particularly valuable for yielding precise inferences about distinct subgroups within a population by dividing the population into mutually exclusive strata and sampling from each group. This approach reduces sampling error and enhances the accuracy of population estimates. In this study, we propose a set of improved calibrated log-ratio-type estimators for estimating population variance under a stratified sampling framework. The performance of three proposed estimators is evaluated and compared in terms of the mean squared error. A simulation study is conducted to assess the efficiency of the estimators, complemented by a real-life application to validate the simulation results. The findings demonstrate that the proposed calibrated log-ratio variance estimators outperform existing methods by achieving lower mean squared error.

Extreme events gives rise to outrageous results in terms of population-related parameters and their estimates are usually done using traditional moments. Traditional moments are usually affected by extreme observations. This study aims to propose some new calibration estimators considering the L-Moments scheme for variance, which is one of the most important population parameters, a number of suitable calibration constraints under double stratified random sampling were defined for these estimators. The proposed estimators, which were based on L-Moments, were relatively more robust despite extreme values. The empirical efficiency of the proposed estimators was also assessed through simulation. Covid-19 pandemic data from January 22, 2020 to August 23, 2020 was taken into account in the simulation study.

In this research, a logarithmic-type estimator was formulated for estimating the finite population variance in stratified random sampling. By ensuring that the sampling process is symmetrically conducted across the population, biases can be minimized, and the sample is more likely to be representative of the population as a whole. We conducted a comprehensive numerical study and simulation study to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator. The mean squared error values were computed for both our proposed estimator and several existing ones, including the standard unbiased variance estimator, difference-type estimator, and other considered estimators. The results of the numerical study and simulation study demonstrated that the proposed log-type estimator outperforms the other considered estimators in terms of MSE and percentage relative efficiency. Graphical representations of the results are also provided to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed estimator. Based on the findings of this study, we conclude that the proposed log-type estimator is a valuable addition to the existing literature on variance estimation in stratified random sampling. It provides a more efficient and accurate estimate of the population variance, which can be beneficial for various statistical applications.

Variance is one of the most important measures of descriptive statistics and commonly used for statistical analysis. The traditional second-order central moment based variance estimation is a widely utilized methodology. However, traditional variance estimator is highly affected in the presence of extreme values. So this paper initially, proposes two classes of calibration estimators based on an adaptation of the estimators recently proposed by Koyuncu and then presents a new class of L-Moments based calibration variance estimators utilizing L-Moments characteristics (L-location, L-scale, L-CV) and auxiliary information. It is demonstrated that the proposed L-Moments based calibration variance estimators are more efficient than adapted ones. Artificial data is considered for assessing the performance of the proposed estimators. We also demonstrated an application related to apple fruit for purposes of the article. Using artificial and real data sets, percentage relative efficiency (PRE) of the proposed class of estimators with respect to adapted ones are calculated. The PRE results indicate to the superiority of the proposed class over adapted ones in the presence of extreme values. In this manner, the proposed class of estimators could be applied over an expansive range of survey sampling whenever auxiliary information is available in the presence of extreme values.

Quantile regression is one of the alternative regression techniques used when the assumptions of classical regression analysis are not met, and it estimates the values of the study variable in various quantiles of the distribution. This study proposes ratio-type estimators of a population mean using the information on quantile regression for stratified random sampling. The proposed ratio-type estimators are investigated with the help of the mean square error equations. Efficiency comparisons between the proposed estimators and classical estimators are presented in certain conditions. Under these obtained conditions, it is seen that the proposed estimators outperform the classical estimators. In addition, the theoretical results are supported by a real data application.

This article considers causal inference for treatment contrasts from a randomized experiment using potential outcomes in a finite population setting. Adopting a Neymanian repeated sampling approach that integrates such causal inference with finite population survey sampling, an inferential framework is developed for general mechanisms of assigning experimental units to multiple treatments. This framework extends classical methods by allowing the possibility of randomization restrictions and unequal replications. Novel conditions that are \"milder\" than strict additivity of treatment effects, yet permit unbiased estimation of the finite population sampling variance of any treatment contrast estimator, are derived. The consequences of departures from such conditions are also studied under the criterion of minimax bias, and a new justification for using the Neymanian conservative sampling variance estimator in experiments is provided. The proposed approach can readily be extended to the case of treatments with a general factorial structure.

Multilevel modelling is sometimes used for data from complex surveys involving multistage sampling, unequal sampling probabilities and stratification. We consider generalized linear mixed models and particularly the case of dichotomous responses. A pseudolikelihood approach for accommodating inverse probability weights in multilevel models with an arbitrary number of levels is implemented by using adaptive quadrature. A sandwich estimator is used to obtain standard errors that account for stratification and clustering. When level 1 weights are used that vary between elementary units in clusters, the scaling of the weights becomes important. We point out that not only variance components but also regression coefficients can be severely biased when the response is dichotomous. The pseudolikelihood methodology is applied to complex survey data on reading proficiency from the American sample of the 'Program for international student assessment' 2000 study, using the Stata program gllamm which can estimate a wide range of multilevel and latent variable models. Performance of pseudo-maximum-likelihood with different methods for handling level 1 weights is investigated in a Monte Carlo experiment. Pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimators of (conditional) regression coefficients perform well for large cluster sizes but are biased for small cluster sizes. In contrast, estimators of marginal effects perform well in both situations. We conclude that caution must be exercised in pseudo-maximum-likelihood estimation for small cluster sizes when level 1 weights are used.

Variance is one of the most vital measures of dispersion widely employed in practical aspects. A commonly used approach for variance estimation is the traditional method of moments that is strongly influenced by the presence of extreme values, and thus its results cannot be relied on. Finding momentum from Koyuncu’s recent work, the present paper focuses first on proposing two classes of variance estimators based on linear moments (L-moments), and then employing them with auxiliary data under double stratified sampling to introduce a new class of calibration variance estimators using important properties of L-moments (L-location, L-cv, L-variance). Three populations are taken into account to assess the efficiency of the new estimators. The first and second populations are concerned with artificial data, and the third populations is concerned with real data. The percentage relative efficiency of the proposed estimators over existing ones is evaluated. In the presence of extreme values, our findings depict the superiority and high efficiency of the proposed classes over traditional classes. Hence, when auxiliary data is available along with extreme values, the proposed classes of estimators may be implemented in an extensive variety of sampling surveys.