Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
1,027 result(s) for "Subcortical"
Sort by:
Analysis of 17 genes detects mutations in 81% of 811 patients with lissencephaly
Purpose To estimate diagnostic yield and genotype-phenotype correlations in a cohort of 811 patients with lissencephaly or subcortical band heterotopia. Methods We collected DNA from 756 children with lissencephaly over 30 years. Many were tested for deletion 17p13.3 and mutations of LIS1 , DCX , and ARX , but few other genes. Among those tested, 216 remained unsolved and were tested by a targeted panel of 17 genes ( ACTB , ACTG1 , ARX , CRADD , DCX , LIS1 , TUBA1A , TUBA8 , TUBB2B , TUBB , TUBB3 , TUBG1 , KIF2A , KIF5C , DYNC1H1 , RELN , and VLDLR ) or by whole-exome sequencing. Fifty-five patients studied at another institution were added as a validation cohort. Results The overall mutation frequency in the entire cohort was 81%. LIS1 accounted for 40% of patients, followed by DCX (23%), TUBA1A (5%), and DYNC1H1 (3%). Other genes accounted for 1% or less of patients. Nineteen percent remained unsolved, which suggests that several additional genes remain to be discovered. The majority of unsolved patients had posterior pachygyria, subcortical band heterotopia, or mild frontal pachygyria. Conclusion The brain-imaging pattern correlates with mutations in single lissencephaly-associated genes, as well as in biological pathways. We propose the first LIS classification system based on the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Dysregulation of mTOR signalling is a converging mechanism in lissencephaly
Cerebral cortex development in humans is a highly complex and orchestrated process that is under tight genetic regulation. Rare mutations that alter gene expression or function can disrupt the structure of the cerebral cortex, resulting in a range of neurological conditions 1 . Lissencephaly (‘smooth brain’) spectrum disorders comprise a group of rare, genetically heterogeneous congenital brain malformations commonly associated with epilepsy and intellectual disability 2 . However, the molecular mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis remain unknown. Here we establish hypoactivity of the mTOR pathway as a clinically relevant molecular mechanism in lissencephaly spectrum disorders. We characterized two types of cerebral organoid derived from individuals with genetically distinct lissencephalies with a recessive mutation in p53-induced death domain protein 1 ( PIDD1 ) or a heterozygous chromosome 17p13.3 microdeletion leading to Miller–Dieker lissencephaly syndrome (MDLS). PIDD1-mutant organoids and MDLS organoids recapitulated the thickened cortex typical of human lissencephaly and demonstrated dysregulation of protein translation, metabolism and the mTOR pathway. A brain-selective activator of mTOR complex 1 prevented and reversed cellular and molecular defects in the lissencephaly organoids. Our findings show that a converging molecular mechanism contributes to two genetically distinct lissencephaly spectrum disorders. Cellular, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells show that mTOR pathway hypoactivation is involved in two genetically distinct lissencephaly spectrum disorders.
Understanding the Molecular Basis of Miller–Dieker Syndrome
Miller–Dieker Syndrome (MDS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a heterozygous deletion of approximately 26 genes within the MDS locus of human chromosome 17. MDS, which affects 1 in 100,000 babies, can lead to a range of phenotypes, including lissencephaly, severe neurological defects, distinctive facial abnormalities, cognitive impairments, seizures, growth retardation, and congenital heart and liver abnormalities. One hallmark feature of MDS is an unusually smooth brain surface due to abnormal neuronal migration during early brain development. Several genes located within the MDS locus have been implicated in the pathogenesis of MDS, including PAFAH1B1, YWHAE, CRK, and METTL16. These genes play a role in the molecular and cellular pathways that are vital for neuronal migration, the proper development of the cerebral cortex, and protein translation in MDS. Improved model systems, such as MDS patient-derived organoids and multi-omics analyses indicate that WNT/β-catenin signaling, calcium signaling, S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) homeostasis, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling, and others are dysfunctional in MDS. This review of MDS integrates details at the clinical level alongside newly emerging details at the molecular and cellular levels, which may inform the development of novel therapeutic strategies for MDS.
Somatic Mutation, Genomic Variation, and Neurological Disease
With the increased power now available in sequencing and genomic technologies has come the realization that within an organism, individual cellular genomes can diverge from one another. Poduri et al. (p. 10.1126/science.1237758 ) review how de novo mutations, which arise in the parental germ line, or during development of the child, are the cause of a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders. Genetic mutations causing human disease are conventionally thought to be inherited through the germ line from one’s parents and present in all somatic (body) cells, except for most cancer mutations, which arise somatically. Increasingly, somatic mutations are being identified in diseases other than cancer, including neurodevelopmental diseases. Somatic mutations can arise during the course of prenatal brain development and cause neurological disease—even when present at low levels of mosaicism, for example—resulting in brain malformations associated with epilepsy and intellectual disability. Novel, highly sensitive technologies will allow more accurate evaluation of somatic mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders and during normal brain development.
Somatic Mutations in Cerebral Cortical Malformations
Somatic mutations can cause brain malformations but may escape detection if their prevalence in blood is low. The authors of this study used deep-coverage targeting sequencing to gauge the extent to which somatic mutations cause relatively common forms of brain malformation. Somatic mutation, a postzygotic event, leads to two or more populations of cells with distinct genotypes in an organism, despite development from a single fertilized egg. 1 , 2 Although the role of somatic mutation in cancer cells is well established, 3 an analogous role for somatic mutations that occur randomly during the normal mitotic cell divisions of embryonic development — and that are therefore present in clones of cells in one or more tissues of the body — has been recognized only recently. Somatic mutations have been described in several noncancerous disorders, including the McCune–Albright syndrome, 4 the Sturge–Weber syndrome, 5 the Proteus syndrome, . . .
Non-pharmacological treatment options of drug-resistant epilepsy in subcortical band heterotopia: systematic review and illustrative case
Objective Subcortical band heterotopia is a rare X-linked neuronal migration disorder primarily in females often associated with drug-resistant epilepsy. The aim of this study is to review the literature for non-pharmacological treatment options of drug-resistant epilepsy in subcortical band heterotopia. Material and methods In accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we performed a systematic review. Entering the keywords “double cortex,” “subcortical band heterotopia,” and “subcortical laminar heterotopia,” we searched Scopus and PubMed databases. We paid particular attention to type of invasive and non-invasive treatment, radiological presentation, and outcome. We also describe a related case report, managed at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool. Results The systematic literature review yielded 25 patients with subcortical band heterotopia and drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent non-pharmacological treatment. Including our patient, 26 patients were reported. The patients’ mean age at seizure onset was 6.5 years (range 0.2–23) with a female sex predilection (5.25:1). The patients’ mean age at invasive or non-invasive treatment was 21.5 years (range 6.5–51). The 26 patients underwent 29 non-pharmacological treatments. Ten patients underwent corpus callosotomy; 8 patients had a formal temporal lobectomy. Three patients had focal cortical resection. Two patients respectively had multiple subpial transections, insertion of a vagal nerve stimulator, or deep brain stimulation of the bilateral anterior nuclei of the thalamus. One patient underwent responsive focal neurostimulation. Another patient had transcutaneous stimulation of the vagal nerve. Sixteen patients reported a reduction or the disappearance of the seizures; 1 patient had no improvement. The outcome of 2 patients was classified class I, of 1 patient class II, of 1 patient class III, and of 5 patients class IV according to the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale. Conclusion Mainly corpus callosotomy and formal temporal lobectomy have been performed as non-pharmacological treatment with few cases published overall. Several other invasive procedures and one non-invasive technique are based on case reports. The small number of reported cases prevents drawing a firm conclusion as to which non-pharmacological treatment is the best treatment option for refractive epilepsy in patients with subcortical band heterotopia.
Phenotypic Variability in Novel Doublecortin Gene Variants Associated with Subcortical Band Heterotopia
Doublecortin, encoded by the DCX gene, plays a crucial role in the neuronal migration process during brain development. Pathogenic variants of the DCX gene are the major causes of the “lissencephaly (LIS) spectrum”, which comprehends a milder phenotype like Subcortical Band Heterotopia (SBH) in heterozygous female subjects. We performed targeted sequencing in three unrelated female cases with SBH. We identified three DCX-related variants: a novel missense (c.601A>G: p.Lys201Glu), a novel nonsense (c.210C>G: p.Tyr70*), and a previously identified nonsense (c.907C>T: p.Arg303*) variant. The novel c.601A>G: p.Lys201Glu variant shows a mother–daughter transmission pattern across four generations. The proband exhibits focal epilepsy and achieved seizure freedom with a combination of oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam. All other affected members have no history of epileptic seizures. Brain MRIs of the affected members shows predominant fronto-central SBH with mixed pachygyria on the overlying cortex. The two nonsense variants were identified in two unrelated probands with SBH, severe drug-resistant epilepsy and intellectual disability. These novel DCX variants further expand the genotypic–phenotypic correlations of lissencephaly spectrum disorders. Our documented phenotypic descriptions of three unrelated families provide valuable insights and stimulate further discussions on DCX-SBH cases.
Dcx reexpression reduces subcortical band heterotopia and seizure threshold in an animal model of neuronal migration disorder
Aberrant neuronal migration during development leads to defects in cortical development and to an increased seizure susceptibility. Now, Joseph LoTurco and his colleagues show that it is possible to re-invoke neuronal migration perinatally in rodents and reposition neurons into their correct cortical location ( pages 17–18 ). Disorders of neuronal migration can lead to malformations of the cerebral neocortex that greatly increase the risk of seizures. It remains untested whether malformations caused by disorders in neuronal migration can be reduced by reactivating cellular migration and whether such repair can decrease seizure risk. Here we show, in a rat model of subcortical band heterotopia (SBH) generated by in utero RNA interference of the Dcx gene, that aberrantly positioned neurons can be stimulated to migrate by reexpressing Dcx after birth. Restarting migration in this way both reduces neocortical malformations and restores neuronal patterning. We further find that the capacity to reduce SBH continues into early postnatal development. Moreover, intervention after birth reduces the convulsant-induced seizure threshold to a level similar to that in malformation-free controls. These results suggest that disorders of neuronal migration may be eventually treatable by reengaging developmental programs both to reduce the size of cortical malformations and to reduce seizure risk.
Clinical and neuroimaging findings in patients with lissencephaly/subcortical band heterotopia spectrum: a magnetic resonance conventional and diffusion tensor study
Purpose To clarify brain abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its clinical implications in lissencephaly/subcortical band heterotopia (LIS/SBH) spectrum patients. Methods The clinical severity and classification according to Di Donato were retrospectively reviewed in 23 LIS/SBH spectrum patients. The morphological and signal abnormalities of the brainstem, corpus callosum, and basal ganglia were also assessed. The brainstem distribution pattern of the corticospinal tract (CST) was analyzed by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and categorized into two types: normal pattern, in which the CST and medial lemniscus (ML) are separated by the dorsal portion of the transverse pontine fiber, and the abnormal pattern, in which the CST and ML are juxtaposed on the dorsal portion of a single transverse pontine fiber. Correlations between MR grading score and potential additional malformative findings of the brain and clinical symptoms were investigated. Results All patients with grade 3 ( n  = 5) showed brainstem deformities, signal abnormalities of pontine surface and had a tendency of basal ganglia deformity and callosal hypoplasia whereas those abnormalities were rarely seen in patients with grade 1 and 2 ( n  = 18). For DTI analysis, the patients with grade 3 LIS/SBH had typically abnormal CST, whereas the patients with grade 1 and 2 LIS/SBH had normal CST. The classification was well correlated with CST and brainstem abnormalities and clinical severity. Conclusion MR assessment including DTI analysis may be useful in assessing the clinical severity in LIS/BH spectrum and may provide insight into its developmental pathology.