Explore the vast range of titles available.

Adjuvant-containing subunit vaccines represent a promising approach for protection against tuberculosis (TB), but current candidates require refrigerated storage. Here we present results from a randomized, double-blinded Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03722472) evaluating the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a thermostable lyophilized single-vial presentation of the ID93 + GLA-SE vaccine candidate compared to the non-thermostable two-vial vaccine presentation in healthy adults. Participants were monitored for primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints following intramuscular administration of two vaccine doses 56 days apart. Primary endpoints included local and systemic reactogenicity and adverse events. Secondary endpoints included antigen-specific antibody (IgG) and cellular immune responses (cytokine-producing peripheral blood mononuclear cells and T cells). Both vaccine presentations are safe and well tolerated and elicit robust antigen-specific serum antibody and Th1-type cellular immune responses. Compared to the non-thermostable presentation, the thermostable vaccine formulation generates greater serum antibody responses ( p  < 0.05) and more antibody-secreting cells ( p  < 0.05). In this work, we show the thermostable ID93 + GLA-SE vaccine candidate is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults. Here the authors present results from a randomized, double-blinded Phase 1 clinical trial, testing a thermostable presentation of a clinical-stage adjuvanted subunit tuberculosis vaccine candidate. The vaccine candidate is safe and well tolerated, and elicits comparable or improved immune responses compared to the non-thermostable presentation.

•CMV seronegative girls between 12 and 17 years of age received CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine with MF59 or saline placebo at 0, 1 and 6 months.•The vaccine was generally well tolerated, although local and systemic adverse events were significantly more common in the vaccine group.•In the per protocol population vaccine efficacy was 43% after 3 doses, p=0.20 and 45%, p=0.08 after 2 doses.•We conclude the vaccine was safe and immunogenic and although the efficacy did not reach significance, the results are consistent with a previous study in adult women (Pass et al NEJM 360:1191, 2009) using the same formulation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of congenital infection and an important target for vaccine development. CMV seronegative girls between 12 and 17 years of age received CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine with MF59 or saline placebo at 0, 1 and 6 months. Blood and urine were collected throughout the study for evidence of CMV infection based on PCR and/or seroconversion to non-vaccine CMV antigens. 402 CMV seronegative subjects were vaccinated (195 vaccine, 207 placebo). The vaccine was generally well tolerated, although local and systemic adverse events were significantly more common in the vaccine group. The vaccine induced gB antibody in all vaccine recipients with a gB geometric mean titer of 13,400EU; 95%CI 11,436, 15,700, after 3 doses. Overall, 48 CMV infections were detected (21 vaccine, 27 placebo). In the per protocol population (124 vaccine, 125 placebo) vaccine efficacy was 43%; 95%CI: −36; 76, p=0.20. The most significant difference was after 2 doses, administered as per protocol; vaccine efficacy 45%, 95%CI: −9; 72, p=0.08. The vaccine was safe and immunogenic. Although the efficacy did not reach conventional levels of significance, the results are consistent with a previous study in adult women (Pass et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1191) using the same formulation.

In this trial of a recombinant VZV glycoprotein E subunit vaccine with the adjuvant AS01 B , the risk of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia is shown to be significantly lower in association with the vaccine than with placebo among persons 70 years of age or older. Herpes zoster, or shingles, results from the reactivation of latent varicella–zoster virus (VZV) and typically manifests as a vesicular, painful dermatomal rash. 1 , 2 The most common complication of herpes zoster, postherpetic neuralgia, manifests as chronic neuropathic pain that can greatly limit daily activities. 1 , 3 – 6 The overall incidence of herpes zoster is 2.0 to 4.6 cases per 1000 person-years but increases with age to 10.0 to 12.8 per 1000 person-years among persons 80 years of age or older. 7 – 10 Similarly, the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia also increases with age. 10 – 13 Antiviral therapy can reduce the duration of herpes zoster rash . . .

Efficacy of live oral rotavirus vaccines is reduced in low-income compared with high-income settings. Parenteral non-replicating rotavirus vaccines might offer benefits over oral vaccines. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the P2-VP8-P[8] subunit rotavirus vaccine at different doses in South African toddlers and infants. This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial was done at a single research unit based at a hospital in South Africa in healthy HIV-uninfected toddlers (aged 2 to <3 years) and term infants (aged 6 to <8 weeks, without previous rotavirus vaccination). Block randomisation (computer-generated, electronic allocation) was used to assign eligible toddlers (in a 6:1 ratio) and infants (in a 3:1 ratio) in each dose cohort (10 μg, followed by 30 μg, then 60 μg if doses tolerated) to parenteral P2-VP8-P[8] subunit rotavirus or placebo injection. The two highest tolerated doses were then assessed in an expanded cohort (in a 1:1:1 ratio). Parents of participants and clinical, data, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment assignment. P2-VP8-P[8] vaccine versus placebo was assessed first in toddlers (single injection) and then in infants (three injections 4 weeks apart). The primary safety endpoints were local and systemic reactions within 7 days after each injection, adverse events within 28 days after each injection, and all serious adverse events, assessed in toddlers and infants who received at least one dose. In infants receiving all study injections, primary immunogenicity endpoints were anti-P2-VP8-P[8] IgA and IgG and neutralising antibody seroresponses and geometric mean titres 4 weeks after the third injection. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02109484. Between March 17, 2014, and Sept 29, 2014, 42 toddlers (36 to vaccine and six to placebo) and 48 infants (36 to vaccine and 12 to placebo) were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase, in which the 30 μg and 60 μg doses where found to be the highest tolerated doses. A further 114 infants were enrolled in the expanded cohort between Nov 3, 2014, and March 20, 2015, and all 162 infants (12 assigned to 10 μg, 50 to 30 μg, 50 to 60 μg, and 50 to placebo) were included in the safety analysis. Serum IgA seroresponses were observed in 38 (81%, 95% CI 67–91) of 47 infants in the 30 μg group and 32 (68%, 53–81) of 47 in the 60 μg group, compared with nine (20%, 10–35) of 45 in the placebo group; adjusted IgG seroresponses were seen in 46 (98%, 89–100) of 47 infants in the 30 μg group and 47 (100%; 92–100) of 47 in the 60 μg group, compared with four (9%, 2·5–21) of 45 in the placebo group; and adjusted neutralising antibody seroresponses against the homologous Wa-strain were seen in 40 (85%, 72–94) of 47 infants in both the 30 μg and 60 μg groups, compared with three (7%, 1·4–18) of 45 participants in the placebo group. Solicited reactions following any injection occurred with similar frequency and severity in participants receiving vaccine and those receiving placebo. Unsolicited adverse events were mostly mild and occurred at a similar frequency between groups. Eight serious adverse events (one with placebo, two with 30 μg, and five with 60 μg) occurred in seven infants within 28 days of any study injection, none of which were deemed related to study treatment. The parenteral P2-VP8-P[8] vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in infants, providing a novel approach to vaccination against rotavirus disease. On the basis of these results, a phase 1/2 trial of a trivalent P2-VP8 (P[4], P[6], and P[8]) subunit vaccine is underway at three sites in South Africa. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Novel influenza viruses continue to pose a potential pandemic threat worldwide. In recent years, plants have been used to produce recombinant proteins, including subunit vaccines. A subunit influenza vaccine, HAC1, based on recombinant hemagglutinin from the 2009 pandemic A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) strain of influenza virus, has been manufactured using a plant virus-based transient expression technology in Nicotiana benthamiana plants and demonstrated to be immunogenic and safe in pre-clinical studies (Shoji et al., 2011). A first-in-human, Phase 1, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study was conducted to investigate safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an HAC1 formulation at three escalating dose levels (15μg, 45μg and 90μg) with and without Alhydrogel®, in healthy adults 18–50 years of age (inclusive). Eighty participants were randomized into six study vaccine groups, a saline placebo group and an approved monovalent H1N1 vaccine group. Recipients received two doses of vaccine or placebo (except for the monovalent H1N1 vaccine cohort, which received a single dose of vaccine, later followed by a dose of placebo). The experimental vaccine was safe and well tolerated, and comparable to placebo and the approved monovalent H1N1 vaccine. Pain and tenderness at the injection site were the only local solicited reactions reported following vaccinations. Nearly all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The HAC1 vaccine was also immunogenic, with the highest seroconversion rates, based on serum hemagglutination-inhibition and virus microneutralization antibody titers, in the 90μg non-adjuvanted HAC1 vaccine group after the second vaccine dose (78% and 100%, respectively). This is the first study demonstrating the safety and immunogenicity of a plant-produced subunit H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy adults. The results support further clinical investigation of the HAC1 vaccine as well as demonstrate the feasibility of the plant-based technology for vaccine antigen production.

Mosaic immunogens are bioinformatically engineered human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) sequences designed to elicit clade-independent coverage against globally circulating HIV-1 strains. This phase 1, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled healthy HIV-uninfected adults who received 2 doses of a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-vectored HIV-1 bivalent mosaic immunogen vaccine or placebo on days 0 and 84. Two groups were enrolled: those who were HIV-1 vaccine naive (n = 15) and those who had received an HIV-1 vaccine (Ad26.ENVA.01) 4-6 years earlier (n = 10). We performed prespecified blinded cellular and humoral immunogenicity analyses at days 0, 14, 28, 84, 98, 112, 168, 270, and 365. All 50 planned vaccinations were administered. Vaccination was safe and generally well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred. Both cellular and humoral cross-clade immune responses were elicited after 1 or 2 vaccinations in all participants in the HIV-1 vaccine-naive group. Env-specific responses were induced after a single immunization in nearly all subjects who had previously received the prototype Ad26.ENVA.01 vaccine. No safety concerns were identified, and multiclade HIV-1-specific immune responses were elicited. NCT02218125.

When the adjuvanted HZ subunit vaccine candidate was coadministered with a quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine, no interference in the immune responses were observed, and no safety concerns were identified. Abstract Background The immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit (HZ/su) vaccine when coadministered with a quadrivalent seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) was investigated in a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial in adults aged ≥50 years. Methods Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either HZ/su (varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E; AS01B Adjuvant System) and IIV4 at day 0 followed by a second HZ/su dose at month 2 (coadministration group), or IIV4 at month 0 and HZ/su at months 2 and 4 (control group). The primary objectives were the HZ/su vaccine response rate in the coadministration group and the noninferiority of the antibody responses to HZ/su and IIV4 in the coadministration compared with the control group. Safety information was collected throughout the duration of the study. Results A total of 413 subjects were vaccinated in the coadministration group and 415 in the control group. The HZ/su vaccine response rate in the coadministration group was 95.8% (95% confidence interval, 93.3%–97.6%) and the anti–glycoprotein E GMCControl/Coadmin ratio was 1.08 (.97–1.20). The primary noninferiority objectives were met. No safety concerns were observed. Conclusions No interference in the immune responses to either vaccine was observed when the vaccines were coadministered, and no safety concerns were identified. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01954251.

•This phase I study examined a candidate trivalent pneumococcal protein vaccine.•The vaccine contained recombinant PcpA, PhtD, and PlyD1.•The vaccine was safe and immunogenic in adults, toddlers, and infants.•In infants, aluminum adjuvant improved immunogenicity without changing safety.•The results support and provide guidance for the development of the vaccine. Pneumococcal protein vaccines (PPrVs) may provide improved protection over currently available polysaccharide and conjugated polysaccharide vaccines. Here, we examined the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent recombinant PPrV containing PcpA, PhtD, and PlyD1. This was a phase I, single-center, randomized, observer-blind study with safety review between cohorts. Adults (18–50 years; n=30) and then toddlers (12–13 months; n=30) were randomized 2:1 to receive aluminum-adjuvanted trivalent PPrV (PPrV+adj) containing 50μg per antigen or placebo. Infants (42–49 days; n=220) were next randomized to be injected at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age with 10μg PPrV+adj or placebo (n=60; 2:1); 25μg PPrV+adj, 25μg unadjuvanted PPrV, or placebo (n=100; 2:2:1); and 50μg PPrV+adj or placebo (n=60; 2:1). Solicited reactions were recorded for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events for 30 days after each vaccination. Concentrations of antibodies to the three vaccine antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Tenderness/pain was the most frequent injection-site reaction. Abnormal crying and irritability (infants), loss of appetite (toddlers), and headache, malaise, and myalgia (adults) were the most frequent systemic reactions. Reactions were mostly mild or moderate, resolved within 3 days, were not adjuvant- or dose-dependent, and were not increased by repeated vaccination. No immediate adverse events, hypersensitivity reactions, or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. In all PPrV+adj cohorts, at least 75% of subjects had a ≥2-fold increase in all three antibody concentrations. In infants, antibody concentrations were higher with PPrV+adj than with unadjuvanted PPrV, higher with three than two vaccinations, and similar at the different vaccine doses. The candidate trivalent PPrV was safe and immunogenic in adults, toddlers, and infants. Addition of aluminum adjuvant improved immunogenicity in infants without changing the safety profile.

Influenza poses a significant global healthcare burden, with up to 1 billion infections annually, and poorer outcomes in vulnerable populations such as older adults. Vaccination effectiveness is often lower in elderly individuals. By adding an adjuvant and using cell-based vaccine production methods, the MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent cell-based influenza vaccine (aQIVc) may boost immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness in this population. We report the results of a randomised proof-of-concept study, investigating the immunogenicity and safety of aQIVc. Eligible participants aged ≥50 years were randomised 1: 1:1:1 to receive aQIVc (n = 116), a non-adjuvanted quadrivalent cell-based influenza vaccine (QIVc; n = 119), an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent egg-based influenza vaccine (aQIV; n = 116), or a high-dose quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (QIVr; n = 120). The primary objective was to assess immunogenicity of aQIVc vs the comparators by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay 28 days post-vaccination. Secondary objectives included immunogenicity of aQIVc vs comparators 28 days and 180 post-vaccination by microneutralisation assay and 180 days post-vaccination by HI assay; and reactogenicity and safety of all study vaccines. Compared with QIVc and aQIV, aQIVc elicited a higher immune response (adjusted geometric mean titre [GMT] ratio range 1.18–1.85) against all four influenza strains at Day 29. Against QIVr, aQIVc elicited lower responses against A strains (adjusted GMT ratio range 0.79–0.84), and higher responses against B strains (adjusted GMT ratio range 1.15–1.26). Estimated GMT ratios were generally higher in the subgroup of participants aged ≥65 years vs those aged 50–64 years. aQIVc was well tolerated, eliciting similar rates of solicited local adverse events (AE) and slightly higher rates of solicited systemic AE than aQIV, and a higher rate of all solicited AE than QIVc and QIVr. No safety concern was identified. These data support further investigation of additional formulations of aQIVc in adults aged ≥50 years. Clinical trial registry:NCT04576702 •We assessed an adjuvanted, cell-based influenza vaccine (aQIVc) in adults ≥50 years•aQIVc elicited higher immune responses than a non-adjuvanted comparator•aQIVc elicited higher immune responses than an egg-based adjuvanted comparator•aQIVc showed an acceptable safety profile; no safety concerns were identified•These data are proof-of-concept for seasonal aQIVc vaccination in adults ≥50 years

Rindopepimut (also known as CDX-110), a vaccine targeting the EGFR deletion mutation EGFRvIII, consists of an EGFRvIII-specific peptide conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin. In the ACT IV study, we aimed to assess whether or not the addition of rindopepimut to standard chemotherapy is able to improve survival in patients with EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma. In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with glioblastoma from 165 hospitals in 22 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed glioblastoma confirmed to express EGFRvIII by central analysis, and had undergone maximal surgical resection and completion of standard chemoradiation without progression. Patients were stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recursive partitioning analysis class, MGMT promoter methylation, and geographical region, and randomly assigned (1:1) with a prespecified randomisation sequence (block size of four) to receive rindopepimut (500 μg admixed with 150 μg GM-CSF) or control (100 μg keyhole limpet haemocyanin) via monthly intradermal injection until progression or intolerance, concurrent with standard oral temozolomide (150–200 mg/m2 for 5 of 28 days) for 6–12 cycles or longer. Patients, investigators, and the trial funder were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; enhancing tumour <2 cm2 post-chemoradiation by central review), analysed by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01480479. Between April 12, 2012, and Dec 15, 2014, 745 patients were enrolled (405 with MRD, 338 with significant residual disease [SRD], and two unevaluable) and randomly assigned to rindopepimut and temozolomide (n=371) or control and temozolomide (n=374). The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. At final analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival for patients with MRD: median overall survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 18·5–22·1) in the rindopepimut group versus 20·0 months (18·1–21·9) in the control group (HR 1·01, 95% CI 0·79–1·30; p=0·93). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events for all 369 treated patients in the rindopepimut group versus 372 treated patients in the control group were: thrombocytopenia (32 [9%] vs 23 [6%]), fatigue (six [2%] vs 19 [5%]), brain oedema (eight [2%] vs 11 [3%]), seizure (nine [2%] vs eight [2%]), and headache (six [2%] vs ten [3%]). Serious adverse events included seizure (18 [5%] vs 22 [6%]) and brain oedema (seven [2%] vs 12 [3%]). 16 deaths in the study were caused by adverse events (nine [4%] in the rindopepimut group and seven [3%] in the control group), of which one—a pulmonary embolism in a 64-year-old male patient after 11 months of treatment—was assessed as potentially related to rindopepimut. Rindopepimut did not increase survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Combination approaches potentially including rindopepimut might be required to show efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.