Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
18,130 result(s) for "Supervised learning"
Sort by:
Self-supervised Learning: A Succinct Review
Machine learning has made significant advances in the field of image processing. The foundation of this success is supervised learning, which necessitates annotated labels generated by humans and hence learns from labelled data, whereas unsupervised learning learns from unlabeled data. Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a type of un-supervised learning that helps in the performance of downstream computer vision tasks such as object detection, image comprehension, image segmentation, and so on. It can develop generic artificial intelligence systems at a low cost using unstructured and unlabeled data. The authors of this review article have presented detailed literature on self-supervised learning as well as its applications in different domains. The primary goal of this review article is to demonstrate how images learn from their visual features using self-supervised approaches. The authors have also discussed various terms used in self-supervised learning as well as different types of learning, such as contrastive learning, transfer learning, and so on. This review article describes in detail the pipeline of self-supervised learning, including its two main phases: pretext and downstream tasks. The authors have shed light on various challenges encountered while working on self-supervised learning at the end of the article.
A Survey on Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning
Self-supervised learning has gained popularity because of its ability to avoid the cost of annotating large-scale datasets. It is capable of adopting self-defined pseudolabels as supervision and use the learned representations for several downstream tasks. Specifically, contrastive learning has recently become a dominant component in self-supervised learning for computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), and other domains. It aims at embedding augmented versions of the same sample close to each other while trying to push away embeddings from different samples. This paper provides an extensive review of self-supervised methods that follow the contrastive approach. The work explains commonly used pretext tasks in a contrastive learning setup, followed by different architectures that have been proposed so far. Next, we present a performance comparison of different methods for multiple downstream tasks such as image classification, object detection, and action recognition. Finally, we conclude with the limitations of the current methods and the need for further techniques and future directions to make meaningful progress.
A survey of class-imbalanced semi-supervised learning
Semi-supervised learning(SSL) can substantially improve the performance of deep neural networks by utilizing unlabeled data when labeled data is scarce. The state-of-the-art(SOTA) semi-supervised algorithms implicitly assume that the class distribution of labeled datasets and unlabeled datasets are balanced, which means the different classes have the same numbers of training samples. However, they can hardly perform well on minority classes when the class distribution of training data is imbalanced. Recent work has found several ways to decrease the degeneration of semi-supervised learning models in class-imbalanced learning. In this article, we comprehensively review class-imbalanced semi-supervised learning (CISSL), starting with an introduction to this field, followed by a realistic evaluation of existing class-imbalanced semi-supervised learning algorithms and a brief summary of them.
Survey on Self-Supervised Learning: Auxiliary Pretext Tasks and Contrastive Learning Methods in Imaging
Although deep learning algorithms have achieved significant progress in a variety of domains, they require costly annotations on huge datasets. Self-supervised learning (SSL) using unlabeled data has emerged as an alternative, as it eliminates manual annotation. To do this, SSL constructs feature representations using pretext tasks that operate without manual annotation, which allows models trained in these tasks to extract useful latent representations that later improve downstream tasks such as object classification and detection. The early methods of SSL are based on auxiliary pretext tasks as a way to learn representations using pseudo-labels, or labels that were created automatically based on the dataset’s attributes. Furthermore, contrastive learning has also performed well in learning representations via SSL. To succeed, it pushes positive samples closer together, and negative ones further apart, in the latent space. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the top-performing SSL methods using auxiliary pretext and contrastive learning techniques. It details the motivation for this research, a general pipeline of SSL, the terminologies of the field, and provides an examination of pretext tasks and self-supervised methods. It also examines how self-supervised methods compare to supervised ones, and then discusses both further considerations and ongoing challenges faced by SSL.
A Survey on Active Learning: State-of-the-Art, Practical Challenges and Research Directions
Despite the availability and ease of collecting a large amount of free, unlabeled data, the expensive and time-consuming labeling process is still an obstacle to labeling a sufficient amount of training data, which is essential for building supervised learning models. Here, with low labeling cost, the active learning (AL) technique could be a solution, whereby a few, high-quality data points are queried by searching for the most informative and representative points within the instance space. This strategy ensures high generalizability across the space and improves classification performance on data we have never seen before. In this paper, we provide a survey of recent studies on active learning in the context of classification. This survey starts with an introduction to the theoretical background of the AL technique, AL scenarios, AL components supported with visual explanations, and illustrative examples to explain how AL simply works and the benefits of using AL. In addition to an overview of the query strategies for the classification scenarios, this survey provides a high-level summary to explain various practical challenges with AL in real-world settings; it also explains how AL can be combined with various research areas. Finally, the most commonly used AL software packages and experimental evaluation metrics with AL are also discussed.
A Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Classifying Colorectal Neoplasia Based on the NICE Classification
Labelling medical images is an arduous and costly task that necessitates clinical expertise and large numbers of qualified images. Insufficient samples can lead to underfitting during training and poor performance of supervised learning models. In this study, we aim to develop a SimCLR-based semi-supervised learning framework to classify colorectal neoplasia based on the NICE classification. First, the proposed framework was trained under self-supervised learning using a large unlabelled dataset; subsequently, it was fine-tuned on a limited labelled dataset based on the NICE classification. The model was evaluated on an independent dataset and compared with models based on supervised transfer learning and endoscopists using accuracy, Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC), and Cohen’s kappa. Finally, Grad-CAM and t-SNE were applied to visualize the models’ interpretations. A ResNet-backboned SimCLR model (accuracy of 0.908, MCC of 0.862, and Cohen’s kappa of 0.896) outperformed supervised transfer learning-based models (means: 0.803, 0.698, and 0.742) and junior endoscopists (0.816, 0.724, and 0.863), while performing only slightly worse than senior endoscopists (0.916, 0.875, and 0.944). Moreover, t-SNE showed a better clustering of ternary samples through self-supervised learning in SimCLR than through supervised transfer learning. Compared with traditional supervised learning, semi-supervised learning enables deep learning models to achieve improved performance with limited labelled endoscopic images.
Learning Self-supervised Low-Rank Network for Single-Stage Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation
Semantic segmentation with limited annotations, such as weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) and semi-supervised semantic segmentation (SSSS), is a challenging task that has attracted much attention recently. Most leading WSSS methods employ a sophisticated multi-stage training strategy to estimate pseudo-labels as precise as possible, but they suffer from high model complexity. In contrast, there exists another research line that trains a single network with image-level labels in one training cycle. However, such a single-stage strategy often performs poorly because of the compounding effect caused by inaccurate pseudo-label estimation. To address this issue, this paper presents a Self-supervised Low-Rank Network (SLRNet) for single-stage WSSS and SSSS. The SLRNet uses cross-view self-supervision, that is, it simultaneously predicts several complementary attentive LR representations from different views of an image to learn precise pseudo-labels. Specifically, we reformulate the LR representation learning as a collective matrix factorization problem and optimize it jointly with the network learning in an end-to-end manner. The resulting LR representation deprecates noisy information while capturing stable semantics across different views, making it robust to the input variations, thereby reducing overfitting to self-supervision errors. The SLRNet can provide a unified single-stage framework for various label-efficient semantic segmentation settings: (1) WSSS with image-level labeled data, (2) SSSS with a few pixel-level labeled data, and (3) SSSS with a few pixel-level labeled data and many image-level labeled data. Extensive experiments on the Pascal VOC 2012, COCO, and L2ID datasets demonstrate that our SLRNet outperforms both state-of-the-art WSSS and SSSS methods with a variety of different settings, proving its good generalizability and efficacy.
Leveraging Prior-Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Object Detection Under a Collaborative Self-Paced Curriculum Learning Framework
Weakly supervised object detection is an interesting yet challenging research topic in computer vision community, which aims at learning object models to localize and detect the corresponding objects of interest only under the supervision of image-level annotation. For addressing this problem, this paper establishes a novel weakly supervised learning framework to leverage both the instance-level prior-knowledge and the image-level prior-knowledge based on a novel collaborative self-paced curriculum learning (C-SPCL) regime. Under the weak supervision, C-SPCL can leverage helpful prior-knowledge throughout the whole learning process and collaborate the instance-level confidence inference with the image-level confidence inference in a robust way. Comprehensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior capacity of the proposed C-SPCL regime and the proposed whole framework as compared with state-of-the-art methods along this research line.