Explore the vast range of titles available.

The role of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery remains uncertain. Levels of pressure higher than 0 cm H2O might protect against postoperative pulmonary complications but could also cause intraoperative circulatory depression and lung injury from overdistension. We tested the hypothesis that a high level of positive end-expiratory pressure with recruitment manoeuvres protects against postoperative pulmonary complications in patients at risk of complications who are receiving mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery. In this randomised controlled trial at 30 centres in Europe and North and South America, we recruited 900 patients at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who were planned for open abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia and ventilation at tidal volumes of 8 mL/kg. We randomly allocated patients to either a high level of positive end-expiratory pressure (12 cm H2O) with recruitment manoeuvres (higher PEEP group) or a low level of pressure (≤2 cm H2O) without recruitment manoeuvres (lower PEEP group). We used a centralised computer-generated randomisation system. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to the intervention. Primary endpoint was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications by postoperative day 5. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The study is registered at Controlled-Trials.com, number ISRCTN70332574. From February, 2011, to January, 2013, 447 patients were randomly allocated to the higher PEEP group and 453 to the lower PEEP group. Six patients were excluded from the analysis, four because they withdrew consent and two for violation of inclusion criteria. Median levels of positive end-expiratory pressure were 12 cm H2O (IQR 12–12) in the higher PEEP group and 2 cm H2O (0–2) in the lower PEEP group. Postoperative pulmonary complications were reported in 174 (40%) of 445 patients in the higher PEEP group versus 172 (39%) of 449 patients in the lower PEEP group (relative risk 1·01; 95% CI 0·86–1·20; p=0·86). Compared with patients in the lower PEEP group, those in the higher PEEP group developed intraoperative hypotension and needed more vasoactive drugs. A strategy with a high level of positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment manoeuvres during open abdominal surgery does not protect against postoperative pulmonary complications. An intraoperative protective ventilation strategy should include a low tidal volume and low positive end-expiratory pressure, without recruitment manoeuvres. Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, Netherlands), European Society of Anaesthesiology.

Immobilisation predicts adverse outcomes in patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Attempts to mobilise critically ill patients early after surgery are frequently restricted, but we tested whether early mobilisation leads to improved mobility, decreased SICU length of stay, and increased functional independence of patients at hospital discharge. We did a multicentre, international, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial in SICUs of five university hospitals in Austria (n=1), Germany (n=1), and the USA (n=3). Eligible patients (aged 18 years or older, who had been mechanically ventilated for <48 h, and were expected to require mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h) were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a stratified block randomisation via restricted web platform to standard of care (control) or early, goal-directed mobilisation using an inter-professional approach of closed-loop communication and the SICU optimal mobilisation score (SOMS) algorithm (intervention), which describes patients’ mobilisation capacity on a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 (no mobilisation) to 4 (ambulation). We had three main outcomes hierarchically tested in a prespecified order: the mean SOMS level patients achieved during their SICU stay (primary outcome), and patient's length of stay on SICU and the mini-modified functional independence measure score (mmFIM) at hospital discharge (both secondary outcomes). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01363102). Between July 1, 2011, and Nov 4, 2015, we randomly assigned 200 patients to receive standard treatment (control; n=96) or intervention (n=104). Intention-to-treat analysis showed that the intervention improved the mobilisation level (mean achieved SOMS 2·2 [SD 1·0] in intervention group vs 1·5 [0·8] in control group, p<0·0001), decreased SICU length of stay (mean 7 days [SD 5–12] in intervention group vs 10 days [6–15] in control group, p=0·0054), and improved functional mobility at hospital discharge (mmFIM score 8 [4–8] in intervention group vs 5 [2–8] in control group, p=0·0002). More adverse events were reported in the intervention group (25 cases [2·8%]) than in the control group (ten cases [0·8%]); no serious adverse events were observed. Before hospital discharge 25 patients died (17 [16%] in the intervention group, eight [8%] in the control group). 3 months after hospital discharge 36 patients died (21 [22%] in the intervention group, 15 [17%] in the control group). Early, goal-directed mobilisation improved patient mobilisation throughout SICU admission, shortened patient length of stay in the SICU, and improved patients’ functional mobility at hospital discharge. Jeffrey and Judy Buzen.

Delirium is a postoperative complication that occurs frequently in patients older than 65 years, and presages adverse outcomes. We investigated whether prophylactic low-dose dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2 adrenoceptor agonist, could safely decrease the incidence of delirium in elderly patients after non-cardiac surgery. We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in two tertiary-care hospitals in Beijing, China. We enrolled patients aged 65 years or older, who were admitted to intensive care units after non-cardiac surgery, with informed consent. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence (in a 1:1 ratio) to randomly assign patients to receive either intravenous dexmedetomidine (0·1 μg/kg per h, from intensive care unit admission on the day of surgery until 0800 h on postoperative day 1), or placebo (intravenous normal saline). Participants, care providers, and investigators were all masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium, assessed twice daily with the Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care units during the first 7 postoperative days. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat and safety populations. This study is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, www.chictr.org.cn, number ChiCTR-TRC-10000802. Between Aug 17, 2011, and Nov 20, 2013, of 2016 patients assessed, 700 were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n=350) or dexmedetomidine (n=350). The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (32 [9%] of 350 patients) than in the placebo group (79 [23%] of 350 patients; odds ratio [OR] 0·35, 95% CI 0·22–0·54; p<0·0001). Regarding safety, the incidence of hypertension was higher with placebo (62 [18%] of 350 patients) than with dexmedetomidine (34 [10%] of 350 patients; 0·50, 0·32–0·78; p=0·002). Tachycardia was also higher in patients given placebo (48 [14%] of 350 patients) than in patients given dexmedetomidine (23 [7%] of 350 patients; 0·44, 0·26–0·75; p=0·002). Occurrence of hypotension and bradycardia did not differ between groups. For patients aged over 65 years who are admitted to the intensive care unit after non-cardiac surgery, prophylactic low-dose dexmedetomidine significantly decreases the occurrence of delirium during the first 7 days after surgery. The therapy is safe. Braun Anaesthesia Scientific Research Fund and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, Beijing, China. Study drugs were manufactured and supplied by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co, Ltd, Jiangsu, China.

No consensus exists on whether preoperative blood transfusions are beneficial in patients with sickle-cell disease. We assessed whether perioperative complication rates would be altered by preoperative transfusion. We did a multicentre, randomised trial. Eligible patients were aged at least 1 year, had haemoglobin SS or Sβ0thalassaemia sickle-cell-disease subtypes, and were scheduled for low-risk or medium-risk operations. Patients were randomly assigned no transfusion or transfusion no more than 10 days before surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of clinically important complications between randomisation and 30 days after surgery. Analysis was by intention to treat. 67 (96%) of 70 enrolled patients—33 no preoperative transfusion and 34 preoperative transfusion—were assessed. 65 (97%) of 67 patients had the haemoglobin SS subtype and 54 (81%) were scheduled to undergo medium-risk surgery. 13 (39%) of 33 patients in the no-preoperative-transfusion group had clinically important complications, compared with five (15%) in the preoperative-transfusion group (p=0·023). Of these, 10 (30%) and one (3%), respectively, had serious adverse events. The unadjusted odds ratio of clinically important complications was 3·8 (95% CI 1·2–12·2, p=0·027). 10 (91%) of 11 serious adverse events were acute chest syndrome (nine in the no-preoperative-transfusion group and one in the preoperative-transfusion group). Duration of hospital stay and readmission rates did not differ between study groups. Preoperative transfusion was associated with decreased perioperative complications in patients with sickle-cell disease in this trial. This approach could, therefore, be beneficial for patients with the haemoglobin SS subtype who are scheduled to undergo low-risk and medium-risk surgeries. NHS Blood and Transplant.

The perioperative safety profile of clopidogrel, a potent antiplatelet agent used in the management of cardiovascular disease, is unknown, and there are no evidence-based guidelines recommending for either its interruption or continuation at this time. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients who are maintained on clopidogrel before general surgical procedures are at increased risk of perioperative bleeding complications. Patients receiving clopidogrel at the time of elective general surgery were randomized to either discontinue clopidogrel 1 week before surgery (group A) or continue clopidogrel into surgery (group B). All other antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents were discontinued before surgery. The primary end points were perioperative bleeding requiring intraoperative or postoperative transfusion of blood or blood components and bleeding-related readmission, reoperation, or mortality within 90 days of surgery. The secondary end points were perioperative myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents within 90 days of surgery. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and underwent 43 general surgical operations. Twenty-one procedures were randomized to group A and 22 to group B. The most commonly performed individual procedures were open inguinal hernia repair (23%), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21%), open ventral hernia repair (15%), laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (11%), and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (9%). No perioperative mortalities, bleeding events requiring blood transfusion, or reoperations occurred. One readmission for intra-abdominal hematoma requiring percutaneous drainage occurred in each group (group A: 4.8% vs group B: 4.5%; P = 1.0). No myocardial infarctions or cerebrovascular accidents were observed or reported. The outcomes from this prospective study suggest that, patients undergoing commonly performed elective general surgical procedures can be safely maintained on clopidogrel without increased perioperative bleeding risk.

Background Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This randomized trial was designed to compare the clinical benefits and risks of antiplatelet drug discontinuation via LMWH bridging therapy. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either dalteparin sodium or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac or cerebrovascular events. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Results Among 2476 randomized patients, the variables (sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and procedural characteristics) and percutaneous coronary intervention information were not significantly different between the bridging and non-bridging groups. During the follow-up period, the rate of the combined endpoint in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (5.79% vs. 8.42%, p = 0.012). The incidence of myocardial injury in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (3.14% vs. 5.19%, p = 0.011). Deep vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the non-bridging group (1.21% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.024), and there was a trend toward a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (0.32% vs. 0.08%, p = 0.177). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of acute myocardial infarction (0.81% vs. 1.38%), cardiac death (0.24% vs. 0.41%), stroke (0.16% vs. 0.24%), or major bleeding (1.22% vs. 1.45%). Multivariable analysis showed that LMWH bridging, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, preoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of ischemic events. LMWH bridging and a preoperative platelet count of < 70 × 10 9 /L were independent predictors of minor bleeding events. Conclusions This study showed the safety and efficacy of perioperative LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. An alternative approach might be the use of bridging therapy with half-dose LMWH. Trial registration ISRCTN65203415.

We hypothesize that personalized perioperative blood pressure management maintaining intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP reduces perfusion-related organ injury compared to maintaining intraoperative MAP above 65 mmHg in patients having major non-cardiac surgery. Before testing this hypothesis in a large-scale trial, we performed this bicentric pilot trial to determine a) if performing preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring to calculate personalized intraoperative MAP targets is feasible; b) in what proportion of patients the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differs from a MAP of 65 mmHg; and c) if maintaining intraoperative MAP above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP is feasible in patients having major non-cardiac surgery. Bicentric pilot randomized trial. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, and RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. Patients ≥ 45 years old having major non-cardiac surgery. Personalized blood pressure management. Proportion of patients in whom preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring was possible; proportion of patients in whom the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differed from a MAP of 65 mmHg (difference > ±10 mmHg); intraoperative time-weighted average MAP below the preoperative mean nighttime MAP. We enrolled 105 patients and randomized 98 patients. In 98 patients (93 %), preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring was possible. In 83 patients (85 %), the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differed from a MAP of 65 mmHg. The median time-weighted average MAP below the preoperative mean nighttime MAP was 3.29 (1.64, 6.82) mmHg in patients assigned to personalized blood pressure management. It seems feasible to determine the effect of personalized perioperative blood pressure management maintaining intraoperative MAP above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP on postoperative complications in a large multicenter trial. [Display omitted] •Optimal blood pressure targets during surgery remain unknown.•Individual nighttime mean arterial pressure (MAP) may be a reasonable blood pressure target.•Performing preoperative automated blood pressure monitoring is feasible.•Nighttime MAP meaningfully differs from a MAP of 65 mmHg in most patients.•Targeting nighttime MAP during surgery is feasible.

Background Myocardial injury is a major cause of death after noncardiac surgery and is associated with long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Perioperative tachycardia increases this risk. Although perioperative beta blockers prevent myocardial injury, they increase the risk of death and stroke, which analyses suggest is due to a significant increase in hypotension. Ivabradine, a selective heart rate-lowering drug, may offer a safer alternative. The primary objective of the PREVENT-MINS trial is to determine whether perioperative administration of ivabradine is superior to placebo for the prevention of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in patients with or at risk of atherosclerotic disease having noncardiac surgery.  Methods The PREVENT-MINS trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 26 hospitals in Poland. It will enroll 2500 patients aged ≥ 45 years undergoing noncardiac surgery with at least one risk factor for myocardial injury. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ivabradine 5 mg orally twice daily for 7 days starting 1 h before surgery or placebo. The primary outcome is MINS within 30 days after randomization; independent experts will adjudicate this outcome. Secondary outcomes include vascular complications, mortality, haemodynamics, and quality of life at 30 days. Additional tertiary and 1-year outcomes will assess long-term cardiovascular and surgical complications. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach. For the primary outcome, a chi-squared test will be conducted, with results presented as unadjusted relative risk (RR) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p -values.  Discussion This trial will generate high-quality, generalizable data due to its large population and rigorous design, including blinding. Moreover, it will be one of the first large-scale trials specifically focused on preventing MINS. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05279651. Registered on 4 March 2022. 

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a multifactorial adverse event most frequently in elderly patients. This study evaluated the effect of dexamethasone on POCD incidence after noncardiac and nonneurologic surgery. One hundred and forty patients (ASA I-II; age 60-87 years) took part in a prospective phase III, double blind, randomized study involving the administration or not of 8 mg of IV dexamethasone before general anesthesia under bispectral index (BIS) between 35-45 or 46-55. Neuropsychological tests were applied preoperatively and on the 3rd, 7th, 21st, 90th and 180th days after surgery and compared with normative data. S100β was evaluated before and 12 hours after induction of anesthesia. The generalized estimating equations (GEE) method was applied, followed by the posthoc Bonferroni test considering P<0.05 as significant. On the 3rd postoperative day, POCD was diagnosed in 25.2% and 15.3% of patients receiving dexamethasone, BIS 35-45, and BIS 46-55 groups, respectively. Meanwhile, POCD was present in 68.2% and 27.2% of patients without dexamethasone, BIS 35-45 and BIS 46-55 groups (p<0.0001). Neuropsychological tests showed that dexamethasone associated to BIS 46-55 decreased the incidence of POCD, especially memory and executive function. The administration of dexamethasone might have prevented the postoperative increase in S100β serum levels. Dexamethasone can reduce the incidence of POCD in elderly patients undergoing surgery, especially when associated with BIS 46-55. The effect of dexamethasone on S100β might be related with some degree of neuroprotection. www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01332812.

Aim Chronic heart failure (HF) is a frequent comorbidity in elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery with increasing prevalence. This trial aims to evaluate a new interdisciplinary, multimodal and individually optimised treatment strategy in patients with established or at risk for HF throughout the entire perioperative period. Methods The PeriOP-CARE HF trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled and interventional trial. The primary hypothesis is that an interdisciplinary, intersectoral and standardised approach to the preoperative evaluation, optimisation and perioperative management of patients aged ≥ 65 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery with intermediate or high surgical risk and preoperative N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels ≥ 450 pg/mL, will reduce postoperative morbidity. The preoperative evaluation includes clinical evaluations by anaesthesiologists and cardiologists, electrocardiography and echocardiography, as well as a discussion of these findings by a perioperative management team, where all involved specialities, including the speciality surgeon, will decide the perioperative treatment strategy for each patient. Intraoperative strategies include individualised haemodynamic optimisation. The interdisciplinary team and specialised HF nurses will screen patients for HF-related postoperative complications. The primary end point will be a composite morbidity end point, comprising any rehospitalisation, acute kidney injury, suspected or proven bacterial infection requiring treatment and acute decompensated HF at postoperative day 90. Conclusion The new treatment form can potentially reduce the morbidity burden after major non-cardiac surgery in patients with known or unknown HF. If the PeriOP-CARE HF trial yields positive results, the treatment of patients with HF undergoing major non-cardiac surgery could be considerably improved. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06381427, registered April 24, 2024.