Explore the vast range of titles available.

Previous randomised renal denervation studies did not show consistent efficacy in reducing blood pressure. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications. SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED was a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Patients were enrolled at 21 centres in the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were drug-naive or discontinued their antihypertensive medications. Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150 mm Hg or greater and less than 180 mm Hg, office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mm Hg or greater, and a mean 24-h ambulatory SBP of 140 mm Hg or greater and less than 170 mm Hg at second screening underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were blinded to randomisation assignments. The primary endpoint, change in 24-h blood pressure at 3 months, was compared between groups. Drug surveillance was done to ensure patient compliance with absence of antihypertensive medication. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed at 3 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439749. Between June 25, 2015, and Jan 30, 2017, 353 patients were screened. 80 patients were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) or sham control (n=42) and followed up for 3 months. Office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months in the renal denervation group: 24-h SBP −5·5 mm Hg (95% CI −9·1 to −2·0; p=0·0031), 24-h DBP −4·8 mm Hg (−7·0 to −2·6; p<0·0001), office SBP −10·0 mm Hg (−15·1 to −4·9; p=0·0004), and office DBP −5·3 mm Hg (−7·8 to −2·7; p=0·0002). No significant changes were seen in the sham-control group: 24-h SBP −0·5 mm Hg (95% CI −3·9 to 2·9; p=0·7644), 24-h DBP −0·4 mm Hg (−2·2 to 1·4; p=0·6448), office SBP −2·3 mm Hg (−6·1 to 1·6; p=0·2381), and office DBP −0·3 mm Hg (−2·9 to 2·2; p=0·8052). The mean difference between the groups favoured renal denervation for 3-month change in both office and 24-h blood pressure from baseline: 24-h SBP −5·0 mm Hg (95% CI −9·9 to −0·2; p=0·0414), 24-h DBP −4·4 mm Hg (−7·2 to −1·6; p=0·0024), office SBP −7·7 mm Hg (−14·0 to −1·5; p=0·0155), and office DBP −4·9 mm Hg (−8·5 to −1·4; p=0·0077). Baseline-adjusted analyses showed similar findings. There were no major adverse events in either group. Results from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED provide biological proof of principle for the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation. Medtronic.

The SYMPLICITY HTN-3 (Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension) trial showed the safety but not efficacy of the Symplicity system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) at 6 months follow-up in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. This final report presents the 36-month follow-up results. SYMPLICITY HTN-3 was a single-blind, multicentre, sham-controlled, randomised clinical trial, done in 88 centres in the USA. Adults aged 18–80 years, with treatment-resistant hypertension on stable, maximally tolerated doses of three or more drugs including a diuretic, who had a seated office systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more and 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mm Hg or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive renal artery denervation using the single electrode (Flex) catheter or a sham control. The original primary endpoint was the change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months for the renal artery denervation group compared with the sham control group. Patients were unmasked after the primary endpoint assessment at 6 months, at which point eligible patients in the sham control group who met the inclusion criteria (office blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg, 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥135 mm Hg, and still prescribed three or more antihypertensive medications) could cross over to receive renal artery denervation. Changes in blood pressure up to 36 months were analysed in patients in the original renal artery denervation group and sham control group, including those who underwent renal artery denervation after 6 months (crossover group) and those who did not (non-crossover group). For comparisons between the renal artery denervation and sham control groups, follow-up blood pressure values were imputed for patients in the crossover group using their most recent pre-crossover masked blood pressure value. We report long-term blood pressure changes in renal artery denervation and sham control groups, and investigate blood pressure control in both groups using time in therapeutic blood pressure range analysis. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of all-cause mortality, end stage renal disease, significant embolic event, renal artery perforation or dissection requiring intervention, vascular complications, hospitalisation for hypertensive crisis unrelated to non-adherence to medications, or new renal artery stenosis of more than 70% within 6 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01418261. From Sep 29, 2011, to May 6, 2013, 1442 patients were screened, of whom 535 (37%; 210 [39%] women and 325 [61%] men; mean age 57·9 years [SD 10·7]) were randomly assigned: 364 (68%) patients received renal artery denervation (mean age 57·9 years [10·4]) and 171 (32%) received the sham control (mean age 56·2 years [11·2]). 36-month follow-up data were available for 219 patients (original renal artery denervation group), 63 patients (crossover group), and 33 patients (non-crossover group). At 36 months, the change in office systolic blood pressure was –26·4 mm Hg (SD 25·9) in the renal artery denervation group and –5·7 mm Hg (24·4) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference –22·1 mm Hg [95% CI –27·2 to –17·0]; p≤0·0001). The change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 36 months was –15·6 mm Hg (SD 20·8) in the renal artery denervation group and –0·3 mm Hg (15·1) in the sham control group (adjusted treatment difference –16·5 mm Hg [95% CI –20·5 to –12·5]; p≤0·0001). Without imputation, the renal artery denervation group spent a significantly longer time in therapeutic blood pressure range (ie, better blood pressure control) than patients in the sham control group (18% [SD 25·0] for the renal artery denervation group vs 9% [SD 18·8] for the sham control group; p≤0·0001) despite a similar medication burden, with consistent and significant results with imputation. Rates of adverse events were similar across treatment groups, with no evidence of late-emerging complications from renal artery denervation. The rate of the composite safety endpoint to 48 months, including all-cause death, new-onset end-stage renal disease, significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage, vascular complication, renal artery re-intervention, and hypertensive emergency was 15% (54 of 352 patients) for the renal artery denervation group, 14% (13 of 96 patients) for the crossover group, and 14% (10 of 69 patients) for the non-crossover group. This final report of the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial adds to the totality of evidence supporting the safety of renal artery denervation to 36 months after the procedure. From 12 months to 36 months after the procedure, patients who were originally randomly assigned to receive renal artery denervation had larger reductions in blood pressure and better blood pressure control compared with patients who received sham control. Medtronic

Catheter-based renal denervation has significantly reduced blood pressure in previous studies. Following a positive pilot trial, the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (SPYRAL Pivotal) trial was designed to assess the efficacy of renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications. In this international, prospective, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial, done at 44 study sites in Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Japan, the UK, and the USA, hypertensive patients with office systolic blood pressure of 150 mm Hg to less than 180 mm Hg were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a renal denervation or sham procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in 24-h systolic blood pressure and the secondary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 3 months after the procedure. We used a Bayesian design with an informative prior, so the primary analysis combines evidence from the pilot and Pivotal trials. The primary efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439749. From June 25, 2015, to Oct 15, 2019, 331 patients were randomly assigned to either renal denervation (n=166) or a sham procedure (n=165). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were met, with posterior probability of superiority more than 0·999 for both. The treatment difference between the two groups for 24-h systolic blood pressure was −3·9 mm Hg (Bayesian 95% credible interval −6·2 to −1·6) and for office systolic blood pressure the difference was −6·5 mm Hg (−9·6 to −3·5). No major device-related or procedural-related safety events occurred up to 3 months. SPYRAL Pivotal showed the superiority of catheter-based renal denervation compared with a sham procedure to safely lower blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications. Medtronic.

Elevated morning and nighttime blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events such as stroke and myocardial infarction. We compared the long-term changes in morning and nighttime BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (office systolic BP between 150 and <180 mmHg/diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg; mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) between 140 and <170 mmHg; 1–3 prescribed antihypertensive medications). Eighty patients were randomized to RDN or sham control. In patients taking at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months ( N  = 23 RDN group; N  = 23 sham group), the 24 h ambulatory SBP as well as morning (7:00–9:00AM) and nighttime (1:00–6:00AM) ambulatory SBP were significantly lower for the RDN group compared to sham control (24 h SBP: −20.2 vs. −10.2, p  = 0.0087; morning SBP: −23.9 vs. −8.0 mmHg, p  = 0.029; nighttime SBP: −20.8 vs. −7.2 mmHg, p  = 0.0011). At 36 months, 24 h SBP was controlled to <130 mmHg in 40% of RDN patients in the morning compared to 6% for the sham group; P  = 0.021 and in 80% of the RDN patients at night compared to 39% in the sham group; P  = 0.019. Major adverse events through 36 months were rare in both groups, and there were no renal artery re-interventions or vascular complications. Morning and nighttime SBP were significantly lower in patients prescribed at least 3 antihypertensive medications at 36 months in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial for RDN compared with sham control. The results suggest RDN has significant benefit when the risk of cardiovascular events is highest.

Renal sympathetic hyperactivity is associated with hypertension and its progression, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. We did a proof-of-principle trial of therapeutic renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension (ie, systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg on three or more antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic) to assess safety and blood-pressure reduction effectiveness. We enrolled 50 patients at five Australian and European centres; 5 patients were excluded for anatomical reasons (mainly on the basis of dual renal artery systems). Patients received percutaneous radiofrequency catheter-based treatment between June, 2007, and November, 2008, with subsequent follow-up to 1 year. We assessed the effectiveness of renal sympathetic denervation with renal noradrenaline spillover in a subgroup of patients. Primary endpoints were office blood pressure and safety data before and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after procedure. Renal angiography was done before, immediately after, and 14–30 days after procedure, and magnetic resonance angiogram 6 months after procedure. We assessed blood-pressure lowering effectiveness by repeated measures ANOVA. This study is registered in Australia and Europe with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT 00483808 and NCT 00664638. In treated patients, baseline mean office blood pressure was 177/101 mm Hg (SD 20/15), (mean 4·7 antihypertensive medications); estimated glomerular filtration rate was 81 mL/min/1·73m 2 (SD 23); and mean reduction in renal noradrenaline spillover was 47% (95% CI 28–65%). Office blood pressures after procedure were reduced by −14/−10, −21/−10, −22/−11, −24/−11, and −27/−17 mm Hg at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In the five non-treated patients, mean rise in office blood pressure was +3/−2, +2/+3, +14/+9, and +26/+17 mm Hg at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. One intraprocedural renal artery dissection occurred before radiofrequency energy delivery, without further sequelae. There were no other renovascular complications. Catheter-based renal denervation causes substantial and sustained blood-pressure reduction, without serious adverse events, in patients with resistant hypertension. Prospective randomised clinical trials are needed to investigate the usefulness of this procedure in the management of this condition. Ardian Inc.

BackgroundRandomized sham-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension. Data on the very long-term effects of renal denervation are scarce.AimsThis study evaluates the 10-year safety and efficacy of renal denervation in resistant hypertension.MethodsThis prospective single-center study included patients with resistant hypertension undergoing radio-frequency renal denervation between 2010 and 2012. Office blood pressure, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, color duplex sonography, and renal function were assessed after 1-, 2- and 10-years.ResultsThirty-nine patients completed the 10-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration 9.4 ± 0.7 years). Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure were 164 ± 23 mmHg and 153 ± 16 mmHg, respectively. After 10 years, 24-h ambulatory and office systolic blood pressure were reduced by 16 ± 17 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 14 ± 23 mmHg (P = 0.001), respectively. The number of antihypertensive drugs remained unchanged from 4.9 ± 1.4 to 4.5 ± 1.2 drugs (P = 0.087). The estimated glomerular filtration rate declined within the expected range from 69 (95% CI 63 to 74) to 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI 53 to 68; P < 0.001) through 10-year follow-up. Three renal artery interventions were documented for progression of pre-existing renal artery stenosis in two patients and one patient with new-onset renal artery stenosis. No other adverse events were observed during the follow-up.ConclusionRenal denervation was safe and sustainedly reduced ambulatory and office blood pressure out to 10 years in patients with resistant hypertension.Left panel, Change in 24-h and office SBP. Right panel, eGFR over time. SBP, systolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Maintaining medication adherence is important in treating hypertension, especially resistant hypertension (RH), and variable medication adherence can confound results in blood pressure trials. This post-hoc analysis evaluated adherence at baseline and 3 months using available urine samples from the REQUIRE trial, comparing 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (ASBP) lowering effects of ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) versus sham in RH. At baseline, 45% (26/58) patients showed poor adherence. Among patients with good baseline adherence, adherence was unchanged at 3 months, and uRDN patients had a decreased ASBP whereas sham patients did not. In poorly adherent patients, sham patients showed a trend towards increased adherence and a significant ASBP reduction, whereas uRDN patients did not change. Accordingly, adherence changes and the resultant ASBP reduction in poorly adherent sham patients may explain the lack of between-group difference seen in REQUIRE. Monitoring and maintaining medication adherence is important for future interventional studies in RH.

Catheter-based renal denervation is a new approach to treat hypertension via modulation of the renal sympathetic nerves. Although nonrandomized and small, open-label randomized studies resulted in significant reductions in office blood pressure 6months after renal denervation with monopolar radiofrequency catheters, the first prospective, randomized, sham-controlled study (Symplicity HTN-3) failed to meet its blood pressure efficacy end point. New clinical trials with new catheters have since been designed to address the limitations of earlier studies. Accordingly, the RADIANCE-HTN and REQUIRE studies are multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trials designed to assess the blood pressure–lowering efficacy of the ultrasound-based renal denervation system (Paradise) in patients with established hypertension either on or off antihypertensive medications, is designed to evaluate patients in 2 cohorts—SOLO and TRIO, in the United States and Europe. The SOLO cohort includes patients with essential hypertension, at low cardiovascular risk, and either controlled on 1 to 2 antihypertensive medications or uncontrolled on 0 to 2 antihypertensive medications. Patients undergo a 4-week medication washout period before randomization to renal denervation (treatment) or renal angiogram (sham). The TRIO cohort includes patients with hypertension resistant to at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. Patients will be stabilized on a single-pill, triple-antihypertensive-drug combination for 4weeks before randomization to treatment or sham. Reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (primary end point) will be assessed at 2months in both cohorts. A predefined medication escalation protocol, as needed for blood pressure control, is implemented between 2 and 6months in both cohorts by a study staff member blinded to the randomization process. At 6months, daytime ambulatory blood pressure and antihypertensive treatment score will be assessed. REQUIRE is designed to evaluate patients with resistant hypertension on standard of care medication in Japan and Korea. Reduction in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure will be assessed at 3months (primary end point). Both studies are enrolling patients, and their results are expected in 2018.

Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham‐controlled SPYRAL HTN‐ON MED study, office‐based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost‐effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) were projected using a decision‐analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta‐regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN‐ON MED trial (oSBP effect size −4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night‐time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost‐effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10‐year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night‐time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost‐effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model‐based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost‐effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.

Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) reduced blood pressure (BP) compared to sham at 2 months in patients with resistant hypertension in the multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial. This analysis evaluates longer-term outcomes of patients randomized to uRDN. Patients with resistant hypertension to a 3-drug combination pill were randomized to uRDN ( n  = 69) or sham ( n  = 67). From 2-5 months, patients followed a standardized anti-hypertensive medication (AHM) titration protocol. At 6 months, patients were unblinded and received AHM per standard of care. In the uRDN group, 71% (49/69) completed 36-month follow-up. Screening office BP was 159/103 on 3.9 AHM. Baseline office BP on the single-pill combination was 153/99 mmHg. At 36 months, office BP changed by −14.5 ± 26.1/−9.0 ± 14.8 mmHg from screening ( p  < 0.001 for both) and −8.0 ± 24.5/−5.0 ± 14.6 mmHg from baseline ( p  = 0.007; p  = 0.022) on 3.7 AHM. The efficacy of uRDN was durable to 36 months in patients with resistant hypertension with no safety concerns.