Explore the vast range of titles available.

•Strategy to detect drugs retrospectively in data files acquired with UHPLC-QTOF-MS.•A crowdsourced database with NPS integrated in an in-house workflow.•Evaluation of a data dependent acquisition method.•Flubromazepam and phenibut were identified in reprocessed data files. The introduction of new psychoactive substances (NPS) on the illicit drug market has led to major challenges for the analytical laboratories. Keeping screening methods up to date with all relevant drugs is hard to achieve and the risk of missing important findings in biological samples is a matter of concern. Aiming for an extended retrospective data analysis, diagnostic fragment ions from synthetic cannabinoids (n=251), synthetic opioids (n=88) and designer benzodiazepines (n=26) not included in our original analytical method were obtained from the crowdsourced database HighResNPS.com and converted to a personalized library in a format compatible with the analytical instrumentation. Data files from the analysis of 1314 forensic post mortem samples with an Agilent 6540 ultra high pressure liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) performed in our laboratory from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrieved and retrospectively processed with the new personalized library. Potentially positive findings were grouped in two: The most confident findings contained MS/MS data for library match (category 1) whereas the less confident findings lacked such data (category 2). Five new category 1 findings were identified: Flubromazepam in two data files from 2015 and 2016, respectively, phenibut (4-amino-3-phenylbutyric acid) in one data file from 2015, fluorofentanyl in one data file from 2016 and cyclopropylfentanyl in one data file from 2018. Retention time matches with reference standards further strengthened these findings. A list of 35 presumably positive category 2 findings was generated. Of these, only one finding of phenibut was considered plausible after checking retention times and signal-to-noise ratios. This study shows that new compounds can be detected retrospectively in data files from QTOF-MS using an updated library containing diagnostic fragment ions. Automatic screening procedures can be useful, but a manual re-evaluation of positive findings will always be necessary.

•Methods were validated for detection of 15 synthetic opioids in postmortem samples.•Six synthetic opioids were detected in authentic cases (n=58).•Concentrations were within 0.1–100ng/mL or ng/g.•Acetylfentanyl and U-47700 concentrations exceeded 100ng/mL or ng/g.•Highest concentrations were observed in brain, followed by blood and vitreous humor. In the US, the use of synthetic opioids (e.g. fentanyl and derivatives) has become an increasing health issue with thousands of overdose deaths being observed since 2013. With the high mortality rate associated with these substances, postmortem analyses and interpretation of synthetic opioids has become extremely important. However, due to the novelty of these compounds, the available data are limited and provides challenges to toxicologists. The objectives of this study were (1) to develop and validate analytical methods for the determination of synthetic opioids in vitreous humor and brain, and (2) to investigate the postmortem distribution of new synthetic opioids in blood, vitreous humor, and brain tissue. Vitreous humor (0.5mL) and brain tissue (5g) homogenized in water (diluted 1:3, w/w) were extracted by mixed mode cation exchange-reversed phase solid phase extraction. Extracts were analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MSMS). The chromatographic separation was performed by reversed-phase with 0.1% formic acid in water and in acetonitrile as mobile phases in gradient mode, with a total run time of 21min. Data were acquired with ESI+ in dynamic multiple reaction mode (dMRM), monitoring 2 transitions per compound. The methods were succesfully validated following SWGTOX guidelines, with limits of quantification of 0.1ng/mL in vitreous humor and 0.1ng/g in brain. Fifty-eight authentic case samples from the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (NYC-OCME) were analyzed to assess the distribution and detectability of synthetic opioids in these postmortem samples. Of the fifteen synthetic opioids included in the method, six synthetic opioids and metabolites (4-ANPP, acetylfentanyl, fentanyl, furanylfentanyl, norfentanyl, U-47700) were detected in the authentic cases. Concentrations for most analytes were within the 0.1 to 100ng/mL or ng/g calibration range across all three matrices, with only concentrations from acetylfentanyl and U-47700 exceeding 100ng/mL or ng/g. The highest concentrations were observed in brain (except norfentanyl), followed by blood and vitreous humor. Most analytes were detected in all three matrices in a given case. This was followed by detection of an analyte in combinations of brain and another matrix or brain only. Through the case analyses, vitreous humor and brain demonstrated to be viable alternatives to blood when performing postmortem analyses of synthetic opioids. Brain exhibited a higher detectability for most analytes when compared to blood and vitreous humor.

•A LC–MS/MS method was developed to detect synthetic cannabinoids in human hair.•The method was selective and sensitive for each analyte.•This method was successfully applied to hair samples of Korean drug abusers.•AB-CHMINACA and JWH-210 were most detected in Korea from 2016 to 2018. Hair is one of the key samples for judging drug abuse in the field of forensic science. However, few studies have examined synthetic cannabinoids and their metabolites in human hair. Synthetic cannabinoids are a class of chemicals that bind to cannabinoid receptors, but they differ structurally from the cannabinoids found in cannabis. They have been sold sprayed on dried, shredded plant material under brand names such as “Spice” since the 2000s. In South Korea, synthetic cannabinoids have been widely distributed since 2009 and many types detected up to now. Unlike traditional drugs such as methamphetamine and cannabis, the abuse trends of synthetic cannabinoids were variable by regions and changed according to the times. If new types of synthetic cannabinoids become popular which has been altered in some structures, it becomes difficult to identify using exist analytical method. Therefore, it is important to develop a new analytical method for synthetic cannabinoids currently being abused in society. In this study, we developed simultaneous analytical methods for the detection of 18 synthetic cannabinoids and 41 of their metabolites in authentic human hair samples using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). Selectivity, linearity, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), precision, accuracy, matrix effect, recovery, and process efficiency were evaluated, and all results were acceptable. Additionally, the distribution of synthetic cannabinoids in the head hair of Korean drug abusers from 2016 to 2018 was investigated. Hair samples from 43 individuals suspected of synthetic cannabinoid use were provided by law enforcement agencies. The drugs detected most prevalently in the head hair of Korean drug abusers were AB-CHMINACA and JWH-210.

In forensic toxicology, the rapid and reliable detection of emerging synthetic opioids and hallucinogens is crucial for case investigations and public health monitoring. This work describes the development, optimization and validation of a simple, fast and sensitive methodology for the simultaneous analysis of 6 new synthetic opioids (carfentanil, fentanyl, isotonitazene, metonitazene, norfentanyl, and sufentanil) and 2 hallucinogens (lysergide [LSD] and mescaline), together with the main LSD metabolite 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-lysergide [LSD-OH], in whole blood samples by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Under optimized experimental conditions, linearity was verified between 0.1 and 20 ng/mL for all analytes except mescaline (2.5–500 ng/mL), with r2 > 0.99 for 1/x weighting, and no significant carryover or matrix effects were observed. Good precision (% RSD < 13 %) and trueness (% Bias within ± 20 %) values were achieved. The estimated limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.1 ng/mL for all compounds except mescaline (2.5 ng/mL). Authentic forensic samples were also analyzed, and positive samples for fentanyl, norfentanyl, and sufentanil were identified. The proposed methodology allows the simultaneous analysis of compounds from different families of psychoactive substances, in both postmortem and in vivo samples, using only 50 µL of whole blood. The demonstrated speed, simplicity, and effectiveness make it particularly advantageous for routine implementation in forensic toxicology laboratories. [Display omitted] •First known UHPLC-MS/MS method for nitazenes and hallucinogens analysis.•Validation of fast method for in vivo and postmortem whole blood samples analysis.•Low sample volume required is advantageous for forensic toxicology laboratories.•Sensitive and extensive linear range for a broad spectrum of concentrations.•Applied to suspected intoxication cases and feasible to routine forensic work.

•To develop and validate an UPLC-MS/MS method for the analysis of 16 fentanyl analogues in hair.•To determine of the prevalence of fentanyl analogue drugs in authentic hair samples from fentanyl users.•First time where concentrations of tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl, and valerylfentanyl in hair are reported.•Determination of poly drug history with segmented hair. Seizures of synthetic opioids have increased since 2012, with a 45 % increase in synthetic opioid related deaths between 2016 and 2017 in US. Recently, concerns have arisen around these substances and their illicit use also in several European countries. Our aim was to develop and validate an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for the analysis of 16 synthetic opioids in segmented hair, including fentanyl, norfentanyl, acetylfentanyl, U-47700, AH-7921, acrylfentanyl, crotonylfentanyl, butyrylfentanyl, methoxacetylfentanyl, U-49900, valeryfentanyl, 4-fluoro-iso-butyrylfentanyl, ocfentanyl, furanylfentanyl, tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl, and alfetanyl. Sample preparation involved washing the hair in dichloromethane, water and methanol, and extraction in methanol, followed by solid phase extraction clean-up. This method was validated for linearity, limit of quantification (LLOQ), precision and bias, selectivity, stability, matrix effects, extraction efficiency of the clean up procedure, and carryover. LLOQs ranged from 0.15−1pg/mg, and the calibration ranged from the LLOQ up to 500pg/mg. Intra and inter-day precision were evaluated at low and high concentrations, with spiked QCs, during 8 days and the results were satisfactory with RSD<15 % for all the compounds except for norfentanyl (22 %) and alfentanyl (19 %). Two external certified QCs containing fentanyl at 11 and 105pg/mg were also analysed within each batch and the RSD and bias were lower than 16 % and 10 %, respectively. Matrix effects compensated by internal standard fentanyl-d5 (MEIS), were between 77–115 % (RSD<10 %) and extraction efficiency of the clean-up procedure was between 66–93 % (RSD<21 %). Processed sample stability and carryover were acceptable for all of the compounds. The method was applied to 17 authentic hair samples (body or head hair) from US fentanyl analogue users. When head hair was available, the hair strands were analysed in 1cm/segment. Concentrations ranges were as follows: fentanyl (n=16) 2->ULOQ (500) pg/mg, norfentanyl (n=14) 1−38pg/mg, acetylfentanyl (n=7) 0.6->ULOQ (250) pg/mg, furanylfentanyl (n=5) 2−123pg/mg, tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl (n=1) 0.5−63pg/mg and valerylfentanyl (n=1) 2.1->ULOQ (50) pg/mg, along the hair strands. To our knowledge, this is the first time where concentrations of tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl, and valerylfentanyl in hair are reported. The same samples were also analysed for the determination of other drugs of abuse using our routine method (also in 1cm/segment for head hair when available). The results demonstrated poly-drug use in these fentanyl-analogue users population (mean drugs: n=5): amphetamine and/or methamphetamine (n=10), buprenorphine (n=5), cocaine (n=8), methadone (n=8), 6-MAM (n=17), meperidine (n=1), oxycodone (n=11), tramadol (n=3). Evaluation of the concentrations of these drugs, together with the fentanyl analogues is discussed in the present paper. Two authentic samples from two Belgian post-mortem cases, were also analysed showing fentanyl use and in one case polydrug use. The results demonstrated multi-analyte quantitative methods, including fentanyl analogues, are becoming useful in forensic laboratories involved in hair analysis, and in particular when polydrug use is suspected.

•5F-ADB is regarded as one of the most dangerous synthetic cannabinoids.•5F-ADB is currently the most frequently consumed SC in Turkey.•Seventy 5F-ADB intoxication case reports are presented.•5F-ADB and its metabolite are detected and quantified in blood and urine.•Bucket method is used for inhalation in Turkey. 5F-ADB (methyl 2-{[1-(5-fluoropentyl)-1H-indazole-3-carbonyl]amino}-3,3-dimethylbutanoate) is a frequently abused new synthetic cannabinoid that has been sold since at least the end of 2014 on the drug market. It has been classified as an illicit drug in most European countries, and also in Turkey, Japan, and the United States. In this study, 5F-ADB and its methyl ester metabolite were determined in the blood and urine samples taken from fatal cases using liquid chromatography–highresolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS). The extraction of samples was performed using a solid-phase extraction method, followed by LC–HRMS analysis. The method was fully validated for linearities, limits of detection (LODs), limits of quantification (LOQs), recoveries, matrix effects, process efficiencies, accuracies, precisions, and stabilities and was applied to 70 blood and 36 urine samples from fatal cases where 5F-ADB was the only drug detected. The LODs were between 0.08 and 0.10ng/mL, and LOQs were between 0.10 and 0.12ng/mL for both blood and urine samples. 5F-ADB and its methyl ester hydrolysis metabolite were found at the blood concentrations ranging from 0.10 to 1.55ng/mL (mean=0.40ng/mL) and 0.15 to 23.4ng/mL (mean=2.69ng/mL), respectively. 5F-ADB was not detected in any urine samples. 5F-ADBmethyl ester hydrolysis metabolite was detected in 35 urine samples with a detection range of 0.28–72.2ng/mL and a mean of 9.02ng/mL. The synthetic cannabinoid 5F-ADB and its methyl ester metabolite were identified and quantified in authentic human blood and/or urine specimens obtained from 70 fatal cases. The method was successfully applied to postmortem blood and urine samples.

[Display omitted] •Furanylfentanyl and 4-ANPP detected and quantitated on fatal intoxication case.•Postmortem redistribution of furanylfentanyl and 4-ANPP was checked in a real case.•Furanylfentanyl and 4-ANPP were quantitated for the first time in CSF. Fatal intoxications due to accidental or voluntary intake of synthetic opioids represent an actual emerging issue. We report a case where we have analyzed furanyl fentanyl and its metabolite 4–anilino-N-phenetyl-piperidine (4-ANPP) in blood, urine, gastric content, bile and cerebrospinal fluid. In this case, a 53-year-old man was found dead at home with a needle still inserted in a vein; a plastic bag containing a white powder (later identified as a furanyl fentanyl-based product) was discovered in the room. Biological samples were collected during autopsy and extracted/purified onto a SPE cartridge before instrumental analysis. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed by LC–MS/MS on peripheral and cardiac blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), bile and gastric content. Furanyl fentanyl was identified and quantified in all the biological fluids collected. Interestingly, gastric content revealed an unexpected high amount of furanyl fentanyl; yet, cardiac blood and femoral blood provided significantly different concentrations (11.8 and 2.7 ng/g respectively). The concentration of furanyl fentanyl in CSF was similar to that measured in femoral blood (2.6 ng/mL), thus confirming that CSF could be a good alternative biological fluid whenever a postmortem redistribution is suspected. Concentrations of 93.5, 50.4, 171.7, 41.9, 10.2 ng/mL(g) were measured for 4-ANPP in cardiac blood, femoral blood, urine, bile and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively. The outcomes from the presented case report suggest that the two substances have been not only injected intravenously, but probably also ingested by the man. Fentanyl derivative and its precursor seemed to undergo an extensive postmortem redistribution.

•CMV seronegative girls between 12 and 17 years of age received CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine with MF59 or saline placebo at 0, 1 and 6 months.•The vaccine was generally well tolerated, although local and systemic adverse events were significantly more common in the vaccine group.•In the per protocol population vaccine efficacy was 43% after 3 doses, p=0.20 and 45%, p=0.08 after 2 doses.•We conclude the vaccine was safe and immunogenic and although the efficacy did not reach significance, the results are consistent with a previous study in adult women (Pass et al NEJM 360:1191, 2009) using the same formulation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of congenital infection and an important target for vaccine development. CMV seronegative girls between 12 and 17 years of age received CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine with MF59 or saline placebo at 0, 1 and 6 months. Blood and urine were collected throughout the study for evidence of CMV infection based on PCR and/or seroconversion to non-vaccine CMV antigens. 402 CMV seronegative subjects were vaccinated (195 vaccine, 207 placebo). The vaccine was generally well tolerated, although local and systemic adverse events were significantly more common in the vaccine group. The vaccine induced gB antibody in all vaccine recipients with a gB geometric mean titer of 13,400EU; 95%CI 11,436, 15,700, after 3 doses. Overall, 48 CMV infections were detected (21 vaccine, 27 placebo). In the per protocol population (124 vaccine, 125 placebo) vaccine efficacy was 43%; 95%CI: −36; 76, p=0.20. The most significant difference was after 2 doses, administered as per protocol; vaccine efficacy 45%, 95%CI: −9; 72, p=0.08. The vaccine was safe and immunogenic. Although the efficacy did not reach conventional levels of significance, the results are consistent with a previous study in adult women (Pass et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1191) using the same formulation.

Emergency contraception can prevent unintended pregnancies, but current methods are only effective if used as soon as possible after sexual intercourse and before ovulation. We compared the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate with levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Women with regular menstrual cycles who presented to a participating family planning clinic requesting emergency contraception within 5 days of unprotected sexual intercourse were eligible for enrolment in this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. 2221 women were randomly assigned to receive a single, supervised dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate (n=1104) or 1·5 mg levonorgestrel (n=1117) orally. Allocation was by block randomisation stratified by centre and time from unprotected sexual intercourse to treatment, with allocation concealment by identical opaque boxes labelled with a unique treatment number. Participants were masked to treatment assignment whereas investigators were not. Follow-up was done 5–7 days after expected onset of next menses. The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate in women who received emergency contraception within 72 h of unprotected sexual intercourse, with a non-inferiority margin of 1% point difference between groups (limit of 1·6 for odds ratio). Analysis was done on the efficacy-evaluable population, which excluded women lost to follow-up, those aged over 35 years, women with unknown follow-up pregnancy status, and those who had re-enrolled in the study. Additionally, we undertook a meta-analysis of our trial and an earlier study to assess the efficacy of ulipristal acetate compared with levonorgestrel. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00551616. In the efficacy-evaluable population, 1696 women received emergency contraception within 72 h of sexual intercourse (ulipristal acetate, n=844; levonorgestrel, n=852). There were 15 pregnancies in the ulipristal acetate group (1·8%, 95% CI 1·0–3·0) and 22 in the levonorgestrel group (2·6%, 1·7–3·9; odds ratio [OR] 0·68, 95% CI 0·35–1·31). In 203 women who received emergency contraception between 72 h and 120 h after sexual intercourse, there were three pregnancies, all of which were in the levonorgestrel group. The most frequent adverse event was headache (ulipristal acetate, 213 events [19·3%] in 1104 women; levonorgestrel, 211 events [18·9%] in 1117 women). Two serious adverse events were judged possibly related to use of emergency contraception; a case of dizziness in the ulipristal acetate group and a molar pregnancy in the levonorgestrel group. In the meta-analysis (0–72 h), there were 22 (1·4%) pregnancies in 1617 women in the ulipristal acetate group and 35 (2·2%) in 1625 women in the levonorgestrel group (OR 0·58, 0·33–0·99; p=0·046). Ulipristal acetate provides women and health-care providers with an effective alternative for emergency contraception that can be used up to 5 days after unprotected sexual intercourse. HRA Pharma.