Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
142 result(s) for "T-DM1"
Sort by:
HER2‐positive breast cancer brain metastasis: A new and exciting landscape
Background Brain metastases (BrM) incidence is 25% to 50% in women with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently the main local treatment approaches for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Systemic anti‐HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of BrM improves outcomes. Previous preclinical data has helped elucidate HER2 brain trophism, the blood‐brain/blood‐tumor barrier(s), and the brain tumor microenvironment, all of which can lead to development of novel therapeutic options. Recent findings Several anti‐HER2 agents are currently available and reviewed here, some of which have recently shown promising effects in BrM patients, specifically. New strategies driven by and focusing on brain metastasis‐specific genomics, immunotherapy, and preventive strategies have shown promising results and are under development. Conclusions The field of HER2+ breast cancer, particularly for BrM, continues to evolve as new therapeutic strategies show promising results in recent clinical trials. Increasing inclusion of patients with BrM in clinical studies, and a focus on assessing their outcomes both intracranially and extracranially, is changing the landscape for patients with HER2+ CNS metastases by demonstrating the ability of newer agents to improve outcomes.
Antibody-drug conjugates—an emerging class of cancer treatment
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging novel class of anticancer treatment agents that combines the selectivity of targeted treatment with the cytotoxic potency of chemotherapy drugs. New linker technology associated with novel highly potent cytotoxic payloads has permitted the development of more effective and safe ADCs. In recent years, two ADCs have been licensed, T-DM1 and brentuximab vedotin, and are already establishing their place in cancer treatment. A plethora of ADCs are being investigated in phases I and II trials, emerging data of which appears promising. As we deepen our understanding of what makes a successful ADC, an increasing number of ADCs will likely become viable treatment options as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy. This review will present the philosophy underlying ADCs, their main characteristics and current research developments with a focus on ADCs in solid tumours.
Acquired resistance to trastuzumab/pertuzumab or to T‐DM1 in vivo can be overcome by HER2 kinase inhibition with TAS0728
HER2‐targeting antibodies (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and a HER2‐directed antibody‐drug conjugate (trastuzumab emtansine: T‐DM1) are used for the treatment of HER2‐overexpressing breast cancer. However, these treatments eventually become ineffective due to acquired resistance and there is an urgent need for alternative therapies. TAS0728 is a small‐molecule, irreversible selective HER2 kinase inhibitor. In the present study, we established new in vivo models of cancer resistance by continuous exposure to a combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab or to T‐DM1 for evaluating the effect of TAS0728 on HER2 antibody‐resistant populations. Treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab or with T‐DM1 initially induced tumor regression in NCI‐N87 xenografts. However, tumor regrowth during treatment indicated loss of drug effectiveness. In tumors with acquired resistance to trastuzumab and pertuzumab or to T‐DM1, HER2‐HER3 phosphorylation was retained. Switching to TAS0728 resulted in a significant anti‐tumor effect associated with HER2‐HER3 signal inhibition. No alternative receptor tyrosine kinase activation was observed in these resistant tumors. Furthermore, in a patient‐derived xenograft model derived from breast cancer refractory to both trastuzumab/pertuzumab and T‐DM1, TAS0728 exerted a potent anti‐tumor effect. These results suggest that tumors with acquired resistance to trastuzumab and pertuzumab and to T‐DM1 are still dependent on oncogenic HER2‐HER3 signaling and are vulnerable to HER2 signal inhibition by TAS0728. These results provide a rationale for TAS0728 therapy for breast cancers that are refractory to established anti‐HER2 therapies. We successfully established, for the first time, in vivo tumor models of trastuzumab and pertuzumab or T‐DM1 resistance, and TAS0728 monotherapy was effective against tumors resistant to these therapies. These results imply that the tumors that are resistant to trastuzumab and pertuzumab or to T‐DM1 do not show cross‐resistance to TAS0728, and that acquired resistance to these therapies can be overcome by HER2 kinase inhibition with TAS0728 in vivo. TAS0728 is a potentially useful treatment option for patients with tumors refractory to established anti‐HER2 antibodies and HER2‐targeting ADCs.
Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: a review of clinical risk factors, pharmacologic prevention, and cardiotoxicity of other HER2-directed therapies
PurposeDespite great success as a targeted breast cancer therapy, trastuzumab use may be complicated by heart failure and loss of left ventricular contractile function. This review summarizes the risk factors, imaging, and prevention of cardiotoxicity associated with trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies.FindingsCardiovascular disease risk factors, advanced age, and previous anthracycline treatment predispose to trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC), with anthracycline exposure being the most significant risk factor. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and pro-BNP and imaging assessments such as echocardiogram before and during trastuzumab therapy may help in early identification of TIC. Initiation of beta-adrenergic antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may prevent TIC. Cardiotoxicity rates of other HER2-targeted treatments, such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and margetuximab, appear to be significantly lower as reported in the pivotal trials which led to their approval.ConclusionsRisk assessment for TIC should include cardiac imaging assessment and should incorporate prior anthracycline use, the strongest risk factor for TIC. Screening and prediction of cardiotoxicity, referral to a cardio-oncology specialist, and initiation of effective prophylactic therapy may all improve prognosis in patients receiving HER2-directed therapy. Beta blockers and ACE inhibitors appear to mitigate risk of TIC. Anthracycline-free regimens have been proven to be efficacious in early HER2-positive breast cancer and should now be considered the standard of care for early HER2-positive breast cancer. Newer HER2-directed therapies appear to have significantly lower cardiotoxicity compared to trastuzumab, but trials are needed in patients who have experienced TIC and patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction.
Aberrant intracellular metabolism of T‐DM1 confers T‐DM1 resistance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐positive gastric cancer cells
Trastuzumab emtansine (T‐DM1), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐targeted mAb trastuzumab linked to antimicrotubule agent mertansine (DM1), has been approved for the treatment of HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. Acquired resistance has been a major obstacle to T‐DM1 treatment, and mechanisms remain incompletely understood. In the present study, we established a T‐DM1‐resistant N87‐KR cell line from HER2‐positive N87 gastric cancer cells to investigate mechanisms of acquired resistance and develop strategies for overcoming it. Although the kinetics of binding, internalization, and externalization of T‐DM1 were the same in N87‐KR cells and N87 cells, N87‐KR was strongly resistant to T‐DM1, but remained sensitive to both trastuzumab and DM1. T‐DM1 failed to inhibit microtubule polymerization in N87‐KR cells. Consistently, lysine‐MCC‐DM1, the active T‐DM1 metabolite that inhibits microtubule polymerization, accumulated much less in N87‐KR cells than in N87 cells. Furthermore, lysosome acidification, achieved by vacuolar H+‐ATPase (V‐ATPase), was much diminished in N87‐KR cells. Notably, treatment of sensitive N87 cells with the V‐ATPase selective inhibitor bafilomycin A1 induced T‐DM1 resistance, suggesting that aberrant V‐ATPase activity decreases T‐DM1 metabolism, leading to T‐DM1 resistance in N87‐KR cells. Interestingly, HER2‐targeted ADCs containing a protease‐cleavable linker, such as hertuzumab‐vc‐monomethyl auristatin E, were capable of efficiently overcoming this resistance. Our results show for the first time that a decrease in T‐DM1 metabolites induced by aberrant V‐ATPase activity contributes to T‐DM1 resistance, which could be overcome by HER2‐targeted ADCs containing different linkers, including a protease‐cleavable linker. Accordingly, we propose that V‐ATPase activity in lysosomes is a novel biomarker for predicting T‐DM1 resistance. To date, acquired resistances arise to be a major obstacle to T‐DM1 treatment and mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Our results demonstrate for the first time that T‐DM1 metabolites reduction induced by V‐ATPase aberation contributes to T‐DM1 resistance, which could be overcome by HER2‐targeted ADC with different linkers including protease‐cleavable linker, and we propose V‐ATPase activity in lysosomes as a novel biomarker to predict T‐DM1 resistance.
HER2 heterogeneity and resistance to anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates
Background There has been substantial interest in HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity as an explanation for the development of resistance to anti-HER2 therapies in breast cancer, particularly to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Methods Through a literature-based approach, we discuss mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in breast cancer. Results We describe results from clinical studies reporting the effect of anti-HER2 strategies particularly ADCs and their mechanistic effect. We review biological findings underlying HER2 heterogeneity and its implication in the development of novel anti-HER2 drugs including new ADCs in clinical development like trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201). Conclusions We suggest potential mechanisms to optimize these compounds and their future clinical implementation.
Loss of HER2 positivity after anti-HER2 chemotherapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer patients: results of the GASTric cancer HER2 reassessment study 3 (GASTHER3)
BackgroundAlthough discordance in HER2 positivity between primary and metastatic lesions is well established, changes in HER2 positivity after anti-HER2 therapy have not been well evaluated in gastric cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether HER2 expression in gastric cancer is affected by trastuzumab therapy.MethodsWe enrolled 48 HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing first-line chemotherapy and had paired biopsies at baseline and after progression.ResultsAt baseline, HER2 was positive, with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ and in situ hybridization (ISH)+ in five patients, and with IHC 3+ in 43 patients. Fourteen patients (29.1%) exhibited loss of HER2 positivity on post-progression biopsy: 10 with IHC 0 or 1+, and four with IHC 2+/ISH−. HER2 remained positive on second biopsy in 34 patients: four with IHC 2+/ISH+, and 30 with IHC 3+. Median H-scores decreased from 225 to 175 (p = 0.047). HER2 genetic heterogeneity was defined in one of 34 ISH-assessable patients (2.9%) at baseline and seven of 32 (21.9%) at second biopsy. Among 13 patients who received second-line trastuzumab emtansine, three showed HER2-negative conversion; they had no objective response and short progression-free survival (1.2, 1.3, and 3.4 months). Patients with stable HER2 status had a 44% response rate and median progression-free survival of 2.7 (0.4–36.8) months.ConclusionA substantial portion of HER2-positive patients showed HER2-negative conversion with increased HER2 genetic heterogeneity after failure of trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy. Loss of HER2 positivity could be predictive of second-line anti-HER2 treatment, suggesting a need to reexamine HER2 status before initiating second-line anti-HER2 therapy.
The Second Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugate SYD985 Overcomes Resistances to T-DM1
Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved for the treatment of HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-positive breast cancer. T-DM1 consists of trastuzumab covalently linked to the cytotoxic maytansinoid DM1 via a non-cleavable linker. Despite its efficacy, primary or acquired resistance frequently develops, particularly in advanced stages of the disease. Second generation ADCs targeting HER2 are meant to supersede T-DM1 by using a cleavable linker and a more potent payload with a different mechanism of action. To determine the effect of one of these novel ADCs, SYD985, on tumors resistant to T-DM1, we developed several patient-derived models of resistance to T-DM1. Characterization of these models showed that previously described mechanisms—HER2 downmodulation, impairment of lysosomal function and upregulation of drug efflux pumps—account for the resistances observed, arguing that mechanisms of resistance to T-DM1 are limited, and most of them have already been described. Importantly, SYD985 was effective in these models, showing that the resistance to first generation ADCs can be overcome with an improved design.
Hsp90 inhibition and co‐incubation with pertuzumab induce internalization and degradation of trastuzumab: Implications for use of T‐DM1
The receptor tyrosine kinase HER2 is associated with a number of human malignancies and is an important therapeutic target. The antibody‐drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T‐DM1; Kadcyla®) is recommended as a first‐line treatment for patients with HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer. T‐DM1 combines the antibody‐induced effects of the anti‐HER2 antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin®) with the cytotoxic effect of the tubulin inhibitor mertansine (DM1). For DM1 to have effect, the T‐DM1‐HER2 complex has to be internalized and the trastuzumab part of T‐DM1 has to be degraded. HER2 is, however, considered endocytosis‐resistant. As a result of this, trastuzumab is only internalized to a highly limited extent, and if internalized, it is rapidly recycled. The exact reasons for the endocytosis resistance of HER2 are not clear, but it is stabilized by heat‐shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and Hsp90 inhibitors induce internalization and degradation of HER2. HER2 can also be internalized upon activation of protein kinase C, and contrary to trastuzumab alone, the combination of two or more anti‐HER2 antibodies can induce efficient internalization and degradation of HER2. With intention to find ways to improve the action of T‐DM1, we investigated how different ways of inducing HER2 internalization leads to degradation of trastuzumab. The results show that although both Hsp90 inhibition and activation of protein kinase C induce internalization of trastuzumab, only Hsp90 inhibition induces degradation. Furthermore, we find that antibody internalization and degradation are increased when trastuzumab is combined with the clinically approved anti‐HER2 antibody pertuzumab (Perjeta®).