Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Tapping panel dryness (TPD) in rubber tree has become the most severe restricting factor of natural rubber production. To date, there is no effective measures to prevent and control TPD. Previous studies primarily focused on analyzing the molecular mechanism underlying TPD occurrence. However, there is no research on the molecular mechanism of TPD recovery. Results In this study, the TPD trees were recovered by treatment with TPD rehabilitation nutrient agents that could promote the recovery of latex flow on the tapping panel of TPD trees. The genes and proteins involved in TPD recovery were first identified by employing integrated transcriptomics and proteomics analyses. In total, 2029 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 951 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were detected in the bark of recovery trees compared to that of TPD trees. Among them, 19 DEPs and 11 DEGs were found to be involved in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway, suggesting their important roles in regulating the syntheses of sucrose and D-glucose, which were the key precursors of natural rubber biosynthesis. Furthermore, 16 DEPs and 15 DEGs were identified in the rubber biosynthesis pathway. Interestingly, almost all the DEPs and DEGs related to rubber biosynthesis exhibited significantly up-regulated expressions in the recovery trees, indicating that latex biosynthesis were probably markedly enhanced during TPD recovery. Conclusions These results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying TPD recovery, as well as excellent supplements to the mechanisms of TPD occurrence, which will contribute to the development of more effective agents for the prevention and treatment of TPD in the future.

Background/Objectives: In the context of facial surgery, particularly reconstructive procedures, sensory recovery is a critical yet often underexplored aspect of functional rehabilitation. Sensory-motor recovery can be considered a key marker of integration following reconstructive surgery. Among sensory modalities, discriminative sensitivity is typically the last to recover, making its evaluation particularly relevant. While established norms for hand sensitivity exist in the literature, there is a paucity of data regarding facial sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the discriminative sensitivity of the face in a population of healthy women aged 45–60 years. Methods: A total of 20 healthy women were included between January and March 2013. Participants had no history of facial pathologies or trauma. Discriminative sensitivity was measured using the Disk-Criminator™ device across eight facial zones. A detailed mapping of the tested areas was performed. Data obtained were compared with the existing literature. Statistical analyses included Shapiro–Wilk tests for normality, followed by Student’s t-tests for group comparisons. To account for small sample size and verify robustness, non-parametric Mann–Whitney U tests were also performed. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied using the Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0125). Results: The mean age of participants was 52.3 years (±4.0 years). Discrimination threshold values ranged from 2.9 to 14.3 mm. Comparison with existing studies showed no significant age-related differences in zone 2R (cheek) and zone 8 (lower lip), suggesting stable sensitivity in these regions across adulthood. However, a significant decline in sensitivity with age was observed only in zone 1R (forehead), with a p-value < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction. Conclusions: We established a reference framework for cutaneous discriminative sensitivity across eight facial zones. These norms can serve as a baseline for the assessment and monitoring of patients with facial pathologies. Furthermore, our findings contribute to a better understanding of age-related sensory changes.