Explore the vast range of titles available.

Rimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, has shown efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine using a standard tablet formulation. The objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel orally disintegrating tablet formulation of rimegepant at 75 mg with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial, adults aged 18 years or older with history of migraine of at least 1 year were recruited to 69 study centres in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned to receive rimegepant (75 mg orally disintegrating tablet) or placebo and instructed to treat a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The randomisation was stratified by the use of prophylactic medication (yes or no), and was carried out using an interactive web response system that was accessed by each clinical site. All participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group assignment. The coprimary endpoints were freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h postdose. The efficacy analyses used the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned, had a migraine attack with pain of moderate or severe intensity, took a dose of rimegepant or placebo, and had at least one efficacy assessment after administration of the dose. The safety analyses included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03461757, and is closed to accrual. Between Feb 27 and Aug 28, 2018, 1811 participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility. 1466 participants were randomly assigned to the rimegepant (n=732) or placebo (n=734) groups, of whom 1375 received treatment with rimegepant (n=682) or placebo (n=693), and 1351 were evaluated for efficacy (rimegepant n=669, placebo n=682). At 2 h postdose, rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet was superior to placebo for freedom from pain (21% vs 11%, p<0·0001; risk difference 10, 95% CI 6–14) and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (35% vs 27%, p=0·0009; risk difference 8, 95% CI 3–13). The most common adverse events were nausea (rimegepant n=11 [2%]; placebo n=3 [<1%]) and urinary tract infection (rimegepant n=10 [1%]; placebo n=4 [1%]). One participant in each treatment group had a transaminase concentration of more than 3 × the upper limit of normal; neither was related to study medication, and no elevations in bilirubin greater than 2 × the upper limit of normal were reported. Treated participants reported no serious adverse events. In the acute treatment of migraine, a single 75 mg dose of rimegepant in an orally disintegrating tablet formulation was more effective than placebo. Tolerability was similar to placebo, with no safety concerns. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals.

Objective Liquid medicines are easy to swallow. However, they may have disadvantages, such as a bad taste or refrigerated storage conditions. These disadvantages may be avoided by the use of oral solid medicines, such as powders or tablets. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability of and preference among four oral formulations in domiciliary infants and preschool children in The Netherlands. Methods Parents administered four oral placebo dosage forms that were aimed at a neutral taste, at home, to their child (1–4 years of age) twice on one day following a randomised cross-over design: small (4 mm) tablet, powder, suspension and syrup. They were asked to report the child's acceptability by a score on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS score) and by the result of the intake. At the end of the study, they were asked to report the preference of the child and themselves. Results 183 children were included and 148 children were evaluated. The data revealed a period/cross-over effect. The estimate of the mean VAS score was significantly higher for the tablet than for the suspension (tablet 9.39/9.01; powder 8.84/8.20, suspension 8.26/7.90, syrup 8.35/8.19; data day 1/all days). The estimate of the mean number of intakes fully swallowed was significantly higher for the tablet than for the other formulations (all p values <0.05). Children and parents preferred the tablet and syrup over the suspension and the suspension over the powder (all p values <0.05). Conclusions All formulations were well accepted. The tablets were the best accepted formulation; the tablets and syrup the most preferred. Trial Registration number ISRCTN63138435.

Gynophilus® (Lcr regenerans®) is a live biotherapeutic product (LBP) that contains the live biotherapeutic microorganism Lactobacillus rhamnosus Lcr35®, which is indicated to restore vaginal health. The aim of the study was to compare the safety, ease of use, and compliance of two formulations (immediate release: IR capsule and slow release: SR muco-adhesive tablets) as well as the colonization of Lcr35® in healthy women. This phase I study (Comprigel) is a parallel, randomized, 4-arm, and open-label clinical trial evaluating an IR daily capsule formulation vs. a SR tablet administered every 3, 4, or 5 days for 21 days. Self-collected vaginal swabs were used to quantify Lcr35® and characterize the composition and structure of the vaginal microbiota. Both LBPs were well-tolerated, and no severe adverse effects were reported. All groups had Lcr35® vaginal concentrations over 107 colony forming unit per milliliter of vaginal secretion on each day in the study. The new Gynophilus® slow release tablets administered either every 3, 4, or 5 days provided vaginal concentrations that were not significantly different from those of classic Gynophilus® (capsule) once-a-day regimen. The LBPs and the different regimens did not adversely influence the abundance of native Lactobacillus spp. and indeed tended to favor their growth and reduce colonization by non-Lactobacillus spp. This study illustrates that the SR muco-adhesive LBP tablet (Gynophilus® SR) administered every 3 or 4 days as a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative to a more demanding IR daily capsule and could protect women’s healthy vaginal microbiome by promoting endogenous Lactobacillus spp.

The acute diarrhea is a wide-spread disease. The prescription of enterosorbents is appropriate as a primary measure for the treatment of the acute diarrhea for effective prevention of the fluid and electrolyte loss, as well as method for symptom relief of the attack of the disease. Aim of the study - the antidiarrheal efficacy and safety study of high-dispersion silicon dioxide enterosorbent in tablet dosage form in patients with acute diarrhea. This was randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-center study. Acute diarrhea was defined as three and more episodes of watery stool per day either during 48 hours or less before study entry in the patients having normal stool recently. It has been postulated that symptoms and signs of acute diarrhea have to be caused by direct infection of the gastrointestinal tract and did not associated with moderate-to-severe systemic states. 144 patients with established acute diarrhea were randomized into treatment group (enterosorbent “Carbowhite”, n = 120) or placebo group. Date collection including severity diarrhea, systemic symptoms was performed at baseline and daily during 7 days. Stool examination and serological assay were performed at baseline. The primary end points were declared as time to complete recovery from acute diarrhea. It has been found that the use of the siliceous enterosorbent (“Carbowhite”) allowed to reduce (p < 0.001) the treatment period averagely for 0.9 days (95% confidence interval 0.5–1.2 days) in comparison with placebo. Data of safety monitoring has revealed that both patient groups had negative stool culture, while initiation of antibiotic treatment was run more frequently in placebo group (8.3%) compared to investigational product group (4.1%, P = 0.044). The siliceous enterosorbent “Carbowhite” was well tolerated and reduced the recovery time of the acute episode of the diarrhea in the clinically significant form.

WHO 2013 guidelines recommend universal treatment for HIV-infected children younger than 5 years. No paediatric trials have compared nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Africa, where most HIV-infected children live. We aimed to compare stavudine, zidovudine, or abacavir as dual or triple fixed-dose-combination paediatric tablets with lamivudine and nevirapine or efavirenz. In this open-label, parallel-group, randomised trial (CHAPAS-3), we enrolled children from one centre in Zambia and three in Uganda who were previously untreated (ART naive) or on stavudine for more than 2 years with viral load less than 50 copies per mL (ART experienced). Computer-generated randomisation tables were incorporated securely within the database. The primary endpoint was grade 2–4 clinical or grade 3/4 laboratory adverse events. Analysis was intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry number, 69078957. Between Nov 8, 2010, and Dec 28, 2011, 480 children were randomised: 156 to stavudine, 159 to zidovudine, and 165 to abacavir. After two were excluded due to randomisation error, 156 children were analysed in the stavudine group, 158 in the zidovudine group, and 164 in the abacavir group, and followed for median 2·3 years (5% lost to follow-up). 365 (76%) were ART naive (median age 2·6 years vs 6·2 years in ART experienced). 917 grade 2–4 clinical or grade 3/4 laboratory adverse events (835 clinical [634 grade 2]; 40 laboratory) occurred in 104 (67%) children on stavudine, 103 (65%) on zidovudine, and 105 (64%), on abacavir (p=0·63; zidovudine vs stavudine: hazard ratio [HR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·75–1·29]; abacavir vs stavudine: HR 0·88 [0·67–1·15]). At 48 weeks, 98 (85%), 81 (80%) and 95 (81%) ART-naive children in the stavudine, zidovudine, and abacavir groups, respectively, had viral load less than 400 copies per mL (p=0·58); most ART-experienced children maintained suppression (p=1·00). All NRTIs had low toxicity and good clinical, immunological, and virological responses. Clinical and subclinical lipodystrophy was not noted in those younger than 5 years and anaemia was no more frequent with zidovudine than with the other drugs. Absence of hypersensitivity reactions, superior resistance profile and once-daily dosing favours abacavir for African children, supporting WHO 2013 guidelines. European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership.

Schizophrenia is a serious mental disorder with high disability rates, and antipsychotics, especially second‐generation ones like aripiprazole, are the cornerstone of treatment. As a novel formulation, oral soluble films (OSF) offer an alternative to tablets or capsules, improving patient compliance. This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence, pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, and safety of aripiprazole OSF and aripiprazole orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) in healthy Chinese participants. A single‐dose, randomized, open‐label, and crossover study was conducted. Participants received 10 mg of test aripiprazole OSF (Qilu Pharmaceutical) and reference aripiprazole ODT (Otsuka Pharmaceutical) under fasting and fed states. The fasting trial comprised a three‐sequence, three‐period design, while the fed trial comprised a two‐sequence, two‐period design. In the fasting trial, after single oral dosing of aripiprazole OSF (with water), aripiprazole OSF (without water), and aripiprazole ODT, Cmax were 55 ± 10 ng/mL, 54 ± 10 ng/mL, and 48 ± 13 ng/mL, respectively; the AUC0‐72h were 1857 ± 377 h·ng/mL, 1823 ± 350 h·ng/mL, and 1745 ± 405 h·ng/mL, respectively. In the fed trial, after single oral dosing of aripiprazole OSF and ODT with water, the Cmax were 43 ± 9 ng/mL and 43 ± 10 ng/mL, respectively; AUC0‐72h were 2024 ± 387 h·ng/mL and 1994 ± 426 h·ng/mL, respectively. In terms of bioequivalence evaluation, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio of the main PK parameters of aripiprazole OSF and ODT in the fasting and fed states were all within the acceptable equivalence range (80%–125%). Both formulations were well‐tolerated. In conclusion, aripiprazole OSF and ODT reached bioequivalence, and aripiprazole OSF demonstrates significant potential for application in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.

PurposeMercaptopurine (6MP) is essential to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A liquid 6MP formulation was recently introduced to facilitate oral 6MP administration, especially to children. Its approval and bioequivalence with 6MP tablet were based on comparative pharmacokinetics in 60 healthy adults. Due to potential pharmacokinetic differences between healthy adults and children with ALL, we compared pharmacokinetics of tablet and liquid 6MP formulations in children with ALL.MethodsPharmacokinetics of 50 mg 6MP tablet (Puri-Nethol®) and 20 mg/ml 6MP liquid suspension (Xaluprine®) were compared in a non-blinded, random order, single-dose, cross-over study in 16 children with ALL (eight males). 6MP was administered after a 12 h fast, and 6MP plasma concentrations measured consecutively over seven hours post-dose. Pharmacokinetic outcomes were as follows: Area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and terminal half-life (T½).ResultsLiquid 6MP formulation resulted in a 26% lower AUC (p = 0.02) compared with tablet (median 1215 vs. 1805 h × nmol/l). No significant differences were observed for Cmax,Tmax and T½ (p = 0.28, p = 0.09, p = 0.41, respectively). Based on criteria declared by the World Health Organization the results did not establish non-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet.ConclusionNon-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet was not demonstrated. Yet, maintenance therapy doses are adjusted by degree of myelosuppression and not by 6MP dose. Thus, in spite of a lower bioavailability, a liquid 6MP formulation is still desirable in a clinical setting, especially for children. However, if shifting between 6MP formulation is indicated, dose adjustments should be anticipated to maintain equivalent treatment intensity in children with ALL.The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01906671). Date of registration: 24.07.13.

Due to large dosage variation, a variety of warfarin prescription regimens are utilized for specific doses such as tablet splitting, or pill strength alternating. The clinical comparison between the two is lacking. We hypothesize that both approaches result in different times in therapeutic range. We randomized patients with specific warfarin dosage and stable INR for 6 months or longer to receive the whole tablet, alternate-day dosing or the split tablet, same daily-dosing regimen without initial dose change and followed them every 6 weeks for 6 months. The primary outcome was a time in therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. The secondary outcomes included dosage, compliance, INR, anticoagulant-related events. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 32 randomly assigned to the split tablet regimen (group S) and 34 to the alternate-day regimen (group A) with two withdrawers. The mean age was 58.6 ± 8.5 years. All baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The average time in therapeutic range was 72.8 ± 25.4% in group S and 74.9 ± 22.0% in group A ( p  = 0.72). There were no significant differences in warfarin dosage, compliance, INR and, complications between the two groups. Both warfarin prescription methods, the split tablet and the alternate-day had comparable time in the therapeutic range.

A new orodispersible film formulation of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, has been developed to examine the advantages of an orally disintegrating film formulation and provide an alternative to the current marketed products for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The pharmacokinetics of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film (IBSA) was compared to that of the conventional marketed 100 mg film-coated tablet (Viagra ) after single-dose administration to 53 healthy male volunteers (aged 18-51 years) in a randomized, open, two-way crossover bioequivalence study. Each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg of sildenafil as test or reference formulation administered under fasting conditions at each of the two study periods according to a randomized crossover design. There was a washout interval of ≥7 days between the two administrations of the investigational medicinal products. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected up to 24 h post-dosing. The primary objective was to compare the rate (peak plasma concentration; C ) and extent (area under the curve [AUC] from administration to last observed concentration time; AUC ) of sildenafil absorption after single-dose administration of test and reference. Secondary endpoints were observed to describe the plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of sildenafil and its metabolite N-desmethyl-sildenafil relative bioavailability and safety profile after single-dose administration. The mean sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil plasma concentration-time profiles up to 24 h after single-dose administration of sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film and film-coated tablet were nearly superimposable. The bioequivalence test was fully satisfied for sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil in terms of rate and extent of bioavailability. Adverse events occurred at similar rates for the two formulations and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The results suggest that the new orodispersible film formulation can be used interchangeably with the conventional film-coated formulation.

Background A pivotal randomised, blinded, positive-controlled, multicentre, European field study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel combination tablet of lotilaner and milbemycin oxime (Credelio ® Plus) administered orally to client-owned dogs naturally infested with fleas and/or ticks. Methods In this field study, households with flea- or tick-infested dog(s) were enrolled on Day 0 into the study to provide data for either the tick or flea infestation cohorts. Households were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the combination investigational product (IP, Credelio Plus ® tablets) or the control product (CP: Nexgard Spectra ® tablets). Dogs were administered IP (flea cohort n  = 135; tick cohort: n  = 147) or CP (flea cohort: n  = 67; tick cohort: n  = 74) once every 4 weeks for a total of three times at a dose rate of 20.0–41.5 mg/kg bodyweight lotilaner and 0.75–1.53 mg/kg bodyweight milbemycin oxime (IP) or as recommended (CP). Percentage reduction was calculated by comparing individual dog flea and tick counts at each assessed post-treatment time point to their respective baseline (pre-treatment) infestation. Resolution of the clinical signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) was assessed in flea-allergic dogs on the days that flea counts were performed. Results Flea effectiveness of Credelio Plus ® after 3 consecutive monthly treatments was 100% against Ctenocephalides felis , C. canis and Pulex irritans . Tick effectiveness of Credelio Plus ® over the same time frame was 99.3% for Ixodes ricinus and 100% against Rhipicephalus sanguineus ( s.l. ). Flea effectiveness of the CP after three consecutive monthly treatments was 100% against C. felis , C. canis and P. irritans . Tick effectiveness of the CP over the same time frame was 99.8% for I. ricinus and 100% against R. sanguineus . Credelio Plus ® was well tolerated based on the safety assessments in all treated dogs in this field study. Within both treatment groups there was a reduction in total FAD scores from baseline. Conclusions This pivotal European field study demonstrated the excellent effectiveness and safety of a combination of lotilaner and milbemycin oxime (Credelio Plus ® ) administered orally to dogs naturally infested with fleas and/or ticks. Graphical Abstract