Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
91,056
result(s) for
"Team science"
Sort by:
Introducing Microsoft Teams : understanding the new chat-based workspace in Office 365
Gain industry best practices from planning to implementing Microsoft Teams and learn how to enable, configure, and integrate user provisioning, management, and monitoring. This book also covers troubleshooting Teams with step-by-step instructions and examples. You'll learn how to migrate from Skype for Business to Microsoft Teams with a step-by-step tutorial. This Book Is For Unified communication administrators and IT support engineers who are currently supporting an existing unified communication platform such as Skype for Business (Lync). It would also help support engineers, new administrators, and consultant to start their journey with Teams.
Book
Tracking the featured topics of the International Science of Team Science conference series and their evolution during 2010–2019
In this paper, we study how research topics and trends have evolved in the field of the science of team science (SciTS). Over the past 12 years, the International Science of Team Science conference has been making efforts to understand and enhance the processes and outcomes of collaborative team science. We argue that the sessions and papers in academic conferences are the best way to reflect the latest research trends. Based on the panel sessions and submitted papers in conference programs during 2010–2019, this study tracks the featured topics and how they have evolved in the field. We extracted terms from the titles of the sessions and papers, and visualized the research hotspots, research topics, and how they have evolved for analysis. We found that the research hotspots are constantly changing, and the research topics present evolutionary characteristics, such as continuation, split, and fusion. Additionally, we examined the models and case studies of team science, the characteristics and dynamics of teams, the interdisciplinary research dynamics in team science, team science education and training, and how team science is measured and evaluated. These results summarize the major research trends and opportunities in the SciTS field.
Journal Article
Dagger 22 : U.S. Marine Corps special operations in Bala Murghab, Afghanistan
In this sequel to Level Zero Heroes ... \"nothing in Bala Murghab comes easily as combat operations wear on the operators of Dagger 22 as they lean on each other once again in order to complete their mission in one of the most brutal environments on earth\"--Amazon.com.
Book
Individual and team competencies in translational teams
Translational scientists create, advance, and translate knowledge as a result of research, learning, and application. Translational teams are composed of dynamic and diverse interprofessional and cross-disciplinary members that generate new knowledge to address a shared translational objective. The objective involves advancing an interventional product, behavioral intervention, or evidence-based approach to improve human health. This paper focuses on identifying individual and team competencies using a modified Delphi method to reach a consensus on the competencies needed by translational teams (TTs).
Journal Article
Strong inside : Perry Wallace and the collision of race and sports in the South
The \"untold story of Perry Wallace, a brilliant student and talented athlete who became the first African-American basketball player in the SEC at Vanderbilt University during the tumultuous late 1960s. The [book] places Wallace's struggles and ultimate success into the larger contexts of civil rights and race relations in the South\"--Provided by publisher.
Book
An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all
As the need to tackle complex clinical and societal problems rises, researchers are increasingly taking on a translational approach. This approach, which seeks to integrate theories, methodologies, and frameworks from various disciplines across a team of researchers, places emphasis on translation of findings in order to offer practical solutions to real-world problems. While translational research leads to a number of positive outcomes, there are also a multitude of barriers to conducting effective team science, such as effective coordination and communication across the organizational, disciplinary, and even geographic boundaries of science teams. Given these barriers to success, there is a significant need to establish team interventions that increase science team effectiveness as translational research becomes the new face of science. This review is intended to provide translational scientists with an understanding of barriers to effective team science and equip them with the necessary tools to overcome such barriers. We provide an overview of translational science teams, discuss barriers to science team effectiveness, demonstrate the lacking state of current interventions, and present recommendations for improving interventions in science teams by applying best practices from the teams and groups literature across the four phases of transdisciplinary research.
Journal Article
The science of team science (SciTS): An emerging and evolving field of interdisciplinary collaboration
In recent years, collaboration within a team to solve complicated scientific and social problems has attracted growing popularity. In particular, many complex challenges and opportunities require expertise and skills across disciplinary, organizational, and cultural boundaries. However, rapid growth in the demand for scientific collaboration has outpaced changes in the factors needed to support scientific teams. Also, scientific results are not simply a combination of different working results; understanding how teams work and what causes them to fail or succeed is of the utmost importance. Thus, the Science of Team Science (SciTS), an emerging interdisciplinary research area, has emerged as a way of understanding and managing the circumstances that facilitate or hinder the effectiveness of large-scale cross-disciplinary, collaborative research, training, and translational initiatives. SciTS integrates various quantitative and qualitative research methods and is still advancing in its sophistication. Using bibliometric and information visualization methods, this paper clarifies the concepts and connotations of teams and team science. It sets out important events in the emergence and development of SciTS and summarizes the characteristics of the SciTS literature, identifying seven main research areas. The paper concludes with a discussion on the challenges facing the future advancement of SciTS and corresponding recommendations for breaking through these bottlenecks. Our goal is to deepen researchers’ understanding of SciTS and better inform the policies and practices that govern SciTS for more effective team science.
Journal Article
Reflections on and a short review of the science of team science
We provide a short overview of the science of team science (SciTS). Starting from the notion of a scientific team, we move to interdisciplinary studies and finally the Science of Team Science itself. We describe the main areas of research in this field. As co-authorship networks may grow over time, which can lead to a future “global brain”, understanding how teams work and what leads to their failure or success is of the utmost importance. A thorough study of team science in all its aspects needs a collaborative, interdisciplinary and international approach. Such an approach will result in reaching the main objective of SciTS, namely to use science to transform the ways researchers do science and to enhance their effectiveness.
Journal Article
Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention
Team Methods to Advance Processes and Performance in Science (TeamMAPPS) is an evidence-based Team Science competency model and intervention. TeamMAPPS was developed by experts in the Science of Team Science with translational teams in mind. TeamMAPPS focuses on three core teamwork competencies: (1) psychological safety, (2) awareness and exchange, and (3) self-correction and adaptation. In 2023, the TeamMAPPS framework was operationalized into five online training modules that can be used to train whole teams or individuals, with or without facilitation, in any order. This article reports formative findings from the pre-implementation stage of the TeamMAPPS Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) study.
We conducted 27 interviews and participant-observation fieldwork with 23 individuals involved in the conceptualization, design, or implementation of TeamMAPPS (four were interviewed twice). All implementers were affiliated with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hub. Data were collected during pre-implementation, when modules were being tested and early-stage implementers were being trained. We used D&I theories and frameworks to structure the study, analyze interview data, and recommend implementation strategies.
\"Adoption,\" \"reach,\" and \"effectiveness\" emerged as key implementation outcomes. TeamMAPPS was perceived to be evidence-based, highly adaptable, and a Team Science intervention offering unique benefits. We draw on participants' responses and expert recommendations to suggest implementation strategies.
CTSAs and other organizations can use varied strategies to implement TeamMAPPS. The flexibility of the intervention and its rootedness in an evidence-base synthesized by Team Science leaders make TeamMAPPS appealing for CTSAs seeking to enhance their team training offerings.
Journal Article
A Quantitative Perspective on Ethics in Large Team Science
The gradual crowding out of singleton and small team science by large team endeavors is challenging key features of research culture. It is therefore important for the future of scientific practice to reflect upon the individual scientist’s ethical responsibilities within teams. To facilitate this reflection we show labor force trends in the US revealing a skewed growth in academic ranks and increased levels of competition for promotion within the system; we analyze teaming trends across disciplines and national borders demonstrating why it is becoming difficult to distribute credit and to avoid conflicts of interest; and we use more than a century of Nobel prize data to show how science is outgrowing its old institutions of singleton awards. Of particular concern within the large team environment is the weakening of the mentor–mentee relation, which undermines the cultivation of virtue ethics across scientific generations. These trends and emerging organizational complexities call for a universal set of behavioral norms that transcend team heterogeneity and hierarchy. To this end, our expository analysis provides a survey of ethical issues in team settings to inform science ethics education and science policy.
Journal Article