Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To derive estimates of CYP1A2 abundance as a function of daily cigarette consumption and use these values to predict the clearances of CYP1A2 substrates in smokers. Methods Smoking-induced changes in hepatic CYP1A2 abundance were extrapolated from reported in vivo caffeine clearance data for sub-groups of a smoking population that were categorized according to their daily cigarette consumption. These abundance values together with in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) within the Simcyp population-based Simulator were used to predict the clearances of caffeine, theophylline, and clozapine in smokers. The model was used subsequently to predict differences in oral clearance between smoker and non-smoker cohorts in a Phase 1 clinical trial involving PF-2400013, a drug metabolized by CYP1A2. Results Estimated hepatic CYP1A2 abundance values were 52, 64, 79, 90, and 94 pmol/mg microsomal protein for subjects smoking 0, 1–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 cigarettes/day respectively. Predicted -fold increases in oral clearance of caffeine, theophylline and clozapine in smokers relative to non-smokers were consistent with observed data. The validated model was able to recover the smoking-induced increase in oral clearance of PF-2400013; predicted and observed mean (CV%) values in male nonsmokers and smokers were 90 L/h (40%) and 141 L/h (34%) respectively, and 100 L/h (58%) and 131 L/h (33%) respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrates that it may be possible to predict the clearance of CYP1A2 substrates in smoking populations using quantitative estimates of CYP1A2 abundance based on daily cigarette consumption in conjunction with an IVIVE approach.

Objective: To determine whether duloxetine is a substrate, inhibitor or inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme, using in vitro and in vivo studies in humans. Methods: Human liver microsomes or cells with expressed CYP enzymes and specific CYP inhibitors were used to identify which CYP enzymes catalyse the initial oxidation steps in the metabolism of duloxetine. The potential of duloxetine to inhibit CYP1A2 activity was determined using incubations with human liver microsomes and phenacetin, the CYP1A2 substrate. The potential for duloxetine to induce CYP1A2 activity was determined using human primary hepatocytes treated with duloxetine for 72 hours. Studies in humans were conducted using fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and theophylline, a CYP1A2 substrate, as probes. The subjects were healthy men and women aged 18–65 years. Single-dose duloxetine was administered either intravenously as a 10-mg infusion over 30 minutes or orally as a 60-mg dose in the presence or absence of steady-state fluvoxamine (100 mg orally once daily). Single-dose theophylline was given as 30-minute intravenous infusions of aminophylline 250 mg in the presence or absence of steady-state duloxetine (60 mg orally twice daily). Plasma concentrations of duloxetine, its metabolites and theophylline were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods and evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA. Safety measurements included vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, a physical examination, ECG readings and adverse event reports. Results: The in vitro results indicated that duloxetine is metabolized by CYP1A2; however, duloxetine was predicted not to be an inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2 in humans. Following oral administration in the presence of fluvoxamine, the duloxetine area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC ∞ ) and the maximum plasma drug concentration (C max ) significantly increased by 460% (90% CI 359, 584) and 141% (90% CI 93, 200), respectively. In the presence of fluvoxamine, the oral bioavailability of duloxetine increased from 42.8% to 81.9%. In the presence of duloxetine, the theophylline AUC ∞ and C max increased by only 13% (90% CI 7, 18) and 7% (90% CI 2,14), respectively. Coadministration of duloxetine with fluvoxamine or theophylline did not result in any clinically important safety concerns, and these combinations were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Duloxetine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2; therefore, coadministration of duloxetine with potent CYP1A2 inhibitors should be avoided. Duloxetine does not seem to be a clinically significant inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2; therefore, dose adjustment of CYP1A2 substrates may not be necessary when they are coadministered with duloxetine.

Background and objective: Most proton pump inhibitors are extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, as are many other drugs, giving rise to potential drug-drug interactions. Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) [TAK-390MR] is a modified-release formulation of dexlansoprazole (TAK-390), an enantiomer of lansoprazole, which employs an innovative Dual Delayed Release™ technology designed to prolong the plasma dexlansoprazole concentration-time profile following once-daily oral administration. As with lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole is metabolized mainly by CYP3A and CYP2C19. Based on in vitro studies, dexlansoprazole has the potential to inhibit activity of these isoenzymes and also may induce human hepatic CYP1A and CYP2C9 activity. To determine whether dexlansoprazole has an effect on these isoenzymes in vivo , drug interaction studies with dexlansoprazole MR were conducted. Methods: Four separate randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover, placebo-controlled, single-centre studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the effect of dexlansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of four test substrates (diazepam, phenytoin, theophylline [administered as intravenous aminophylline] and warfarin), which were selected based on in vitro and/or in vivo data that suggest a potential drug interaction with CYP isoenzymes or potentially coadministered narrow therapeutic index drugs. In each study, dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg or placebo was administered once daily for 9 or 11 days in each period. Subjects received a single dose of test substrate in each study period. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the test substrates were estimated using noncompartmental methods. A conclusion of no effect of dexlansoprazole MR on the test substrate was made if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the central values for the observed maximum plasma drug concentration (C max ) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of test substrate administered with dexlansoprazole MR versus placebo were within 0.80–1.25 based on an analysis of variance model. The potential for a pharmacodynamic interaction was also assessed for warfarin using prothrombin time, measured as the international normalized ratio. Routine safety assessments were conducted in these studies. Results: Mean C max and AUC values were generally similar for each test substrate when administered with multiple once-daily doses of dexlansoprazole MR or placebo. The 90% CIs for the bioavailability of these test substrates administered with dexlansoprazole MR relative to that obtained when the substrates were administered with placebo were within the bioequivalency range of 0.80–1.25, indicating that multiple doses of dexlansoprazole MR had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. Additionally, dexlansoprazole MR had no effect on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Administration of these drugs with dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg or placebo was well tolerated; the only serious adverse event, which led to a subject’s discontinuation from the study, was considered unrelated to study drugs. Conclusions: Coadministration of dexlansoprazole MR with diazepam, phenytoin or theophylline did not affect the pharmacokinetics of these drugs, and therefore is unlikely to alter the pharmacokinetic profile of other drugs metabolized by CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP1A2 and perhaps CYP3A. Additionally, dexlansoprazole MR coadministered with warfarin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of the warfarin enantiomers and had no effect on the anticoagulant activity of warfarin. Dexlansoprazole MR was well tolerated in these trials of healthy subjects.

Abstract Theophylline (dimethylxanthine) has been used to treat airway diseases for more than 80 years. It was originally used as a bronchodilator, but the relatively high doses required are associated with frequent side effects, so its use declined as inhaled β2-agonists became more widely used. More recently it has been shown to have antiinflammatory effects in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at lower concentrations. The molecular mechanism of bronchodilatation is inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE)3, but the antiinflammatory effect may be due to inhibition of PDE4 and histone deacetylase-2 activation, resulting in switching off of activated inflammatory genes. Through this mechanism, theophylline also reverses corticosteroid resistance, and this may be of particular value in severe asthma and COPD, wherein histone deacetylase-2 activity is reduced. Theophylline is given systemically (orally as slow-release preparations for chronic treatment and intravenously for acute exacerbations of asthma). Efficacy is related to blood concentrations, which are determined mainly by hepatic metabolism, which may be increased or decreased in several diseases and by concomitant drug therapy. Theophylline is now usually used as an add-on therapy in patients with asthma not well controlled on inhaled corticosteroids with or without long-acting β2-agonists and in patients with COPD with severe disease not controlled by bronchodilator therapy. Side effects are related to plasma concentrations and include nausea, vomiting, and headaches due to PDE inhibition and at higher concentrations to cardiac arrhythmias and seizures due to adenosine A1-receptor antagonism. In the future, low-dose theophylline may be useful in reversing corticosteroid resistance in COPD and severe asthma.

Aim： To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between theophylline and antofloxacin in vivo and in vitro. Methods： A randomized, 5-day treatment and 3-way crossover design was documented in 12 healthy subjects. The subjects were orally administered with antofloxacin （400 mg on d I and 200 mg on d 2 to 5）, theophylline （100 mg twice a day and morning dose 200 mg on d I and 5）, or theophylline plus antofloxacin. The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of antofloxacin and theophylline were characterized after the first and last dose. The effect of antofloxacin on theophylline metabolism was also investigated in pooled human liver microsomes. Results： The 5-day treatment with antofloxacin significantly increased the area of the plasma concentration-time curve and peak plasma concentration of theophylline, accompanied by a decrease in the excretion of theophylline metabolites. On the contrary, theophylline did not affect the pharmacokinetics of antofloxacin. In vitro studies using pooled human hepatic microsomes demonstrated that antofloxacin was a weak reversible and mechanism-based inhibitor of CYPIA2. The clinical interaction between theophylline and antofloxacin was further validated by the in vitro results. Conclusion： The results showed that antofloxacin increases the plasma theophylline concentration, partly by acting as a mechanismbased inhibitor of CYP1A2.

Objective We studied the effects of gender and smoking on the pharmacokinetics and effects of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 substrate tizanidine. Methods Seventy-one healthy young volunteers (male and female nonsmokers, male smokers) ingested 4 mg tizanidine. Plasma concentrations and pharmacodynamics of tizanidine were measured, and a caffeine test was performed. Results Among nonsmokers, the peak concentration (C max ) and area under concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of tizanidine did not differ significantly between females and males. However, the half-life (t 1/2 ) was 9% shorter in female nonsmokers than in male nonsmokers ( P  < 0.05). In male smokers, the t 1/2 was 10% shorter and the weight-adjusted AUC(0-∞) 33% smaller than in male nonsmokers ( P  < 0.05). The caffeine/paraxanthine ratio was 35–40% smaller ( P  = 0.001) in male smokers than in nonsmoking males or females, but did not differ between males and females. Tizanidine lowered blood pressure and caused drowsiness significantly ( P  < 0.05) more in females than in either male groups. The effects on blood pressure were smallest in male smokers ( P  < 0.05). Conclusions Gender by itself seems to have no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of tizanidine, whereas smoking reduces plasma concentrations and effects of tizanidine. Any possible effect of gender and smoking is largely outweighed by individual variability in CYP1A2 activity due to genetic and environmental factors and in body weight. Careful dosing of tizanidine is warranted in small females, whereas male smokers can require higher than average doses.

Skin penetration/permeation enhancers are compounds that improve (trans)dermal drug delivery. We designed hybrid terpene-amino acid enhancers by conjugating natural terpenes (citronellol, geraniol, nerol, farnesol, linalool, perillyl alcohol, menthol, borneol, carveol) or cinnamyl alcohol with 6-(dimethylamino)hexanoic acid through a biodegradable ester linker. The compounds were screened for their ability to increase the delivery of theophylline and hydrocortisone through and into human skin ex vivo . The citronellyl, bornyl and cinnamyl esters showed exceptional permeation-enhancing properties (enhancement ratios up to 82) while having low cellular toxicities. The barrier function of enhancer-treated skin (assessed by transepidermal water loss and electrical impedance) recovered within 24 h. Infrared spectroscopy suggested that these esters fluidized the stratum corneum lipids. Furthermore, the citronellyl ester increased the epidermal concentration of topically applied cidofovir, which is a potent antiviral and anticancer drug, by 15-fold. In conclusion, citronellyl 6-(dimethylamino)hexanoate is an outstanding enhancer with an advantageous combination of properties, which may improve the delivery of drugs that have a limited ability to cross biological barriers.

Background and Objectives Current cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and 3A4 ontogeny profiles, which are derived mainly from in vitro studies and incorporated in paediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, have been reported to under-predict the in vivo clearances of some model substrates in neonates and infants. Method We report ontogeny functions for these enzymes as paediatric to adult relative intrinsic clearance per mg of hepatic microsomal protein, based on the deconvolution of in vivo pharmacokinetic data and by accounting for the impact of known clinical condition on hepatic unbound intrinsic clearance for caffeine and theophylline as markers of CYP1A2 activity and for midazolam as a marker of CYP3A4 activity. Results The function for CYP1A2 describes an increase in relative intrinsic metabolic clearance from birth to 3 years followed by a decrease to adult values. The function for CYP3A4 describes a continuous rise in relative intrinsic metabolic clearance, reaching the adult value at about 1.3 years of age. The new models were validated by showing improved predictions of the systemic clearances of ropivacaine (major CYP1A2 substrate; minor CYP3A4 substrate) and alfentanil (major CYP3A4 substrate) compared with those using a previous ontogeny function based on in vitro data (alfentanil: mean squared prediction error 3.0 vs. 6.8; ropivacaine: mean squared prediction error 2.3 vs.14.2). Conclusions When implementing enzyme ontogeny functions, it is important to consider potential confounding factors (e.g. disease) that may affect the physiological conditions of the patient and, hence, the prediction of net in vivo clearance.

Terbutaline is used for the management of bronchospasm associated with asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic review would be beneficial to assess the impact of routes of administration, stereoisomerism, disease states, smoking, age, exercise, and chronobiology on pharmacokinetics (PK) of terbutaline in humans. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to screen all the relevant articles consisting of at least one of the PK parameters after administration of oral, inhaled, and intravenous (IV) terbutaline in humans. Oral studies of terbutaline depicted a linear relationship between plasma concentration ( C p ) and the administered dose. The IV studies demonstrated multi-exponential behavior for disposition and renal clearance. Higher systemic availability was observed with inhaled as compared to oral route, and chrono-pharmacokinetic behavior was notable. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration ( T max ) was prolonged, and maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) was lowered after exercise. The primary route of excretion in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is reported to be nonrenal. In pregnant women, the C p of terbutaline is lowered and clearance is increased. The addition of theophylline to terbutaline did not affect the PK of terbutaline; hence, both can be used without dose adjustment. This review summarizes all the available PK parameters of terbutaline, and it may be helpful for researchers in the development and evaluation of PK models as well as in designing optimal dosage regimens in different clinical conditions.

BackgroundTherapeutic monitoring of theophylline serum levels is required due to its narrow therapeutic range and marked interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. We evaluated therapeutic drug monitoring service for theophylline in Slovenian clinical setting, which currently includes no pharmacokinetic evaluation of measured theophylline serum concentrations. MethodsWe  retrospectively evaluated 127 randomly selected theophylline serum level determinations performed in 2010 in a tertiary clinical setting in Slovenia. Demographic data, information on theophylline dosing and blood sampling was collected from patients’ data files. Authors evaluated the appropriateness of the following procedures: indications for theophylline serum concentration measurement, timing of blood sampling and dosage adjustments made after theophylline levels had been reported. On the basis of collected data, population pharmacokinetic model for theophylline was built and further used for the evaluation of dosage adjustments. ResultsOut of 127 cases, 107 (84.3%) had clinically justified indication for theophylline serum level measurement. Near half of measurements (44.9%) were performed before the steady state of theophylline concentrations was established. 65% of measured concentrations were subtherapeutic and the average measured concentration was below therapeutic range (53.1 μmol/L). Despite subtherapeutic concentrations the dose of theophylline was mainly not increased. Pharmacokinetic model enabled the calculation of average optimal daily dose which was significantly higher than the average actual daily dose used (876 mg vs. 572 mg, p < 0.001). ConclusionsTheophylline TDM service should be optimized and pharmacokinetic interpretation of theophylline serum levels should be integrated into clinical practice.