Explore the vast range of titles available.

For the first time, a comprehensive review is presented on the quantitative determination of narrow therapeutic index drugs (NTIDs) by nano optical and electrochemical sensors and biosensors. NTIDs have a narrow index between their effective doses and those at which they produce adverse toxic effects. Therefore, accurate determination of these drugs is very important for clinicians to provide a clear judgment about drug therapy for patients. Routine analytical techniques have limitations such as being expensive, laborious, and time-consuming, and need a skilled user and therefore  the nano/(bio)sensing technology leads to high interest. Graphical abstract

The link between the antimicrobial and anticancer activity of peptides has long been studied, and the number of peptides identified with both activities has recently increased considerably. In this work, we hypothesized that designed peptides with a wide spectrum of selective antimicrobial activity will also have anticancer activity, and tested this hypothesis with newly designed peptides. The spectrum of peptides, used as partial or full design templates, ranged from cell-penetrating peptides and putative bacteriocin to those from the simplest animals (placozoans) and the Chordata phylum (anurans). We applied custom computational tools to predict amino acid substitutions, conferring the increased product of bacteriostatic activity and selectivity. Experiments confirmed that better overall performance was achieved with respect to that of initial templates. Nine of our synthesized helical peptides had excellent bactericidal activity against both standard and multidrug-resistant bacteria. These peptides were then compared to a known anticancer peptide polybia-MP1, for their ability to kill prostate cancer cells and dermal primary fibroblasts. The therapeutic index was higher for seven of our peptides, and anticancer activity stronger for all of them. In conclusion, the peptides that we designed for selective antimicrobial activity also have promising potential for anticancer applications.

The molecular mechanisms of toxicity of chemically modified phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides (PS-ASOs) are not fully understood. Here, we report that toxic gapmer PS-ASOs containing modifications such as constrained ethyl (cEt), locked nucleic acid (LNA) and 2′- O -methoxyethyl (2′-MOE) bind many cellular proteins with high avidity, altering their function, localization and stability. We show that RNase H1–dependent delocalization of paraspeckle proteins to nucleoli is an early event in PS-ASO toxicity, followed by nucleolar stress, p53 activation and apoptotic cell death. Introduction of a single 2′- O -methyl (2′-OMe) modification at gap position 2 reduced protein-binding, substantially decreasing hepatotoxicity and improving the therapeutic index with minimal impairment of antisense activity. We validated the ability of this modification to generally mitigate PS-ASO toxicity with more than 300 sequences. Our findings will guide the design of PS-ASOs with optimal therapeutic profiles. Chemical modification of PS-ASO therapeutics reduces binding to cellular proteins and decreases toxic side-effects.

Brachytherapy is a specific form of radiotherapy consisting of the precise placement of radioactive sources directly into or next to the tumor. This technique is indicated for patients affected by various types of cancers. It is an optimal tool for delivering very high doses to the tumor focally while minimizing the probability of normal tissue complications. Physicians from a wide range of specialties may be involved in either the referral to or the placement of brachytherapy. Many patients require brachytherapy as either primary treatment or as part of their oncologic care. On the basis of high‐level evidence from randomized controlled trials, brachytherapy is mainly indicated: 1) as standard in combination with chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; 2) in surgically treated patients with uterine endometrial cancer for decreasing the risk of vaginal vault recurrence; 3) in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer to perform dose escalation and improve progression‐free survival; and 4) in patients with breast cancer as adjuvant, accelerated partial breast irradiation or to boost the tumor bed. In this review, the authors discuss the clinical relevance of brachytherapy with a focus on indications, levels of evidence, and results in the overall context of radiation use for patients with cancer.

Abstract This new drug application was first submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the Orion Corporation from Finland on January 2, 1998. The final clinical pharmacology review was completed on September 3, 1999. Entacapone is a potent and specific peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. It has been shown to improve the clinical benefits of levodopa plus an aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor when given to patients with Parkinson’s disease and end-of-dose deterioration in the response to levodopa (the “wearing-off” phenomenon). The drug indication is for Parkinson’s disease as an adjunct therapy to levodopa/carbidopa. This is a combination drug with carbidopa (aromatic amino acid decarboxylation inhibitor) and entacapone. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration of a single dose, with peak time generally reached within 1 hour. It is noted that no accumulation of plasma entacapone was detected after 8 daily doses. The maximum daily dose is 2000 mg. In this paper, the clinical pharmacology review of the drug is presented from the perspective of a clinical pharmacologist who reviewed this new drug application at the FDA. It should be noted that all the information in this paper is publicly available on the FDA website and in its literature.

Chemotherapy is a standard treatment modality in clinic that exerts an antitumor effect via the activation of the caspase-3 pathway, inducing cell death. While a number of chemotherapeutic drugs have been developed to combat various types of tumors, severe side effects have been their common limitation, due to the nonspecific drug biodistribution, bringing significant pain to cancer patients. Recently, scientists found that, besides apoptosis, chemotherapy could also cause cell pyroptosis, both of which have great influence on the therapeutic index. For example, cell apoptosis is, generally, regarded as the main mechanism of killing tumor cells, while cell pyroptosis in tumors promotes treatment efficacy, but in normal tissue results in toxicity. Therefore, significant research efforts have been paid to exploring the rational modulation mode of cell death induced by chemotherapy. This critical review aims to summarize recent progress in the field, focusing on how to balance cell apoptosis and pyroptosis for better tumor chemotherapy. We first reviewed the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cell apoptosis and pyroptosis, in which the activated caspase-3 is the key signaling molecule for regulating both types of cell deaths. Then, we systematically discussed the rationale and methods of switching apoptosis to pyroptosis for enhanced antitumor efficacy, as well as the blockage of pyroptosis to decrease side effects. To balance cell pyroptosis in tumor and normal tissues, the level of GSDME expression and tumor-targeting drug delivery are two important factors. Finally, we proposed potential future research directions, which may provide guidance for researchers in the field.

Purpose The therapeutic index (TI) is the range of doses at which a medication is effective without unacceptable adverse events. Drugs with a narrow TI (NTIDs) have a narrow window between their effective doses and those at which they produce adverse toxic effects. Generic drugs may be substituted for brand-name drugs provided that they meet the recommended bioequivalence (BE) limits. However, an appropriate range of BE for NTIDs is essential to define due to the potential for ineffectiveness or adverse events. Flecainide is an antiarrhythmic agent that has the potential to be considered an NTID. This review aims to evaluate the literature surrounding guidelines on generic substitution for NTIDs and to evaluate the evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID. Methods A review of recommendations from various regulatory authorities regarding BE and NTIDs, and publications regarding the NTID characteristics of flecainide, was carried out. Results Regulatory authorities generally recommend reduced BE limits for NTIDs. Some, but not all, regulatory authorities specify flecainide as an NTID. The literature review demonstrated that flecainide displays NTID characteristics including a steep drug dose–response relationship for safety and efficacy, a need for therapeutic drug monitoring of pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamics measures and intra-subject variability in its PK properties. Conclusions There is much evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID based on both preclinical and clinical data. A clear understanding of the potential of proarrhythmic effects or lack of efficacy, careful patient selection and regular monitoring are essential for the safe and rational administration of flecainide.

There are several clinical areas or types of drugs that make prescribing branded drugs preferable, because of potential therapeutic inequivalence or confusion. Bioequivalence criteria may be fine for most drugs, but some conditions may require drug levels with modified variations, like in the case of rrow therapeutic index and critical dose drugs, highly variable drugs and modified-release formulations. Moreover, substitution with generics can be problematic in some patient subpopulations, such as elderly frail people, immunocompromised and transplant patients and patients with epilepsy. We include a list of branded drugs that are considered safer, more effective or with a lower risk of error. The therapeutic substitution is markedly different from therapeutic interchange. The replacement of a brand product with an equivalent has to occur under the control of the physician. At some point in their interaction with individual patients, physicians should let them know that generics are available as substitutes for the more expensive brand-me medications and are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety. Filly, we hope that a tool like the American Orange book will be also implemented in Italy: it would serve as an accurate reference, that can be useful both to physicians for prescription appropriateness and to patients for their own informed consent.

Background Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear. Methods Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup. Results Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM ( n  = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–8] and 0 (IQR 0–1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1–2 (4.1) vs. 3–6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)]. Conclusion The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.

To demonstrate that exosomes (exo) could increase the therapeutic index of doxorubicin (DOX). Exosomes were characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot. Tissue toxicity was evaluated by histopathological analysis and drug efficacy by measuring tumor volume. DOX biodistribution was analyzed by MS. Exosomal doxorubicin (exoDOX) avoids heart toxicity by partially limiting the crossing of DOX through the myocardial endothelial cells. For this reason, mice can be treated with higher concentration of exoDOX thus increasing the efficacy of DOX as demonstrated in breast and ovarian mouse tumors. ExoDOX is safer and more effective than free DOX. Importantly, the first spontaneous transformed syngeneic model of high-grade serous ovarian cancer was utilized for providing a new therapeutic opportunity.