Explore the vast range of titles available.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of ZhuZheng robot-assisted versus C-arm fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated at our institution between March 2022 and August 2023. The cohort included 46 males and 40 females, aged 27 to 69 years. Patients were assigned to either the robot-assisted group ( n  = 41) or the conventional C-arm fluoroscopy group ( n  = 45) according to intraoperative navigation method. Baseline characteristics, including gender ratio and body mass index (BMI), were comparable between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). All patients underwent segmental fixation. Intraoperative parameters such as fluoroscopy frequency, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. The accuracy of screw placement was assessed using postoperative CT at day 3 and graded according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) preoperatively and at 1 day, 3 days, and 1 month postoperatively. Radiological assessments included Cobb angle and anterior vertebral height ratio at baseline, 3 days, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. The robot-assisted group had significantly shorter operative time, reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower radiation dose, and fewer fluoroscopy exposures compared to the conventional group (all P  < 0.05). No perioperative complications occurred in either group during follow-up. The screw placement accuracy (grades A + B) was significantly higher in the robot-assisted group (98.4%, 242/246) than in the conventional group (90.4%, 244/270; P  < 0.05). VAS pain scores at postoperative day 1 and day 3 were significantly lower in the robot-assisted group; no significant difference was observed at 1 month. There were no significant intergroup differences in the postoperative Cobb angle or anterior vertebral height ratio at any time point ( P  > 0.05). Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery demonstrates significant advantages in improving screw placement accuracy, reducing intraoperative blood loss, shortening operative time, and minimizing radiation exposure and fluoroscopy frequency, thereby offering improved clinical outcomes in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Purpose Dorsal spinal instrumentation with pedicle screw constructs is considered the gold standard for numerous spinal pathologies. Screw misplacement is biomechanically disadvantageous and may create severe complications. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of patient-specific template-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine compared to the free-hand technique with fluoroscopy. Methods Patient-specific targeting guides were used for pedicle screw placement from Th2–L5 in three cadaveric specimens by three surgeons with different experience levels. Instrumentation for each side and level was randomized (template-guided vs. free-hand). Accuracy was assessed by computed tomography (CT), considering perforations of <2 mm as acceptable (safe zone). Time efficiency, radiation exposure and dependencies on surgical experience were compared between the two techniques. Results 96 screws were inserted with an equal distribution of 48 screws (50 %) in each group. 58 % ( n  = 28) of template-guided (without fluoroscopy) vs. 44 % ( n  = 21) of free-hand screws (with fluoroscopy) were fully contained within the pedicle ( p  = 0.153). 97.9 % ( n  = 47) of template-guided vs. 81.3 % ( n  = 39) of free-hand screws were within the 2 mm safe zone ( p  = 0.008). The mean time for instrumentation per level was 01:14 ± 00:37 for the template-guided vs. 01:40 ± 00:59 min for the free-hand technique ( p  = 0.013), respectively. Increased radiation exposure was highly associated with lesser experience of the surgeon with the free-hand technique. Conclusions In a cadaver model, template-guided pedicle screw placement is faster considering intraoperative instrumentation time, has a higher accuracy particularly in the thoracic spine and creates less intraoperative radiation exposure compared to the free-hand technique.

SummaryWe performed a 1-year prospective study to see whether zoledronic acid infusion combined with percutaneous kyphoplasty could provide more benefits in the treatment of T12 or L1 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).IntroductionTo investigate and analyze the clinical effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in combination with percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of OVCF in postmenopausal women.MethodsIncluded in this study were 101 postmenopausal women patients with T12 or L1 OVCF who received PKP in our hospital between August 2015 and July 2017. They were randomly assigned to a zoledronic acid (ZOL) group (n = 50) or a control group (n = 51). Patients in ZOL group were treated preoperatively with IV infusion of 5 mg ZOL in combination with 0.25μg/d calcitriol and D3 600 mg/d calcium carbonate for a year. Patients in the control group were treated with the same dose of calcitriol and calcium carbonate D3 without ZOL.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), menopause age, and the fractured vertebral body between the two groups. At 6 and 12 months after treatment, bone mineral density (BMD) in ZOL group was higher than that in the control group (p < 0.01); bone markers (NMID, P1NP, and β-CTX) and the VAS score in ZOL group were significantly lower than those in the control group. No new fracture occurred in ZOL group. The incidence of recompression vertebral fracture (RVF) in the control group was 11.7%, while no RVF was detected in any patient in ZOL group. Mild adverse reactions in ZOL group were significantly higher than those in the control group, but all of them were relieved after symptomatic treatment.ConclusionsZOL IV infusion in combination with PKP is beneficial for the treatment of T12 or L1 OVCF.

This study aims to analysis the efficacy of the 3D printing percutaneous guide template in combination with the pointed lotus-style regulator in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. 60 thoracolumbar fractures patients receiving percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups. Patients in Group A received traditional PPSF, while patients in Group B received PPSF with flat end lotus-style regulator and patients in Group C received PPSF with pointed lotus-style regulator. The experimental results showed that the highest number of pedicle screw successfully inserted by the first time was in group C, while lowest in group A ( P  < 0.05). The total time of fluoroscopy and operation were lower in group C, and higher in group A ( P  < 0.05). VAS and ODI scores were all lower after surgery than before surgery in 3groups. VAS and ODI scores were lower in group B and C, compared with group A at day 1, 7 after surgery ( P  < 0.05). KA decreased significantly in 3 groups after surgery and no difference in KA change between 3 groups ( P  > 0.05). Taken together, Application of the 3D printing guide template in combination with pointed lotus-style regulator improved the accuracy of pedicle insertion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04980131. Registered 18/07/2021.

This research was developed to accurately evaluate the unstable fractures of thoracolumbar before and after surgery and discuss the treatment timing and methods. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element method was adopted to construct the T12-L5 segment model of human body. The efficiency of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), two commonly used internal fixation procedures, was retrospectively compared. A total of 150 patients with chest fracture who received PKP or PVP surgery in our hospital, and 104 patients with the same symptoms who received conservative treatment were collected and randomly rolled into PVP group (75 cases), PKP group (75 cases), and control group (104 cases). Visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) of patients were collected before and after surgery and 2, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Then, the anterior and central height of the patient’s cone and the kyphosis angle were calculated by X-ray. Lumbar minimally invasive fusion system and lumbar pedicle screw rod system were established by computer-aided design (CAD), and the biomechanical characteristics were analyzed. The results showed that there was no substantial difference in VAS score and ODI score between PKP and PVP (P>0.05), but they were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The anterior edge and middle height of vertebra in the two groups were higher than those in control group (P<0.05), and the increase in PKP group was more substantial (P<0.05). The kyphosis of the two groups was smaller than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the decrease of the kyphosis of the PKP group was more substantial (P<0.05). In summary, the thoracolumbar segment model established by 3D finite element method was an effective model, and it was verified on patients that both PKP and PVP could achieve relatively satisfactory efficacy. The implantation of the new internal fixation system had no obvious effect on the lumbar movement. This work provided a novel idea and method for the treatment of senile thoracolumbar unstable fracture, as well as experimental data of biomechanics for the operation of senile unstable fracture.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) in treating thoracic and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Methods Patients with thoracolumbar OVCFs were recruited and randomly divided into three treatment groups: PCVP, unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or bilateral PVP. Bone cement dispersion in the fractured vertebrae was observed. Surgery duration, X-ray frequency, bone cement injection volume, bone cement leakage rate and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded. Results Among 78 patients included, surgery duration and X-ray frequency were significantly lower in the PCVP and unilateral PVP groups versus bilateral PVP group. Bone cement injection volume was significantly higher in the bilateral PVP group (6.3 ± 1.4 ml) versus unilateral PVP (3.5 ± 1.1 ml) and PCVP groups (4.6 ± 1.2 ml). VAS scores at 24 h and 3 months post-surgery were significantly decreased versus baseline in all groups. The bone cement leakage rate was lowest in the PCVP group (8.8% [3/34 patients]). Conclusion PCVP is associated with reduced trauma, less complicated surgery with shorter duration, fewer X-rays, lower complication rate, and quicker postoperative recovery versus unilateral and bilateral PVP.

BackgroundBoth surgery and conservative management are well established treatments for compression fractures of the thoraco-lumbar spine without neurological compromise. This article aims to compare the outcomes of conservative management to those of vertebroplasty, a relatively safe and simple procedure.Methods102 patients were admitted to our neurosurgical unit between January 2012 and February 2016, presenting with a single-level, post-traumatic A1 or A2 Mager l type fracture, affecting the thoracic-lumbar spine without any neurological deficits. After description of both treatment options, the patients were asked to choose between vertebroplasty or conservative treatment. Accordingly, the patients were allocated into two groups and a prospective non-randomized controlled trial was carried out. The first group (Group A) included 52 patients, treated with bed rest and an orthosis. The second group (Group B) of 50 patients underwent a percutaneous vertebroplasty. Pain intensity (assessed via visual analog scale (VAS)), disability degree (assessed via Oswestry Disability Index), ability to resume work (assessed via Denis work Scale), vertebral body height loss rate, regional kyphosis angle (Cobb’s angle), duration of hospitalization and treatment-associated complications, were prospectively recorded in a database and analyzed. Follow ups were planned at 1, 6, and 12 months after the injury.ResultsGroup B, compared with group A, showed a faster improvement in VAS score as well as functional ability and return to work. Cobb’s angle progression was significantly less in the surgical group. Morbidity, mortality, and complication rate were similar and comparable in both groups without a statistical difference (P<0.05)ConclusionsVertebroplasty is a safe and effective treatment in post-traumatic thoracic-lumbar fractures compared with conservative management.

Background Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. Methods/designs This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18–65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). Discussion Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness between percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixation without fusion for treating type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common pathology without a consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) systems have been recently introduced in the treatment of spinal fractures to reduce the adverse effects associated with the conventional open approaches, such as iatrogenic muscle denervation and pain.MethodsA prospective analysis was made to evaluate consecutive 46 patients with type A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures. Patients were divided into a percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group (PPSF) and an open pedicle screw fixation group (OPSF). The mean age of patients in PPSF group (12 men, 11 woman) was 49.9 years and in OPSF group (10 men, 13 women) 52.2 years. For the purpose of evaluation, the radiological assessment of the bisegmental Cobb angle, the loss of correction, the volume of blood loss, operation time, cumulative radiation time and dose were recorded and compared.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 12 months. There were no significant differences between OPSF and PPSF in the Cobb angle preoperative and postoperative angle and the loss of bisegmental correction. In PPSF group, the mean preoperative Cobb angle was 10.9° and improved by 4.5° postoperatively, and in OPSF group the preoperative angle was 12.1° and postoperatively improved by 3.8°. Significant differences between OPSF and PPSF were found in the mean cumulative radiation time, radiation dose and operation time. PPSF group also had a significantly lower perioperative blood loss.ConclusionsBoth open and percutaneous short-segment pedicle fixation were safe and effective methods to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. Percutaneous fixation without fusion seems to be suitable for type A3 and A4 fractures.

Short segment posterior fixation is the preferred method for stabilizing thoracolumbar fractures. In case of significant disruption of the anterior column, the simple short segment construct does not ensure adequate stability. In this study, we tried to evaluate the effect of inclusion of the fractured vertebra in short segment fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. In a prospective randomized study, eighty patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated just with posterior pedicular fixation were randomized into two groups receiving either the one level above and one level below excluding the fracture level (bridging group), or including the fracture level (including group). Different clinical and radiological parameters were recorded and followed. A sum of 80 patients (42 patients in group 1 and 38 patients in group 2) were enrolled in the study. The patients in both the groups showed similar clinical outcome. There was a high rate of instrumentation failure in the “bridging” group. The “bridging” group showed a mean worsening (29%) in kyphosis, whereas the “including” group improved significantly by a mean of 6%. The significant effect of the “including” technique on the reduction of kyphotic deformity was most prominent in type C fractures. In conclusion, inclusion of the fracture level into the construct offers a better kyphosis correction, in addition to fewer instrument failures, without additional complications, and with a comparable-if not better-clinical and functional outcome. We recommend insertion of screws into pedicles of the fractured thoracolumbar vertebra when considering a short segment posterior fixation, especially in Magerl type C fractures.