Explore the vast range of titles available.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. The development of a neuroprotective therapy is crucial for mitigating features and progression of PD. Since autophagy induction has recently emerged as a promising neuroprotective strategy, this study aimed to identify autophagy-inducing compounds and evaluate their neuroprotective activity. Among 3,200 compounds consisting of FDA-approved drugs or are under active development, 547 compounds targeting neurological diseases were filtered in, and three compounds (sertraline, tiagabine and bicifadine) were finally identified to exhibit the autophagy-inducing activity and also demonstrated the autophagy-dependent neuroprotective action by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Furthermore, the analysis of neurochemical changes suggested that the ability of those compounds to restore the quantity of cellular neurotransmitters such as betaine, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and kynurenine might be linked to their neuroprotective function. In conclusion, compounds like sertraline, tiagabine, and bicifadine that have the ability to induce autophagy and inhibit mTOR might be repurposed as PD treatment to protect the neuronal cells.

The aim of the present study was to investigate various aspects of tiagabine (TGB) effectiveness in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This open, prospective study recruited the patients with epilepsy attending the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. The patients completed diaries about the seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events. There were regular documented visits at 3 or 6 months during the first year of treatment with TGB and at 6 months or 1 year afterwards, with dynamic assessment of seizure frequency, severity, adverse events, and EEG recordings. TGB was applied as an add-on treatment in 43 patients (24 males, mean age 39 years). There was relatively mild and transient dynamic improvement of seizure severity, satisfactory seizure frequency reduction in 32.6% of participants, stable mean seizure frequency reduction (40-50%) from month 6 to month 24 and a stable response rate (52.3-50%) during the same period. New seizure types (myoclonic, myoclonic-atonic) occurred in 2 patients. The final clinical efficacy was higher in patients with initial monotherapy. There were adverse events (dizziness/vertigo, sedation, memory impairment, loss of appetite and weight, confusion, psychosis, insomnia, transient diplopia, lymphadenomegaly, rash, nausea, depression, anxiety, tremor of hands, unstable gait, legs edema, thrombocytopenia, cervical muscles tightening) in 26.19% of patients. In conclusion, TGB treatment is associated with low and transient improvement of seizure severity, good and stable improvement of seizure frequency, possible worsening of seizure control, possible appearance of new seizure types, and acceptable safety and tolerability.

Background Current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) offer contradictory recommendations regarding use of medications or psychotherapy as first‐line treatment. Direct head‐to‐head comparisons are lacking. Methods Systemic review of Medline, EMBASE, PILOTS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Global Health Library was conducted without language restrictions. Randomized clinical trials ≥8 weeks in duration using structured clinical interview‐based outcome measures, active‐control conditions (e.g. supportive psychotherapy), and intent‐to‐treat analysis were selected for analyses. Independent review, data ion, and bias assessment were performed using standardized processes. Study outcomes were grouped around conventional follow‐up time periods (3, 6, and 9 months). Combined effect sizes were computed using meta‐analyses for medication versus control, medication pre‐/posttreatment, psychotherapy versus control, and psychotherapy pre‐/posttreatment. Results Effect sizes for trauma‐focused psychotherapies (TFPs) versus active control conditions were greater than medications versus placebo and other psychotherapies versus active controls. TFPs resulted in greater sustained benefit over time than medications. Sertraline, venlafaxine, and nefazodone outperformed other medications, although potential for methodological biases were high. Improvement following paroxetine and fluoxetine treatment was small. Venlafaxine and stress inoculation training (SIT) demonstrated large initial effects that decreased over time. Bupropion, citalopram, divalproex, mirtazapine, tiagabine, and topiramate failed to differentiate from placebo. Aripiprazole, divalproex, guanfacine, and olanzapine failed to differentiate from placebo when combined with an antidepressant. Conclusions Study findings support use of TFPs over nontrauma‐focused psychotherapy or medication as first‐line interventions. Second‐line interventions include SIT, and potentially sertraline or venlafaxine, rather than entire classes of medication, such as SSRIs. Future revisions of CPGs should prioritize studies that utilize active controls over waitlist or treatment‐as‐usual conditions. Direct head‐to‐head trials of TFPs versus sertraline or venlafaxine are needed.

The authors show that chronic neonatal hypoxia reduces GABA A receptor–mediated signaling to oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the cerebellar white matter and enhances their proliferation, delays oligodendrocyte maturation and disrupts myelination. Following hypoxia, treatment with a GABA uptake blocker restores myelination. Diffuse white matter injury (DWMI), a leading cause of neurodevelopmental disabilities in preterm infants, is characterized by reduced oligodendrocyte formation. NG2-expressing oligodendrocyte precursor cells (NG2 cells) are exposed to various extrinsic regulatory signals, including the neurotransmitter GABA. We investigated GABAergic signaling to cerebellar white matter NG2 cells in a mouse model of DWMI (chronic neonatal hypoxia). We found that hypoxia caused a loss of GABA A receptor–mediated synaptic input to NG2 cells, extensive proliferation of these cells and delayed oligodendrocyte maturation, leading to dysmyelination. Treatment of control mice with a GABA A receptor antagonist or deletion of the chloride-accumulating transporter NKCC1 mimicked the effects of hypoxia. Conversely, blockade of GABA catabolism or GABA uptake reduced NG2 cell numbers and increased the formation of mature oligodendrocytes both in control and hypoxic mice. Our results indicate that GABAergic signaling regulates NG2 cell differentiation and proliferation in vivo, and suggest that its perturbation is a key factor in DWMI.

Cullin 4B (CUL4B) is the scaffold protein in the CUL4B-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL4B) complex. Loss-of-function mutations in the human CUL4B gene result in syndromic X-linked intellectual disability (XLID). In addition to intellectual disability, patients with CUL4B mutations exhibit epilepsy. To date, the mechanism underlying epilepsy associated with CUL4B mutation has not been elucidated. Here, we show that male mice with Cul4b deleted in the nervous system are more susceptible to both pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)- and kainic acid (KA)-induced epilepsy and exhibit spontaneous epilepsy without any chemical inducers. We identify the CRL4B complex as an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets GABA transporter 1 (GAT1). CUL4B deletion in male mice results in GAT1 accumulation and increased GABA reuptake, leading to impaired GABA-mediated inhibitory synaptic transmission. Treating CUL4B-deficient mice with the GAT1 inhibitor tiagabine effectively reverses the increased susceptibility to chemical-induced epilepsy and attenuates spontaneous epilepsy without the use of chemical inducers. We further confirm the role of CUL4B in the regulation of GAT1 levels and GABA uptake in neurons and astrocytes differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from patients with CUL4B loss-of-function mutations. Our work reveals a novel mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of epilepsy and identifies a promising drug target for treating CUL4B mutation-associated epilepsy.

The pathophysiology of fibromyalgia, a condition that causes chronic pain throughout the body, involves abnormal pain signaling, genetic predispositions, and abnormal neuroendocrine function, significantly impairing quality of life. Fibromyalgia is commonly characterized by musculoskeletal pain, chronic fatigue, and severe sleep alterations. Changes in the central processing of sensory input and defects in endogenous pain inhibition could be the basis of enhanced and persistent pain sensitivity in individuals with fibromyalgia. The term central sensitivity syndrome was chosen as an umbrella term for fibromyalgia and related illnesses, including myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, migraine, and irritable bowel syndrome. Given the substantial impact of fibromyalgia on health, there is a need for new prevention and treatment strategies, particularly those involving bioavailable nutraceuticals and/or phytochemicals. This approach is particularly important considering the adverse effects of current fibromyalgia pharmaceutical treatments, such as antidepressants and anticonvulsants, which can lead to physical dependence and tolerance. Natural products have recently been considered for the design of innovative analgesics and antinociceptive agents to manage fibromyalgia pain. Polyphenols show promise in the management of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia, especially considering how anti-inflammatory treatments, including corticosteroids and nonsteroidal medical drugs, are effective only when inflammatory processes coexist and are not recommended as the primary treatment for fibromyalgia.

3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) is currently being evaluated for treatment of patients with moderate or higher severity post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To provide a comprehensive summary of investigational MDMA-AT and current treatments for PTSD. A search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (December 20, 2023). Populations included adults with chronic, treatment-resistant, moderate or higher severity PTSD. Interventions were MDMA-AT and comparators based on PTSD treatment guidelines. The primary outcome of interest was the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score. Other outcomes observed were Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and loss of diagnosis (LOD). Studies observing chronic, moderate or higher severity treatment-resistant PTSD in adults were included. Only randomized controlled trials published in English were considered. The NICE quality appraisal checklist was used to assess risk of bias in included studies. We provided qualitative synthesis of evidence presented in extraction tables. Overall, 77 studies were included. Phase II/III trials consistently reported significantly greater CAPS improvement with MDMA-AT vs. placebo with therapy (PT) after two or three interventional sessions. Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment. FDA-approved and off-label medications used for PTSD treatment did not yield a consistently greater CAPS decrease vs. control arms across trials. Significant CAPS improvement was consistently observed in venlafaxine ER, olanzapine, propranolol (with traumatic memory reactivation), nefazodone, and nabilone placebo-controlled trials. Most psychotherapy trials lacked between-group statistical assessments. Significant CAPS decrease compared to the waitlist was reported for cognitive therapy (CT), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), and group cognitive exposure therapy. CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years). MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). The percentage of participants with LOD after two or three active-dose MDMA-AT sessions ranged from 41.7-83.3%. This systematic review suggests current treatments for PTSD are associated with heterogeneous evidence and the majority do not demonstrate sustained effects. Results from MDMA-AT showed consistent improvements in CAPS, BDI and LOD.

Objective To appraise the evidence for comparative efficacy and tolerability of drug treatments in patients with generalised anxiety disorder.Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Primary Bayesian probabilistic mixed treatment meta-analyses allowed pharmacological treatments to be ranked for effectiveness for each outcome measure, given as percentage probability of being the most effective treatment. Secondary frequentist mixed treatment meta-analyses conducted with random effects model; effect size reported as odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.Data sources Medline, Embase, BIOSIS, PsycINFO, Health Economic Evaluations Database, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects via DataStar, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Cochrane Library (January 1980 to February 2009).Eligibility criteria Double blind placebo controlled randomised controlled trials; published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Randomised controlled trials including adult participants (aged ≥18) receiving any pharmacological treatment for generalised anxiety disorder.Data abstraction methods Titles or abstracts reviewed initially, followed by review of full text publications for citations remaining after first pass. A three person team conducted screening; an independent reviewer checked a random selection (10%) of articles screened. Data extracted for meta-analysis were also independently reviewed.Main outcome measures Proportion of participants experiencing ≥50% reduction from baseline score on Hamilton anxiety scale (HAM-A) (response), proportion with final HAM-A score ≤7 (remission), proportion withdrawing from trial because of adverse events (tolerability).Results The review identified 3249 citations, and 46 randomised controlled trials met inclusion criteria; 27 trials contained sufficient or appropriate data for inclusion in the analysis. Analyses compared nine drugs (duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, lorazepam, paroxetine, pregabalin, sertraline, tiagabine, and venlafaxine). In the primary probabilistic mixed treatment meta-analyses, fluoxetine was ranked first for response and remission (probability of 62.9% and 60.6%, respectively) and sertraline was ranked first for tolerability (49.3%). In a subanalysis ranking treatments for generalised anxiety disorder currently licensed in the United Kingdom, duloxetine was ranked first for response (third across all treatments; 2.7%), escitalopram was ranked first for remission (second across all treatments; 26.7%), and pregabalin was ranked first for tolerability (second across all treatments; 7.7%).Conclusions Though the frequentist analysis was inconclusive because of a high level of uncertainty in effect sizes (based on the relatively small number of comparative trials), the probabilistic analysis, which did not rely on significant outcomes, showed that fluoxetine (in terms of response and remission) and sertraline (in terms of tolerability) seem to have some advantages over other treatments. Among five UK licensed treatments, duloxetine, escitalopram, and pregabalin might offer some advantages over venlafaxine and paroxetine.

Objective The objective of this study was to perform a comparative assessment of tolerability of all licensed new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) through a network meta-analysis (NMA) including all placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trials (RCTs) in all conditions in which these drugs have been tested. Methods NMA with a frequentist approach was used to compare proportions of patients withdrawing because of adverse events (AEs). Analyses were conducted for all therapeutic doses pooled and specifically for high therapeutic doses. Patients treated with non-therapeutic doses of each drug were excluded. Results A total of 195 RCTs were included in the current analysis, comprising a total of 28,013 patients treated with AEDs and 17,908 patients treated with placebo. RCTs included in the analysis were 8 for brivaracetam; 5 for eslicarbazepine; 22 for gabapentin; 7 for lacosamide; 14 for levetiracetam; 14 for lamotrigine; 6 for oxcarbazepine; 9 for perampanel; 50 for pregabalin; 5 for tiagabine; 36 for topiramate; 7 for zonisamide; 4 for gabapentin-extended formulation (ER); 2 each for levetiracetam-ER, lamotrigine-ER, and topiramate-ER; and 1 each for oxcarbazepine-ER and pregabalin-ER. Brivaracetam, gabapentin, gabapentin-ER, and levetiracetam had a significantly lower withdrawal rate compared to several other AEDs, while eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate had a higher withdrawal rate. Perampanel, lamotrigine, pregabalin, tiagabine, and zonisamide showed an intermediate pattern of tolerability. Additional analysis has been conducted through selection of highly recommended doses for each drug. This analysis has roughly confirmed results of head to head comparisons of the all-dose analysis, with some exceptions. A further analysis has been conducted after exclusion of RCTs in which patients were allocated to the therapeutic dose of the experimental drug without titration, and it failed to show clinically important differences. Significance Relevant differences in short-term tolerability of AEDs have been observed between AEDs. Brivaracetam, gabapentin, and levetiracetam show the best tolerability profile while other AEDs are at higher risk for intolerable adverse effects.

Abstract Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity is markedly reduced during slow-wave sleep (SWS) even in patients with a severe disease. The reason for this improvement is uncertain but likely relates to non-anatomical factors (i.e. reduced arousability, chemosensitivity, and increased dilator muscle activity). The anticonvulsant tiagabine produces a dose-dependent increase in SWS in subjects without OSA. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that tiagabine would reduce OSA severity by raising the overall arousal threshold during sleep. Aims and Methods: After a baseline physiology night to assess patients’ OSA phenotypic traits, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial of tiagabine 12 mg administered before sleep was performed in 14 OSA patients. Under each condition, we assessed the effects on sleep and OSA severity using standard clinical polysomnography. Results: Tiagabine increased slow-wave activity (SWA) of the electroencephalogram (1–4 Hz) compared to placebo (1.8 [0.4] vs. 2.0 [0.5] LogμV2, p = .04) but did not reduce OSA severity (apnea–hypopnea index [AHI] 41.5 [20.3] vs. 39.1 [16.5], p > .5). SWS duration (25 [20] vs. 26 [43] mins, p > .5) and arousal threshold (−26.5 [5.0] vs. −27.6 [5.1] cmH2O, p = .26) were also unchanged between nights. Conclusions: Tiagabine modified sleep microstructure (increase in SWA) but did not change the duration of SWS, OSA severity, or arousal threshold in this group of OSA patients. Based on these findings, tiagabine should not be considered as a therapeutic option for OSA treatment.