Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose Time pressure is the most common kind of work pressure that employees face in the workplace; the existing research results on the effect of time pressure are highly controversial (positive, negative, inverted U-shaped). Especially in the era of knowledge economy, there remains a research gap in the impact of time pressure on individual knowledge hiding. The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of different time pressure (challenge and hindrance) on knowledge hiding and to explain why there is controversy about the effect of time pressure in the academics. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected two waves of data and surveyed 341 R&D employees in China. Moreover, they used regression analysis, bootstrapping and Johnson–Neyman statistical technique to verify research hypotheses. Findings The results show that challenge time pressure (CTP) has a significant negative effect on knowledge hiding, whereas hindrance time pressure (HTP) has a significant positive effect on knowledge hiding; job security mediates the relationship between time pressure and knowledge hiding; temporal leadership strengthen the positive impact of CTP on job security; temporal leadership can mitigate the negative impact of HTP on job security. Originality/value The findings not only respond to the academic debate about the effect of time pressure and point out the reasons for the controversy but also enhance the scholars’ attention and understanding of the internal mechanism between time pressure and knowledge hiding.

In patients with hypertension and pre‐frailty or frailty, the influence of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) time in target range (TTR) on clinical outcomes is unclear. Thus, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Classifying 4208 participants into frail and non‐frail groups using a frailty index, the study calculated blood pressure time in target range (BP‐TTR) for the first three months using the Rosendaal method. The primary endpoint included a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and cardiovascular death. Relationships between BP‐TTR and outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan‐Meier curves, Cox models, and restricted cubic spline curves, with subgroup analysis for further insights. In a median follow‐up of 3.17 years, primary outcomes occurred in 6.7% of participants. Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed that a lower systolic blood pressure time in target range (SBP‐TTR) (0%–25%) correlated with an increased cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (p < .001), nonfatal MI (P = .021), stroke (P = .004), and cardiovascular death (P = .002). A higher SBP‐TTR (75%–<100%) was linked to a reduced risk of these outcomes. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve revealed a linear association between SBP‐TTR and the primary outcome (non‐linear P = .704). Similar patterns were observed for diastolic blood pressure time in target range (DBP‐TTR). Subgroup analysis showed that the protective effect of higher SBP‐TTR was less pronounced at low DBP‐TTR levels (P for interaction = .023). In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of maintaining BP within the target range to mitigate cardiovascular risks in this population.

Previous research suggests that individuals automatically lie rather than be honest and that lies increase under time pressure. However, subsequent studies have failed to replicate the original findings. Moreover, because participants could decide their responses before the onset of time pressure, it was difficult to conclude that the difference between the conditions observed in the original study was due to time pressure. Therefore, we improved the methodology in the current study by applying time pressure throughout the task to ensure that the participants were consistently influenced by it regardless of when they made their decisions to lie. The results (N = 428) revealed a statistically significant increase in lies under time pressure. A connection between the frequency of lies and participants' perceived time pressure was also shown. These findings support the original study which indicated that cognitive control is needed to resist the temptation to lie and suggested that the frequency of lies increases, especially when the perceived time pressure is stronger, because it exhausts the resources available to suppress lies. KEYWORDS lies cheating time pressure perceived time pressure

Background: The principal strategy for managing head injury is to reduce the frequency and severity of secondary brain insults from intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and hence improve outcome. Precise critical threshold levels have not been determined in head injured children. Objective: To create a novel pressure–time index (PTI) measuring both duration and amplitude of insult, and then employ it to determine critical insult thresholds of ICP and CPP in children. Methods: Prospective, observational, physiologically based study from Edinburgh and Newcastle, using patient monitored blood pressure, ICP, and CPP time series data. The PTI for ICP and CPP for 81 children, using theoretical values derived from physiological norms, was varied systematically to derive critical insult thresholds which delineate Glasgow outcome scale categories. Results: The PTI for CPP had a very high predictive value for outcome (receiver operating characteristic analyses: area under curve = 0.957 and 0.890 for mortality and favourable outcome, respectively) and was more predictive than for ICP. Initial physiological values most accurately predicted favourable outcome. The CPP critical threshold values determined for children aged 2–6, 7–10, and 11–15 years were 48, 54, and 58 mm Hg. respectively. Conclusions: The PTI is the first substantive paediatric index of total ICP and CPP following head injury. The insult thresholds generated are identical to age related physiological values. Management guidelines for paediatric head injuries should take account of these CPP thresholds to titrate appropriate pressor therapy.

Chronic time pressure represents a prevalent concern within modern society, and effective measurement is crucial for research advancement. The Chronic Time Pressure Inventory (CTPI) has thus far demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. However, only two studies have examined the measure and evidence of its validity is limited. Accordingly, the current investigation, two independent studies, assessed the factorial composition and validity (convergent/discriminant) of the CTPI. Study 1 ( = 398) examined competing factorial models and validity in relation to the Big Five personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness). Study 2 ( = 358) replicated the analysis of factor structure and assessed validity in comparison with five time perspectives (Past Negative, Present Fatalistic, Future, Past Positive, Present Hedonistic). Participants across both studies completed standardized self-report measures capturing the variables. Comparison of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) factor solutions indicated that an ESEM bifactor model provided the strongest data-model fit. This included a general chronic time pressure component alongside specific subfactors of Feeling Harried and Cognitive Awareness of Time Shortage. All scale items reflected the general factor; however, some items loaded weakly on the intended specific factor. The CTPI is thus a robust indicator of chronic time pressure but needs refinement as a measure of the specific factors. Convergent/discriminant validity analyses inferred that the CTPI captured chronic time pressure as a related, but distinct, construct to perceived stress, and evidenced a relationship with theoretically associated constructs (Big Five personality traits and time perspective). Overall, the CTPI is a sound measure of chronic time pressure and has the potential to further cohesive research efforts on the contribution of this construct to various life domains.

Timescapes of Waiting explores the intersections of temporality and space by examining various manifestations of spatial (im-)mobility. The articles approach these spaces perspectives - including such as history, architecture, law and literary and cultural studies.

To validate the pressure–time index of the inspiratory muscles as a non-invasive index of inspiratory muscle function in spontaneously breathing infants by comparing it against the gold-standard pressure–time index of the diaphragm. Prospective observational cohort study of consecutive infants breathing unsupported in room air in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, studied prior to discharge from neonatal care. The invasive pressure–time index of the diaphragm was calculated using a transdiaphragmatic dual-pressure catheter that measured transdiaphragmatic pressure by subtraction of the oesophageal from the gastric pressure. The non-invasive pressure–time index of the inspiratory muscles was calculated using pressure measurements at the level of the mouth via a differential pressure transducer connected to a face mask. Both indices were calculated as the product of the ratio of the mean inspiratory pressure divided by the maximum inspiratory pressure and the ratio of the inspiratory time divided by the total time of a respiratory cycle. One hundred and thirty infants (79 male) were included with a mean (SD) gestational age of 35.2 (3.2) weeks, studied at a median (IQR) postnatal age of 9 (6–20) days. The mean (SD) pressure–time index of the diaphragm was 0.063 (0.019) and the mean (SD) pressure–time index of the inspiratory muscles was 0.065 (0.023). The correlation coefficient for the two indices was 0.509 (p < 0.001). The mean (SD) absolute difference between the pressure–time index of the inspiratory muscles and pressure–time index of the diaphragm was 0.002 (0.021). In convalescent infants, the non-invasive pressure–time index of the inspiratory muscles had a moderate degree of correlation with the invasively derived pressure time index of the diaphragm measured with a transdiaphragmatic catheter.

This study is motivated by the expectation gap over the role of external auditors in detecting fraud. External auditors are expected to detect fraudulent financial statements, however the findings of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Global 2020 proved that fraud can be detected by external auditors by 4%. The preceding finding showed that the auditor’s ability to detect fraud is still relatively low. Based on that motivation, this study aims to investigate the role of workload, time pressure, professional skepticism, and competence on the ability of auditors to detect fraud. This study was conducted by a quantitative study with primary data. Data was obtained through online and direct questionnaires distribution. This study employed convenience sampling by distributing questionnaires to external auditors who were more accessible in order to facilitate efficient data collection. This study proved that professional skepticism and auditors’ competence affect the auditors’ ability to detect fraud. Meanwhile, workload and time pressure did not affect the auditors’ ability to detect fraud. Auditors are responsible for ensuring the fairness of financial reports, this makes auditors act professionally and carefully, even if the auditor is under work and time pressure.

Chronic time pressure is a common source of everyday stress and anxiety. Noting this, the Chronic Time Pressure Inventory (CTPI) was designed to measure the construct within general samples. The CTPI was validated using procedures informed by classical test theory. This identified a bifactor solution, comprising a general factor encompassing two overlapping factors: Cognitive Awareness of Time Shortage and Feeling Harried. Furthermore, the CTPI demonstrated good psychometric integrity. Explicitly, internal consistency, satisfactory convergent validity with the Perceived Stress Scale, and measurement invariance. While these outcomes indicated that the CTPI was an effective measure of chronic time pressure, the scale was not subjected to analysis of item-person functioning ( ., Rasch evaluation). This study accordingly examined the psychometric properties of the CTPI using Rasch analysis. A general sample of 748 (595 females, 153 males) participants completed the measure online. Initial findings recommended modification of the response scale. Subsequent analyses revealed unidimensionality, adequate item/person reliability, and gender invariance. Overall, findings confirmed that the CTPI was a valid instrument for assessing perceptions of chronic time pressure within general population samples. Noting the lack of items aligning with higher ability levels, future work should develop the CTPI by adding more complex positively keyed items.

Background Roughly 10% of newborns need help to complete the transition of birth. For these infants, international guidelines recommend supporting them using a 4-step procedure (A to D). Step A is an assessment time, which includes eight tasks and finishes by starting the positive pressure ventilation (PPV), if necessary (step B). The guidelines changed in 2015 and the allotted time was raised from 30 to 60 seconds for step A completion. This study aimed to assess if the reduced time constraint in step A could have an impact on 1st-year pediatric residents' performance to complete step A and if could lead to later initiation of step A. Methods Using video recordings of standardized neonatal scenarios over 6 years (3 before the change and 3 after), we assessed the ability of 1st-year pediatric residents of the Paris region to complete step A and initiate PPV in the allotted time in each period. Among the sessions, including at least five scenarios we evaluated all the PPV required scenarios executed for the first time by a dyad of 1st-year pediatric residents. Results Among 52 sessions, we included 104 scenarios (25 sessions and 50 scenarios before the change and 27 sessions and 54 scenarios after). PPV started roughly at 1-minute resuscitation in both periods, but completion of the tasks before PPV-start was significant. Only 12% of the dyad of residents executed the eight tasks before PPV initiation in the first period versus 54% in the second period ( p < 0.0001). Additionally, the completion of the eight tasks of step A was significantly better during the second period (6 [6-7] vs. 8 [7-8] p < 0.001). Conclusions: These results could suggest that a reduced time constraint for step A imposed by the new Guidelines was associated with better performance.