Explore the vast range of titles available.

The Institute of Medicine carried out a study mandated by Congress and sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide an assessment of several issues related to noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus associated with service in the Armed Forces since World War II. The resulting book, Noise and Military Service: Implications for Hearing Loss and Tinnitus , presents findings on the presence of hazardous noise in military settings, levels of noise exposure necessary to cause hearing loss or tinnitus, risk factors for noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus, the timing of the effects of noise exposure on hearing, and the adequacy of military hearing conservation programs and audiometric testing. The book stresses the importance of conducting hearing tests (audiograms) at the beginning and end of military service for all military personnel and recommends several steps aimed at improving the military services' prevention of and surveillance for hearing loss and tinnitus. The book also identifies research needs, emphasizing topics specifically related to military service.

Tinnitus: Clinical and Research Perspectives summarizes contemporary findings from basic and clinical research regarding tinnitus mechanisms, effects, and interventions.The book's coverage of emerging practice considerations, such as the success of cognitive behavioral therapy, neuromodulation, and hearing aid use will be of particular interest.

Tinnitus is a common medical symptom that can be debilitating. Risk factors include hearing loss, ototoxic medication, head injury, and depression. At presentation, the possibilities of otological disease, anxiety, and depression should be considered. No effective drug treatments are available, although much research is underway into mechanisms and possible treatments. Surgical intervention for any otological pathology associated with tinnitus might be effective for that condition, but the tinnitus can persist. Available treatments include hearing aids when hearing loss is identified (even mild or unilateral), wide-band sound therapy, and counselling. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is indicated for some patients, but availability of tinnitus-specific CBT in the UK is poor. The evidence base is strongest for a combination of sound therapy and CBT-based counselling, although clinical trials are constrained by the heterogeneity of patients with tinnitus.

Introduction: The last decade has been characterized by a growing interest in indirectly delivered therapeutic measures for Tinnitus, an often disabling and distressing phenomenon. At this point, it seems important to review existing studies in order to evaluate the effects of these innovative interventions. Methods: We included RCTs studying psychological therapies for chronic Tinnitus in adults in an indirectly delivered way (mainly internet based). Applying a search term based on the key terms tinnitus, internet-based therapy and e-health therapy we identified 155 studies, from which 35 were scrutinized for data availability, resulting in 11 studies providing data for integration. As primary outcome measures we analyzed pre-post treatment comparisons of tinnitus distress and handicap, as well as depression, anxiety and sleep problems as secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses were carried out using randomeffect models due to heterogeneity. Multiple findings within a study were integrated applying a study effect model, resulting in one effect size for each sample. Control conditions most often consisted of a waiting list or provision of information material. A preregistration of the study is available on Open Science Framework (OSF; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ ESN3F) Results: A preliminary analysis of the included studies reveals a statistically significant large effect size for improvement in tinnitus distress (d = 0.83; [confidence interval 0.61-1.06]), whilst the reduction of tinnitus handicap was smaller (moderate effect size d = 0.59; [0.44-0.73]). We found less strong but still significant results for depression (d = 0.38 [0.23, 0.53]), anxiety (d = 0.41 [0.24, 0.57]) and insomnia (d = 0.50 [0.34, 0.67]). Conclusion: Indirectly delivered psychological therapies for chronic tinnitus seem to be Pontenzially suited - in a first analysis - to alleviate in particular tinnitus related distress and handicap, but also in improving symptoms of mental distress and sleeplessness. Thus, indirect therapies could be a component in tinnitus treatment. The heterogeneous quality and wide range of interventions of the included studies should be considered as limitations of this review. The effect sizes will be compared with the direct therapies (face-to-face CBT) and other active treatments. Especially the effects of online therapy have to be differentiated according to the number of sessions, elements of therapy, support by therapists and long-term effects.

Background Tinnitus is a highly prevalent symptom affecting 10–15% of the adult population. It often affects patient quality of life and frequently causes distress. When subjective tinnitus can be elicited by the somatosensory system of the cervical spine or temporomandibular area it is termed somatic tinnitus. The first aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of the best evidence conservative temporomandibular disorder (TMD) treatment on tinnitus in patients with co-existence of tinnitus and TMD or oral parafunctions compared to no treatment. The second aim is to identify a subgroup of patients with tinnitus that benefits from the conservative temporomandibular joint treatment. Methods and design This study is a randomised controlled trial with a delayed treatment design. Patients with a TMD (TMD pain screener ≥ 3 points) or oral parafunctions (such as clenching and bruxism), who are suffering from moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) between 25 and 90 points), will be recruited from the tertiary tinnitus clinic of the University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium. Patients will be excluded in case of clear otological or neurological causes of the tinnitus, progressive middle ear pathology, intracranial pathology, traumatic cervical spine or temporomandibular injury in the past 6 months, severe depression as diagnosed by a psychologist, tumours, previous surgery in the orofacial area, substance abuse that may affect the outcome measures, any contra-indication for physical therapy treatment directed to the orofacial area or when they received TMD treatment in the past 2 months. After screening for eligibility, baseline data among which scores on the TFI, tinnitus questionnaire (TQ), mean tinnitus loudness as measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), TMD pain screener, and a set of temporomandibular joint tests will be collected. Patients will be randomised in an early-start group and in a delayed-start group of therapy by 9 weeks. Patients will receive conservative TMD treatment with a maximum of 18 sessions within 9 weeks. At baseline (week 0), at the start of therapy (weeks 0 or 9), 9 weeks after therapy (weeks 9 or 18), and at follow-up (weeks 18 or 27) data from the TFI, TQ, VAS mean tinnitus loudness and the TMD pain screener will be collected. Discussion Herein, we aim to improve the quality of care for patients with tinnitus attributed to TMD or oral parafunctions. By evaluating the effect of state-of-the-art TMD treatment on tinnitus complaints, we can investigate the usefulness of TMD treatment in patients with somatic tinnitus. Trial registration 3 July 2017, version 1 of the protocol, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03209297 .