Explore the vast range of titles available.

Photobiomodulation is a safe option for controlling pain, edema, and trismus when applied postoperatively in third molar surgery. However, administration prior to surgery has been under-explored. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of pre-emptive photobiomodulation in reducing postoperative edema in impacted lower third molar extractions. Two groups of healthy individuals undergoing tooth extraction will be randomly assigned: Control group receiving pre-emptive corticosteroid and simulated photobiomodulation, and Photobiomodulation Group receiving intraoral low-intensity laser and extraoral LED cluster application. The primary outcome will be postoperative edema after 48 h. The secondary outcomes will be pain, trismus dysphagia, and analgesic intake (paracetamol). These outcomes will be assessed at baseline as well as two and seven days after surgery. Adverse effects will be recorded. Data will be presented as means ± SD and a p-value < 0.05 will be indicative of statistical significance.

Background-objective(s) This randomized, split-mouth study aimed to compare postoperative complications following the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars using piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients, aged 18–35 years, with bilaterally and symmetrically impacted lower third molars, were randomly assigned to undergo extraction using piezosurgery on one side and conventional rotary instruments on the other. Results The piezosurgery method required a longer operation time. However, it resulted in quicker resolution of postoperative swelling by the 7th day compared to the conventional method, where swelling persisted longer. Mandibular angle-tragus measurements were significantly higher with the conventional method on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. Although mouth opening decreased significantly after piezosurgery, it returned to preoperative levels by the 7th day, outperforming the conventional method. Postoperative pain was notably higher with the conventional method during the first four days but showed no significant difference from the 5th day onward. Alveolar bone healing was significantly better with piezosurgery at the 3rd and 6th months. Temporary paresthesia occurred in one patient from the conventional group, resolving within four weeks. Neither method resulted in alveolar osteitis. Conclusion(s) Within the study's limitations, piezosurgery demonstrated a reduction in postoperative discomfort, suggesting its advantage in enhancing patient recovery following lower third molar extractions. Clinical significance Piezosurgery, when used appropriately, can reduce postoperative complications compared to conventional methods. Clinicians should be aware of its indications, benefits, and potential challenges. Trial registration This study was registered as a clinical trial to the ClinicalTrials.gov, and the registration ID is NCT06262841 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06262841 ).

Background The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of orthodontic and traditional extraction methods on nerve injury following the extraction of impacted third molars close to the inferior alveolar nerve and to demonstrate the impact of factors such as gender, age, systemic diseases, the side of the third molar, its position, and classification on nerve recovery. Methods Patients with impacted third molars close to the inferior alveolar nerve and an indication for impacted third molar extraction were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach to be applied. Results Preoperative 2-point discrimination (2PD) test values, as well as postoperative 2PD test and visual analog scales (VAS) values on the 7th day, 14th day, and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months, were compared. In the traditional extraction group, the results of the 2PD test were statistically significantly higher on the 7th day, 14th day, 1 month, and 3 months compared to the orthodontic extraction group ( P  < 0.05). Sex, age, systemic disease, M3 side, position, and classification had no statistically significant effect on nerve recovery ( P  > 0.05). Conclusions The orthodontic extraction was found to be safer than traditional extraction in terms of nerve injury for high-risk M3s. Clinical trial registration This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.govin13/02/2024 . Clinical trial number: NCT06270784.

Background Among the post-surgical complications of lower wisdom teeth surgery, swelling is considered by patients one of the most impairing, with both social and biological influences and impacting patients' quality of life. Aim of the study was to evaluate the swelling following the osteotomy when performed with drilling burs versus piezo-electric instruments in the mandibular impacted third molar extraction, using a facial reconstruction software. Materials and methods A randomized, split-mouth, single-blind study was conducted on patients, ranging between 18 and 40 years of age, requiring lower third molars extraction and referred at the Oral Surgery Unit of the School of Dentistry of the University of Messina. Twenty-two patients were recruited during an 8 months period according to the following criteria: good general health conditions; bilateral, symmetrical, impacted third molars; no use of medication that would influence or alter wound healing; no temporomandibular joint disorder history; no smoking. All patients underwent bilateral surgical removal. For each patient, a facial scan was obtained prior to the surgical procedures. The two extractions were conducted performing, in a randomized way, osteotomy with rotatory burs or use of piezo surgical instruments. Facial scans were repeated at 3 and 7 days after the surgical procedures. Volumetric differences were calculated via superimposition using a dedicated software. The data obtained were processed using paired t-test. Results The results obtained from our study showed no significant differences between two groups regarding post-operative swelling. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first experience of using an objective method that can be reproducible on the collection of patients' clinical parameters. Conclusions The 3D digital analysis, in the evaluation of facial swelling, is a technique of simple application, objective, reproducible, reliable, decreasing the variables of error. Based on these data, it is possible to conclude that piezo surgery is a safe way for performing the osteotomies during third molar surgery. However, regarding the post-operative swelling, it does not show an advantage over classical rotary instruments. Trial registration Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05488028, on 04/08/2022). Approved by Ethical Committee of Messina: (ID 01–2020, on 27/04/2020).

Previous findings indicated that the laser photobiomodulation is more effective than the control or placebo in preserving the alveolar socket. This study aimed to compare two different lasers regarding their effectiveness in aiding alveolar socket preservation. Twenty extraction sockets were selected then divided into two equal groups. Group A was exposed to 650 nm Diode laser, and Group B to 810 nm Diode laser following the same protocol and parameters after a standard alveolar socket preservation procedure with collagen plug. Radiographic analysis with cone beam computed tomography was done to compare the alveolar bone surface area immediately after extraction and three months post-operatively, while bone samples collected before implant drilling were histologically examined for newly formed bone evaluation and histomorphometric analysis in terms of percentage of new bone surface area, percentage of unmineralized bone and finally, immunohistochemical analysis of Osteocalcin reaction surface area as well as optical density. Radiographically, infrared (810 nm) Diode effect on alveolar bone surface area has significantly exceeded the red laser, while histologically, red (650 nm) Diode has demonstrated statistical significance regarding all parameters; newly formed bone surface area percentage, unmineralized bone area percentage and finally Osteocalcin bone marker reaction surface area percentage and optical density. Under the specified conditions and laser parameters, photobiomodulation using the 810 nm Diode got the upper hand radiographically, yet histologically, the red 650 nm Diode managed to dominate all histological parameters when both employed as an adjunct to alveolar socket preservation procedures.

SummaryRoot amputation, immunosuppressive therapy, mandibular tooth extraction, pre-existing inflammation, and longer duration of treatment with bone-modifying agents were significantly associated with an increased risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Hopeless teeth should be extracted without drug holiday before the development of inflammation in cancer patients receiving high-dose bone-modifying agents.IntroductionNo studies have comprehensively analyzed the influence of pre-existing inflammation, surgical procedure–related factors such as primary wound closure, demographic factors, and drug holiday on the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the relationships between these various factors and the development of MRONJ after tooth extraction in cancer patients receiving high-dose bone-modifying agents (BMAs) such as bisphosphonates or denosumab.MethodsRisk factors for MRONJ after tooth extraction were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. The following parameters were investigated in all patients: demographics, type and duration of BMA use, whether BMA use was discontinued before tooth extraction (drug holiday), the duration of such discontinuation, the presence of pre-existing inflammation, and whether additional surgical procedures (e.g., incision, removal of bone edges, root amputation) were performed.ResultsWe found that root amputation (OR = 22.62), immunosuppressive therapy (OR = 16.61), extraction of mandibular teeth (OR = 12.14), extraction of teeth with pre-existing inflammation, and longer duration (≥ 8 months) of high-dose BMA (OR = 7.85) were all significantly associated with MRONJ.ConclusionsTooth extraction should not necessarily be postponed in cancer patients receiving high-dose BMA. The effectiveness of a short-term drug holiday was not confirmed, as drug holidays had no significant impact on MRONJ incidence. Tooth extraction may be acceptable during high-dose BMA therapy until 8 months after initiation.

SummaryThis study investigates the effects of antiresorptive drugs and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extraction. Among the findings, antiresorptive-treated patients had thicker lamina dura and longer healing times. Additionally, corticosteroid intake and multi-rooted teeth carried a higher osteonecrosis risk. Bone sequestrum indicated osteonecrosis.PurposeTo describe the effects of antiresorptive drugs (ARD) in the maxilla and mandible and risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extractions using clinical data and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study collected clinical and CBCT data from 176 patients. The study group (n = 78; 224 extractions) received ARD treatment, underwent tooth extraction, and had a pre-operative CBCT. Additionally, age-, sex-, and tooth-matched controls were selected (n = 98; 227 extractions). Radiographic examinations were performed independently by three calibrated examiners. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Mann–Whitney U, and t-tests to contrast clinical and radiographic data between study and control, MRONJ + and MRONJ − , and bisphosphonate and denosumab patients/sites. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.ResultsFrom the study group, 4 patients (5%) and 5 sites (2%) developed MRONJ after tooth extraction. ARD-treated patients exhibited significantly more thickening of the lamina dura and a longer average mucosal healing time (4.4 weeks) than controls (2.6 weeks). In the study group, MRONJ risk significantly increased with corticosteroid intake and in multi-rooted teeth. No significant differences between bisphosphonates and denosumab use were seen in the tomographic features (p > 0.05). Lastly, bone sequestrum was exclusively observed in osteoporotic patients, who exhibited post-operative exposed bone or histological evidence of osteonecrosis.ConclusionOsteoporotic patients under ARD may exhibit thickening of the lamina dura and prolonged post-operative healing. Among these patients, multi-rooted teeth are at higher risk for MRONJ than single-rooted teeth. Sequester formation is a radiographic indicator of osteonecrosis.

Background Third molar surgery is associated with various postoperative complications (PC). Different strategies, including the application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), have been implemented to reduce PC. Digital technologies have proven useful in objectively assessing postoperative facial swelling. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PRF on reducing facial swelling after lower third molar surgery using a 3D face scanner. Methods A randomized split-mouth clinical trial was set up and 32 patients (18 to 32 years), requiring extraction of both mandibular third molars, were recruited at the Oral Surgery Clinic of the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro. The primary predictive variable was the application or not of PRF plugs and membranes in the post-extraction socket. Primary outcome variable was facial swelling recorded with a face scanner preoperatively (T0), after three (T1) and seven (T2) days. Qualitative and quantitative data analysis were conducted following an automated and standardized imaging analysis workflow using the 3D Slicer software. Secondary outcome variables were trismus, recorded by measuring the maximum buccal opening with a caliper, pain, recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and duration of the surgery. Descriptive and bivariate analysis were performed by setting the significance level = 0.05. Results All patients exhibited a significant increase in facial swelling at T1, followed by a subsequent reduction from day 3 to day 7, with a slight persistence of edema observed on the seventh day. No significant data emerged from the statistical analysis conducted. Linear differences in PRF group reported improved values of postoperative swelling only in the T1-T2 and T0-T2 phases of analysis. Volumetric differences favored PRF group compared with control group in all phases. VAS was lower in PRF group only at T2, compared with control group. Conclusions Application of PRF in post-extraction sockets showed effectiveness in reducing facial swelling. Its advantages, including accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and absence of adverse reactions, make it an optimal treatment choice in reducing post-surgical sequelae.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of applying real-time dynamic navigation (RDN) in the extraction of deep horizontal mandibular impacted third molars, hypothesizing that RDN reduces surgical time and minimizes the risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 160 patients aged between 18 and 37 years with deep horizontal impaction of the mandibular third molar. The participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (receiving RDN-assisted extractions) or the control group (undergoing traditional extraction methods). Preoperative planning utilized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and Mimics software for the accurate localization and segmentation of impacted teeth. Parametric data were analysed via an independent t test for intergroup comparisons, and significance was set to p  < 0.05. Results In the experimental group, an average of 11 ± 1 min was required for preoperative planning via RDN, which was not required in the control group. The setup of the navigation system took an average of 4 ± 1 min in the experimental group and 0 min in the control group. The experimental group demonstrated a significantly shorter average surgical time (22 ± 3 min) than did the control group (36 ± 3 min). The differences in the preoperative design time, surgical time, and complication rates between the two groups were statistically significant ( p  = 0.005). Additionally, the RDN group reported no complications related to adjacent tooth damage or nerve injury. Conclusion The precision, safety, real-time guidance of RDN supports its use in complicated dental extractions, which would introduce a new era of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Graphical Abstract

SummaryRoot amputation, extraction of a single tooth, bone loss or severe tooth mobility, and an unclosed wound were significantly associated with increased risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). We recommend a minimally traumatic extraction technique, removal of any bone edges, and mucosal wound closure as standard procedures in patients receiving bisphosphonates.IntroductionOsteonecrosis of the jaws can occur following tooth extraction in patients receiving bisphosphonate drugs. Various strategies for minimizing the risk of MRONJ have been advanced, but no studies have comprehensively analyzed the efficacy of factors such as primary wound closure, demographics, and drug holidays in reducing its incidence. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the relationships between these various risk factors after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy.MethodsRisk factors for MRONJ after tooth extraction were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. All patients were investigated with regard to demographics; type and duration of oral bisphosphonate use; whether they underwent a discontinuation of oral bisphosphonates before tooth extraction (drug holiday), and the duration of such discontinuation; and whether any additional surgical procedures (e.g., incision, removal of bone edges, root amputation) were performed.ResultsWe found that root amputation (OR = 6.64), extraction of a single tooth (OR = 3.70), bone loss or severe tooth mobility (OR = 3.60), and an unclosed wound (OR = 2.51) were significantly associated with increased risk of developing MRONJ.ConclusionsWe recommend a minimally traumatic extraction technique, removal of any bone edges, and mucosal wound closure as standard procedures in patients receiving bisphosphonates. We find no evidence supporting the efficacy of a pre-extraction short-term drug holiday from oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of MRONJ.