Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose of Review With improvement in survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), it has become important to focus on the late complications experienced by the survivors that may lead to late mortality and morbidity to be able to provide patient-centered care across the transplant continuum. The goals of this article are to describe the status of literature on late complications in HCT survivors; offer a brief overview of the status of the screening, prevention, and management of these complications; and identify opportunities for future practice and research. Recent Findings This is an exciting time for the field with increasing awareness about survivorship issues. Studies are moving beyond description to examining pathogenesis of these late complications and identifying biomarkers. The eventual goal is to promote changes in our transplant techniques to decrease the incidence of these complications as well as help develop interventions targeting these late effects. There is also an emphasis on improving health care delivery models to provide optimal post-HCT management for medical and psychosocial complications through close coordination between multiple stakeholders and leveraging technology to help address the barriers in delivery of care to fulfill the unmet needs in this area. Summary The increasing population of HCT survivors with their burden of late effects underscores the need for concerted efforts to improve long-term medical and psychosocial outcomes for this group.

   Purpose of Review Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic HCT. Recently, several pivotal studies have been conducted demonstrating significant improvements in the management of GVHD. Here, we review important trials pertaining to GVHD prevention, acute GVHD treatment, and treatment of steroid refractory acute and chronic GVHD. Recent Findings Clinical trials in preventing GVHD demonstrate lower rates of severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD with post-transplant cyclophosphamide. For acute GVHD, lower risk acute GVHD appears amenable to steroid-sparing therapies, such as sirolimus and itacitinib. Combinations with novel agents such as itolizumab appear promising for high risk acute GVHD. For steroid-refractory acute GVHD, ruxolitinib should be considered first line therapy. For chronic GVHD requiring therapy beyond steroids, ruxolitinib, belumosudil, and ibrutinib are now available and should be considered. Summary Increasingly, GVHD has become a manageable complication after allogeneic HCT potentially translating to greater success with allogeneic HCT in the future.

Purpose of Review Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers. Recent Findings Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. Summary In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.

Purpose of Review Discogenic low back pain (DLBP) stems from pathology in one or more intervertebral discs identified as the root cause of the pain. It is the most common type of chronic low back pain (LBP), representing 26–42% of attributable cases. Recent Findings The clinical presentation of DLBP includes increased pain when sitting, coughing, or sneezing, and experiencing relief when standing or ambulating. Dermatomal radiation of pain to the lower extremity and neurological symptoms including numbness, motor weakness, and urinary or fecal incontinence are signs of advanced disease with disc prolapse, nerve root compression, or spinal stenosis. Degenerative disc disease is caused by both a decrease in disc nutrient supply causing decreased oxygen, lowered pH, and lessened ability of the intervertebral disc (IVD) to respond to increased load or injury; moreover, changes in the extracellular matrix composition cause weakening of the tissue and skewing the extracellular matrix’s (ECM) harmonious balance between catabolic and anabolic factors for cell turnover in favor of catabolism. Thus, the degeneration of the disc causes a shift from type II to type I collagen expression by NP cells and a decrease in aggrecan synthesis leads to dehydrated matrix cells ultimately with loss of swelling pressure needed for mechanical support. Cell-based therapies such as autologous nucleus pulposus cell re-implantation have in animal models and human trials shown improvements in LBP score, retention of hydration in IVD, and increased disc height. Percutaneously delivered multipotent mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy has been proposed as a potential means to uniquely ameliorate discogenic LBP holistically through three mechanisms: mitigation of primary nociceptive disc pain, slow or reversal of the catabolic metabolism, and restoration of disc tissue. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can differentiate into cells of all three germ layers in vitro, but their use is hindered related to ethical concerns, potential for immune rejection after transplantation, disease, and teratoma formation. Another similar approach to treating back pain is transplantation of the nucleus pulposus, which, like stem cell therapy, seeks to address the underlying cause of intervertebral disc degeneration by aiming to reverse the destructive inflammatory process and regenerate the proteoglycans and collagen found in healthy disc tissue. Summary Preliminary animal models and clinical studies have shown mesenchymal stem cell implantation as a potential therapy for IVD regeneration and ECM restoration via a shift towards favorable anabolic balance and reduction of pain.

Purpose of ReviewTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global public health concern, with limited treatment options available. Despite improving survival rate after TBI, treatment is lacking for brain functional recovery and structural repair in clinic. Recent studies have suggested that the mature brain harbors neural stem cells which have regenerative capacity following brain insults. Much progress has been made in preclinical TBI model studies in understanding the behaviors, functions, and regulatory mechanisms of neural stem cells in the injured brain. Different strategies targeting these cell population have been assessed in TBI models. In parallel, cell transplantation strategy using a wide range of stem cells has been explored for TBI treatment in pre-clinical studies and some in clinical trials. This review summarized strategies which have been explored to enhance endogenous neural stem cell-mediated regeneration and recent development in cell transplantation studies for post-TBI brain repair.Recent FindingsThus far, neural regeneration through neural stem cells either by modulating endogenous neural stem cells or by stem cell transplantation has attracted much attention. It is highly speculated that targeting neural stem cells could be a potential strategy to repair and regenerate the injured brain.SummaryNeuroprotection and neuroregeneration are major aspects for TBI therapeutic development. With technique advancement, it is hoped that stem cell-based therapy targeting neuroregeneration will be able to translate to clinic in not so far future.

Opinion statementWith the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), the prognosis of patients has improved dramatically. Currently, the standard of care in the frontline setting for fit patients is TKI in combination with chemotherapy. Age-adjusted chemotherapy or corticosteroids alone have been used with TKIs in elderly patients with comorbidities with modest long-term benefit. The primary goal of treatment is the achievement of early deep molecular remission as the achievement of complete molecular remission (CMR) at 3 months has been demonstrated to be predictive of higher long-term survival. The probability of attaining this goal by a more potent TKIs like dasatinib or ponatinib is higher, thus we recommend the use of second- or third-generation TKIs over imatinib. Clinicians should be aware of possible fatal cardiovascular events mainly related to ponatinib. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) should still be considered in first remission, especially for younger patients treated with imatinib combination therapy. A subset of patients achieving CMR at 3 months may be able to continue consolidation and maintenance with chemotherapy and TKI without the need for alloHSCT. Because of higher risk of relapses in the central nervous system, intrathecal chemoprophylaxis is mandatory for all patients. New strategies incorporating novel agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, potent TKIs, and CAR T cells are under investigation.

Purpose of Review The use of stem cell therapy is a rapidly evolving and progressing frontier of science that has been used to treat illnesses such as malignancies, immunodeficiencies, and metabolic syndromes. This review aims to give an overview of the use of stem cell therapy in the treatment of pain caused by diabetic neuropathy, osteoarthritis, and other spinal cord pathologies. Recent Findings Pain is defined as a generalized or localized feeling of distress related to a physical or emotional stimulus and can be caused by a multitude of pathologies. The field of pain management has explored many strategies such as gene therapies, neuromodulation, platelet-rich plasma, and numerous pharmacotherapies. The approach to the delivery of these strategies has varied, with the method of stem cell therapy delivery being the focus of this present investigation. In addition, we combined several different studies to analyze the effects of stem cell therapies and improvement in pain scores quantified by the visual analog scale (VAS). The overall results showed a mean difference of -2.58, suggesting that the stem cell treatment group had a lower VAS score at 6 months compared to the control group. Summary The use of different types of stem cells, such as pluripotent and mesenchymal stem cells, play a critical role in the care of cases suffering from pain. Effective delivery methods are evolving and can transform treatment options in the future, for which large cohort studies are warranted.

Purpose of ReviewLymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) is a rare, highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma variant virtually indistinguishable from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We review the advancements in diagnostics, staging, treatment, and response assessment.Recent FindingsT-LBL displays a mediastinal mass with pleuro-pericardic effusions as key distinctive features and is far more frequent than B-LBL. LBL is exquisitely sensitive to ALL-type chemotherapy, achieving cure rates in the order of 70% in adults and even more in children. Positron-emission tomography, genetic risk classifications, and minimal disseminated/residual disease assays are increasingly used to detect occult sites of involvement and predict treatment outcome. Stem cell transplantation is effective and should be considered for very high-risk subsets and/or at salvage.SummaryAlthough curable in the majority of patients, about 25–30% of adults with LBL patients experience resistance or relapse following first-line therapy. It is essential to identify these cases early on and to explore new modalities of precision medicine with targeted agents.

Purpose of ReviewHuman pancreas-on-a-chip (PoC) technology is quickly advancing as a platform for complex in vitro modeling of islet physiology. This review summarizes the current progress and evaluates the possibility of using this technology for clinical islet transplantation.Recent FindingsPoC microfluidic platforms have mainly shown proof of principle for long-term culturing of islets to study islet function in a standardized format. Advancement in microfluidic design by using imaging-compatible biomaterials and biosensor technology might provide a novel future tool for predicting islet transplantation outcome. Progress in combining islets with other tissue types gives a possibility to study diabetic interventions in a minimal equivalent in vitro environment.SummaryAlthough the field of PoC is still in its infancy, considerable progress in the development of functional systems has brought the technology on the verge of a general applicable tool that may be used to study islet quality and to replace animal testing in the development of diabetes interventions.

Opinion statement Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare, life-threatening bone marrow failure (BMF) disorder that affects patients of all ages and is caused by lymphocyte destruction of early hematopoietic cells. Diagnosis of AA requires a comprehensive approach with prompt evaluation for inherited and secondary causes of bone marrow aplasia, while providing aggressive supportive care. The choice of frontline therapy is determined by a number of factors including AA severity, age of the patient, donor availability, and access to optimal therapies. For newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia, bone marrow transplant should be pursued in all pediatric patients and in younger adult patients when a matched sibling donor is available. Frontline therapy in older adult patients and in all patients lacking a matched sibling donor involves immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with horse antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine A. Recent improvements in upfront therapy include encouraging results with closely matched unrelated donor transplants in younger patients and the emerging benefits of eltrombopag combined with initial IST, with randomized studies underway. In the refractory setting, several therapeutic options exist, with improving outcomes of matched unrelated donor and haploidentical bone marrow transplantation as well as the addition of eltrombopag to the non-transplant AA armamentarium. With the recent appreciation of frequent clonal hematopoiesis in AA patients and with the growing use of next-generation sequencing in the clinic, utmost caution should be exercised in interpreting the significance of somatic mutations in AA. Future longitudinal studies of large numbers of patients are needed to determine the prognostic significance of somatic mutations and to guide optimal surveillance and treatment approaches to prevent long-term clonal complications.