Explore the vast range of titles available.

High-frequency (HF) transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely used in Major Depressive Episode (MDE). Optimization of its efficacy with a neuro-navigation system has been proposed based on a small randomized controlled trial (RCT) supporting a large effect. This evaluator- and patient-blind, multicenter RCT assessed the superiority in terms of efficacy of 10 HF rTMS sessions of the left DLPFC targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation versus similar sessions targeted by the standard 5 cm technique. The study was conducted between January 2013 and April 2017, at 4 hospitals centers in France where both in- and out- patients with MDE were included. Randomization was computer-generated (1:1), with allocation concealment implemented within the e-CRF. The main outcome measure was the percentage of responders 44 days (D44) after the rTMS session. Secondary outcomes were percentage of remitters, Beck Depression Inventory and psychomotor retardation assessed with Salpêtrière retardation rating scale (SRRS) for depression at D14 and D44. The results are presented along with their 95% confidence intervals. 105 patients were randomized and 92 were evaluable with respectively 45 patients in the neuronavigation group and 47 in the standard group. A treatment response was observed for 14 (31.8%) of 44 patients analyzed in the intervention group, and for 16 (35.6%) of 45 patients analyzed in the control group with no statistical difference (relative risk 0.89; 95% confidence interval, [0.50;1.61]). No difference was evidenced for secondary outcomes at D44 whether it concerns remission at D44 (relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.88), or BDI results (difference in means, 0,01; 95% CI, -3.06 to 3.26), or SRRS results (difference in means, 0.11; 95% CI, -2.42 to 5.02). Similar results were observed at D14. Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups with 23 (47.9%) and 1 (2.1%) of adverse events and serious adverse events in the neuro-navigation group versus 20 (40.8%) and 0 (0%) in the standard group. This study failed to reproduce previous findings supporting the use of neuro-navigation system to optimize rTMS efficacy. Limitations of this study includes a small sample size and a number of rTMS sessions that may appear substandard in 2025. NCT01677078.

Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder is common; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by use of high-frequency (10 Hz) left-side dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation is an evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer form of rTMS that can be delivered in 3 min, versus 37·5 min for a standard 10 Hz treatment session. We aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of iTBS compared with standard 10 Hz rTMS in adults with treatment-resistant depression. In this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial, we recruited patients who were referred to specialty neurostimulation centres based at three Canadian university hospitals (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, and University of British Columbia Hospital, Vancouver, BC). Participants were aged 18–65 years, were diagnosed with a current treatment-resistant major depressive episode or could not tolerate at least two antidepressants in the current episode, were receiving stable antidepressant medication doses for at least 4 weeks before baseline, and had an HRSD-17 score of at least 18. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment groups (10 Hz rTMS or iTBS) by use of a random permuted block method, with stratification by site and number of adequate trials in which the antidepressants were unsuccessful. Treatment was delivered open-label but investigators and outcome assessors were masked to treatment groups. Participants were treated with 10 Hz rTMS or iTBS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, administered on 5 days a week for 4–6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) score, with a non-inferiority margin of 2·25 points. For the primary outcome measure, we did a per-protocol analysis of all participants who were randomly allocated to groups and who attained the primary completion point of 4 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01887782. Between Sept 3, 2013, and Oct 3, 2016, we randomly allocated 205 participants to receive 10 Hz rTMS and 209 participants to receive iTBS. 192 (94%) participants in the 10 Hz rTMS group and 193 (92%) in the iTBS group were assessed for the primary outcome after 4–6 weeks of treatment. HRSD-17 scores improved from 23·5 (SD 4·4) to 13·4 (7·8) in the 10 Hz rTMS group and from 23·6 (4·3) to 13·4 (7·9) in the iTBS group (adjusted difference 0·103, lower 95% CI −1·16; p=0·0011), which indicated non-inferiority of iTBS. Self-rated intensity of pain associated with treatment was greater in the iTBS group than in the 10 Hz rTMS group (mean score on verbal analogue scale 3·8 [SD 2·0] vs 3·4 [2·0] out of 10; p=0·011). Dropout rates did not differ between groups (10 Hz rTMS: 13 [6%] of 205 participants; iTBS: 16 [8%] of 209 participants); p=0·6004). The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache in both groups (10 Hz rTMS: 131 [64%] of 204; iTBS: 136 [65%] of 208). In patients with treatment-resistant depression, iTBS was non-inferior to 10 Hz rTMS for the treatment of depression. Both treatments had low numbers of dropouts and similar side-effects, safety, and tolerability profiles. By use of iTBS, the number of patients treated per day with current rTMS devices can be increased several times without compromising clinical effectiveness. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Late-life depression (LLD) is a growing worldwide problem due to demographic changes, with limited treatment options due to high rates of pharmacotherapy adverse effects, accessibility of psychotherapy, and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy. Novel neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), may overcome these limitations. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects of high-dose deep rTMS in LLD. In this study we randomized older adults between 60 and 85 years old with major depressive disorder (MDD) to sham or active deep rTMS (H1 coil, 6012 pulses, 18 Hz, 120% of resting motor threshold) delivered over the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex 5 days per week over 4 weeks. Our primary outcome was remission of depression in an intention-to-treat analysis. We also assessed change in cognitive functioning with rTMS treatment and tolerability based on adverse effects. Fifty-two participants were randomized to active (n = 25) or sham H1 coil (n = 27). Remission rate was significantly higher with active than sham rTMS (40.0% vs 14.8%) with a number needed to treat of 4.0 (95% CI: 2.1–56.5). There was no change on any measure of executive function and no serious adverse events. Adverse effect profiles were similar between active and sham rTMS, except for reports of pain being significantly more common in the active condition (16.0% vs 0%). High-dose deep rTMS appears to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the treatment of LLD.

Disruption in reciprocal connectivity between the right anterior insula and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is associated with depression and may be a target for neuromodulation. In a five-center, parallel, double-blind, randomized controlled trial we personalized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging neuronavigated connectivity-guided intermittent theta burst stimulation (cgiTBS) at a site based on effective connectivity from the right anterior insula to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We tested its efficacy in reducing the primary outcome depression symptoms measured by the GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item over 8, 16 and 26 weeks, compared with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered at the standard stimulation site (F3) in patients with ‘treatment-resistant depression’. Participants were randomly assigned to 20 sessions over 4–6 weeks of either cgiTBS ( n  = 128) or rTMS ( n  = 127) with resting-state functional MRI at baseline and 16 weeks. Persistent decreases in depressive symptoms were seen over 26 weeks, with no differences between arms on the primary outcome GRID Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item score (intention-to-treat adjusted mean, −0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.87, 1.24, P  = 0.689). Two serious adverse events were possibly related to TMS (mania and psychosis). MRI-neuronavigated cgiTBS and rTMS were equally effective in patients with treatment-resistant depression over 26 weeks (trial registration no. ISRCTN19674644). A randomized controlled trial found that functional connectivity-guided approaches to intermittent theta burst stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation both reduced depressive symptoms in patients with moderate to severe treatment-resistant depression over 26 weeks.

Memory loss is one of the first symptoms of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), for which there are no effective therapies available. The precuneus (PC) has been recently emphasized as a key area for the memory impairment observed in early AD, likely due to disconnection mechanisms within large-scale networks such as the default mode network (DMN). Using a multimodal approach we investigated in a two-week, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial the effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the PC on cognition, as measured by the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite in 14 patients with early AD (7 females). TMS combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) was used to detect changes in brain connectivity. We found that rTMS of the PC induced a selective improvement in episodic memory, but not in other cognitive domains. Analysis of TMS-EEG signal revealed an increase of neural activity in patients' PC, an enhancement of brain oscillations in the beta band and a modification of functional connections between the PC and medial frontal areas within the DMN. Our findings show that high-frequency rTMS of the PC is a promising, non-invasive treatment for memory dysfunction in patients at early stages of AD. This clinical improvement is accompanied by modulation of brain connectivity, consistently with the pathophysiological model of brain disconnection in AD. •The precuneus is a key area for memory impairment in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).•We investigated the effects of precuneus-rTMS on memory in patients with early AD.•Precuneus-rTMS induced a selective improvement in episodic memory.•Precuneus-rTMS enhance precuneus activity and connectivity with frontal areas.•Precuneus-rTMS is a promising treatment for memory dysfunction in early AD patients.

Size and duration of the neuroplastic effects of tDCS depend on stimulation parameters, including stimulation duration and intensity of current. The impact of stimulation parameters on physiological effects is partially non-linear. To improve the utility of this intervention, it is critical to gather information about the impact of stimulation duration and intensity on neuroplasticity, while expanding the parameter space to improve efficacy. Anodal tDCS of 1–3 mA current intensity was applied for 15–30 minutes to study motor cortex plasticity. Sixteen healthy right-handed non-smoking volunteers participated in 10 sessions (intensity-duration pairs) of stimulation in a randomized cross-over design. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded as outcome measures of tDCS effects until next evening after tDCS. All active stimulation conditions enhanced motor cortex excitability within the first 2 hours after stimulation. We observed no significant differences between the three stimulation intensities and durations on cortical excitability. A trend for larger cortical excitability enhancements was however observed for higher current intensities (1 vs 3 mA). These results add information about intensified tDCS protocols and suggest that the impact of anodal tDCS on neuroplasticity is relatively robust with respect to gradual alterations of stimulation intensity, and duration.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a weak electric current to modulate neuronal activity. A neurophysiologic outcome measure to demonstrate reliable tDCS modulation at the group level is transcranial magnetic stimulation engendered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Here, we conduct a study testing the reliability of individual MEP response patterns following a common tDCS protocol. Fourteen participants (7m/7f) each underwent nine randomized sessions of 1 mA, 10 min tDCS (3 anode; 3 cathode; 3 sham) delivered using an M1/orbito-frontal electrode montage (sessions separated by an average of ~5.5 days). Fifteen MEPs were obtained prior to, immediately following and in 5 min intervals for 30 min following tDCS. TMS was delivered at 130 % resting motor threshold using neuronavigation to ensure consistent coil localization. A number of non-experimental variables were collected during each session. At the individual level, considerable variability was seen among different testing sessions. No participant demonstrated an excitatory response ≥20 % to all three anodal sessions, and no participant demonstrated an inhibitory response ≥20 % to all three cathodal sessions. Intra-class correlation revealed poor anodal and cathodal test–retest reliability [anode: ICC (2,1)  = 0.062; cathode: ICC (2,1)  = 0.055] and moderate sham test–retest reliability [ICC (2,1)  = 0.433]. Results also revealed no significant effect of tDCS at the group level. Using this common protocol, we found the effects of tDCS on MEP amplitudes to be highly variable at the individual level. In addition, no significant effects of tDCS on MEP amplitude were found at the group level. Future studies should consider utilizing a more strict experimental protocol to potentially account for intra-individual response variations.

Background Chronic insomnia increases the risk of various health problems and mental illness. Existing research suggests promise for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating chronic insomnia individually. However, the combined effects of tDCS and rTMS on this condition remain unclear. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tDCS combined with rTMS for the treatment of adult patients with chronic insomnia. Methods This was a randomised double-blind parallel-group controlled study. Overall, 157 participants with chronic insomnia were randomly assigned to one of three neurotherapy regimens: tDCS + rTMS, sham tDCS + rTMS, or tDCS + sham rTMS. All groups received 20 treatment sessions over 4 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the change in patients’ sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome was the assessment of different dimensions of depression and anxiety in patients through the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), as well as the occurrence of adverse events. Results Throughout the intervention and after the 3-month follow-up, the tDCS + rTMS group had significantly reduced total PSQI scores compared with the other two groups [tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03; difference − 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 1.82 to − 0.38; p  = 0.003; tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference − 2.14; 95% CI, − 2.90 to − 1.38; p  < 0.001; sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference − 1.04; 95% CI, − 1.82 to − 0.26; p  = 0.010), indicating improved overall sleep quality. Total HAMD and insomnia factor scores were significantly lower in the tDCS + rTMS group than in the other two groups after treatment ( p  < 0.05). Notably, no adverse events or serious adverse reactions were observed during the study period. Conclusions Combining tDCS with rTMS effectively relieved insomnia symptoms, achieving a significant therapeutic effect after 2-week of intervention, and demonstrating the persistence of treatment effects in later follow-up, emphasising the advantages of combination therapy in improving treatment stability and long-term benefits, reflecting the rapid and effective augmentation of combination therapy. This combined therapy may serve as a safe and effective treatment for adults with chronic insomnia. Trial registration This study was registered as a clinical trial with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100052681).

The capacity for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to increase learning and cognition shows promise for the development of enhanced therapeutic interventions. One potential application is the combination of tDCS with cognitive training (CT), a psychological intervention which aims to improve targeted cognitive abilities. We have previously shown that tDCS enhanced performance accuracy, but not skill acquisition, on a dual n -back working memory (WM) CT task over repeated sessions. In the current study, we investigated the optimal timing for combining tDCS with the same CT task to enhance within and between session performance outcomes across two daily CT sessions. Twenty healthy participants received in a randomised order 30 min of anodal tDCS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex immediately before (‘offline’ tDCS) and during performance (‘online’ tDCS) on a dual n -back WM CT task, in an intra-individual crossover design. Analyses examined within and between session consolidation effects of tDCS on CT performance outcomes. Results showed that ‘online’ tDCS was associated with better within session skill acquisition on the CT task, with a significant difference found between conditions the following day. These results suggest that ‘online’ tDCS is superior to ‘offline’ tDCS for enhancing skill acquisition when combining anodal tDCS with CT. This finding may assist with the development of enhanced protocols involving the combination of tDCS with CT and other rehabilitation protocols.

Preliminary work suggests that single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) could be effective as a treatment for migraine. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new portable sTMS device for acute treatment of migraine with aura. We undertook a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, two-phase, sham-controlled study at 18 centres in the USA. 267 adults aged 18–68 years were enrolled into phase one. All individuals had to meet international criteria for migraine with aura, with visual aura preceding at least 30% of migraines followed by moderate or severe headache in more than 90% of those attacks. 66 patients dropped out during phase one. In phase two, 201 individuals were randomly allocated by computer to either sham stimulation (n=99) or sTMS (n=102). We instructed participants to treat up to three attacks over 3 months while experiencing aura. The primary outcome was pain-free response 2 h after the first attack, and co-primary outcomes were non-inferiority at 2 h for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Analyses were modified intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00449540. 37 patients did not treat a migraine attack and were excluded from outcome analyses. 164 patients treated at least one attack with sTMS (n=82) or sham stimulation (n=82; modified intention-to-treat analysis set). Pain-free response rates after 2 h were significantly higher with sTMS (32/82 [39%]) than with sham stimulation (18/82 [22%]), for a therapeutic gain of 17% (95% CI 3–31%; p=0·0179). Sustained pain-free response rates significantly favoured sTMS at 24 h and 48 h post-treatment. Non-inferiority was shown for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. No device-related serious adverse events were recorded, and incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between sTMS and sham groups. Early treatment of migraine with aura by sTMS resulted in increased freedom from pain at 2 h compared with sham stimulation, and absence of pain was sustained 24 h and 48 h after treatment. sTMS could be a promising acute treatment for some patients with migraine with aura. Neuralieve.