Explore the vast range of titles available.

Systematic interrogation of gene function requires the ability to perturb gene expression in a robust and generalizable manner. Here we describe structure-guided engineering of a CRISPR-Cas9 complex to mediate efficient transcriptional activation at endogenous genomic loci. We used these engineered Cas9 activation complexes to investigate single-guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting rules for effective transcriptional activation, to demonstrate multiplexed activation of ten genes simultaneously, and to upregulate long intergenic non-coding RNA (lincRNA) transcripts. We also synthesized a library consisting of 70,290 guides targeting all human RefSeq coding isoforms to screen for genes that, upon activation, confer resistance to a BRAF inhibitor. The top hits included genes previously shown to be able to confer resistance, and novel candidates were validated using individual sgRNA and complementary DNA overexpression. A gene expression signature based on the top screening hits correlated with markers of BRAF inhibitor resistance in cell lines and patient-derived samples. These results collectively demonstrate the potential of Cas9-based activators as a powerful genetic perturbation technology. The CRISPR-Cas9 system, a powerful tool for genome editing, has been engineered to activate endogenous gene transcription specifically and potently on a genome-wide scale and applied to a large-scale gain-of-function screen for studying melanoma drug resistance. CRISPR-Cas9 used for gene-expression regulation The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as a powerful tool for genome editing and transcriptional regulation of specific genes. Feng Zhang and colleagues have successfully modified the system to specifically and potently activate endogenous gene transcription on a genome-wide scale, such that it can be used for large-scale functional genomics screens. Application to a genome-wide screen of melanoma cells for genes which when overexpressed can confer resistance to a BRAF inhibitor demonstrates the feasibility of such screens, and also led to the discovery of potential new resistance mechanisms.

Yes-associated protein (YAP) is a transcriptional co-activator that regulates cell proliferation and survival by binding to a select set of enhancers for target gene activation. How YAP coordinates these transcriptional responses is unknown. Here, we demonstrate that YAP forms liquid-like condensates in the nucleus. Formed within seconds of hyperosmotic stress, YAP condensates compartmentalized the YAP transcription factor TEAD1 and other YAP-related co-activators, including TAZ, and subsequently induced the transcription of YAP-specific proliferation genes. Super-resolution imaging using assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with photoactivated localization microscopy revealed that the YAP nuclear condensates were areas enriched in accessible chromatin domains organized as super-enhancers. Initially devoid of RNA polymerase II, the accessible chromatin domains later acquired RNA polymerase II, transcribing RNA. The removal of the intrinsically-disordered YAP transcription activation domain prevented the formation of YAP condensates and diminished downstream YAP signalling. Thus, dynamic changes in genome organization and gene activation during YAP reprogramming is mediated by liquid–liquid phase separation. Cai et al. show that YAP forms liquid-like condensates in the nucleus that compartmentalize YAP’s DNA binding cofactors and transcription co-activators to induce transcription of YAP-specific proliferation genes.

Protein aggregation is the hallmark of neurodegeneration, but the molecular mechanisms underlying late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are unclear. Here we integrated transcriptomic, proteomic and epigenomic analyses of postmortem human brains to identify molecular pathways involved in AD. RNA sequencing analysis revealed upregulation of transcription- and chromatin-related genes, including the histone acetyltransferases for H3K27ac and H3K9ac. An unbiased proteomic screening singled out H3K27ac and H3K9ac as the main enrichments specific to AD. In turn, epigenomic profiling revealed gains in the histone H3 modifications H3K27ac and H3K9ac linked to transcription, chromatin and disease pathways in AD. Increasing genome-wide H3K27ac and H3K9ac in a fly model of AD exacerbated amyloid-β42-driven neurodegeneration. Together, these findings suggest that AD involves a reconfiguration of the epigenome, wherein H3K27ac and H3K9ac affect disease pathways by dysregulating transcription- and chromatin–gene feedback loops. The identification of this process highlights potential epigenetic strategies for early-stage disease treatment. Multi-omic profiling of brain tissue from patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) identifies gains in H3K27ac and H3K9ac linked to transcription and disease pathways. Increasing H3K27ac and H3K9ac in a fly model of AD exacerbates neurodegeneration.

Histone-modifying enzymes are implicated in the control of diverse DNA-templated processes including gene expression. Here, we outline historical and current thinking regarding the functions of histone modifications and their associated enzymes. One current viewpoint, based largely on correlative evidence, posits that histone modifications are instructive for transcriptional regulation and represent an epigenetic ‘code’. Recent studies have challenged this model and suggest that histone marks previously associated with active genes do not directly cause transcriptional activation. Additionally, many histone-modifying proteins possess non-catalytic functions that overshadow their enzymatic activities. Given that much remains unknown regarding the functions of these proteins, the field should be cautious in interpreting loss-of-function phenotypes and must consider both cellular and developmental context. In this Perspective, we focus on recent progress relating to the catalytic and non-catalytic functions of the Trithorax–COMPASS complexes, Polycomb repressive complexes and Clr4/Suv39 histone-modifying machineries. Recent progress relating to the catalytic and non-catalytic functions of histone modifying complexes warrants a fresh look at the role of histone modifications and the “histone code” model.

A crucial feature of differentiated cells is the rapid activation of enhancer-driven transcriptional programs in response to signals. The potential contributions of physicochemical properties of enhancer assembly in signaling events remain poorly understood. Here we report that in human breast cancer cells, the acute 17β-estradiol-dependent activation of functional enhancers requires assembly of an enhancer RNA–dependent ribonucleoprotein (eRNP) complex exhibiting properties of phase-separated condensates. Unexpectedly, while acute ligand-dependent assembly of eRNPs resulted in enhancer activation sensitive to chemical disruption of phase separation, chronically activated enhancers proved resistant to such disruption, with progressive maturation of eRNPs to a more gel-like state. Acute, but not chronic, stimulation resulted in ligand-induced, condensin-dependent changes in spatial chromatin conformation based on homotypic enhancer association, resulting in cooperative enhancer-activation events. Thus, distinct physicochemical properties of eRNP condensates on enhancers serve as determinants of rapid ligand-dependent alterations in chromosomal architecture and cooperative enhancer activation.After acute agonist stimulation, phase-separated complexes form at estrogen-receptor-bound enhancer sites and coalesce into condensates with cooperative enhancer activity. Chronic stimulation causes the condensates to mature into a less dynamic, gel-like state.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small noncoding RNAs that participate in a majority of biological processes via regulating target gene expression. The post-transcriptional repression through miRNA seed region binding to 3′ UTR of target mRNA is considered as the canonical mode of miRNA-mediated gene regulation. However, emerging evidence suggests that other regulatory modes exist beyond the canonical mechanism. In particular, the function of intranuclear miRNA in gene transcriptional regulation is gradually revealed, with evidence showing their contribution to gene silencing or activating. Therefore, miRNA-mediated regulation of gene transcription not only expands our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying miRNA regulatory function, but also provides new evidence to explain its ability in the sophisticated regulation of many bioprocesses. In this review, mechanisms of miRNA-mediated gene transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation are summarized, and the synergistic effects among these actions which form a regulatory network of a miRNA on its target are particularly elaborated. With these discussions, we aim to emphasize the importance of miRNA regulatory network on target gene regulation and further highlight the potential application of the network mode in the achievement of a more effective and stable modulation of the target gene expression.

The primary regulators of metazoan gene expression are enhancers, originally functionally defined as DNA sequences that can activate transcription at promoters in an orientation-independent and distance-independent manner. Despite being crucial for gene regulation in animals, what mechanisms underlie enhancer selectivity for promoters, and more fundamentally, how enhancers interact with promoters and activate transcription, remain poorly understood. In this Review, we first discuss current models of enhancer–promoter interactions in space and time and how enhancers affect transcription activation. Next, we discuss different mechanisms that mediate enhancer selectivity, including repression, biochemical compatibility and regulation of 3D genome structure. Through 3D polymer simulations, we illustrate how the ability of 3D genome folding mechanisms to mediate enhancer selectivity strongly varies for different enhancer–promoter interaction mechanisms. Finally, we discuss how recent technical advances may provide new insights into mechanisms of enhancer–promoter interactions and how technical biases in methods such as Hi-C and Micro-C and imaging techniques may affect their interpretation.Gene regulation in animals depends chiefly on enhancers, yet the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. This Review discusses enhancer–promoter interactions and transcription activation, focusing on how enhancer–promoter selectivity is achieved and on recent technical advances that may provide new insights into transcription activation.

It is unclear whether bidirectional non-coding RNAs transcribed from enhancer elements (eRNAs) have any functional role; here, eRNA transcription is shown to be functionally important during the activation of genes by the oestrogen receptor in human breast cancer cells. Regulatory role for eRNAs Bidirectional non-coding RNAs are transcribed from enhancer elements, but it is unclear whether these enhancer-derived RNAs (eRNAs) have a functional role or are merely a reflection of enhancer activity. Two manuscripts in this issue of Nature examine this question in the context of the positive and negative transcriptional functions of different nuclear receptors. Wenbo Li et al . provide evidence for the functional importance of eRNA transcription during the activation of genes by the oestrogen receptor in breast cancer cell lines; and Michael Lam et al . show that the repressive functions of Rev-Erb nuclear receptors in macrophages are linked to their ability to inhibit the transcription of eRNAs. Taken together these studies provide evidence for a role for eRNAs in contributing to enhancer functions. The functional importance of gene enhancers in regulated gene expression is well established 1 , 2 , 3 . In addition to widespread transcription of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in mammalian cells 4 , 5 , 6 , bidirectional ncRNAs are transcribed on enhancers, and are thus referred to as enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) 7 , 8 , 9 . However, it has remained unclear whether these eRNAs are functional or merely a reflection of enhancer activation. Here we report that in human breast cancer cells 17β-oestradiol (E2)-bound oestrogen receptor α (ER-α) causes a global increase in eRNA transcription on enhancers adjacent to E2-upregulated coding genes. These induced eRNAs, as functional transcripts, seem to exert important roles for the observed ligand-dependent induction of target coding genes, increasing the strength of specific enhancer–promoter looping initiated by ER-α binding. Cohesin, present on many ER-α-regulated enhancers even before ligand treatment, apparently contributes to E2-dependent gene activation, at least in part by stabilizing E2/ER-α/eRNA-induced enhancer–promoter looping. Our data indicate that eRNAs are likely to have important functions in many regulated programs of gene transcription.

The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) is accumulated after drought stress and plays critical roles in the responses to drought stress in plants, such as gene regulation, stomatal closure, seed maturation, and dormancy. Although previous reports revealed detailed molecular roles of ABA in stress responses, the factors that contribute to the drought-stress responses—in particular, regulation of ABA accumulation—remain unclear. The enzyme NINE-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE 3 (NCED3) is essential for ABA biosynthesis during drought stress, and the NCED3 gene is highly induced by drought stress. In the present study, we isolated NGATHAs (NGAs) as candidate transcriptional regulators of NCED3 through a screen of a plant library harboring the transcription factors fused to a chimeric repressor domain, SRDX. The NGA proteins were directly bound to a cis-element NGA-binding element (NBE) in the 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) of the NCED3 promoter and were suggested to be transcriptional activators of NCED3. Among the single-knockout mutants of four NGA family genes, we found that the NGATHA1 (NGA1) knockout mutant was drought-stress-sensitive with a decreased expression level of NCED3 during dehydration stress. These results suggested that NGA1 essentially functions as a transcriptional activator of NCED3 among the NGA family proteins. Moreover, the NGA1 protein was degraded under non-stressed conditions, and dehydration stress enhanced the accumulation of NGA1 proteins, even in ABA-deficient mutant plants, indicating that there should be ABA-independent posttranslational regulations. These findings emphasize the regulatory mechanisms of ABA biosynthesis during early drought stress.

Although much is known about plant responses to heat shock (HS), how plants sense high temperature and the primary HS signal transduction pathway leading to HS-regulated gene expression are still poorly understood. To identify primary transcription factors that mediate HS-regulated gene expression and their target genes, RNA sequencing was performed to detect genes whose expression is rapidly altered by HS in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The results showed several genes were induced after only 5 min of HS treatment, suggesting that HS signaling occurs very rapidly. Analysis of the cis-elements in the promoters of genes upregulated by 10 min of HS treatment identified HEAT SHOCK FACTOR A1s (HSFA1s) and circadian clock proteins REVEILLE4 (RVE4) and RVE8 as essential transcription factors that independently mediate early HS-induced gene expression. Using hsfa1a/b/d/e and rve4/8 mutants, we identified subsets of HSFA1s- or RVE4/8-dependent early HS-induced genes and showed RVE4/8 regulate plant thermotolerance partially by regulating the expression of downstream transcription factors ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTOR53 (ERF53) and ERF54, specifically around noon. These findings reveal a potential transcriptional regulatory hierarchy governing the first wave of HS-induced gene expression. They also provided important insight into the mechanism by which the circadian clock gates thermotolerance and prepares plants for exposure to high temperatures during the day.