Explore the vast range of titles available.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to quantitatively compare the somatosensory function changes of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after mandibular third molar extraction with a surgery protocol of coronectomy, as opposed to the conventional method.Materials and methodsPatients with a lower third molar directly contacting IAN were recruited and assigned either to a test group (coronectomy group) or a control group (conventional extraction). A standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) battery was performed for four times: one week before surgery and the second, seventh, and 28th days after surgery. Z-scores and the loss/gain coding system were applied for each participant.ResultsA total of 140 molars (test group: n = 91, control group: n = 49) were enrolled. The sensitivity of the mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) significantly increased after surgery more than before surgery in both groups (P ≤ 0.001). After the surgery, the sensitivities of the cold detection threshold (CDT), cold pain threshold (CPT), and heat pain threshold (HPT) were significantly higher in the test group than in the control group (P ≤ 0.027). The risk of IANI was significantly larger (P = 0.041) in the test group than in the control group.ConclusionsQST was a sensitive way to detect somatosensory abnormalities even with no subjective complaint caused by surgery. Coronectomy had less influence on IAN function than conventional total extraction.Clinical relevanceThe somatosensory function changes after mandibular third molar extraction were quantitatively studied, and coronectomy was proved a reliable alternation to reduce IAN injury rate.

Aim: Damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) while extracting lower third molars is often caused by the intimate relationship between the nerve and the roots of the teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the sequelae of coronectomy with odontectomy in impacted mandibular third molars. Patients and Methods: This study included thirty patients which were divided into two groups, Group-I (test group) including 15 patients undergoing coronectomy and Group-2 (control group) of 15 patients undergoing odontectomy. Investigations included digital orthopantomogram. The parameters for this study included pain, swelling, nerve paresthesia, trismus, postoperative infection, postoperative wound dehiscence, postoperative pocket depth, and migration. Results: In Group-1 (coronectomy group), the patients underwent follow-up for 6 months to evaluate migration of the retained mandibular third molar root which was in proximity with the IAN. There was a mean increase in migration when the distance from the inferior border of IAN until the apex of the retained mandibular third molar root was measured which was by 3.43 mm after 6 months of follow up. Conclusion: On statistical analysis, the result in this study showed no statistical difference in both the groups in all the parameters that were taken.

A prospective study on 100 patients presented with a mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar in close proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve canal (IANC) was done to evaluate the efficacy of tooth sectioning in reducing the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during their surgical removal. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, where tooth sectioning was not performed, and group B, where tooth sectioning was performed. Patients were recalled 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively for evaluation of nerve injury and its recovery. A total of 13 patients suffered from nerve damage out of which 10 patients (10/50 or 20 %) belonged to group A and 3 patients (3/50 or 6 %) belonged to group B. All patients showed complete recovery from nerve damage within 6 months except 1 patient. The result of the study showed that tooth sectioning significantly reduces the incidence of nerve damage by 14 %. Deviation of the IANC, increased depth of the impacted tooth, intraoperative hemorrhage within socket/nerve exposure, and increased duration of procedure were found to be the significant risk factors associated with nerve injury.

Purpose To analyse and quantify ocular surface parameters in patients with unilateral neurotrophic keratitis (NK) induced by trigeminal nerve injury post-neurosurgery. Methods The study included 26 unilateral NK patients who had undergone neurosurgery, and 20 matched normal controls. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all participants were collected and analysed. Slit-lamp examination, Cochet–Bonnet aesthesiometry, Keratograph 5 M, and LipiView interferometer were performed on both eyes of 17 mild NK patients. For nine moderate/severe NK patients, sub-basal nerve density was measured by in vivo confocal microscopy. Results Of the 26 patients, nine had acoustic neuroma, nine had trigeminal neuralgia, and eight had neoplasms. Facial nerve paralysis was observed in one of the 17 mild NK eyes (5.9%) and seven of the nine moderate/severe NK eyes (77.8%). Compared to contralateral and normal control eyes, 26 NK eyes showed significantly reduced sensitivity in five corneal regions ( P  <  0.05). Corneal sensitivity in moderate/severe NK eyes was significantly lower than in mild NK eyes ( P  <  0.05). Moderate/severe NK eyes had poor visual acuity, and their sub-basal nerve density was lower than that of the controls. The onset of the moderate/severe NK was from 0.5 to 24 months (median [Q1, Q3], 1 [0.5, 2.5] months) after neurosurgery. For the mild NK eyes, the number of total blinks, the first non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) and average NITBUT were significantly lower than contralateral and normal control eyes ( P  <  0.05), and the number of partial blinks and partial blinking rate were significantly higher than the other two control groups ( P  <  0.05). Conclusions Patients with NK induced by trigeminal nerve injury following neurosurgery had decreased corneal sensitivity to various degrees accompanied by increased partial blinks and shortened NITBUT. The severity of NK is related to the severity of the corneal sensory impairment. Facial nerve paralysis can worsen the clinical progression of NK. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100044068, Date of Registration: March 9, 2021).

PurposeThe sensory trigeminal nerve in the trigeminal cave of Meckel—which is an individualized lodge—is classically segmented into two parts: the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and the triangular plexus (TP). The TP has been defined as the portion of the trigeminal nerve from the posterior margin of the TG to the path over the upper ridge of the petrous bone. Due to its relatively unrecognized status, its morphological and functional anatomy has been reviewed by the authors through a PRISMA systematic review of the literature.MethodsThe authors have carried out a systematic review of the TP according to the PRISMA model with various bibliographical bases. Before 1947: Medic @ Library (BIU Santé Paris, 2017); Index-Catalog of the Library of the Surgeon-General’s Office (US National Library of Medicine, 2017); Gallica (French National Library, 2017). After 1947: PUBMED, PubMed Central and MEDLINE.Results56 articles were retained for full-text examination, of which 23 were chosen and included. The TP was described as having a triangular shape (30.2%), a plexual organization (97.4%) with sensory-, motor- and sympathetic-anastomoses (96.7%) that, however, respect the somatotopic trigeminal distribution (93.3%). The direct electrical stimulation of the root at the level of the TP (during radiofrequency-thermorhizotomy procedures) confirmed a clear-cut somatotopy.ConclusionAn understanding of both the morphological and the functional anatomy of the triangular plexus can contribute to accuracy and safety on the surgeries performed for trigeminal neuralgia and tumor removal inside the trigeminal cave.

Background The injury of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is one of the most serious complications of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs) extraction. The influence of the root orientation of IMTMs on IAN injury is still controversial. A deeper understanding of the risk factors of IAN injury conduces to better prevention of IAN injury. This study aims to explore whether root orientation is an independent risk factor of IAN injury during IMTMs extraction using the statistical strategy of propensity score matching (PSM). Methods This retrospective cohort study included 379 patients with 539 cases of high-risk IMTMs screened by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. The IAN injury incidence after extraction of different groups of IMTMs was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The correlation between third molar root orientation and impaction depth/contact degree with IAN was evaluated by the Lambda coefficient. Based on PSM for balancing confounding factors including age, sex, impaction depth, and contact degree, the effect of root orientation on the incidence of IAN injury was further analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results There were significant group differences in IAN injury incidence in impaction depth, root orientation, and contact degree of root-IAC before PSM. Root orientation was correlated with impaction depth and contact degree of root-IAC. After PSM, there were 9 cases with IAN injury and 257 cases without IAN injury. There were significant group differences between the buccal and non-buccal groups after PSM, and the risk of IAN injury was higher when the root was located on the buccal side of IAC (OR = 8.448, RR = 8). Conclusions Root orientation is an independent risk factor of IAN injury, and the risk is higher when the root is located on the buccal side of IAC. These findings could help better evaluate the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury before the extraction of IMTMs.

Introduction Orthognathic surgery is widely used to correct dentofacial discrepancies. However, this procedure presents numerous possible complications. The aim of our study is to review intraoperative and postoperative complications related to orthognathic surgery based upon a 10-year period in the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Federico II University of Naples. Materials and methods Medical records of 423 patients who undergone orthognathic surgery in a 10-year period were retrospectively analyzed and complications was noted. Statistical analysis was conduced in order to understand if the type of surgical procedure influenced complications rate. Results One hundred eighty-five complications in 143 (33.8%) of the 423 treated patients were reported. Complications detected were nerve injury (49 cases, 11.9%), infections (10 cases, 2.4%), complications related to fixation plates or screws (30 cases, 7.1%), bad split osteotomy (8 cases, 1.9%), secondary temporo-mandibular joint disorders (36 cases, 8.5%), dental injuries (21 cases, 5%), condilar resorption (2 cases, 0.5%), and necessity of a second-time surgery (24 cases, 5.7%). Conclusions Serious complications seem to be quite rare in orthognathic surgery. Some of the surgical complications found are related to the surgeon experience and not strictly to the risks of the operation itself. Understanding potential complications allows the surgeon to guarantee safe care through early intervention and correctly inform the patient in the preoperative colloquy.

Key Points This paper highlights some of the risks of causing nerve injury during planning, preparation and placement of mandibular implants. Highlights potential pitfalls and problems. Provides tips on how to prevent these implant related trigeminal injuries. Background The incidence of implant-related inferior alveolar nerve injuries (IANI) is steadily increasing within the UK population. Aims This study prospectively reviewed thirty cases (35% male; 65% female) of implant-related IANI seen in a specialist nerve injury clinic. Methods Neurosensory examinations were carried out to ascertain a quantifiable rating of the perception, pain profiling and functional difficulties. Data were analysed using SPSS software. Results Patients were aware of signing consent forms for the surgery in 11 cases and 8 of those felt they were not explicitly warned about nerve injury. Over 70% of patients were referred after six months post injury. Implant surgery planning involved intra-oral films only (30%), CBCT (10%), dental pantomograph (50%) and long cone peri-apical radiographs (48%). However, no radiographic evidence pre- or postoperatively was provided by the referring practitioner in 15% of cases. Intra-operative problems included bleeding and neurological symptoms. Proximity of the implant bed or implant to the inferior alveolar canal was evident radiographically. This showed contact with roof inferior alveolar nerve canal in 44% of cases, protrusion into the canal in 20% of cases, crossing of the canal in 20% cases and distance in one case, presumed to be due to local anaesthetic injury. All patients presented with a demonstrable neuropathy, which included neuropathic pain (50%) that interfered with speaking, kissing and socialising. Conclusions Consent, preoperative planning and appropriate referral were inadequate in provision of mandibular implants in this patient group. Recommendations have been proposed to improve practice and possible novel strategies are suggested for the prevention and improved management of these complications.

ObjectivesThe present study aimed to assess whether anatomical variations of the mandibular canal are associated with neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) following mandibular third molar removal.MethodsTwo observers compared the detection of third molar root-nerve relations and bifurcations of the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs and CBCT images of 201 patients undergoing removal of 357 mandibular third molars. Potential neurosensory disturbances of the IAN were surveyed ten days after surgery. Fisher’s Exact was performed to correlate presence of canal variations to postoperative neurosensory disturbances. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and likelihood ratios (LR + , LR–) were calculated.ResultsThirteen patients reported postoperative altered sensation of the lower lip, with 2 of them having mandibular canal bifurcations on the ipsilateral side of the injury. Fisher’s Exact showed that the studied mandibular canal variations were not related to postoperative neurosensory disturbances. CBCT was superior in visualization of anatomical variations of the mandibular canal. Prevalence of bifurcations was 14% on CBCT and 7% on panoramic radiographs. In both imaging modalities and for all parameters, PPVs were low (0.04 − 0.06) and NPVs were high (0.92 − 0.98), with LR ranging around 1.ConclusionIn the present study, the assessed mandibular canal variations had limited predictive value for IAN neurosensory disturbances following third molar removal.Clinical relevanceWhile a close relation between the third molar and the mandibular canal remains a high risk factor, mandibular canal variations did not pose an increased risk of postoperative IAN injury after third molar removal.

Purpose To assess the impact of endoscope-assisted fractured roots or fragments extraction within the mandibular canal, along with quantitative sensory testing (QST) alterations in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Methods Six patients with lower lip numbness following mandibular third molar extraction were selected. All patients had broken roots or fragments within the mandibular canal that were extracted under real-time endoscopic assistance. Follow-up assessments were conducted on postoperative days 1, 7, and 35, including a standardized QST of the lower lip skin. Results The average surgical duration was 32.5 min, with the IAN exposed in all cases. Two of the patient exhibited complete recovery of lower lip numbness, three experienced symptom improvement, and one patient remained unaffected 35 days after the surgery. Preoperative QST results showed that the mechanical detection and pain thresholds on the affected side were significantly higher than those on the healthy side, but improved significantly by postoperative day 7 in five patients, and returned to baseline in two patients on day 35. There were no significant differences in the remaining QST parameters. Conclusions All endoscopic surgical procedures were successfully completed without any additional postoperative complications. There were no cases of deterioration of IAN injury, and lower lip numbness recovered in the majority of cases. Endoscopy allowed direct visualization and examination of the affected nerve, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of the IAN.