Explore the vast range of titles available.

The efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is low1–5, highlighting a need for strategies that render the tumor microenvironment more sensitive to PD-1 blockade. Preclinical research has suggested immunomodulatory properties for chemotherapy and irradiation6–13. In the first stage of this adaptive, non-comparative phase 2 trial, 67 patients with metastatic TNBC were randomized to nivolumab (1) without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction, or with (2) irradiation (3 × 8 Gy), (3) cyclophosphamide, (4) cisplatin or (5) doxorubicin, all followed by nivolumab. In the overall cohort, the objective response rate (ORR; iRECIST14) was 20%. The majority of responses were observed in the cisplatin (ORR 23%) and doxorubicin (ORR 35%) cohorts. After doxorubicin and cisplatin induction, we detected an upregulation of immune-related genes involved in PD-1–PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) and T cell cytotoxicity pathways. This was further supported by enrichment among upregulated genes related to inflammation, JAK–STAT and TNF-α signaling after doxorubicin. Together, the clinical and translational data of this study indicate that short-term doxorubicin and cisplatin may induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment and increase the likelihood of response to PD-1 blockade in TNBC. These data warrant confirmation in TNBC and exploration of induction treatments prior to PD-1 blockade in other cancer types.A pick-the-winner clinical trial design in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer shows that immune induction with doxorubicin or cisplatin may improve clinical responses to PD-1 blockade and induce a more favorable tumor microenvironment.

Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) is abundant in the tumor microenvironment, where this cytokine can promote tumor growth, but also antitumor activities. We studied IL-1β during early tumor progression using a model of orthotopically introduced 4T1 breast cancer cells. Whereas there is tumor progression and spontaneous metastasis in wild-type (WT) mice, in IL-1β–deficient mice, tumors begin to grow but subsequently regress. This change is due to recruitment and differentiation of inflammatory monocytes in the tumor microenvironment. In WT mice, macrophages heavily infiltrate tumors, but in IL-1β–deficient mice, low levels of the chemokine CCL2 hamper recruitment of monocytes and, together with low levels of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), inhibit their differentiation into macrophages. The low levels of macrophages in IL-1β–deficient mice result in a relatively high percentage of CD11b⁺ dendritic cells (DCs) in the tumors. In WT mice, IL-10 secretion from macrophages is dominant and induces immunosuppression and tumor progression; in contrast, in IL-1β–deficient mice, IL-12 secretion by CD11b⁺ DCs prevails and supports antitumor immunity. The antitumor immunity in IL-1β–deficient mice includes activated CD8⁺ lymphocytes expressing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and granzyme B; these cells infiltrate tumors and induce regression. WT mice with 4T1 tumors were treated with either anti–IL-1β or anti–PD-1 Abs, each of which resulted in partial growth inhibition. However, treating mice first with anti–IL-1β Abs followed by anti–PD-1 Abs completely abrogated tumor progression. These data define microenvironmental IL-1β as a master cytokine in tumor progression. In addition to reducing tumor progression, blocking IL-1β facilitates checkpoint inhibition.

Background The RANK pathway has been extensively investigated for its role in bone resorption; however, its significance extends beyond bone metabolism. Preclinical models suggest that inhibition of RANK signaling can prevent mammary tumor development by reducing proliferation and tumor cell survival. Additionally, both preclinical and clinical data support the ability of RANK pathway inhibitors to enhance the anti-tumor immune response. Methods D-BIOMARK is a prospective, randomized window-of-opportunity clinical trial assessing the biological effects of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against RANKL, in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer. The study aims to assess denosumab’s impact on breast tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and its potential to influence the tumor immune microenvironment. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive two doses of single agent denosumab (120 mg one week apart) before surgery or to the control arm (no treatment). Fifty-eight patients were evaluated, 27 pre-menopausal and 31 post-menopausal women, 48 with luminal tumors and 10 with triple negative breast cancer. Paired tumor samples were collected to compare baseline (core biopsy) and surgical (surgical specimen) time points, as well as serum samples at both time points. Results Denosumab demonstrated its ability to reduce serum free RANKL levels (experimental p  < 0.001, control p  = 0.270). However, a reduction in tumor cell proliferation or cell survival was not observed. A denosumab-driven increase in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was observed (experimental p  = 0.001, control p  = 0.060), particularly in the luminal B-like population (experimental p  = 0.012, control p  = 0.070) and a similar trend in the TNBC group (experimental p  = 0.079, control p  = 0.237). Denosumab led to increased TILs in both pre-menopausal (experimental p  = 0.048, control p  = 0.639) and post-menopausal (experimental p  = 0.041, control p  = 0.062) women with luminal tumors. RANK protein expression in tumor and stroma was associated with markers of tumor aggressiveness but an increase in TILs was observed in the experimental arm, irrespectively of RANK and RANKL expression in tumor or stromal cells. Conclusions The D-BIOMARK trial suggests a potential role for denosumab as an immune-enhancing agent in early HER2-negative breast cancer. Although preoperative denosumab did not reduce tumor proliferation or increased apoptosis, it led to an increase in TILs, particularly in luminal B-like tumors. These findings underscore the importance of further investigation into the multifaceted aspects of the RANK pathway. Trial registration EudraCT number: 2016-002678-11 registered on June 15, 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03691311, retrospectively registered on September 04, 2018.

Background Emerging evidence suggests that myeloid cells play a critical role in glioblastoma (GBM) immunosuppression. Disappointing results of recent checkpoint inhibitor trials suggest that combination immunotherapy with alternative agents could be fruitful in overcoming immunosuppression. Overexpression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 is associated with poor prognosis in GBM. We investigate the treatment effects of combination immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-CXCR4 in a murine glioma model. Methods C57BL/6 mice were implanted with GL261-Luc+ glioma cells and randomized into 4 arms: (1) control (2) anti-PD-1 (3) anti-CXCR4, and (4) anti-PD-1 and anti-CXCR4 therapy. Overall survival and median survival were assessed. Cell populations were assessed by flow cytometry. Results Combination therapy conferred a significant survival benefit compared to control and monotherapy arms. Mice that received combination therapy demonstrated immune memory and decreased populations of immunosuppressive tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, such as monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and microglia within the brain. Furthermore, combination therapy improved CD4+/CD8+ ratios in the brain as well as contributed to increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Conclusions Anti-CXCR4 and anti-PD-1 combination immunotherapy modulates tumor-infiltrating populations of the glioma microenvironment. Targeting myeloid cells with anti-CXCR4 facilitates anti-PD-1 to promote an antitumor immune response and improved survival rates.

In this multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II investigator-sponsored neoadjuvant trial with funding provided by Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (TRIO-US B07, Clinical Trials NCT00769470), participants with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer ( N  = 128) were recruited from 13 United States oncology centers throughout the Translational Research in Oncology network. Participants were randomized to receive trastuzumab (T; N  = 34), lapatinib (L; N  = 36), or both (TL; N  = 58) as HER2-targeted therapy, with each participant given one cycle of this designated anti-HER2 therapy alone followed by six cycles of standard combination chemotherapy with the same anti-HER2 therapy. The primary objective was to estimate the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery in each of the three arms. In the intent-to-treat population, we observed similar pCR rates between T (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 30–65%) and TL (52%, 95% CI 38–65%), and a lower pCR rate with L (25%, 95% CI 13–43%). In the T arm, 100% of participants completed all protocol-specified treatment prior to surgery, as compared to 69% in the L arm and 74% in the TL arm. Tumor or tumor bed tissue was collected whenever possible pre-treatment ( N  = 110), after one cycle of HER2-targeted therapy alone ( N  = 89), and at time of surgery ( N  = 59). Higher-level amplification of HER2 and hormone receptor (HR)-negative status were associated with a higher pCR rate. Large shifts in the tumor, immune, and stromal gene expression occurred after one cycle of HER2-targeted therapy. In contrast to pCR rates, the L-containing arms exhibited greater proliferation reduction than T at this timepoint. Immune expression signatures increased in all arms after one cycle of HER2-targeted therapy, decreasing again by the time of surgery. Our results inform approaches to early assessment of sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapy and shed light on the role of the immune microenvironment in response to HER2-targeted agents. HER2+ breast cancer patients can often develop resistance to trastuzumab and therefore potential combination therapies need to be explored. Here, the authors report the results of a multi-center randomized phase II clinical trial evaluating the pathological and molecular responses associated with trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in combination with chemotherapy in HER2+ breast cancer patients.

Background Ipilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, has demonstrated an improvement in overall survival in two phase III trials of patients with advanced melanoma. The primary objective of the current trial was to prospectively explore candidate biomarkers from the tumor microenvironment for associations with clinical response to ipilimumab. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, phase II biomarker study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00261365), 82 pretreated or treatment-naïve patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were induced with 3 or 10 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 4 doses; at Week 24, patients could receive maintenance doses every 12 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated per modified World Health Organization response criteria and safety was assessed continuously. Candidate biomarkers were evaluated in tumor biopsies collected pretreatment and 24 to 72 hours after the second ipilimumab dose. Polymorphisms in immune-related genes were also evaluated. Results Objective response rate, response patterns, and safety were consistent with previous trials of ipilimumab in melanoma. No associations between genetic polymorphisms and clinical activity were observed. Immunohistochemistry and histology on tumor biopsies revealed significant associations between clinical activity and high baseline expression of FoxP3 (p = 0.014) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (p = 0.012), and between clinical activity and increase in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between baseline and 3 weeks after start of treatment (p = 0.005). Microarray analysis of mRNA from tumor samples taken pretreatment and post-treatment demonstrated significant increases in expression of several immune-related genes, and decreases in expression of genes implicated in cancer and melanoma. Conclusions Baseline expression of immune-related tumor biomarkers and a post-treatment increase in TILs may be positively associated with ipilimumab clinical activity. The observed pharmacodynamic changes in gene expression warrant further analysis to determine whether treatment-emergent changes in gene expression may be associated with clinical efficacy. Further studies are required to determine the predictive value of these and other potential biomarkers associated with clinical response to ipilimumab.

Background Preclinical research suggests that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer can be enhanced by combining them with antiangiogenics, particularly in a sequential fashion. We sought to explore the efficacy and biomarkers of combining the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab plus the antiangiogenic bevacizumab after bevacizumab monotherapy for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods Patients had advanced HER2-negative disease that progressed while receiving single-agent bevacizumab maintenance as a part of a previous chemotherapy plus bevacizumab regimen. Treatment consisted of bi-weekly durvalumab plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg each i.v.). Peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained before the first durvalumab dose and every 4 weeks and immunophenotyped by flow-cytometry. A fresh pre-durvalumab tumor biopsy was obtained; gene-expression studies and immunohistochemical staining to assess vascular normalization and characterize the immune infiltrate were conducted. Patients were classified as “non-progressors” if they had clinical benefit (SD/PR/CR) at 4 months. The co-primary endpoints were the changes in the percentage T cell subpopulations in PBMCs in progressors versus non-progressors, and PFS/OS time. Results Twenty-six patients were accrued. Median PFS and OS were 3.5 and 11 months; a trend for a longer OS was detected for the hormone-positive subset (19.8 versus 7.4 months in triple-negatives; P  = 0.11). Clinical benefit rate at 2 and 4 months was 60% and 44%, respectively, without significant differences between hormone-positive and triple-negative ( P  = 0.73). Non-progressors’ tumors displayed vascular normalization features as a result of previous bevacizumab, compared with generally abnormal patterns observed in progressors. Non-progressors also showed increased T-effector and T-memory signatures and decreased T REG signatures in gene expression studies in baseline—post-bevacizumab—tumors compared with progressors. Notably, analysis of PBMC populations before durvalumab treatment was concordant with the findings in tumor samples and showed a decreased percentage of circulating T REGs in non-progressors. Conclusions This study reporting on sequential bevacizumab+durvalumab in breast cancer showed encouraging activity in a heavily pre-treated cohort. The correlative studies agree with the preclinical rationale supporting an immunopriming effect exerted by antiangiogenic treatment, probably by reducing T REGs cells both systemically and in tumor tissue. The magnitude of this benefit should be addressed in a randomized setting. Trial registration ( www.clinicaltrials.gov): NCT02802098 . Registered on June 16, 2020.

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has so far shown limited survival benefit for high-grade ovarian carcinomas. By using paired samples from the NeoPembrOv randomized phase II trial (NCT03275506), for which primary outcomes are published, and by combining RNA-seq and multiplexed immunofluorescence staining, we explore the impact of NeoAdjuvant ChemoTherapy (NACT) ± Pembrolizumab (P) on the tumor environment, and identify parameters that correlated with response to immunotherapy as a pre-planned exploratory analysis. Indeed, i) combination therapy results in a significant increase in intraepithelial CD8 + PD-1 + T cells, ii) combining endothelial and monocyte gene signatures with the CD8B/FOXP3 expression ratio is predictive of response to NACT + P with an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-1.00) and iii) high CD8B/FOXP3 and high CD8B/ENTPD1 ratios are significantly associated with positive response to NACT + P, while KDR and VEGFR2 expression are associated with resistance. These results indicate that targeting regulatory T cells and endothelial cells, especially VEGFR2 + endothelial cells, could overcome immune resistance of ovarian cancers. Changes in the tumour microenvironment have been associated with response and resistance to immunotherapy. Here, by performing longitudinal transcriptomic and spatial analysis, the authors report the exploratory analysis of their phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) in patients with advanced high-grade ovarian carcinoma.

BackgroundThe immunosuppressive desmoplastic stroma of pancreatic cancer represents a major hurdle to developing an effective immune response. Preclinical studies in pancreatic cancer have demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition combined with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) blockade.MethodsThis was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical trial evaluating the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib, alone (monotherapy) or in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (combination therapy). Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤1 who had received at least one prior systemic therapy. Oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily was administered with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. Peripheral blood was analyzed for changes in immune markers, and tumors from exceptional responders were molecularly analyzed.ResultsA total of 77 patients were enrolled (37 monotherapy; 40 combination therapy) with a median age of 64 years; 77% had an ECOG PS of 1. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–6). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were seen in 14.3% of patients in the monotherapy arm and 15.8% of those in the combination therapy arm. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 0% and 14.3% with monotherapy and 7.9% and 21.1% with combination therapy, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months in both arms. Peripheral blood flow analysis demonstrated consistent reductions in granulocytic (CD15+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) over time. Two exceptional responders were found to be microsatellite stable with low tumor mutation burden, low neoantigen load and no defects in the homologous DNA repair pathway.ConclusionsThe combination of acalabrutinib and pembrolizumab was well tolerated, but limited clinical activity was seen with either acalabrutinib monotherapy or combination therapy. Peripheral reductions in MDSCs were seen. Efforts to understand and target the pancreatic tumor microenvironment should continue.Trial registration number NCT02362048.

Background Anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy are key components of first-line treatment for advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (G/GEJ) cancer. However, the role of immune cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment (TME) in predicting both therapy responses is still unclear. Methods ORIENT-16 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial, and enrolled 650 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer between January 3, 2019, and August 5, 2020. For patients enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, we analyzed progression-free survival(PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on PD-L1 expression and landmark analysis, and developed a multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) assay for CD4, CD8, PD-L1, CD68 and FoxP3 coupled with digital image analysis and machine learning to assess prognostic survival associations of immune cells. Results A total of 54 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, 35 received sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy and 19 received placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy. For patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) < 10, survival disparities between anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and chemotherapy emerged 300 days post-treatment. High PD-L1 expression correlated with longer survival in anti-PD-1 therapy but less benefit in platinum-based chemotherapy. The mIF analysis also demonstrated significantly higher stromal PD-L1 density in immunotherapy responders, but tended to be lower in chemotherapy responders. Besides, high tumor stromal CD8 expression could be used as a positive biomarker in anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, and high tumor stromal CD4 expression was found associated with worse prognosis in platinum-based chemotherapy. Conclusions Increased PD-L1 expression was associated with an increased effect on anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and reduced benefit from chemotherapy. The signature of TME immune cells has the potential to predict the response of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and chemotherapy in G/GEJ cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03745170.