Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
729 result(s) for "Type-I IFN"
Sort by:
Role of Interferons in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection
Considerable measures have been implemented in healthcare institutions to screen for and treat tuberculosis (TB) in developed countries; however, in low- and middle-income countries, many individuals still suffer from TB’s deleterious effects. TB is caused by an infection from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) bacteria. Symptoms of TB may range from an asymptomatic latent-phase affecting the pulmonary tract to a devastating active and disseminated stage that can cause central nervous system demise, musculoskeletal impairments, and genitourinary compromise. Following M. tb infection, cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) are released as part of the host immune response. Three main classes of IFNs prevalent during the immune defense include: type I IFN (α and β), type II IFN (IFN-γ), and type III IFN (IFN-λ). The current literature reports that type I IFN plays a role in diminishing the host defense against M. tb by attenuating T-cell activation. In opposition, T-cell activation drives type II IFN release, which is the primary cytokine mediating protection from M. tb by stimulating macrophages and their oxidative defense mechanisms. Type III IFN has a subsidiary part in improving the Th1 response for host cell protection against M. tb. Based on the current evidence available, our group aims to summarize the role that each IFN serves in TB within this literature review.
Aging and Interferons: Impacts on Inflammation and Viral Disease Outcomes
As highlighted by the COVID-19 global pandemic, elderly individuals comprise the majority of cases of severe viral infection outcomes and death. A combined inability to control viral replication and exacerbated inflammatory immune activation in elderly patients causes irreparable immune-mediated tissue pathology in response to infection. Key to these responses are type I, II, and III interferons (IFNs), which are involved in inducing an antiviral response, as well as controlling and suppressing inflammation and immunopathology. IFNs support monocyte/macrophage-stimulated immune responses that clear infection and promote their immunosuppressive functions that prevent excess inflammation and immune-mediated pathology. The timing and magnitude of IFN responses to infection are critical towards their immunoregulatory functions and ability to prevent immunopathology. Aging is associated with multiple defects in the ability of macrophages and dendritic cells to produce IFNs in response to viral infection, leading to a dysregulation of inflammatory immune responses. Understanding the implications of aging on IFN-regulated inflammation will give critical insights on how to treat and prevent severe infection in vulnerable individuals. In this review, we describe the causes of impaired IFN production in aging, and the evidence to suggest that these impairments impact the regulation of the innate and adaptive immune response to infection, thereby causing disease pathology.
Interferons in Autoimmunity: From Loss of Tolerance to Chronic Inflammation
Interferons (IFNs) are key cytokines at the intersection of innate and adaptive immunity. While their antiviral and antitumor roles are well recognized, emerging evidence implicates IFNs—particularly types I, II, and III—in the initiation and progression of autoimmune diseases (ADs). This review synthesizes current data on IFN biology, their immunoregulatory and pathogenic mechanisms, and their contributions to distinct AD phenotypes. We conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature on IFNs and autoimmune diseases, focusing on publications indexed in PubMed and Scopus. Studies on molecular pathways, immune cell interactions, disease-specific IFN signatures, and clinical correlations were included. Data were extracted and thematically organized by IFN type, signaling pathway, and disease context, with emphasis on rheumatic and systemic autoimmune disorders. Across systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel diseases, IFNs were consistently associated with aberrant activation of pattern recognition receptors, sustained expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and dysregulated T cell and B cell responses. Type I IFNs often preceded clinical onset, suggesting a triggering role, whereas type II and III IFNs modulated disease course and severity. Notably, IFNs exhibited dual immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects, contingent on tissue context, cytokine milieu, and disease stage. IFNs are central mediators in autoimmune pathogenesis, functioning as both initiators and amplifiers of chronic inflammation. Deciphering the context-dependent effects of IFN signaling may inform targeted therapeutic strategies and advance precision immunomodulation in autoimmune diseases.
Differential Regulation of Type I and Type III Interferon Signaling
Interferons (IFNs) are very powerful cytokines, which play a key role in combatting pathogen infections by controlling inflammation and immune response by directly inducing anti-pathogen molecular countermeasures. There are three classes of IFNs: type I, type II and type III. While type II IFN is specific for immune cells, type I and III IFNs are expressed by both immune and tissue specific cells. Unlike type I IFNs, type III IFNs have a unique tropism where their signaling and functions are mostly restricted to epithelial cells. As such, this class of IFN has recently emerged as a key player in mucosal immunity. Since the discovery of type III IFNs, the last 15 years of research in the IFN field has focused on understanding whether the induction, the signaling and the function of these powerful cytokines are regulated differently compared to type I IFN-mediated immune response. This review will cover the current state of the knowledge of the similarities and differences in the signaling pathways emanating from type I and type III IFN stimulation.
DNA vaccine-mediated innate immune response triggered by PRRs in teleosts
Aquacultured fish are threatened by many pathogens, often with serious consequences. Vaccination is one of the most effective tools for enhancing host immunity and protecting fish from infections. Vaccination with DNA vaccine is based on the administration of the gene encoding a vaccine antigen. Several effective DNA vaccines that encode viral or bacterial antigenic proteins have already been shown to be effective for cultured fish. This review summarizes current knowledge on fish DNA vaccines, and the mechanism of interaction between the DNA vaccines and host immunity, especially focusing on the enhancement of innate immunity mediated through direct-recognition of DNA vaccine by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). To date, numerous fish PRR genes have been identified, and the primordial functions of PRRs involved in the innate immune response to viral and bacterial nucleic acids have been increasingly clarified. The evolutionary conservations and divergences in the PRR mechanisms of teleosts and mammals are focused on their molecular features and the recognition of DNA vaccine mediated by TANK binding kinase 1. In addition, the mechanism of type I interferon production in teleosts, which is enhanced after the recognition of cytosolic nucleic acids and current topics on DNA sensing by PRRs are also introduced.
Normalized Interferon Signatures and Clinical Improvements by IFNAR1 Blocking Antibody (Anifrolumab) in Patients with Type I Interferonopathies
Purpose A causal role of type-I interferons (IFN-I) in autoinflammatory type-I interferonopathies such as SAVI (STING–associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy) and CANDLE (chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperatures) is suggested by elevated expression of IFN-I stimulated genes (ISGs). Hitherto, the lack of specific inhibitors of IFN-I signaling has prevented the verification of a causal role for IFN-I in these conditions. Commonly used inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway exert broad effects on multiple signaling pathways leading to more general immunosuppression beyond IFN-I signaling. Methods Here we show in four patients with SAVI and one patient with CANDLE syndrome that blockade of the IFNAR1 receptor (Anifrolumab) exerts an additive effect over JAK-inhibitor alone. In two patients with SAVI, monotherapy with Anifrolumab is sufficient to retain a suppressed IFN-I signature and clinical improvement. Results Anifrolumab normalizes IFN-I signature genes and relieves symptoms beyond what is typically achieved by a JAK-inhibitor (Baricitinib) alone in patients with type-I interferonopathies. In two patients Anifrolumab was used successfully as monotherapy. Addition of Anifrolumab enabled steroid tapering and cessation with reduced overall immunosuppression and lower risks of opportunistic infections and improved metabolic states and growth which is highly beneficial in these young patients. Conclusion These results verify a causal role of IFN-I signaling in type-I Interferonopathies SAVI and CANDLE and suggests Anifrolumab as an important new treatment option in autoinflammatory diseases with elevated IFN-I induced gene expression. Genia Kretzschmar, Laura Piñero Páez, and Ziyang Tan are shared-first authors. Sara Alehashemi, AnnaCarin Horne, and Petter Brodin are co-senior author.
1,25(OH)2D3 Differently Modulates the Secretory Activity of IFN-DC and IL4-DC: A Study in Cells from Healthy Donors and MS Patients
Immune mechanisms play an essential role in driving multiple sclerosis (MS) and altered trafficking and/or activation of dendritic cells (DC) were observed in the central nervous system and cerebrospinal fluid of MS patients. Interferon β (IFNβ) has been used as a first-line therapy in MS for almost three decades and vitamin D deficiency is a recognized environmental risk factor for MS. Both IFNβ and vitamin D modulate DC functions. Here, we studied the response to 1,25-dihydoxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) of DC obtained with IFNβ/GM-CSF (IFN-DC) compared to classically derived IL4-DC, in three donor groups: MS patients free of therapy, MS patients undergoing IFNβ therapy, and healthy donors. Except for a decreased CCL2 secretion by IL4-DC from the MS group, no major defects were observed in the 1,25(OH)2D3 response of either IFN-DC or IL4-DC from MS donors compared to healthy donors. However, the two cell models strongly differed for vitamin D receptor level of expression as well as for basal and 1,25(OH)2D3-induced cytokine/chemokine secretion. 1,25(OH)2D3 up-modulated IL6, its soluble receptor sIL6R, and CCL5 in IL4-DC, and down-modulated IL10 in IFN-DC. IFN-DC, but not IL4-DC, constitutively secreted high levels of IL8 and of matrix-metalloproteinase-9, both down-modulated by 1,25(OH)2D3. DC may contribute to MS pathogenesis, but also provide an avenue for therapeutic intervention. 1,25(OH)2D3-induced tolerogenic DC are in clinical trial for MS. We show that the protocol of in vitro DC differentiation qualitatively and quantitatively affects secretion of cytokines and chemokines deeply involved in MS pathogenesis.
The Role of Type 1 Interferon in Systemic Sclerosis
Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma, SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by vasculopathy, inflammation, and fibrosis that can lead to loss of organ function. Type I interferons (IFNs) are family of cytokines that mitigate the deleterious effects of viral and bacterial infections in the innate immunity system. Past several years, research efforts have been focused on the role of type I IFN and IFN-inducible genes in the pathogenesis of SSc. Polymorphisms in the Interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-5, IRF7, and IRF8 are associated with SSc, Similarly, polymorphism of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)-4, has been established as a genetic risk factor of SSc. IRFs and STAT4 proteins are key activators of type I IFN signaling pathways. An IFN signature (increased expression and activation of IFN-regulated genes) has been observed in the peripheral blood and skin biopsy samples of patients with SSc. Furthermore, a plasma IFN-inducible chemokine score correlated with markers of disease severity and autoantibody subtypes in SSc. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the role of type I IFNs and IFN-inducible genes in the pathogenesis of SSc and their potential role as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Role of Innate Interferon Responses at the Ocular Surface in Herpes Simplex Virus-1-Induced Herpetic Stromal Keratitis
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a highly successful pathogen that primarily infects epithelial cells of the orofacial mucosa. After initial lytic replication, HSV-1 enters sensory neurons and undergoes lifelong latency in the trigeminal ganglion (TG). Reactivation from latency occurs throughout the host’s life and is more common in people with a compromised immune system. HSV-1 causes various diseases depending on the site of lytic HSV-1 replication. These include herpes labialis, herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK), meningitis, and herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). HSK is an immunopathological condition and is usually the consequence of HSV-1 reactivation, anterograde transport to the corneal surface, lytic replication in the epithelial cells, and activation of the host’s innate and adaptive immune responses in the cornea. HSV-1 is recognized by cell surface, endosomal, and cytoplasmic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and activates innate immune responses that include interferons (IFNs), chemokine and cytokine production, as well as the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the site of replication. In the cornea, HSV-1 replication promotes type I (IFN-α/β) and type III (IFN-λ) IFN production. This review summarizes our current understanding of HSV-1 recognition by PRRs and innate IFN-mediated antiviral immunity during HSV-1 infection of the cornea. We also discuss the immunopathogenesis of HSK, current HSK therapeutics and challenges, proposed experimental approaches, and benefits of promoting local IFN-λ responses.