Explore the vast range of titles available.

The ALK gene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor. ALK is physiologically expressed in the nervous system during embryogenesis, but its expression decreases postnatally. ALK first emerged in the field of oncology in 1994 when it was identified to fuse to NPM1 in anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma. Since then, ALK has been associated with other types of cancers, including non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More than 19 different ALK fusion partners have been discovered in NSCLC, including EML4, KIF5B, KLC1, and TPR. Most of these ALK fusions in NSCLC patients respond well to the ALK inhibitor, crizotinib. In this paper, we reviewed fusion partner genes with ALK, detection methods for ALK‐rearrangement (ALK‐R), and the ALK‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib, used in NSCLC patients.

Background The third‐generation EGFR‐TKI, represented by osimertinib, has been widely used in clinical practice; however, resistance eventually emerges. At present, it remains unclear whether an abnormal cell cycle is involved in acquired resistance, and whether the combination of palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and osimertinib can overcome the third‐generation TKI resistance. Methods We established osimertinib‐resistant cells (H1975 OR) derived from EGFR‐mutant NSCLC cells H1975. Drug effects on cells were assessed with Cell Counting Kit‐8 (CCK8). Protein alterations were detected with western blot analysis. RT‐PCR was used to evaluate the differences of gene mRNA. Cell cycle distribution of H1975 S and H1975 OR cells was compared using flow cytometry. Results Compared with H1975, the sensitivity of H1975OR to the CDK4/6 inhibitor was increased and the proportion of cells in G1 phase was decreased. The mRNA level of CDK4, CDK 6 and the protein level of CDK4, pRB were increased in H1975OR. In the H1975OR cells, palbociclib significantly increased the proportion of G1 phase cells. The combination of osimertinib and palbociclib synergistically decreased the survival of H1975OR by cell cycle arrest. Combined treatment was found to inhibit the initial phosphorylation of RB by inhibiting the function of CDK4/6, significantly reducing the level of p‐RB, and blocking cell proliferation. Conclusions An osimertinib acquired resistance cell line (H1975 OR) was successfully established. The expression of cell cycle related genes was altered in H1975OR. The expression of CDK4 and the phosphorylation of Rb, the downstream molecule of CDK4/6, was increased in H1975OR cells. The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and osimertinib could overcome the acquired resistance of osimertinib.

Background This study was conducted to identify whether the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma before treatment with EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with clinical outcomes. Methods Fifty‐seven pairs of tissues and plasma samples were obtained from patients with NSCLC adenocarcinoma harboring activating EGFR mutations before the administration of EGFR‐TKI treatment. ctDNA mutation was identified using the PANAMutyper EGFR mutation kit. Both qualitative and quantitative analyzes of the data were performed. Results Concordance rates with tissue biopsy were 40.4% and 59.6% for the qualitative and quantitative methods, respectively. Bone metastasis showed a statistically significant correlation with ctDNA detection (odds ratio 3.985, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.027–15.457; P = 0.046). Progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the group detected with ctDNA than in the undetected ctDNA group (median PFS 9.8 vs. 20.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] 2.30, 95% CI 1.202–4.385; P = 0.012). Detection of ctDNA before treatment with EGFR‐TKIs (HR 2.388, 95% CI 1.138–5.014; P = 0.021) and extra‐thoracic lymph node metastasis (HR 13.533, 95% CI 2.474–68.747; P = 0.002) were independently associated with PFS. Six of 11 patients (45.5%) monitored by serial sampling showed a dynamic change in ctDNA prior to disease progression. Conclusion Quantitative testing can increase the sensitivity of the ctDNA detection test. Patients with detectable ctDNA had significantly shorter PFS after receiving EGFR‐TKIs than those with undetectable ctDNA. Tumor burden may be associated with plasma ctDNA detection. A shorter PFS was associated with detection of ctDNA and extra‐thoracic lymph node metastasis. Dynamic changes in the ctDNA level may help predict clinical outcomes.

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play an important role in a variety of cellular processes including growth, motility, differentiation, and metabolism. As such, dysregulation of RTK signaling leads to an assortment of human diseases, most notably, cancers. Recent large-scale genomic studies have revealed the presence of various alterations in the genes encoding RTKs such as EGFR , HER2 / ErbB2 , and MET , amongst many others. Abnormal RTK activation in human cancers is mediated by four principal mechanisms: gain-of-function mutations, genomic amplification, chromosomal rearrangements, and / or autocrine activation. In this manuscript, we review the processes whereby RTKs are activated under normal physiological conditions and discuss several mechanisms whereby RTKs can be aberrantly activated in human cancers. Understanding of these mechanisms has important implications for selection of anti-cancer therapies.

Background Previous studies have demonstrated the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other antitumor agents may delay drug resistance. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety of first‐line concurrent EGFR‐TKIs and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without an antiangiogenic agent for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in the real world. Methods A total of 30 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and activating EGFR mutations concurrently received an EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. The safety profile and efficacy were retrospectively reviewed. Results At the median follow‐up time of 22.1 months, 18 patients had experienced disease progression, and six patients had died because of disease. The median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 21.2 months (95% CI: 12.631–29.798). Of the 28 patients who had measurable lesions, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 71.4% and 96.4%, respectively (one patient achieved complete remission, 19 patients had a partial response and seven patients had stable disease). Male patients had significantly longer mPFS than female patients (32.6 vs. 14.6 months, HR = 3.593, 95% CI: 1.158–11.148, p = 0.027). The most frequently seen grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicities, seen in three cases (10%). Three patients ceased bevacizumab due to vascular events, including hypertension (grade 2, 6.7%) and venous thrombosis (grade 2, 3.3%), and continued EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy. Conclusions The combination of first‐generation EGFR‐TKIs with platinum‐based chemotherapy may be a first‐line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring activated EGFR mutations and is well tolerated. Previous studies have demonstrated that the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other antitumor agents may delay drug resistance. As results of phase III trial JMIT and NEJ009 indicated, the combination therapy of EGFR‐TKI and chemotherapy benefited NSCLC patients who harbored EGFR sensitive mutations as first‐line therapy. This study has provided further evidence for the efficacy and safety of concurrent use of EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based chemotherapy as a first‐line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR 19 del or 21 L858R mutation in the real world. We also explored the relationship between EGFR mutation type and efficacy of the combination strategy. In conclusion, we determined that the combination strategy is promising as first‐line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring activated EGFR mutations, and is well‐tolerated.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are the standard treatment choice for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. EGFR‐TKIs have made significant progress in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, but drug resistance issues still inevitably arise. The mechanism of drug resistance and subsequent treatment has been current research challenge and priority. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new choice for late‐stage NSCLC patients without druggable molecular alterations. Currently, several studies have applied ICIs therapy for NSCLC patients with EGFR‐TKIs resistance and explored the potential efficacy of ICIs. This review elaborates on the current status of immunotherapy after EGFR‐TKIs resistance, including ICIs monotherapy, combined with EGFR‐TKIs, chemotherapy, antiangiogenic drugs, and other therapies. EGFR regulates the expression of PD‐L1.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) has been considered as an effective treatment in epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant (EGFR‐mutant) advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most patients develop acquired resistance eventually. Here, we compared and analyzed the genetic alterations between tissue assay and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and further explored the resistance mechanisms after EGFR‐TKI treatment. Methods and Materials Amplification refractory mutation system‐polymerase chain reaction (ARMS‐PCR), Cobas® ARMS‐PCR and next‐generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on tissue samples after pathological diagnosis. Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and NGS were performed on plasma samples. The association between genetic alterations and clinical outcomes was analyzed retrospectively. Results Thirty‐seven patients were included. The success rate of re‐biopsy was 91.89% (34/37). The total detection rate of EGFR T790M was 62.16% (23/37) and the consistency between tissue and ctDNA was 78.26% (18/23). Thirty‐four patients were analyzed retrospectively. For tissue re‐biopsy, 24 patients harbored concomitant mutations. Moreover, tissue re‐biopsy at resistance showed 21 patients (21/34, 61.76%) had the concomitant somatic mutation. The three most frequent concomitant mutations were TP53 (18/34, 52.94%), MET (4/34, 11.76%), and PIK3CA (4/34, 11.76%). Meanwhile, 21 patients (21/34, 61.76%) with EGFR T790M mutation. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in patients with T790M mutation (p = 0.010 and p = 0.017) or third‐generation EGFR‐TKI treatment (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.073). Interestingly, concomitant genetic alterations were significantly associated with a worse prognosis for patients with EGFR T790M mutation receiving third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs (p = 0.037). Conclusions Multi‐platforms are feasible and highly consistent for re‐biopsy after EGFR‐TKI resistance. Concomitant genetic alterations may be associated with a poor prognosis for patients with EGFR T790M mutation after third‐generation EGFR‐TKIs. It is feasible to use multi‐platforms to perform detection of EGFR T790M mutation on EGFR‐TKI resistant re‐biopsy tissue and blood samples. The detection consistency of EGFR T790M between tissue and blood samples is high. Concomitant genetic alterations may lead to a worse response to treatment and affect decisions of the sequential therapy strategy.

Regorafenib is a diphenylurea oral multikinase inhibitor, structurally comparable to sorafenib, which targets a variety of kinases implicated in angiogenic and tumor growth-promoting pathways. Regorafenib was the first agent to positively show significant survival advantage as a second-line therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had previously failed first-line treatment with sorafenib. Recent evidence has shown that its antitumor efficacy is due to a comprehensive spectrum of tumor neo-angiogenesis and proliferation inhibition and immunomodulatory effects on the tumor microenvironment, which plays a crucial role in tumor development. This review addresses the rationale and supporting evidence for regorafenib’s efficacy in HCC that led to regorafenib’s approval as a second-line therapy. In addition, we review proof from clinical practice studies that validate the RESORCE trial results. We discuss regorafenib’s potential role in the newly emerging therapeutic strategy based on combination with immune checkpoint blockade and its possible extensibility to patient categories not enrolled in the registrative study.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is a well-studied oncogenic pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subset of advanced NSCLC patients (15–55%) have EGFR-driven mutations and benefit from treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PDL-1 axis are a new anti-cancer therapy for metastatic NSCLC. The anti-PD-1/PDL-1 ICIs showed promising efficacy (~30% response rate) and improved the survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC, but the role of anti-PD-1/PDL-1 ICIs for EGFR mutant NSCLC is not clear. YAP (yes-associated protein) is the main mediator of the Hippo pathway and has been identified as promoting cancer progression, drug resistance, and metastasis in NSCLC. Here, we review recent studies that examined the correlation between the EGFR, YAP pathways, and PD-L1 and demonstrate the mechanism by which EGFR and YAP regulate PD-L1 expression in human NSCLC. About 50% of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs without known targetable secondary mutations. Targeting YAP therapy is suggested as a potential treatment for NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Future work should focus on the efficacy of YAP inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint PD-L1/PD-1 blockade in EGFR mutant NSCLC without targetable resistant mutations.

Angiogenesis is a vital process for the growth and dissemination of solid cancers. Numerous molecular pathways are known to drive angiogenic switch in cancer cells promoting the growth of new blood vessels and increased incidence of distant metastasis. Several angiogenesis inhibitors are clinically available for the treatment of different types of advanced solid cancers. These inhibitors mostly belong to monoclonal antibodies or small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the classical vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. Nevertheless, breast cancer is one example of solid tumors that had constantly failed to respond to angiogenesis inhibitors in terms of improved survival outcomes of patients. Accordingly, it is of paramount importance to assess the molecular mechanisms driving angiogenic signaling in breast cancer to explore suitable drug targets that can be further investigated in preclinical and clinical settings. This review summarizes the current evidence for the effect of clinically available anti-angiogenic drugs in breast cancer treatment. Further, major mechanisms associated with intrinsic or acquired resistance to anti-VEGF therapy are discussed. The review also describes evidence from preclinical and clinical studies on targeting novel non-VEGF angiogenic pathways in breast cancer and several approaches to the normalization of tumor vasculature by targeting pericytes, utilization of microRNAs and extracellular tumor-associate vesicles, using immunotherapeutic drugs, and nanotechnology.