Explore the vast range of titles available.

George P. Shultz is directed to emphasize that United States National security is at stake in [U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations] Votes on El Salvador Emergency security assistance; George P. Shultz is directed to emphasize that United States National security is at stake in [U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations] Contra funding votes

George P. Shultz is directed to reject any cut-off in Funding Nicaragua Covert Action Program for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency in presentations to the [U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations]; George P. Shultz will explain Funding for Nicaragua Covert Action Program as necessary to the long-term policy of containment of Communism in presentations before the [U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations]

U.S. Department of State officials evaluate the chances of Congress passing Legislation to provide [Economic assistance; Security assistance] to Pakistan and suggest that [Cyrus R. Vance; Warren Christopher] testify before the [U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations; U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations]

United States Embassy. Philippines suggests that Daniel K. Inouye speak to Robert W. Kasten regarding the U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations threat to freeze Economic Support Fund obligations to the Philippines

United States Embassy. Philippines asserts that U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations recommendations to freeze Economic Support Fund obligations will hamper Military Bases Agreement Negotiations (1983)

U.S. Department of State response to request by U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations justifying request for Military equipment; Duarte, Jose Napoleon meetings Carter, Jimmy to request Military equipment

U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Defense debates support for the Contras

U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations proposes that Section 669 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended be changed in order to disallow providing U.S. [Economic assistance; Security assistance; Dual-use nuclear technology] to countries in South Asia which are producing [Enriched uranium; Plutonium] of the quality required to undertake Nuclear weapons development; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Foreign Operations outlines the circumstances under which the U.S. President may waive the provisions of Section 699 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended to provide Economic assistance to [India; Pakistan]

U.S. National Security Council notes that the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States request for the Grenada Invasion (25 October 1983) was not viewed as genuine by observers; U.S. National Security Council notes that U.S. Congress did not previously object to Presidential Finding that permitted support to Contras in cooperation with Friendly governments; U.S. National Security Council develops strategy for new Legislative proposals to overcome restrictions of Boland Amendment II with particular emphasis on concerns of the [U.S. Congress. House. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; U.S. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Intelligence; U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations; U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations] without risking passage of a Central America Clark Amendment of 1976; U.S. National Security Council believes that evidence of [Soviet intervention; Cuban intervention; Bulgarian intervention; German (Democratic Republic) intervention; Korean (People's Democratic Republic) intervention] in Central America is necessary to show that Nicaragua is a credible threat to National security; [Central American Defense Council; Organization of Eastern Caribbean States] are considered as conduits for Contra funding that could be acceptable to U.S. Congress; U.S. National Security Council considers the possibility of winning U.S. Congress approval to allow [U.S. Central Intelligence Agency; U.S. Department of State] to solicit Friendly governments for Contra funding; U.S. National Security Council believes that U.S. Congress restrictions permitting only [Humanitarian assistance; Non-lethal military equipment] would be acceptable if Third-country donors agree to our coordination of Contras [Intelligence gathering; Management; Military training]; U.S. National Security Council proposes that magnitude of National security threat from Nicaragua would be dramatized by increasing Contra funding request in U.S. Congress to $100 million; [U.S. Department of State; U.S. Central Intelligence Agency] interpret language of Boland Amendment II as prohibiting all [Third-country donors; Private sector] solicitations for Contra funding; U.S. National Security Council prefers that Legislative proposals sent to U.S. Congress attempt to remove most restrictions on U.S. Central Intelligence Agency involvement with the Contras; U.S. National Security Council discourages the Contras interest in receiving support through Foreign assistance programs approved by U.S. Congress because of the implied recognition of a government constituted by the Contras; Legislative proposals for Contra funding sent to U.S. Congress will be timed not to interfere with Votes concerning [MX Missiles; Saudi Arabia; Arms control; Budgets]