Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
3,635 result(s) for "Urinary stress incontinence"
Sort by:
A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing before Stress-Incontinence Surgery
This trial assessed the utility of preoperative urodynamic testing in women with uncomplicated stress–predominant urinary incontinence. Women having office evaluation alone had 1-year treatment-success rates noninferior to those of women also having urodynamic testing. In the United States in 2010, approximately 260,000 women underwent surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. 1 Urodynamic studies, which assess physiological variables during bladder storage and emptying, are often performed preoperatively to confirm and characterize the clinical features of stress urinary incontinence or to guide decisions about modifications in treatment. 2 – 4 However, these studies have not been shown to improve surgical outcomes, they are uncomfortable and costly (payments allowed by Medicare are greater than $500 for the three-part study), 5 and they increase the risk of urinary tract infection. 6 A Cochrane review 7 and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . . .
Comparison of 90-90 ball and balloon exercise versus Kegel’s exercise on pelvic floor muscle strength and quality of life among postpartum women with stress urinary incontinence—a randomized clinical trial protocol
Background Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of the notable problems in postpartum women. Even though Kegel’s exercise (KE) is a universally followed pelvic floor exercise for SUI, it is tough to perform as patients find it hard to identify the correct tiny muscles to contract. Co-contraction of the pelvic diaphragm during 90-90 ball balloon exercises (BBE) will work against IAP, and that produces a more controlled action of pelvic floor muscles. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of 90-90 BBE vs. KE over pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) and quality of life (QoL) in women with postpartum SUI. Method Eighty-six postpartum women with SUI will be screened and recruited through purposive sampling. Subjects will be divided into experimental and control groups through block randomization. The control group will receive KE along with the Knack technique (KT); meanwhile, the experimental group will receive 90/90 BBE with KT (10 repetitions, 3 sets a day, 3 days a week, 8 weeks). Outcome measures are pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS), quality of life, 1-h pad test, and global rate of change, which will be taken at pre- and post-intervention at the 8th week, 3rd month, and 6th month follow-up. Parametric or nonparametric statistical tests will be used based on the normal distribution of data. The result will be presented in the form of a 95% confidence interval and P value. Discussion This trial will provide novel evidence comparing a commonly used exercise (Kegel’s) with the 90-90 ball and balloon exercise, a physiologically guided approach targeting pelvic floor–abdominal synergy. If effective, this intervention may offer an easier and potentially more acceptable alternative to postpartum women with stress urinary incontinence. However, the interpretation of findings should consider that the sample size estimation was based on pre–post data, which may overestimate the true effect. Clinical trial registration CTRI—Clinical Trial Registry of India (ICMR)—Reg.No: CTRI/2024/06/069047. Trial registered prospectively. Registered on 18.06.2024.
Pelvic floor muscle training in female functional fitness exercisers: an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial
ObjectiveStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common among females during functional fitness training, such as CrossFit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on SUI in female functional fitness exercisers.MethodsThis was an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with a PFMT group (n=22) and a control group (n=25). The PFMT group followed a 16-week home-training programme with 3 sets of 8–12 maximum pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions daily and weekly follow-up/reminders by phone. The primary outcome was change in a total score of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). The secondary outcomes were perceived change of symptoms of SUI, change of PFM strength measured by vaginal manometry and symptoms of anal incontinence (AI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).Results47 women, mean age of 33.5 years (SD: 8.1), participated. At 16 weeks, there was a mean difference between groups of −1.4 (95% CI: −2.6 to −0.2) in the change of the ICIQ-UI-SF score in favour of the PFMT group. The PFMT group completed a mean of 70% (SD: 23) of the prescribed protocol. 64% in the PFMT group versus 8% in the control group reported improved symptoms of SUI (p<0.001, relative risk: 7.96, 95% CI, 2.03 to 31.19). There were no group differences in the change of PFM strength or AI/POP symptoms.ConclusionA 16-week home-training programme of the PFM led to improvements in SUI in female functional fitness exercisers. However, PFM strength and AI and POP symptoms did not improve significantly in the PFMT group compared with the control group.
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) and Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation (ExMI) in Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training and extracorporeal magnetic innervation in treatment of urinary incontinence in women with stress urinary incontinence. Methods. The randomized controlled trial enrolled 128 women with stress urinary incontinence who were randomly allocated to either one out of two experimental groups (EG1 or EG2) or the control group (CG). Subjects in the experimental group 1 (EG1) received 12 sessions of pelvic floor muscle training, whereas subjects in the experimental group 2 (EG2) received 12 sessions of extracorporeal magnetic innervation. Subjects in the control group (CG) did not receive any therapeutic intervention. The following instruments were used to measure results in all study groups at the initial and final assessments: Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale (RUIS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ). Results. In both experimental groups, a statistically significant decline in depressive symptoms (BDI-II) and an improvement in urinary incontinence severity (RUIS) and quality of life (KHQ) were found in the following domains: “social limitations,” “emotions,” “severity measures,” and “symptom severity scale.” Moreover, self-efficacy beliefs (GSES) improved in the experimental group that received ExMI (EG2). No statistically significant differences were found between all measured variables in the control group. Comparative analysis of the three study groups showed statistically significant differences at the final assessment in the quality of life in the following domains: “physical limitations,” “social limitations,” “personal relationships,” and “emotions.” Conclusion. Pelvic floor muscle training and extracorporeal magnetic innervation proved to be effective treatment methods for stress urinary incontinence in women. The authors observed an improvement in both the physical and psychosocial aspects.
Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Background Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a frequent adverse effect for men undergoing prostate surgery. A large proportion (around 8% after radical prostatectomy and 2% after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)) are left with severe disabling incontinence which adversely effects their quality of life and many are reliant on containment measures such as pads (27% and 6% respectively). Surgery is currently the only option for active management of the problem. The overwhelming majority of surgeries for persistent bothersome SUI involve artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) insertion. However, this is expensive, and necessitates manipulation of a pump to enable voiding. More recently, an alternative to AUS has been developed – a synthetic sling for men which elevates the urethra, thus treating SUI. This is thought, by some, to be less invasive, more acceptable and less expensive than AUS but clear evidence for this is lacking. The MASTER trial aims to determine whether the male synthetic sling is non-inferior to implantation of the AUS for men who have SUI after prostate surgery (for cancer or benign disease), judged primarily on clinical effectiveness but also considering relative harms and cost-effectiveness. Methods/design Men with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) after prostate surgery, for whom surgery is judged appropriate, are the target population. We aim to recruit men from secondary care urological centres in the UK NHS who carry out surgery for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Outcomes will be assessed by participant-completed questionnaires and 3-day urinary bladder diaries at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. The 24-h urinary pad test will be used at baseline as an objective assessment of urine loss. Clinical data will be completed at the time of surgery to provide details of the operative procedures, complications and resource use in hospital. At 12 months, men will also have a clinical review to evaluate the results of surgery (including another 24-h pad test) and to identify problems or need for further treatment. Discussion A robust examination of the comparative effectiveness of the male synthetic sling will provide high-quality evidence to determine whether or not it should be adopted widely in the NHS. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Registry: Number ISRCTN49212975 . Registered on 22 July 2013. First patient randomised on 29 January 2014.
Pelvic floor muscle training in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: A protocol study
To evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function and quality of life (QoL) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study will be a randomized, controlled, parallel, and blinded clinical trial. The final sample will consist of 32 women diagnosed with SUI and cystocele (stage I and II). All volunteers will be assessed and reassessed using the same protocol: assessment form, gynecological examination, functional evaluation of PFM, and questionnaires to assess quality of life, urinary function, and sexual function. All volunteers will be evaluated for satisfaction levels post-treatment. The intervention will be PFMT, totaling 16 sessions to be conducted twice a week. Reevaluation will take place at the end of treatment and 1 month after completion of PFMT. Descriptive analysis and repeated measures ANOVA will be used for result analysis. A significance level of p<0.05 will be considered for all statistical tests. This study has been submitted to the Ethics in Research Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte and approved under protocol number 5.826.563. It has been registered with the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ReBec (RBR-49p6g3t). It is expected that these studies will provide a deeper understanding of the efficacy of PFMT in women with SUI and cystocele. Additionally, it aims to provide more insights into the efficacy of PFMT prior to surgery.
The effect of 12-month postoperative weight change on outcomes following midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence: a secondary analysis of the ESTEEM and TOMUS randomized trials
Introduction and hypothesis Prior studies demonstrate mixed results on the impact of obesity on the success of midurethral slings (MUS), with little known about how postoperative weight change affects outcomes. We aimed to examine the effect of postoperative weight change on outcomes 12 months after MUS for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods This secondary analysis utilized data from two multicenter randomized trials of women undergoing MUS placement. Subjects were categorized into cohorts based on change in body weight at 12 months postoperatively: weight gain (≥5% increase); weight loss (≥5% decrease), and weight stable (<5% change). The primary outcome was SUI cure (no SUI episodes in a 3-day bladder diary). Patients with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) were analyzed for changes in daily average urge incontinence (UUI) episodes in a 3-day diary. Penalized logistic regression assessed the impact of demographic and perioperative variables on the primary outcome. Results Of the 918 women included, 635 (70%) were weight stable, 144 (15%) had weight gain, and 139 (15%) had weight loss. Patients in the weight loss cohort had a higher smoking rate and a higher baseline body mass index (SD 0.29, 2.7 respectively). All cohorts experienced high SUI cure rates ranging from 77 to 81%, with no significant difference in SUI cure between cohorts ( p  = 0.607). Of 372 subjects with MUI, the weight loss cohort had significantly greater improvement in UUI episodes. Conclusions Weight change at 12 months postoperatively did not significantly alter efficacy of MUS for treatment of SUI. Patients with MUI who lost ≥5% body weight had significantly greater improvement in UUI episodes.
The effect of pregnancy pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training on urinary incontinence and birth outcomes: a randomized-controlled study
Purpose To examine the effect of pregnancy pilates-assisted birth preparation training on urinary incontinence (UI) including stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) during pregnancy, and the postpartum period and birth outcomes. Method In this single-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled study, 126 participants who have 28–30 weeks of gestation and nulliparous were randomly assigned to receive either the ( n  = 63) or control group ( n  = 63). The study was carried out between March and August 2022. Pregnancy pilates intervention was applied twice in a week, a total of 8 weeks to pilates group. The control group was given routine obstetric and pregnancy care. A personal data form and the Michigan Incontinence Severity Index Form (M-ISI) were used as data collection tools. Results The mean weight gains of the experimental group during pregnancy were significantly lower than the control group. The experimental group had almost twice the rate of vaginal birth than those of the control group. The duration of labor mean score of experimental group was 5 h and 43 min less than the duration of labor of the control group ( p  < 0.001). After intervention, and postpartum period, the SUI and UUI severity of the experimental group was significantly lower than those of the control group ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training reduced the severity of UI including SUI and UUI symptoms during pregnancy and the early postpartum. In addition, pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training contributes to decrease in weight gain during pregnancy, the increase in the vaginal birth rate, and the shortening of the duration of labor. Trial registration NCT06185439
Urinary incontinence in women
Urinary incontinence symptoms are highly prevalent among women, have a substantial effect on health-related quality of life and are associated with considerable personal and societal expenditure. Two main types are described: stress urinary incontinence, in which urine leaks in association with physical exertion, and urgency urinary incontinence, in which urine leaks in association with a sudden compelling desire to void. Women who experience both symptoms are considered as having mixed urinary incontinence. Research has revealed overlapping potential causes of incontinence, including dysfunction of the detrusor muscle or muscles of the pelvic floor, dysfunction of the neural controls of storage and voiding, and perturbation of the local environment within the bladder. A full diagnostic evaluation of urinary incontinence requires a medical history, physical examination, urinalysis, assessment of quality of life and, when initial treatments fail, invasive urodynamics. Interventions can include non-surgical options (such as lifestyle modifications, pelvic floor muscle training and drugs) and surgical options to support the urethra or increase bladder capacity. Future directions in research may increasingly target primary prevention through understanding of environmental and genetic risks for incontinence. Urinary incontinence symptoms in women are prevalent and substantially affect health-related quality of life. These issues are compounded by the limited attention that urinary incontinence receives at the policy or research-funding levels. Despite these challenges, the field has witnessed considerable innovations in practice over the past decade, which are summarized in this Primer.
Surgery versus Physiotherapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence
In this multicenter trial comparing physiotherapy and sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence, the surgery group had higher rates of subjective improvement and cure at 1 year; 49% of the women in the physiotherapy group crossed over to surgery. Stress urinary incontinence is a common health problem among women that negatively affects quality of life. 1 – 3 The International Consultation on Incontinence defines stress urinary incontinence as an involuntary loss of urine on physical exertion, sneezing, or coughing. 4 Pelvic-floor muscle training (physiotherapy) is generally regarded as first-line management for the condition. 5 However, physiotherapy is associated with broad variation in the rates of subjective success (53 to 97%) and objective success (5 to 49%), and more severe symptoms are associated with worse outcomes. 6 , 7 After 3 to 15 years, 25 to 50% of women initially treated with physiotherapy have proceeded to . . .