Explore the vast range of titles available.

In two trials in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease, intravenous ustekinumab was effective in those who did not have a response to conventional therapy or TNF antagonists. Subcutaneous ustekinumab was more effective than placebo in maintaining remission. Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract that is treated with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, or integrin inhibitors. 1 – 3 The drawbacks of these agents include an increased risk of infection 4 – 7 and cancer 8 and limited efficacy. 9 Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody to the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 that has been approved for use in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. 10 In previous trials involving patients with psoriasis in which ustekinumab was administered subcutaneously for up to 5 years, the drug was not associated with an increased risk of serious adverse . . .

ObjectiveInterleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 have been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The safety and efficacy of ustekinumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-12/23 p40 antibody, and guselkumab, a human monoclonal anti-IL-23 antibody, were evaluated in adults with active RA despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive placebo at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), ustekinumab 90 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks (n=55), guselkumab 50 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=55), or guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks (n=54) through week 28; all patients continued a stable dose of MTX (10–25 mg/week). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20) at week 28. Safety was monitored through week 48.ResultsAt week 28, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients achieving an ACR 20 response between the combined ustekinumab group (53.6%) or the combined guselkumab group (41.3%) compared with placebo (40.0%) (p=0.101 and p=0.877, respectively). Through week 48, the proportions of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable among the treatment groups. Infections were the most common type of AE.ConclusionsTreatment with ustekinumab or guselkumab did not significantly reduce the signs and symptoms of RA. No new safety findings were observed with either treatment.Trial registration numberNCT01645280.

We aimed to evaluate the similarity of BAT2206 to its originator, ustekinumab, including pharmacokinetic profiles, immunogenicity, and safety in healthy Chinese male subjects. This was a double-blinded, randomized, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial, in which 270 healthy male subjects were enrolled to receive a single subcutaneous injection (45 mg) of either BAT2206 or ustekinumab (European Union or USA) at a 1:1:1 ratio. The pairwise pharmacokinetic similarities and the safety and immunogenicity of both drugs were evaluated and compared. The results showed that the 90% confidence interval of the geometric mean ratio for primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) among BAT2206 and ustekinumab (USA or European Union sourced) groups were all within the predefined equivalent interval of 80-125%. Furthermore, all the groups had similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events, in which the majority of cases belonged to Common Terminology Criteria for the Classification of Adverse Events Grade 1 or 2. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 54 (20.1%) subjects, namely 24 (26.7%), 13 (14.8%), and 17 (18.9%) patients in the BAT2206, ustekinumab (European Union), and ustekinumab (USA) groups, respectively. In contrast, the incidences of positive neutralizing antibodies were similar among the three groups. Pharmacokinetic similarity between BAT2206 and ustekinumab (USA or European Union sourced) was confirmed. The three groups had similar safety profiles, and the investigational drugs were well tolerated by subjects. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04371185).

Ustekinumab (Stelara ® ) has been recently approved in the EU and the USA as intravenous induction and subcutaneous maintenance therapy for adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease who have failed or were intolerant to treatment with immunomodulators, corticosteroids or at least one tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist. Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody to the shared p40 subunit of the proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 cytokines, has a unique mechanism of action distinct from that of TNF antagonists. In pivotal phase III trials, compared with placebo, ustekinumab induction therapy improved clinical response and remission rates in patients who had previously failed or were intolerant to conventional therapies or at least one TNF antagonist. When administered as subcutaneous maintenance therapy, ustekinumab continued to offer benefits over placebo for clinical response and remission in patients who had clinically responded to the induction therapy. Ustekinumab was generally well tolerated as both induction and maintenance therapy; serious infections and malignancies were rare. Thus, ustekinumab presents a promising alternative treatment option in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease who have failed or are intolerant to treatment with conventional therapies or TNF antagonists.

Drug survival reflects a drug’s effectiveness, safety, and tolerability. We assessed the drug survival of biologics used to treat psoriasis in a prospective national pharmacovigilance cohort (British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)). The survival rates of the first course of biologics for 3,523 biologic-naive patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were compared using survival analysis techniques and predictors of discontinuation analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Data for patients on adalimumab (n=1,879), etanercept (n=1,098), infliximab (n=96), and ustekinumab (n=450) were available. The overall survival rate in the first year was 77%, falling to 53% in the third year. Multivariate analysis showed that female gender (hazard ratio (HR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–1.37), being a current smoker (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.38), and a higher baseline dermatology life quality index (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02) were predictors of discontinuation. Presence of psoriatic arthritis (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96) was a predictor for drug survival. As compared with adalimumab, patients on etanercept (HR 1.63; 95% CI: 1.45–1.84) or infliximab (HR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.16–2.09) were more likely to discontinue therapy, whereas patients on ustekinumab were more likely to persist (HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.37–0.62). After accounting for relevant covariates, ustekinumab had the highest first-course drug survival. The results of this study will aid clinical decision making when choosing biologic therapy for psoriasis patients.

Abstract Background The POWER study (NCT03782376) evaluated efficacy and safety of a single ustekinumab intravenous (IV) reinduction dose versus placebo under continued ustekinumab subcutaneous (SC) treatment in adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease who demonstrated a secondary loss of response to ustekinumab every 8 weeks (q8w) maintenance therapy. Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 at Week 0 to ustekinumab IV reinduction (ustekinumab ∼6 mg/kg and SC placebo) or continuous maintenance (IV placebo and SC ustekinumab 90 mg q8w). Clinical and biomarker assessments occurred at Weeks 0, 8, 16, and 24 with optional ileocolonoscopy at Weeks 0 and16. The primary endpoint was clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline Crohn’s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score or CDAI <150) at Week 16. Safety events were analyzed through Week 36 and serum samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses and anti-ustekinumab antibody detection. Results Overall, 215 patients were randomized: 108 to the IV reinduction group and 107 to the SC group. In the IV reinduction group, 49.1% achieved clinical response at Week 16 versus 37.4% in the SC group (adjusted treatment difference 11.5% [95% CI: −1.5%, 24.5%; P = .089]). Proportions of patients with endoscopic remission and improvement, normalization of inflammatory biomarkers, and improvement in IBDQ score were greater in the IV reinduction group vs the SC group. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions Although the primary endpoint of clinical response was not met at Week 16, ustekinumab IV reinduction showed numerical improvements in objective endpoints including inflammatory biomarkers and endoscopic outcomes compared with SC maintenance therapy. Safety and immunogenicity results were consistent with the established profile of ustekinumab. Lay Summary Some patients with Crohn’s disease who respond to biologic treatment may lose response over time. The POWER study evaluated the efficacy and safety of receiving an additional intravenous dose of ustekinumab in patients who initially lost response to ustekinumab. Graphical abstract Graphical Abstract

Background Limited evidence exists on the long-term efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) in perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease (PFCD), and the optimal UST trough level for predicting fistula remission remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess both short- and long-term effectiveness of UST in PFCD and to identify thresholds predicting fistula clinical remission. Methods This retrospective cohort included 89 PFCD patients treated with UST. Evaluations utilized the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI), Perianal Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PDAI), and Fistula Drainage Assessment (FDA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the Van Assche Index (VAI) was performed at 52 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified UST trough levels predictive of clinical remission. Results The fistula clinical remission rates were 66.3% (59/89) at 16/20 weeks and 74.2% (66/89) at 52 weeks. Biochemical markers, including CRP, ESR, and PLT, significantly decreased, while RBC and HB levels increased after treatment (p < 0.05). MRI showed fistula improvement in 54.7% (35/64) of patients and complete healing in 21.8% (14/64). Comparative analysis revealed that anti-TNF-naïve patients had significantly higher rates of fistula remission, whereas seton insertion did not affect long-term fistula healing. ROC analysis identified UST trough concentrations ≥3.95 µg/mL at 16/20 weeks as predictive of clinical fistula remission (AUC: 0.791; sensitivity: 73.8%; specificity: 78.6%). Conclusion UST achieves 74.2% fistula clinical remission at 52 weeks in PFCD, with trough concentrations at 16/20 weeks predictive of clinical remission. These findings support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM) to optimize clinical outcomes.

Abstract Background Optimizing therapy and monitoring response are integral aspects of inflammatory bowel disease treatment. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether serum ustekinumab trough concentrations during maintenance therapy were associated with ustekinumab treatment response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Methods A systematic review was performed to March 21, 2022, to identify studies using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. We included studies that reported the association between serum ustekinumab trough concentrations with clinical or endoscopic remission. Outcome measures were combined across studies using the random-effects model with an odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes of endoscopic and clinical remission. Results We identified 14 observational studies that were included in the analysis for clinical remission (919 patients, 63% with Crohn’s disease) or endoscopic remission (290 patients, all with Crohn’s disease). Median ustekinumab trough concentrations were higher amongst individuals achieving clinical remission compared with those not achieving remission (mean difference, 1.6 ug/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-3.01 ug/mL). Furthermore, individuals with median serum trough concentration in the fourth quartile were significantly more likely to achieve clinical (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.11-6.20) but not endoscopic remission (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 0.86-25.19) compared with those with first quartile median trough concentrations. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis primarily relating to patients with Crohn’s disease on maintenance ustekinumab treatment, it appears that there is an association between higher ustekinumab trough concentration and clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are required to determine whether proactive dose adjustments of ustekinumab therapy provides additional clinical benefit. Lay Summary This meta-analysis of 14 observational studies found an association between better clinical outcomes and higher trough ustekinumab levels for maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease.

Abstract In patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with TNF-α antagonists has led to a personalized approach to optimize treatment and has been shown to be cost-effective. The utility of this TDM-based personalized approach for novel biologic agents, which target different inflammatory pathways, is unclear. Commercial assays for ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are available, but there is little available guidance for clinicians regarding the use of TDM with these drugs. Although there is limited evidence for definitive threshold concentrations for UST and VDZ, this review highlights the available literature on the pharmacokinetics of these medications, the association of clinical and endoscopic outcomes with drug concentrations, and the clinical utility of TDM to guide treatment decisions.