Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To our knowledge, there are very few studies evaluating if the levels of folate modify the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and higher (CIN2+ and CIN3+) associated with the levels of HPV genome methylation, two cofactors related to single carbon metabolism and independently associated with cervical cancer in previous studies. We conducted a case–control study nested in a three-arm randomized clinical pragmatic trial (ASCUS-COL trial) to evaluate the risk of CIN3+ associated with methylation levels according to serum folate concentrations. Methods Cases ( n  = 155) were women with histologically confirmed CIN2+ (113 CIN2, 38 CIN3, and 4 SCC) and controls were age and follow-up time at diagnosis-matched women with histologically confirmed ≤ CIN1 ( n  = 155), selected from the 1122 hrHPV + women of this trial. The concentrations of serum folate were determined by the radioimmunoassay SimulTRAC-SNB-VitaminB12/Folate-RIAKit and the methylation levels by the S5 classifier. Stepwise logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between folate or methylation levels and CIN2+ or CIN3+. The joint effect of folate levels and methylation on the risk of CIN3+ was estimated using combinations of categorical stratifications. Results Folate levels were significantly lower in women with CIN3+ than in other diagnostic groups ( p  = 0.019). The risk of CIN3+ was eight times higher (OR 8.9, 95% CI 3.4–24.9) in women with folate deficiency and high methylation levels than in women with normal folate and high methylation levels (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4–4.6). Conclusion High methylation and deficient folate independently increased the risk of CIN3+ while deficient folate combined with high methylation was associated with a substantially elevated risk of CIN3+.

ObjectiveHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is the chief cause of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical carcinoma. The Erhuang suppository (EHS) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prepared from realgar (As2S2), Coptidis rhizoma, alumen, and borneolum syntheticum and has been used for antiviral and antitumor purposes. However, whether EHS can efficiently alleviate HR-HPV infection remains unclear. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of EHS for the treatment of persistent HR-HPV infection in the uterine cervix.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of EHS in a randomized controlled clinical trial with a 3-month follow-up. Totally, 70 patients with persistent HR-HPV infection were randomly assigned to receive intravaginal administration of EHS or placebo. HPV DNA, ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT), colposcopy, and safety evaluation were carried out after treatment. Microarray analysis was performed to compare transcriptome profiles before and after EHS treatment. A K14-HPV16 mouse model was generated to confirm the efficiency of EHS.ResultsAfter 3 months, 74.3% (26/35) of the patients in the treatment group were HPV negative, compared to 6.9% (2/29) in the placebo group. High-throughput microarrays revealed distinct transcriptome profiles after treatment. The differentially expressed genes were significantly enriched in complement activation, immune response, and apoptotic processes. The K14-HPV16 mouse model also validated the remarkable efficacy of EHS.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that EHS is effective against HR-HPV infection and cervical lesions. Additionally, no obvious systemic toxicity was observed in patients during the trial. The superior efficacy and safety of EHS demonstrated its considerable value as a potential cost-effective drug for the treatment of HPV infection and HPV-related cervical diseases.

Immunostaining for p16-INK4A (henceforth p16) is a sensitive and specific method for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV), but longitudinal data have not been obtained. We investigated the relation between p16 status and risk of CIN during 3 years of follow-up. Women aged 25–60 years were enrolled between June 10, 2003, and Dec 31, 2004, in a multicentre randomised trial comparing HPV testing with cytology. HPV-positive women were referred for colposcopy and, in seven of nine centres, were tested for p16 overexpression by immunostaining. If no CIN was detected, these women were followed up at yearly intervals until clearance of HPV infection. The primary endpoint was histologically confirmed CIN of grade 2 or worse (CIN of grade 2 [CIN2], CIN of grade 3 [CIN3], or invasive cervical cancer) at recruitment or during follow-up. We calculated the absolute and relative risks by p16 status at recruitment. We also calculated the longitudinal sensitivity of p16 testing. Additionally, we assessed the relative sensitivity of an alternative strategy (referral to colposcopy and follow-up of only HPV-positive, p16-positive women) versus conventional cytology in two age groups. Percentages were weighted by the inverse of the tested fraction. The trial in which this study is nested is registered, number ISRCTN81678807. Of 1042 HPV-positive women who were tested for p16 with no CIN detected during the first round of screening, 944 (91%) had further HPV tests. 793 (84%) of these 944 were followed up until detection of CIN2 or worse, HPV infection clearance, or for at least 3 years. CIN2 or worse was detected during follow-up in more p16-positive women (31 of 365, 8·8% [95% CI 5·8–11·8]) than in p16-negative women (17 of 579, 3·7% [1·9–5·4]; relative risk [RR] 2·61 [95% CI 1·49–4·59]). RR was higher in women aged 35–60 years at recruitment (3·37 [1·39–8·15]) than in those aged 25–34 years (2·15 [1·00–4·61]), but age was not a significant modifier. CIN3 or worse was detected during follow-up in more p16-positive women (16 of 365, 4·4% [2·3–6·6]) than in p16-negative women (six of 579, 1·3% [0·2–2·3]; RR 3·90 [95% CI 1·57–9·68]). Longitudinal sensitivity of p16 testing for detection of CIN3 or worse during follow-up at all ages was 77·8% (95% CI 63·9–91·6). The relative sensitivity of the alternative strategy compared with conventional cytology was 2·08 (1·13–3·56) in women aged 35–60 years and 2·86 (1·28–5·36) in those aged 25–34 years. HPV-positive, p16-negative women aged 35–60 years had a higher cumulative risk of CIN3 or worse during recruitment or follow-up (2·0%, 95% CI 0·3–3·7) than did HPV-negative women (0·01%, 0–0·04) or those who were cytologically normal (0·04%, 0·02–0·09) at recruitment. p16 overexpression is a marker for CIN2 or worse or for development of CIN2 or worse within 3 years in HPV-positive women, especially those aged 35–60 years. HPV-positive, p16-positive women need immediate colposcopy and, if the assessment is negative, annual follow-up. Immediate colposcopy can be avoided in HPV-positive, p16-negative women, who can be safely managed with repeat screening after 2–3 year intervals. European Union; Italian Ministry of Health; Regional Health Administrations of Piemonte, Tuscany, Veneto and Emilia Romagna; and Public Health Agency of Lazio Region.

Background and aimData on type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) are needed to investigate HPV-based screening tests and HPV vaccines. However, Chinese relevant data are insufficient. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to summarize and demonstrate the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and compensate for the shortage of HPV vaccines in China.MethodsThe Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as references cited in the selected studies, were systematically searched for studies investigating the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes between January 2000 and April 2019 in China.ResultsA total of 8 studies were identified, which comprised 2950 patients with CIN1 and 5393 with CIN2/3. The overall HPV infection rate was 84.37%. The HPV infection rate was significantly higher in the CIN2/3 group (87.00%) than in the CIN1 group (79.56%) (χ2 = 80.095, P < 0.001). The most common HPV types in CIN1 in order of decreasing prevalence were as follows: HPV52 (20.31%), HPV16 (16.81%), HPV58 (14.44%), HPV18 (6.44%), and HPV53 (5.76%). However, in the CIN2/3 group, HPV16 (45.69%) was the predominant type, followed by HPV58 (15.50%), HPV52 (11.74%), HPV33 (9.35%), and HPV31 (4.34%).ConclusionsThis study suggested that HPV16, HPV52, and HPV58 were the top three types of CIN in China. The findings might provide a reference for future HPV-based cervical cancer screening tests, treatment of HPV infection, and application of HPV vaccines in China.

This study aimed to explore the changes of the vaginal microbiota and enzymes in the women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection and cervical lesions. A total of 448 participants were carried out HPV genotyping, cytology tests, and microecology tests, and 28 participants were treated as sub-samples, in which vaginal samples were characterized by sequencing the bacterial 16S V4 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene region. The study found the prevalence of HR-HPV was higher in patients with BV ( P  = 0.036). The HR-HPV infection rate was 72.73% in G. vaginalis women, which was significantly higher than that of women with lactobacillus as the dominant microbiota (44.72%) ( P  = 0.04). The positive rate of sialidase (SNA) was higher in women with HR-HPV infection (P = 0.004) and women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) ( P  = 0.041). In HPV (+) women, the α-diversity was significantly higher than that in HPV (−) women. The 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing results showed that Lactobacillus was the dominant bacteria in the normal vaginal microbiota. However, the proportion of Gardnerella and Prevotella were markedly increased in HPV (+) patients. Gardnerella and Prevotella are the most high-risk combination for the development of HPV (+) women. The SNA secreted by Gardnerella and Prevotella may play a significant role in HPV infection progress to cervical lesions.

Most uterine cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are transient, with only a small fraction developing into cervical cancer. Family aggregation studies and heritability estimates suggest a significant inherited genetic component. Candidate gene studies and previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) report associations between the HLA region and cervical cancer. Adopting a genome-wide approach, we aimed to compare genetic variation in women with invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 with that in healthy controls. We did a GWAS in a cohort of unrelated European individuals using data from UK Biobank, a population-based cohort including 273 377 women aged 40–69 years at recruitment between March 13, 2006, and Oct 1, 2010. We used an additive univariate logistic regression model to analyse genetic variants associated with invasive cervical cancer or CIN3. We sought replication of candidate associations in FinnGen, a large independent dataset of 128 123 individuals. We also did a two-sample mendelian randomisation approach to explore the role of risk factors in the genetic risk of cervical cancer. We included 4769 CIN3 and invasive cervical cancer case samples and 145 545 control samples in the GWAS. Of 9 600 464 assayed and imputed single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), six independent variants were associated with CIN3 and invasive cervical cancer. These included novel loci rs10175462 (PAX8; odds ratio [OR] 0·87, 95% CI 0·84–0·91; p=1·07 × 10−9) and rs27069 (CLPTM1L; 0·88, 0·84–0·92; p=2·51 × 10−9), and previously reported signals at rs9272050 (HLA-DQA1; 1·27, 1·21–1·32; p=2·51 × 10−28), rs6938453 (MICA; 0·79, 0·75–0·83; p=1·97 × 10−17), rs55986091 (HLA-DQB1; 0·66, 0·60–0·72; p=6·42 × 10−28), and rs9266183 (HLA-B; 0·73, 0·64–0·83; p=1·53 × 10−6). Three SNPs were replicated in the independent Finnish dataset of 1648 invasive cervical cancer cases: PAX8 (rs10175462; p=0·015), CLPTM1L (rs27069; p=2·54 × 10−7), and HLA-DQA1 (rs9272050; p=7·90 × 10−8). Mendelian randomisation further supported the complementary role of smoking (OR 2·46, 95% CI 1·64–3·69), older age at first pregnancy (0·80, 0·68–0·95), and number of sexual partners (1·95, 1·44–2·63) in the risk of developing cervical cancer. Our results provide new evidence for the genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer, specifically the PAX8, CLPTM1L, and HLA genes, suggesting disruption in apoptotic and immune function pathways. Future studies integrating host and viral, genetic, and epigenetic variation, could further elucidate complex host–viral interactions. NIHR Imperial BRC Wellcome 4i Clinician Scientist Training Programme.

DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for cervical cancer screening. This study aimed to validate the triage performance of cytological DNA methylation for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) in women with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection from a large prospective cohort undergoing opportunistic screening in China (METHY3). The triage performance for detecting CIN3+ lesions was compared between HPV16/18 genotyping, a liquid-based cytology (LBC) test, and the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test according to cervical pathologic outcomes. Among the 4394 women infected with hrHPV, 1105 had definitive cervical histological findings that were analyzed. For detecting CIN3+, the specificity of HPV16/18(+), the LBC result of ≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) was 66.4%, 23.9%, and 89.6%, respectively, with odds ratios of 4.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.85-6.40), 4.44 (2.27-10.1), and 18.5 (12.1-28.7) (P < .001), respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m(+) had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.790, 95% CI, 0.747-0.832) in the whole cohort and in women of various ages. PAX1m/JAM3m (+) was detected in all patients with cancer (n = 28). Compared with HPV16/18 genotyping and the LBC test, PAX1m/JAM3m testing reduced referrals to colposcopy by 20.64 percentage points and 61.18 percentage points, respectively. PAX1 m /JAM3 m testing is highly specific for detecting CIN3+. As a triage biomarker, it is superior to HPV 16/18 genotyping and LBC testing for women with hrHPV infection.

Cervical cancer screening through detection and treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is most successful in cancer prevention. However, the accuracy of the current cervical cancer screening tests is still low. The aim of this study was to develop a more accurate method based on circulating exosomal miRNAs. The miRNA sequencing was performed to identify candidate exosomal miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers in 121 plasma samples from healthy volunteers, cervical carcinoma patients, and CIN patients. A panel with eight differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs was identified to distinguish patients in the CIN II+ group (including advanced CIN II patients) from those in the CIN I− group (including CIN I patients and healthy volunteers). Let-7d-3p and miR-30d-5p showed significant difference between cervical tumors and adjacent normal tissues ( P  < 0.005), exhibited a consistent trend in plasma samples, and were further validated in 203 independent plasma samples. Integrating these two miRNAs yielded an AUC value of 0.828 to distinguish patients in CIN II+ group from those in CIN I− group. Further integrating them into a cytological test-based model resulted in a higher AUC of 0.887, while the AUC value based on the cytological test alone was 0.766. In summary, plasma exosomal miR-30d-5p and let-7d-3p are valuable diagnostic biomarkers for non-invasive screening of cervical cancer and its precursors. Further validation using large sample sizes is required for clinical diagnosis.

To improve human papilloma virus (HPV) screening, more effective triage methods for HPV-positive samples need development and validation. Cytology, the most common triage method today, is subjective and can only be applied to professionally collected samples. Methylation status has been shown to be informative, as genes are highly methylated in HPV-induced cervical dysplasia and cancer. This study aimed to assess whether triaging HPV-positive samples using molecular methods, such as methylation and genotyping for high-risk HPV types, could be as effective as cytology in cervical screening. A retrospective biobank study was conducted on HPV-positive samples collected in 2017-2018, analyzing FAM19A4/MiR-124-2 hypermethylation and HPV genotyping for types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and/or 59, comparing these results to cytology triage for detecting histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cancer. Results from 1915 positive screening samples were analyzed, including 1052 follow-up biopsies with 402 HSIL or cancer cases. Genotyping showed slightly higher sensitivity than cytology but lower specificity, while methylation had higher specificity but much lower sensitivity. Cytology's positive predictive value (PPV) was 36%, with lower PPVs for the molecular methods. Combining molecular methods increased the PPV but significantly reduced sensitivity. Based on these findings with molecular methods reducing sensitivity, we do not recommend adopting the molecular triage methods evaluated in this study in the Swedish setting. The trade-off between sensitivity and specificity does not support a change from the current cytology-based triage approach.

Background Efficient triage of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women is essential to avoid unnecessary referrals and overtreatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available DNA methylation panel, GynTect® (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671), in cervical cytology samples from 146 women for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cervical carcinoma (CC). This analysis focuses particularly on the performance of the ZNF671 methylation marker (ZNF671 m ) within the panel. Results The positive rates of all triage markers—hrHPV, TCT, HPV16/18, GynTect®, and ZNF671 m —correlated with increasing severity of CIN lesions (Chi-squared test for trend, P  < 0.01). ZNF671 m exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.734–0.888) for identifying CIN3 + cases, closely followed by GynTect® (AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721–0.878). Among 102 hrHPV-positive women, employing GynTect® or ZNF671 m instead of TCT yielded identical sensitivity (0.84; 95% CI: 0.69–1.01) but enhanced specificity (86% and 90%, respectively) for detecting CIN3 +. Adding HPV16/18 to the triage strategy maintained similar outcomes. Additionally, ZNF671 m showed a significant risk difference (60.0%; 95% CI 42.8–77.1%) for detecting CIN3 +, on par with GynTect® (57.6%; 95% CI 37.9–71.2%). Conclusion ZNF671 m within the GynTect® panel demonstrates robust triage performance in diagnosing CIN3 + cases, with efficacy comparable to the full panel. These findings suggest that ZNF671 m could be a promising alternative for cytologic triage, warranting further validation.