Explore the vast range of titles available.

Implementing standard-of-care cryotherapy or electrosurgical excision to treat cervical precancers is challenging in resource-limited settings. An affordable technological alternative that is as effective as standard-of-care techniques would greatly improve access to treatment. This randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate the noninferiority efficacy of a portable, battery-driven thermal ablation (TA) device compared to cryotherapy and electrosurgical excision (large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ)) to treat cervical precancer in a screen-and-treat program in Zambia. A total of 3,124 women positive on visual inspection with acetic acid and eligible for ablative therapy were randomized to one of the treatment arms. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was performed at baseline and at the follow-up. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as either type-specific HPV clearance at the follow-up in participants positive for HPV at baseline, or a negative visual inspection with acetic acid test for those who had a negative HPV test at baseline. After a median follow-up of 12 months, treatment success rates were 74.0%, 71.1% and 71.4% for the TA, cryotherapy and LLETZ arms, respectively, thus demonstrating noninferiority ( P  = 0.83). TA was a safe and well-accepted procedure. Only 3.6% of those randomized to TA reported moderate-to-severe pain, compared to 6.5% and 1.9% for the cryotherapy and LLETZ arms, respectively. Thus, our randomized controlled trial demonstrates the safety and efficacy of TA, which is not inferior to cryotherapy or surgical excision. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02956239 . A randomized controlled trial performed in a screen-and-treat program in Zambia found that a portable, battery-operated thermal ablation device was not inferior to cryotherapy and electrosurgical excision in cervical precancer treatment.

Background Cervical cancer is a common cancer worldwide, with > 85% of deaths occurring in Lower- and Middle-Income Countries where resources for screening programs are limited. Women living with HIV (WLHIV) are at increased risk. HPV test-and-treat is a screening strategy where women with HPV are offered ablative treatment of the cervix to reduce the risk of invasive cancer. WLHIV tend to have more extensive cervical lesions, necessitating more specialised surgical treatments. Method ACTG A5282 was a randomised, open-label, Phase 2 trial conducted in seven countries that compared a cytology-based screening strategy to HPV test-and-treat for cervical cancer prevention in WLHIV. Women with cervical lesions inappropriate for ablative treatment were assigned to Arm C and underwent colposcopy and directed biopsies. Loop electro-excision procedure was performed if high-grade lesions (bHSIL) were present on cervical biopsies. Women were followed 26 weeks later for repeat evaluations. The Clopper-Pearson exact method was used to construct the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of WLHIV with lesions inappropriate for cryotherapy. Logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated with these lesions. Results Of 1046 women screened, 156 (88%) were Black/Non-Hispanic, with a median age of 36 years; 80% were on ART, and 73% had an HIV-1 RNA < 200 copies/mL. On cervical colposcopy, 17% (179/1046, 95% CI 14.9–19.4%) had cervical lesions inappropriate for cervical ablation. Among 428 (44%) women with High-risk HPV (hrHPV) detected, 112 (26%, 95% CI 22.2%, 30.5%) had cervical lesions inappropriate for ablative therapy. hrHPV was found more commonly among women having lesions inappropriate for ablative therapy as compared to lesions appropriate for ablative therapy (70% vs 54%, p < .001). Among 128 women with extensive cervical lesions undergoing colposcopic biopsies, 43 (34%) had bHSIL detected. Among women undergoing LEEP treatment of bHSIL, 24% had bHSIL detected 26 weeks later. Conclusion Cervical lesions inappropriate for ablative therapy were common among WLHIV. This has implications for cervical cancer programs as these lesions can only be optimally treated with surgical therapies such as loop electroexcision procedures, and the capacity for this procedure should be increased to maximise cervical cancer prevention outcomes.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of personalized nursing care in postoperative supplementary surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) patients with positive or high-grade CIN margins after cold knife conization at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University in Shijiazhuang, China. The primary objective was to assess the impact of personalized nursing intervention on postoperative outcomes, including psychological well-being, self-care ability, quality of life, and postoperative complications. A total of 106 patients undergoing additional surgery after CIN III cold knife conization at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2020 to April 2023 were randomly allocated into an observation group (n=53) and a control group (n=53) using a random number table method. Detailed information on the randomization process, including stratification factors and blinding procedures, is provided. The observation group received personalized nursing intervention, while the control group received routine nursing. The retreatment methods, including repeat cold knife conization, total hysterectomy, and radical cervical cancer surgery, were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Statistical software was employed for data analysis. Pathological results post-cold knife conization revealed positive margins in 76 cases and pathological upgrades in 30 cases. The consistency rate between post-cold knife conization and post-retreatment pathological results was 75.47%. After the intervention, the observation group exhibited significantly lower SAS and SDS scores and significantly higher ESCA and WHO QOL-100 scores compared to the control group (P < .05), indicating improved psychological well-being and quality of life. The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 5.66%, significantly lower than in the control group (P < .05). Personalized nursing care in postoperative supplementary surgery for CIN III patients with positive or high-grade CIN margins at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University improves psychological well-being, self-care ability, quality of life, and reduces postoperative complications. The findings underscore the importance of tailored nursing interventions in enhancing patient outcomes. The inclusion of detailed patient demographics and methodological transparency enhances the generalizability and reliability of the study findings beyond the study setting.

BackgroundCervical cancer remains a significant global health concern and is the fourth most prevalent cancer among women. In South Africa, it is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women aged 15–44 years. The disease is typically preceded by persistent high-risk HPV infection, leading to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually cancer. Currently, in South Africa, management primarily involves excision, particularly through large loop excision of the transformation zone, which has associated risks and limitations. Thermal ablation is an alternative cost-effective treatment method, providing a straightforward approach to treatment, particularly advantageous in environments characterised by limited resources. The study aims to assess the efficacy, safety and patient experience of thermal ablation, providing valuable data for potential integration into South Africa’s cervical cancer prevention policies.MethodsRandomised controlled trial in which 420 women living with HIV aged 30–60 years will be recruited from the Colposcopy Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital and will be followed up for a period of two years. The primary study endpoint is a test of cure that will be assessed by HPV genotyping, cervical cytology and histology at six month intervals. Other endpoints include the occurrence of adverse events.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ethics Reference No: M20/11/035) and by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness via the National Health Research Database (WC_202109_016). All study procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, South African Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Medical Research Council’s ethical guidelines. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conference presentations and professional associations. A lay summary will be shared with the Community Advisory Board to guide community-level dissemination.Trial registration numberPan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202504820339039.

PurposeTo compare resected cone mass and resection margin status when performing Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) using video colposcopy (LLETZ-VC) versus a headlight (LLETZ-HL) in women with cervical dysplasia.MethodsProspective, randomised trial (monocentric) at a specialised cervical dysplasia unit in a University Hospital. Women with a biopsy-proven CIN2 + or persisting CIN1 or diagnostic LLETZ were recruited and randomised. LLETZ was performed either under video colposcopic vision or using a standard surgical headlight. The primary endpoint was resected cone mass. Secondary endpoints were the rate of involved margins, fragmentation of the specimen, procedure time, time to complete haemostasis (TCH), blood loss, pain, intra- and postoperative complications, and surgeon preference.ResultsLLETZ-VC and LLETZ-HL (109 women each) had comparable cone masses (1.57 [0.98–2.37] vs. 1.67 [1.15–2.46] grams; P = 0.454). TCH was significantly shorter in the LLETZ-VC arm (60 [41–95.2] vs. 90 [47.2–130.2] seconds; P = 0.008). There was no statistically significant difference in involved resection margins (6/87 [6.5%] vs. 16/101 [13.7%], P = 0.068) and postoperative complications (13/82 [13.7%] vs. 22/72 [23.4%], P = 0.085). Patient-reported outcomes favoured LLETZ-VC with a lower use of analgesics (6/80 [7.0%] vs. 17/87 [16.3%]; P = 0.049). However, LLETZ-VC was more difficult to perform with significantly lower ratings for handling (7 [5–9] vs. 9 [8–10]; P < 0.001) and general satisfaction (7.5 [5–9] vs. 10 [8–10]; P < 0.001).ConclusionIntraoperative video colposcopy for LLETZ has minimal benefits at the cost of surgeons’ satisfaction.Clinical trial registrationNCT04326049 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Investigates whether a significant quality of life difference exists among women receiving treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to 3 (CIN 2–3) who are followed up in either a hospital-based colposcopy clinic, in the community, or given a choice. Estimates costs for the different follow-up options. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.

Biopsy confirmed that cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) may naturally regress or progress. Currently, the risk assessment for CIN progression to cervical cancer is still not satisfactory in clinical practice. We investigated copy number and protein expression of TP63 and MYC and explored the possibility to use them as progression biomarkers. Copy numbers of TP63 and MYC, as well as human papilloma virus (HPV) integration status, were determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 39 patients with CIN and 66 patients with cervical cancer. Corresponding protein expressions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to measure the diagnostic test performance for the detection of cervical cancer from CIN. Sensitivity and specificity values of biomarkers were calculated. The average copy number and expression of TP63 and MYC, as well as the HPV integration rate, increased in the progression of CIN to cervical cancer. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for detection of cervical cancer resulted in area under the curve (AUC) values of TP63 copy number (AUC, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.00), MYC copy number (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96), TP63 expression (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85), and HPV-16 integration (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.85). MYC expression was not able to statistically distinguish cancer from CIN (P = 0.393). The combinations increased the specificity slightly but not sensitivity. Among them, TP63 amplification showed the best diagnostic performance. Amplification and overexpression of TP63 and MYC, and HPV integration rate, are associated with the transition of CIN to cervical cancer. Future studies on these biomarkers will help to assess the risk of CIN progression.

Background In compliance with national and international guidelines, non-pregnant women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 should be treated by cervical conization. According to the definition of the large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) operation, the lesion needs to be resected, including the transformation zone. It is well known from the literature that the cone size directly correlates with the risk of preterm delivery in the course of a future pregnancy. Thus, it would be highly desirable to keep the cone dimension as small as possible while maintaining the same level of oncological safety. Methods/Design The aim of this study is to analyze whether resection of the lesion only, without additional excision of the transformation zone, is equally as effective as the classical LLETZ operation regarding oncological outcome. We are performing this prospective, patient-blinded multicenter trial by randomly assigning women who need to undergo a LLETZ operation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 to either of the following two groups at a ratio of 1:1: (1) additional resection of the transformation zone or (2) resection of the lesion only. To evaluate equal oncological outcome, we are performing human papillomavirus (HPV) tests 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The study is designed to consider the lesion-only operation as oncologically not inferior if the rate of HPV high-risk test results is not higher than 5 % compared with the HPV high-risk rate of women undergoing the classical LLETZ operation. Discussion In case that non-inferiority of the “lesion-only” method can be demonstrated, this operation should eventually become standard treatment for all women at childbearing age due to the reduction in risk of preterm delivery. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) Identifier: DRKS00006169 . Date of registration: 30 July 2014.

Incomplete excision of cervical precancer is associated with therapeutic failure and is therefore considered as a quality indicator of clinical practice. Conversely, the risk of preterm birth is reported to correlate with size of cervical excision and therefore balancing the risk of adequate treatment with iatrogenic harm is challenging. We reviewed the literature with an aim to reveal whether incomplete excision, reflected by presence of precancerous tissue at the section margins, or post-treatment HPV testing are accurate predictors of treatment failure. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of therapeutic failure associated with the histological status of the margins of the tissue excised to treat cervical precancer. We estimated the accuracy of the margin status to predict occurrence of residual or recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade two or worse (CIN2+) and compared it with post-treatment high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. We searched for published systematic reviews and new references from PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL and did also a new search spanning the period Jan 1, 1975, until Feb 1, 2016. Studies were eligible if women underwent treatment by excision of a histologically confirmed CIN2+ lesion, with verification of presence or absence of CIN at the resection margins; were tested by cytology or HPV assay between 3 months and 9 months after treatment; and had subsequent follow-up of at least 18 months post-treatment including histological confirmation of the occurrence of CIN2+. Primary endpoints were the proportion of positive section margins and the occurrence of treatment failure associated with the marginal status, in which treatment failure was defined as occurrence of residual or recurrent CIN2+. Information about positive resection margins and subsequent treatment failure was pooled using procedures for meta-analysis of binomial data and analysed using random-effects models. 97 studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis and included 44 446 women treated for cervical precancer. The proportion of positive margins was 23·1% (95% CI 20·4–25·9) overall and varied by treatment procedure (ranging from 17·8% [12·9–23·2] for laser conisation to 25·9% [22·3–29·6] for large loop excision of the transformation zone) and increased by the severity of the treated lesion. The overall risk of residual or recurrent CIN2+ was 6·6% (95% CI 4·9–8·4) and was increased with positive compared with negative resection margins (relative risk 4·8, 95% CI 3·2–7·2). The pooled sensitivity and specificity to predict residual or recurrent CIN2+ was 55·8% (95% CI 45·8–65·5) and 84·4% (79·5–88·4), respectively, for the margin status, and 91·0% (82·3–95·5) and 83·8% (77·7–88·7), respectively, for high-risk HPV testing. A negative high-risk HPV test post treatment was associated with a risk of CIN2+ of 0·8%, whereas this risk was 3·7% when margins were free. The risk of residual or recurrent CIN2+ is significantly greater with involved margins on excisional treatment; however, high-risk HPV post-treatment predicts treatment failure more accurately than margin status. European Federation for Colposcopy and Institut national du Cancer (INCA).

ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on the risk of HPV infection and recurrent diseases related to HPV infection in individuals undergoing local surgical treatment.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysisData sourcesPubMed (Medline), Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were screened from inception to 31 March 2021.Review methodsStudies reporting on the risk of HPV infection and recurrence of disease related to HPV infection after local surgical treatment of preinvasive genital disease in individuals who were vaccinated were included. The primary outcome measure was risk of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) after local surgical treatment, with follow-up as reported by individual studies. Secondary outcome measures were risk of HPV infection or other lesions related to HPV infection. Independent and in duplicate data extraction and quality assessment were performed with ROBINS-I and RoB-2 tools for observational studies and randomised controlled trials, respectively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was implemented for the primary outcome. Observational studies and randomised controlled trials were analysed separately from post hoc analyses of randomised controlled trials. Pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a random effects meta-analysis model. The restricted maximum likelihood was used as an estimator for heterogeneity, and the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was used to derive confidence intervals.Results22 articles met the inclusion criteria of the review; 18 of these studies also reported data from a non-vaccinated group and were included in the meta-analyses (12 observational studies, two randomised controlled trials, and four post hoc analyses of randomised controlled trials). The risk of recurrence of CIN2+ was reduced in individuals who were vaccinated compared with those who were not vaccinated (11 studies, 19 909 participants; risk ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.60; I2=58%, τ2=0.14, median follow-up 36 months, interquartile range 24-43.5). The effect estimate was even stronger when the risk of recurrence of CIN2+ was assessed for disease related to HPV subtypes HPV16 or HPV18 (six studies, 1879 participants; risk ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.43; I2=0%, τ2=0). Confidence in the meta-analysis for CIN2+ overall and CIN2+ related to HPV16 or HPV18, assessed by GRADE, ranged from very low to moderate, probably because of publication bias and inconsistency in the studies included in the meta-analysis. The risk of recurrence of CIN3 was also reduced in patients who were vaccinated but uncertainty was large (three studies, 17 757 participants; 0.28, 0.01 to 6.37; I2=71%, τ2=1.23). Evidence of benefit was lacking for recurrence of vulvar, vaginal, and anal intraepithelial neoplasia, genital warts, and persistent and incident HPV infections, although the number of studies and participants in each outcome was low.ConclusionHPV vaccination might reduce the risk of recurrence of CIN, in particular when related to HPV16 or HPV18, in women treated with local excision. GRADE assessment for the quality of evidence indicated that the data were inconclusive. Large scale, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to establish the level of effectiveness and cost of HPV vaccination in women undergoing treatment for diseases related to HPV infection.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021237350.