Explore the vast range of titles available.

Metastatic uveal melanoma is an aggressive disease without an established standard treatment. In a randomized trial that evaluated tebentafusp, a soluble T-cell receptor bispecific protein, overall survival at 1 year was 73% among patients who received tebentafusp, as compared with 59% among those who received the investigator’s choice of therapy.

Tebentafusp is a bispecific molecule that recognizes CD3 and gp100. In a trial in patients with uveal melanoma, median survival at 3 years of follow-up was 21.6 months with tebentafusp and 16.9 months with standard therapy.

Background: A phase II randomised discontinuation trial assessed cabozantinib (XL184), an orally bioavailable inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including VEGF receptors, MET, and AXL, in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma. Methods: Patients received cabozantinib 100 mg daily during a 12-week lead-in. Patients with stable disease (SD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at week 12 were randomised to cabozantinib or placebo. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) at week 12 and postrandomisation progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Seventy-seven patients were enroled (62% cutaneous, 30% uveal, and 8% mucosal). At week 12, the ORR was 5%; 39% of patients had SD. During the lead-in phase, reduction in target lesions from baseline was seen in 55% of evaluable patients overall and in 59% of evaluable patients with uveal melanoma. Median PFS after randomisation was 4.1 months with cabozantinib and 2.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio of 0.59; P =0.284). Median PFS from study day 1 was 3.8 months, 6-month PFS was 33%, and median overall survival was 9.4 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue (14%), hypertension (10%), and abdominal pain (8%). One treatment-related death was reported from peritonitis due to diverticular perforation. Conclusions: Cabozantinib has clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma, including uveal melanoma. Further clinical investigation is warranted.

Background Although findings from observational studies published in the 1970s and early 1980s suggested that length of remaining life after a diagnosis of uveal melanoma was similar following enucleation (removal of the eye) and local eye-conserving radiotherapy, the majority of ophthalmologists in the United States were not convinced that “saving the eye” would not compromise survival. Purpose The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) was designed to compare enucleation and radiotherapy among similar patients with respect to survival outcomes. Methods A multicenter randomized trial of primary treatment with iodine-125 brachytherapy versus enucleation (i.e., a comparative effectiveness trial) was conducted to provide the evidence required to answer the concerns of ophthalmologists and their patients. Eligibility criteria adopted for the trial were intended to apply to the majority of patients diagnosed with choroidal melanoma who would be suitable candidates for either form of primary treatment. Results Accrual to this COMS trial began in 1986 and ended in 1998. Participating patients were followed for 5 to 15 years, depending upon date of enrollment, before all clinical follow-up ended in 2003. No difference in survival outcomes and little difference in quality-of-life outcomes were observed between patients in the brachytherapy arm and those in the enucleation arm. Five-year survival was substantially better than anticipated based on a review of the literature when the trial was designed. Limitations The choice of brachytherapy for delivery of radiation to the tumor had important advantages but also imposed restrictions regarding eligibility. Conclusions The multidisciplinary COMS Group not only successfully conducted a randomized trial that answered the primary study questions but also has contributed to clinical and epidemiologic knowledge of choroidal melanoma through numerous publications. As a consequence of the COMS, a standard approach to I-125 brachytherapy for treatment of choroidal melanoma became widely available to affected patients.

Abstract Background Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) primarily affects the liver, and due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for hepatic tumor control. Direct head-to-head trials comparing these LDTs are still lacking. Methods A retrospective multicenter explorative analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT), and percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP, chemosaturation). Results The present analysis was conducted on a cohort of 121 patients who had been treated for metastatic UM with LDT at five different skin cancer centers. A total of n = 15 patients received TACE (12.4%), n = 51 SIRT (42.1%), and n = 55 PHP (45.5%). The estimated median overall survival (OS) for SIRT was 25.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-34.8), for TACE, 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-14.9), and for PHP, 24.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-36.0). In the multivariate analysis that included LDH and additional systemic therapies, there was no significant difference in OS between SIRT and PHP (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.67-1.93, P = .63), whereas TACE was found to be associated with a substantially reduced in OS compared to PHP (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.31-8.04, P = .01). Adverse events occurred in 41.6% of patients undergoing SIRT, 64.3% of patients receiving TACE, and 84.6% of patients receiving PHP. Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that SIRT and PHP demonstrate equivalent survival rates in a real-world setting.

MEK is a member of the MAPK signalling cascade that is commonly activated in melanoma. Direct inhibition of MEK blocks cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. We aimed to analyse safety, efficacy, and genotyping data for the oral, small-molecule MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with melanoma. We undertook a multicentre, phase 1 three-part study (dose escalation, cohort expansion, and pharmacodynamic assessment). The main results of this study are reported elsewhere; here we present data relating to patients with melanoma. We obtained tumour samples to assess BRAF mutational status, and available tissues underwent exploratory genotyping analysis. Disease response was measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and adverse events were defined by common toxicity criteria. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00687622. 97 patients with melanoma were enrolled, including 81 with cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma (36 BRAF mutant, 39 BRAF wild-type, six BRAF status unknown), and 16 with uveal melanoma. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash or dermatitis acneiform (n=80; 82%) and diarrhoea (44; 45%), most of which were grade 2 or lower. No cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas were recorded. Of 36 patients with BRAF mutations, 30 had not received a BRAF inhibitor before; two complete responses (both confirmed) and ten partial responses (eight confirmed) were noted in this subgroup (confirmed response rate, 33%). Median progression-free survival of this subgroup was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0–7·4). Of the six patients who had received previous BRAF inhibition, one unconfirmed partial response was recorded. Of 39 patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma, four partial responses were confirmed (confirmed response rate, 10%). Our data show substantial clinical activity of trametinib in melanoma and suggest that MEK is a valid therapeutic target. Differences in response rates according to mutations indicate the importance of mutational analyses in the future. GlaxoSmithKline.

Michael Zeschnigk and colleagues identify recurrent somatic mutations of EIF1AX and SF3B1 in uveal melanomas with disomy 3. The EIF1AX mutations specifically alter the N-terminal tail of the protein and were found exclusively in tumors lacking SF3B1 mutations. Gene expression profiles and chromosome 3 copy number divide uveal melanomas into two distinct classes correlating with prognosis 1 , 2 , 3 . Using exome sequencing, we identified recurrent somatic mutations in EIF1AX and SF3B1 , specifically occurring in uveal melanomas with disomy 3, which rarely metastasize. Targeted resequencing showed that 24 of 31 tumors with disomy 3 (77%) had mutations in either EIF1AX (15; 48%) or SF3B1 (9; 29%). Mutations were infrequent (2/35; 5.7%) in uveal melanomas with monosomy 3, which are associated with poor prognosis 2 . Resequencing of 13 uveal melanomas with partial monosomy 3 identified 8 tumors with a mutation in either SF3B1 (7; 54%) or EIF1AX (1; 8%). All EIF1AX mutations caused in-frame changes affecting the N terminus of the protein, whereas 17 of 19 SF3B1 mutations encoded an alteration of Arg625. Resequencing of ten uveal melanomas with disomy 3 that developed metastases identified SF3B1 mutations in three tumors, none of which targeted Arg625.

Background Uveal melanoma (UM) has a poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS) is a drug/device combination used for liver-directed treatment of metastatic UM (mUM) patients. The purpose of the FOCUS study was to assess the efficacy and safety of melphalan/HDS in patients with unresectable mUM. Methods Eligible patients with mUM received treatment with melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6 to 8 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The study enrolled 102 patients with mUM. Treatment was attempted in 95 patients, and 91 patients received treatment. In the treated population ( n = 91), the ORR was 36.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 26.44–47.01), including 7.7 % of patients with a complete response. Thus, the study met its primary end point because the lower bound of the 95 % CI for ORR exceeded the upper bound (8.3 %) from the benchmark meta-analysis. The median DOR was 14 months, and the median OS was 20.5 months, with an OS of 80 % at 1 year. The median PFS was 9 months, with a PFS of 65 % at 6 months. The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (15.8 %) and neutropenia (10.5 %), treated mostly on an outpatient basis with observation. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusion Treatment with melphalan/HDS provides a clinically meaningful response rate and demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with unresectable mUM (study funded by Delcath; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02678572; EudraCT no. 2015-000417-44).

Abstract Introduction Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) has a poor prognosis, but hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve outcomes in patients with hepatic metastases. To identify reliable prognostic factors for patient stratification and treatment allocation, we analyzed the clinical and imaging data from a large single-center cohort using machine learning (ML) models. Methods Pre– and post–first treatment clinical data of 235 patients with MUM treated with HAIC between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using Cox regression to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and time to change treatment strategy (TTCS). Furthermore, ML models were trained on clinical and computed tomography (CT) data for endpoint prediction. Results Pre-treatment multi-variate analysis identified elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OS: 6.5 vs. 16.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]) = 1.87, P = 0.006) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (OS: 7.6 vs. 16.4 months, HR = 1.67, P = 0.012) as prognostic factors for inferior OS. Decreased albumin (TTCS: 1.3 vs. 6.1 months, HR = 6.26, P < 0.001) and elevated LDH (TTCS: 2.9 vs. 7.6 months, HR = 1.72, P = 0.011) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (TTCS: 3.7 vs. 6.4 months, HR = 1.65, P = 0.004) predicted shorter TTCS. Scoring enhanced the power of the prognosticators for OS and TTCS. Post–first treatment multi-variate analysis emphasized the importance of inflammation management and liver protection. ML models incorporating radiomics features from baseline CT imaging were not superior to models based on pre-treatment clinical data alone. Conclusion We identified independent but synergistic prognostic factors for outcome stratification to guide treatment decisions and optimize patient management. ML-based radiomics features did not significantly enhance prognostic performance.

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion can lead to meaningful hepatic tumour control in metastatic uveal melanoma, but its benefit is confined to liver metastases and does not address extrahepatic disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab show limited activity in uveal melanoma, although retrospective studies suggest improved outcomes when combined with liver-directed therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining percutaneous hepatic perfusion with ipilimumab and nivolumab. In this investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, adults aged 18–80 years with unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma, WHO performance status 0–1, and with no previous systemic therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive percutaneous hepatic perfusion alone (perfusion group) or percutaneous hepatic perfusion combined with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (combination group). Two perfusions with melphalan (3 mg/kg; maximum 220 mg) were scheduled in weeks 1 and 7. The combination group also received intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks in weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9 without maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint, 1-year progression-free survival, was analysed in the intention-to-treat population; the safety analysis included all treated patients and was prospectively collected and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04283890) and EudraCT (2018-004248-49) and is ongoing but no longer enrolling. Between Dec 10, 2020, and Nov 15, 2024, 80 patients were screened, of whom 76 were eligible and assigned to the combination group (n=38) or perfusion group (n=38), including 49 (64%) men and 27 (36%) women. Median follow-up was 24·9 months (IQR 15·4–36·0). 1-year progression-free survival was 54·7% (95% CI 36·8–69·5) with combination therapy versus 15·8% (5·8–30·1) with perfusion alone (adjusted hazard ratio 0·34 [95% CI 0·19–0·60]; p=0·0002). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31 (82%) of 38 patients with combination therapy compared to 15 (41%) of 37 patients with perfusion alone, due to both a higher incidence of severe perfusion-related events and immunotherapy-related adverse events. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (13 [34%] in the combination group vs five [14%] in the perfusion group), leukopenia (ten [26%] vs five [14%]), γ-glutamyl transferase increase (seven [18%] vs three [8%]), and anaemia (five [13%] vs one [3%]). One treatment-related death (due to triple M syndrome) occurred in the combination group. Adding ipilimumab and nivolumab to percutaneous hepatic perfusion significantly improved progression-free survival, but with a higher rate of adverse events. The combination therapy offers a promising new treatment paradigm for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. These results would ideally be validated in larger, multicentre randomised trials; however, conducting such studies is challenging due to the low incidence of uveal melanoma. Leiden University Medical Centre, Delcath Systems, and Bristol Myers Squibb.